Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Van Slyke
J. Biol. Chem. 1929, 84:243-247.
ARTICLE:
COMPARISON OF RATES OF SUGAR
DISAPPEARANCE AND CARBON
DIOXIDE FORMATION DURING
FERMENTATION OF GLUCOSE
COMPARISON
OF RATES OF SUGAR DISAPPEARANCE
AND CARBON DIOXIDE
FORMATION
DURING
FERMENTATION
OF GLUCOSE.
BY JAMES
(From
A. HAWKISS
the Hospital
AND
DONALD
of The Rockejeller
Institute
New York.)
(Received
for publication,
August
D. VAN
for
SLYKE.
Medical
Research,
5, 1929.)
243
In an investigation
of the amount
of sugar in urine (Van Slyke
and Hawkins, 1929) we noticed that it was impossible to detect
any glucose by the reduction
method after the glucose-yeast
mixture had stood for 15 minutes, whereas it was necessary to
allow the mixture
to stand 1 hour in order to get 80 per cent of
the theoretical yield of carbon dioxide from the glucose.
This
suggested that the combination
or absorption
of glucose by the
yeast is a rapid reaction, while the breaking down of glucose into
alcohol and carbon dioxide is a much slower one.
Slator (1906) explains the mechanism of fermentation
on the
hypothesis that sugar diffuses into the yeast cell and combines
with the enzyme, and that this compound
decomposes either
directly or indirectly into alcohol and carbon dioxide with regeneration of enzyme and immediate formation
of more compound
with sugar. In this series of reactions, he states that the decomposition of the compound is the one which proceeds slowest and
is therefore
the most important
in determining
the velocity
reaction.
He found that when the concentration
of the sugar
was above 1 per cent it had no influence on the velocity reaction,
but that the concentration
of the sugar would have an influence
if the concentrations
of sugar and yeast were such that an appreciable amount of enzyme was left uncombined.
We have measured simultaneously,
by observing the disappearance of reducing material from solution, the rate at which glucose
combines with the yeast and also, by observing the rate of CO,
formation
in the yeast-sugar solution mixture, the rate at which
the sugar breaks down into alcohol and carbon dioxide.
244
Determination
of Carbon Dioxide.
of Glucose by Ferricyanide
Reduction.
and 10
and 5
Mixture
2.
125 mg. glucose
gm. yeast.
Mixture
3.
125 mg. glucose
gm. yeast.
yeast
5
10
15
30
60
5
10
15
30
60
5
10
15
30
60
min.
Removed from
and 10
of glucose
and
100 cc. suspension.
of Glucose
Mixture
1.
250 mg. glucose
gm. yeast.
Amounts
in
Amount
55
83
102
125
125
69
119
124
125
125
120
203
250
250
250
pei%nt
Solution
i-
10.2
25.4
36.6
46.9
48.4
24.445.6
47.4.
48.4
49.3
18.6
64.5
84.0
90.8
95.8
23
52
75
96
99
50
93
97
99
101
38
132
172
186
196
ml.
%?.
er ceni ! 1Per cent
Series
Estimated
TABLE
0.42
0.63
0.73
0.77
0.79
I.
-7
-
36
42
51
98
125
56
107
121
125
125
250
250
98
2.
4.4
10.3
16.1
33.2
44.0
18.6
36.2
43.5
45.4
49.8
13.2
38.6
57.7
88.9
99.7
9
21
33
68
90
38
74
89
93
102
27
79
118
182
204
0.25
0.50
0.65
0.69
0.72
0.67
0.69
0.73
0.74
0.82
0.73
0.82
0.28
Power
ml.
mg.
1er Cc%, IP er cell
Series
in Reducing
ml.
pm cent
Decrease
0.72
0.78
0.78
0.79
0.81
0.32
0.65
0.69
0.74
0.77
from
--
3.
45
90
92
96
98
22.0
44.0
44.9
46.9
47.9
7.8
15.6
22.9
40.1
44.5
63
118
125
125
125
36
51
70
114
125
16
32
47
82
91
82
178
203
226
245
40.0
87.0
99.2
10.4
19.6
0.44
0.63
0.67
0.72
0.73
0.71
0.76
0.74
0.77
0.78
0.79
0.83
0.90
0.98
of COZ.
ml.
mg.
wr ceni tP er cm
a
6
g
Series
Formation
226
245
250
250
and from
246
from solution by yeast is much more rapid than the initial reaction
rate for the decomposition
of glucose to alcohol and CO,. The
rate during the first 5 minutes at which glucose is decomposed
is in Mixtures 1 and 3 only from 0.25 to 0.44 as fast as the rate
at which glucose disappears from solution.
In Mixture 2 the ratio of yeast to glucose is evidently so high
that the initial lag in COz formation
is more nearly overcome
in the first 5 minute period.
In this mixture the glucose decomposition during the first 5 minutes is 0.67 to 0.72 as much as the
glucose removal.
Further evidence of the initial lag in COz formation
is seen in
the fact that in Mixtures 1 and 3 actually less COz was formed
in the first 5 minutes of the reaction than in the second 5 minutes.
From comparison of the results from Mixtures 1 and 2 it is
evident that, with a constant amount of yeast present, the rate
of glucose disappearance
during the first 5 minutes is nearly
proportional
to the glucose concentration.
CO, formation,
however, does not show in its initial rate any proportionality
to glucose
concentration.
From comparison of Mixtures 1 and 3 it is evident that, with a
constant initial glucose concentration,
the initial rates of both
glucose disappearance and COz formation
increase with the concentration of yeast.
Our method of COz determination
measured the total CO2
content of the yeast-solution
mixture, cells as well as fluid.
It is
consequently impossible to ascribe the observed initial lag in CO2
formaticn
to retention of COz in the yeast cells.
Mixtures
containing
glucose, water, and yeast in the same
proportions
gave in the different series of experiments
varying
ates of both glucose disappearance
and CO2 formation.
This
variation
is attributable
to inconstancy
in the activity
of the
yeast used, Different
Fleischmann
yeast cakes were used for
each days experiments, and the activity
of the yeast in them
varied.
With all of them, however, the same lag in initial COz
formation
behind glucose disappearance
was observed.
In Table I the amounts of glucose corresponding to the observed
amounts of COz formed have been calculated in accordance with
the equation
CeHlzO~ = 2CzH50H + 2C0,.
This equation is
not quite exact, as small amounts of other products are formed,
J. A. Hawkins
SUMMARY.
Austin,
J. H., Cullen, G. E., Hastings,
A. B., McLean, F. C., Peters, J. P.,
and Van Slyke, D. D., J. Biol. Chem., 64, 121 (1922).
Slator, A., J. Chem. Sot., @, 129 (1906).
Van Slyke, D. D., and Hawkins,
J. A., J. Biol. Chem., 79, 739 (1928).
Van Slyke, D. D., and Hawkins,
J. A., J. Biol. Chews., 83, 51 (1929).
Van Slyke, D. D., and Neill, J. M., J. Biol. Chem., 61, 523 (1924).
Van Slyke, D. D., and Sendroy,
J., Jr., J. Biol. Chem., 73, 127 (1927).