Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communications
This paper is a tutorial presentation of the use of the generalized admittance approach to aperture problems. An integral
equation is written for the unknown equivalent magnetic current over the aperture region. The generalized network
representation is obtained by applying the method of moments to the integral equation. The formulation is applied to the
problem of an aperture in a perfectly conducting plane, an aperture in a waveguide, and an aperture in a cavity. Computed
results for several examples are included.
1. Introduction
The problem of transmission of electromagnetic energy from one region of space to another
region through an aperture has received considerable attention over the years. One of the first
papers to use the concept of equivalent magnetic
currents and charges is that of Bethe [1], who
treated a small circular aperture in a perfectly
conducting plane. An error was made in the
determination of the equivalent magnetic current,
or tangential electric field, in the aperture, which
was later corrected by Bouwkamp [21. Since that
time many papers have appeared on the subject
of apertures in perfect electric conductors. Over
100 of these are referenced in ref. [3], and many
since then. The generalized network approach
additional papers on apertures have appeared
was introduced in ref. [4], and used extensively by
researchers at Syracuse University [5271.It has
also been used elsewhere, but a complete list of
those references is not available.
In this paper we consider the general problem
of coupling electromagnetic energy between two
or more regions of space isolated except for one
or more apertures. Some examples are cavity
0010-4655/91/$03.50 1991
Conductors
,_
region b
region a
~ /
( /
I
.1
sources
/
/
aperture
20
q,
V pH
.
m,
(2)
VM= jwm.
(3)
Here the symbols q and m denote volume densities, but we use the same symbols for surface
densities. It should be clear from the text and
equations which density is meant,
It is often convenient to express the electromagnetic fields in terms of auxiliary functions,
called potentials. In a homogeneous region we
have the representation
1
HVXA,
(4)
p
where the potentials are: A the magnetic vector
potential, and 4,
the electric scalar potential.
E=jwAV4,,
1
_fffq(r)G(r,
r)
dT,
(6)
r) dT,
G(r, r)
4,(r)
(1)
A(r) =,ifffJ(r)G(r,
4rrlI
(7)
In
(6) and
the radius
radius vector
vector to
to the
fieldeqs.point
and (7),
r ris isthe
the
source p int. The sources J and q are considered
to be vo me densities in eq. (6), as evidenced by
the triple integral sign with dT representing a
volume element of integration. If the current and
charge are surface densities, it is necessary to
change to a surface integration. The electromagnetic field associated with A and 4, is given by
eq. (4). The charge q is related to the current J
by the equation of continuity (3).
For the dual case of a magnetic current M and
its associated magnetic charge m in an infinite
homogeneous medium characterized by e and p,
the potential integrals are
F(r)
eJJfM(r)G(r,
~ ~
r) dr,
( r ) G ( r, r)
(8)
dT
p
where the Greens function G is again given by
eq. (7). The electromagnetic field associated with
F and i/i is given by eq. (5). The charge m is
2~(k
~H~
p p
I).
(9)
J n X (H~ H b)
M= (E~E) ><
=
Ofl
5,
(10)
region b
region a
21
script b. The field vectors in eq. (10) are evaluated on the surface 5, as implied by on S in eq.
(10), with the superscript denoting on which side
of S.
The normal components of the fields on S
obey the conditions
qn.(e~1Ea_bEE~),
m
.(paHa pbHb)
=
on
( )
22
CONDUCTOR
~GIONaMfl
(12)
XE
CONDUCTOR
RTURE
REG
REGION b
c~APE
Fig. 3. The general problem of two regions coupled by an
aperture.
C.
CONDU
RE G ION b
over the aperture region, with the aperture coyered by an electric conductor. In region b, the
field is produced by the equivalent magnetic current M over the aperture region, with the aperture covered by an electric conductor. The fact
that the equivalent current in region b is the
negative of that in region a ensures that the
tangential
tinuous
across
component
thetoaperture.
of
electric
The
field
remaining
is conthe
boundary
aperture.
condition
be the
applied
is continuity
of
theThe
tangential
tangential
component
component
of magnetic
of magnetic
fieldfield
across
in
region a over the aperture, denoted H~,is the
sum of that
due to the impressed sources, denoted H~1,plus that due to the equivalent source
M, denoted H~(M),that is
H~ H
=
H~(M),
(13)
b(
Lf\
t .
fl
bf ~
t .~
23
f14\
~~)
where H~(M)is computed with a conductor coyering the aperture. The last equality in eq. (14) is
a consequence of the linearity of the H~operator. The true solution is obtained when H~aof eq.
(13) equals H~of eq. (14), or
_Ha(M\
t~
I _Hb(M~=H
t \
~1
t~
(15~
This is the basic operator equation for determining the equivalent magnetic current M.
If eq. (15) were satisfied exactly, we would
have the true solution. We use the method of
moments to obtain an approximate solution. Define a set of expansion functions {M~,n 1,
2,..., N), and let
=
[(
(20)
Wm, HIa(Mfl))]NXN
21
The
minuspositive
signs in
eqs.JV~,
(20) M~.
andD(21)
the
real parts
when
efinemake
a source
=
vector
H~
~\ m t /]Nxi
and a coefficient vector
(2
i~~=
[~~c~]NX1.
(23)
[ya+yb]V....J
~fr~H~(M0)
Li~H~~M~)
=H.
(24)
I.
(17)
(25)
~[ya+yb]~Fi
ff A ~B ds
(18)
apert.
V1
[yaj
V2
REGION
_~VnKWm,Hta(Mn))_~Vn(Wm,Htb(Mn))
n
n
=(Wm, He),
[yb]
I 12
REGION b
VN
(19)
~I~l
24
ff M~Hmds,
(26)
apert.
(27)
Hm).
HmKlm=ImV,
where
vector
fm
fm
[(~i~,
(29)
Hm)]NXI.
Klm
REG ION b
lem. A determination of the sources of the adjoint problem is a part of the formulation of the
problem.
linear measurement involves applying reciprocity
If a linear measurement is made in region a, it
will involve a contribution from the impressed
sources J, M added to that from the equivalent
source M. For example, instead of eq. (30) we
would have
HmKlm
[1,
(31)
25
m n
(37)
mn
(32)
Tm=[(MHm)]
yLu1I*r~*.
(38)
[yayb]
(39)
2[yhs],
P~=
ff EXH*
ds,
(33)
.~
apert.
ff M H
ds.
(34)
apert.
H~b( )W)
k~,H~b(M~~).
(35)
WAVE
~~VrnV~* ff M~.H~*(M~)ds.
m
ro
MEASUREMENT
U~
POINT
z
APERTURE
apert.
(36)
If Mm is real, the conjugate operation can be
taken outside the integral. Moreover, if M~ ~,,
=
26
Hti
2H~,
(40)
where H~
is the tangential component of the
magnetic field over the aperture due to the
sources J, M in free space. The components of
the excitation vector F defined by eq. (22) are
now
I~, 2
=
Jf Wm
H~
ds,
(41)
apert.
(44)
H1tm 2H~m0.
Here Jf~tmdenotes the tangential component of H
=
..
Jf
apert.
Wm
H~
Here u~is
a unit vector in
the direction of
H~O,
u
1 e~~
ds.
fl
(46)
4irr~
(42)
P,~,=
de-
(45)
apert.
Kl~
H u e~~
ff M~.H1tmOds.
I~= 2
n
Fm
(43)
The symbol
has been used for this particular
vector to distinguish it from the more general
excitation vector (41).
Similar simplifications apply to the adjoint
(measurement) problem. For the evaluation of a
ff
apert.
The symbol J~tm is used for this particular measurement vector to distinguish it from the more
general measurement vector (45) The far-zone
e_j~m1~m[YI~5]_iP~.
811 Tm
I H,.0
(49)
jw
(50)
27
Re(V[Yim]*V*).
(55)
r7S cos
Note that T depends on both the direction of
incidence and on the polarization of the incident
wave.
Finally, because of symmetry about the z 0
plane, the difference field H Hi which exists in
the region z <0 is simply related to the transmitted field which exists in the region z> 0. The
difference field in the region z <0 is produced by
an equivalent current M on a plane conductor
over the z 0 plane. By image theory, it is also
the field produced in the region z <0 by the
source 2M in free space. Analogously, the transmitted field in the region z> 0 is produced by
=
the source 2M in free space. Hence, the difference field in the region z <0 and the negative of
the transmitted field in the region z > 0 are both
3211
pm[yhs]~
(51)
(52)
~rans.
P10C
where
(53)
(56)
termsscalar
netic
of an potential
electric vector
ii,, as potential
[33]
F,, and magH(M,,)
jwF,,
Vfr,,,
(57)
where
C
e~~~
F~=~
apert.
ffM~ rrI
~/~i7~
is the
intrinsic impedance of
is the
angle between k. and n. The transmitted power
is
~j
Yb)mn
~1Scos
~ya +
ff m,,
1
~
ds
IrrI
ds,
(58)
(59)
apert.
V M,,
Ptrans.Re(Pt),
(54)
m,,=
(60)
28
source points in the aperture, respectively. Substituting eqs. (18) and (57) into eq. (56), we obtain
APERTURE
fJ W~~(jwF,,+
V~,,)ds.
~mn~
(61)
~ENT
~I~REMENT
apert.
L~~x
ff
Z
CONDUCTING
PLANE
(62)
V(IIInWm)dS=0.
apert.
ff W,,~
Vl/1
0 ds +
apert.
ff
~,,V Wm ds = 0.
(63)
apert.
t~x ,~
ft
(FnWm+~nmm) ds
(64)
Mx
p+(q~iXL~~i)
~
M~~(q_
TX(
\~YI
(66)
1)~~=UyTqY(y)P;(X),
apert.
(67)
where
m~=
where
V~Wm
.
Jw
(65)
u~
TX(x)
Z~x
(pi) z~xx p ~x,
(p -t- 1) ~x x
0,
pz~xx(p+1)
~x,
Ix p z~xI ~x,
(q 1) LIy
~
(q
T,~(y)=
(q
1) ~ y y
1) t~y y
q z~
y,
q ~y
0,
(68)
y (q + 1) ~ y,
q z~yI
ky,
(69)
(pi) ~xx<p
P(x)={l0,
(q1)
0,
py~{1,
z~x,
all other x,
(prnu)
4~
dx 4dy,
ff
29
apert. M,
u,~,eu/~~~~05
(70)
z~yy<q~y,
(71)
all other y.
(77)
2
(prnu)
ff M:.uxe
cos4
dx dy,
apert.
(78)
The magnetic charge sheets, say m,,x and m,,~
associated with M~and M,~,are obtained from
eq. (60) as
(P(x) P~i(x))P~(y)
mp(q_I~L~_i)=
jw ~x
(72)
y
mp(q_i)L~ =
(P~~ Pi(y))P(x)
ito L~y
ytors,
axis00180,
in the x 0 plane.
For measurement
04,180.
(P,, vec0~is
for a u0 polarized measurement in the y 0
plane, ~p mu) is for a u,, polarized measure=
Introduction of the two types of expansion functions M and M,,~and the two types of testing
functions
M,~and M,~
into by
eq. (64) gives rise to
four
Y submatrices
defined
2
T
4jw
U =X,
ff (F,
~, apert.
V
X,
1X2
M~+ fr,1
1m~,)d
y.
(74)
.O~.O~4
numerically
evaluating
eq.
(74)form
can be
found
inpm
research
(43)
The
and(48)
plane
report
the
plane
wave
[34].
excitation
measurement
vector
P
vector
offor
eq.aa
of
eq.
are
of wave
the
same
except
minus sign. We therefore need to evaluate only
one of them, say the measurement vector Ppm. We
specialize it to four principal plane patterns as
1
.34
Hi
i
IS
.05
~pmu~
=
=
ffff M~
(P,~)~~2
u,,
cos
dx dy,
~dx dy,
~II
apert.
(76)
.1
.15
.2
.2
(C)
30
ment in the y
r0
1800
2rrr,~,I H0 2
in the y
0 plane,
in the x
0 plane.
(79)
2rrr,~I H~I
3600
eqs. (75)(78).
The mathematical evaluation of eqs. (75)(78)
can be found in the report [341. A computer
program, complete with operating instructions,
for computing the transmission through a rectan-
1800
3600
90
b6--O----8
(a)
w6~
L.
/D~0%...\
OLIBO
I80
9O~
I
,I
tLa
l6a--o--o--6-oa6dI
I0.
~I6O 0
I80
wsJ
w~
Z
I80
.
(b)
~
180
8
/000\
~
Cc)
Cd)
Fig. 10. Magnitude and phase of M/E I, where M is the x directed magnetic current and E is the incident electric field, for the
same slots as for fig. 9. (a) L = -IA, (b) L ~A,(c) L = ~A, (d) L = A. Circles denote magnitude, triangles denote phase.
31
AZ
t/A2
-_____
I~O
1.0
(a)
=---..-~-T~,x2
2
1.0
0~
and ri,. for the cases with (a) 39, (b) 19, (c) 9, and
(d) 4 triangular expansion functions. Note that
the patterns (a) and (b) are essentially the same,
and pattern (c) is only slightly different. They
differ appreciably from (d), which results from
only 4 expansion functions. The difference in the
solutions as the number of expansion functions is
6~
Fig. 11. Transmission cross-section when the number of expansion functions is (a) 39, (b) 19, (c) 9, and (d) 4. Computations are for a slot of length 2A in the x direction and width
A /10 in the y direction. Excitation is by a plane wave normally incident on the conducting plane with magnetic field in
the x direction.
90.
I~J
6.
Ui
___________
I
______________
Ui
(I,
4
~
6
0.4
0.8 1.2
a/A
(a)
1.6
-180
2.0
90
6
Ui
0
0.4
0.8 1.2
a/A
(b)
1.6
90
~:/~~\
U,
_90e0.
0.4
0.8
I.2
a/A
(a)
1.6
180
2.0
~0.4
0.8
1.2
a/A
Cd)
180
1.6
20
Fig. 12. Magnitude and phase of I M/E I, where M is the x directed magnetic current and E is the incident electric field, when
the number of expansion functions is (a) 39, (b) 19, (c) 9, and (d) 4. Circles denote magnitude, triangles denote phase.
Computations are for the same slot as for fig. 11.
32
.~PLANE CONDUCTOR
~
WAVEGUIDE
~ASUREMENT
~OINT
\......
INCfflE~~~ REGION
E
~~~ApERTURE
REGION
6. Waveguide-fed apertures
Consider now a uniform waveguide feeding an
aperture in a conducting plane, as shown in fig.
13. In general, the aperture may be of different
size and shape than the waveguide cross-section.
The half-space region z >0 is the same as in the
previous problem, fig. 7, and the analysis of the
preceding chapter applies. An analysis of the
waveguide region is given below,
Let the excitation of the waveguide be a source
which produces a single mode of unit amplitude,
incident on the aperture. This mode (usually the
dominant mode) is denoted by the index 0. The
field transverse to the z direction can then be
expressed in modal forms as (section 8-1 of ref.
[28])
E~(M,,)
V0
Xe0
~F~Y
___________
2, A > A
a1
k1~/it (A~/A)
1,
H~(M,,)
~A,,1
1
e~~zu~
Xe,.
(80)
=
ff
~
(84)
0 we
(1 M
U X
e ds
Jy1/jw~t,
TEmodes,
TM modes.
82
( )
guide
=
LA,,1
ff
guide
(u~Xe,) .(uxe)
ds.
(86)
33
A,,
1= JfM,~u~Xe,ds.
(87)
I,~,=2Y0
apert.
We have replaced the integral over the waveguide cross-section by one over the aperture,
since M,, exists only in the aperture region. The
elements of the aperture admittance matrix (20)
are now given by
~zwg
mn =
I
3)
iii
~
i
\ ..i
~lVI,,)
US,
/oO\
~~OO)
apert.
ff WmUzXeo ds=2Y0B~0.
(93)
apert.
+1
tzbl
rvwg
~hs
I
where [y gI is the waveguide aperture admittance and [V~] is the half-space aperture admittance. The coefficient matrix V is given by eq.
(25) with the admittance matrix given by eq. (94),
or
~7 [yw~+
(95)
yhs]~fi
LAOIYI
ff
(89)
(90)
apert.
Jf Wm
u2 X e, ds,
M=u~XE~I~..ti=u~Xe0+
LFiu~Xe1.
apert.
(91)
LA,,IB~IYI.
H,=2Y0U~Xe0.
(92)
(96)
Jf M u~Xe1 ds
(1 + F
F
(97)
guide
E V,,A,,0
+ [a,
L~,,A,,1=F1, i*0.
98
34
(99)
and using eq. (95), we can write eq. (98) as
1 +F~,_A[Y~
and, for
(100)
yhs]fI
0,
(101)
+ Y~]~f.
F, ~j[yw~
The parameter of most interest is F0, the reflection coefficient of the incident mode. This is
often expressed in terms of an admittance
1 To
1+F
(102)
(I
which is the equivalent aperture admittance seen
by the incident mode.
The region z> 0 for the waveguide-fed aperture is the same half-space region as existed in
the previous problem of an aperture in a conducting plane. Hence, evaluation of the fields in terms
of M in this region is done in the same way as in
section 4. For example, the u~component of the
far-zone magnetic field at a point r,~is given by
1fI
(103)
4rrrm ei~fim[Y%~+yhs]~
Hm
We now apply the general theory to a rectangular waveguide feeding a rectangular aperture in
a conducting screen. Figure 14 shows the problem to be considered and defines the coordinates
and parameters to be used. The perfectly conducting plate covers the entire z = 0 plane except
for the aperture which is rectangular in shape
with side lengths L~~x and L~z~yin the x and
2yhs]~J~~
replaced by eq. (95). The excitation vector F has
elements given by (93), and the far-field measurement vector Ii has elements given by eq. (48).
The powerintensity
gain pattern
G is direction
the ratio to
of the
radiation
in a given
radiation intensity which would exist if the total
power Re(P~)were radiated uniformly over halfspace, or
G= 2~r~IH~I2
(104)
15i~,
ii~P
_______
Re(P
1)
Substituting for H~ from eq. (103), we have
G=
2e217
811wRe( P,)
hs]1fi
2,
pm[yw~~y
(105)
.003
UXT;(X
1, 2,..., L~ 1, q
xi)P,,~(y
1, 2,
...~
UI
0
.00
I
I
15
.00 I
I
0.4
I
0.5
I
0.6
I
0.7
I
0.6
I
0.9
1,0
a/x
L~,
.002
35
(106)
M,~+(q._i)Lo= u~T,~(y
y1)P(x x1),
p=1,2,...,L~, q=1,2,...,L~1,
(107)
1( y) are triangle functions
where
T,1 and (69), and P,~(x)and
definedT,~(x)and
by eqs. (68)
P,~(y)are the pulse functions defined by eqs. (70)
and (71). An evaluation of the matrix [Y~] is
given in detail in ref. [35]. The elements of [yhs]
are given by the right-hand side of eq. (74) with
the factor 4 replaced by 2. The listing and documentation of a computer program for the problem of fig. 14 is given in part II of the report [351.
We now give some representative computations for the aperture of fig. 14. Figure 15 shows
computed results for a rectangular waveguide of
dimensions A by ~A radiating into half-space
through a narrow centered rectangular slot 2
of
1A
dimensions
A by A/b,
is, a = Aofand
b =
Figure
15a shows
the x that
component
equivalent
magnetic current, which is also equal to the negative of the y component of the tangential E field
in the slot. No y component of magnetic current
was obtained because only one pulse in y was
used. M is normalized with respect to
ff
V
e
0
dx dy,
(108)
guide
where the integral is over the waveguide crosssection. In other words, the normalization factor
is the root-mean-square value of the E field of
the
phaseat of
is with All
respectincident
to that wave.
of thisThe
E field
theMaperture.
computations are for dominant TE~
0mode exci-
80
/z1iIIi~
90
-90
~o
.~a
.~a
.~a
.~a
-I80
a
b
Fig. 15. Equivalent magnetic current M~(a) and radiation gain patterns (b) for a rectangular waveguide of dimensions A by ~A
radiating through a centered rectangular slot ofdimensions A by A /10. Squares denote magnitude and triangles denote phase.
36
tation. Figure 15b shows the radiation gain patterns in the two planes x = 0 and y = 0. The
notation G0~denotes the gain pattern due to H0
in the y = 0 plane. The notation ~ denotes the
gain pattern due to H~in the x 0 plane. The
horizontal axis in fig. b5b is the z axis.
Figure 16 shows a plot of the equivalent aperture admittance ~ seen by the dominant mode
of an open-ended square waveguide of width a
radiating into half-space. It is defined by eq.
(102), where F11 is the reflection coefficient and
Y() is the characteristic wave admittance, both for
the dominant mode. Our computations are compared to some previously obtained by Cohen,
Crowley and Levis [36]. Also shown are measured
values reported in ref. [36]. Additional numerical
computations are given in the report [35].
=
region b
LA e sin k,(
,
H =jEA.Y.(u
I
z)
(109)
sin k,d
Xe.)
Z
cos k,(dz)
sin k,d
(110)
A<AIC,
)2
(111)
~C
_jk,~~/iii(A1~/A)2,
A >A,~,
u1
where A.
211/k.. is the ith-mode cutoff wave.
length. The modal characteristic admittances are
incident
wave
conductor
aperture
Y{kI/W~,
TEmod~,
The
intrinsic wave
number k may be complex if
____________________
cylindrical cavity
region a
-
ffe..e.ds={
1,
S
(113)
37
fJ W,,,
is~Xe,
ds,
(119)
apert.
u~~
LA,,1u~Xe,.
(114)
(115)
By orthogonality (113), all terms of the summation are zero except the i =j term. Hence,
A,,1=
(116)
apert.
Jf Wm H~(M,,)ds.
(117)
apert.
~7
~C~V.]1~
(121)
LA,u~
<i,.
(122)
Again we multiply each side by U~X e~,and integrate over the cross-section S, as in eq. (115), to
obtain
A~=
(123)
apert.
The H,b in eq. (117) is given by eq. (110) evaluated at z 0, so eq. (117) becomes
=
vcav.
mn
LA,,~Y,cot(k1d)
A,= A~=...A[yhs+ycav.]~fli,
X
Jf
apert.
Wm u~Xe, ds.
(118)
(124)
38
E
1
(125)
srnk3d
A3
sin k .d
,
=
sin k .d
sin ~~O
3)
M u~X e3ds
apert.
(126)
However, the theory for this special case will not
be considered here, since it requires considerable
modification of the formulas of this section.
(127)
ff (M) H1 ds.
H.(r)
2k2
H~jwe~ k
(128)
apert.
VX
, X
V X H1
k~H,, in R,
v X H.
(129)
(130)
1
2 are real, and only k~> 0 are
The
used eigenvalues
in eq. (128).k, The eigenvectors H,. are also
real, and orthonormal according to
jjj H
H. ds
1
on
~.
fO,
~1,
(131)
ij
The H
Conductor
R
region b
n
Fig. 18. Equivalence for cavities of arbitrary shape.
HCf
Jf (M) G~ds,
EG~(r)
apert.
(132)
where
G1
(133)
(134)
VtJi1,
2i4i,
in R,
=0,
on 5.
(135)
39
FM,,1
~ni~
[a~1jff[~ j G1 ds,
[ 1= If
apert.
FM,,]
apert. [wJ.~~ld5.
b,,,1
(136)
JfJG1G1 ds=
(142)
bni]
(143)
fff 6, H1 ds
(137)
1
b,,,H1
H(M,,)
a,,1G1 + jwe
2 k~ (144)
where a,,, and b,,~ are given byk eqs. (142) and
H~
~,
(138)
where
b,,,V x If~
1L~(r)ft
~=
(-m)~
ds.
(139)
apert.
(145)
Note that the first summation of eq. (144) drops
out when eq. (145) is derived, since V X G
1 0.
Remembering that the source in region b of the
original problem is M, we can use the superpoE(M,,)
k2k~
(140)
The ~ are still solutions to the eigenvalue problem (134) and (135), and orthonormal according
to eq. (136) where G. is given by eq. (133). The
derivation of eq. (139) from (132) involves substitution for G, from eq. (133) and application of
the divergence theorem to i/i~M.
sition (16) to obtain the total magnetic and electric fields in the cavity as
H=LV,,H(M,,),
(146)
LI,E(M,,).
(147)
E=
40
a~=~-LV,,a,,1
10, Discussion
3
1 V,
(148)
jwp.
where
is the row vector with eleients a,,j
given by eq. (142). Using eq. (121) for V, we have
for the amplitude of the ith static mode
=
jwp.,,
[Vhs +
(149)
jcop.
Similarly, the coefficient of the jth resonator
mode H~in eq. (146) ~
=
jw
jwe
k2 k~
k~ k~~1
(150)
The generalized network formulation of aperture problems is a very general one, being applicable to a wide variety of special cases. The
examples of this paper are some of the simpler
ones. The references [527]give a number of
additional examples. A recent application of the
theory to waveguide coupling problems is given
by ref. [41].
By specializing the theory to small apertures,
all of Bethe-hole theory can be described in terms
of generalized admittances [161.While we do not
have the space to go into the theory here, we do
where
1
given by eq. (143). Again using eq. (121) for ~2,we
have for the amplitude of the jth resonator mode
jwe
k~ k~~
]- i
(151)
2 k~)are the
Hence, 1/jwp.vectors
and jweb~/(k
measurement
for determining a mode
amplitude.
In the vicinity of a resonant frequency in a
relatively loss-free cavity, only one term of eqs.
(146) and (147) may suffice to approximate the
field. For example, if k is near k
3, then
H~rb
3H1,
(152)
=
hs + ycav
b.VXH.
E~ .
~.
(153)
JwE
b3
k_,
i .j~
2
(,k2
ki
(154)
[
I
1
2j~p.a,,,~
[yhs]
01
I.I
2jcop.a~2
jwE
(155)
References
[1] HA. Bethe, Theory of diffraction by small holes, Phys.
Rev. 66 (1944) 163.
[2] C.J. Bouwkamp, On Bethes theory of diffraction by
small holes, Philips Res. Rep. 5 (1950) 321.
[3]C.M. Butler, Y. Rahmat-Samii and R. Mittra, Electromagnetic penetration through apertures in conducting
surfaces, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 26 (1978) 82.
[4] R.F. Harrington and J.R. Mautz, A generalized network
formulation for aperture problems, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 24 (1976) 870.
[5] R.F. Harrington and JR. Mautz, Electromagnetic transmission through an aperture in a conducting plane, Arch.
Elektron. Ubertragungstech. 31(1977) 81.
[6] J.R. Mautz and R.F. Harrington, Transmission from a
rectangular waveguide into half space through a rectangular aperture (computer program description) IEEE
Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 26 (1978) 44.
[7]D.T. Auckland and R.F. Harrington, Electromagnetic
transmission through a filled slit in a conducting plane of
finite thickness, TE case, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 26 (1978) 499.
[8] R.F. Harrington and J.R. Mautz, Computational methods for transmission of waves through apertures, in Elec-
41
mission through an annular aperture in an infinite conducting screen, Arch. Elektron. Ubertragungstech. 35
(1981) 167.
42
[34] J.R. Mautz and R.F. Harrington, Electromagnetic transmission through a rectangular aperture in a perfectly
conducting plane, Report AFCRL-TR-76-0056, Air Force
Cambridge Research Laboratories, Hanscom AFB (1976).
[35] JR. Mautz and R.F. Harrington, Transmission from a
rectangular waveguide into half space through a rectangular aperture, Report RADC-TR-76-264, Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB, NY 13441, DDC No.
ADA 030 779 (1976).
[36] M. Cohen, T. Crowley and K. Levis, The aperture admitlance of a rectangular waveguide radiating into halfspace, Antenna Lab. Rept. ac 21114 SR. No. 22, Ohio
State University, 1953.
[371D.T. Auckland and R.F. Harrington, Electromagnetic
transmission through a filled slit of arbitrary cross section
in a conducting plane of finite thickness, Report TR-79-7,
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Syracuse University (1979).
[38] J. Van Bladel, Electromagnetic Fields (McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1964).
[39] K. Kurokawa, An Introduction to the Theory of Microwave Circuits, (Academic, New York, 1969).
[40] J. Van Biadel and C.M. Butler, Aperture problems, Proc.
NATO Adv. Study Inst. on Theoretical Methods for
Determining the Interaction of Electromagnetic Waves
with Structures, ed. J. Skwirzynski (Sijthoff & Noordhoff,
Aiphen aan den Run, 1981).
[41] SN. Sinha, A generalized network formulation for a class
of waveguide coupling problems, Proc. lEE pt. H 134
(1987) 502.