COMPANY NAME

TRAINING SCORE CARD

Training Name:
Faculty:
Date:
Time
Location
Department

Sr.No

1
2
3

Name Of Employee

Mr.A
Mr.B
Mr.C

Dept.

R&D
R&D
R&D
ACVERAGE ON TOTAL

Total Marks

15
15
15
45

Final Rating Criteria

Non Performer
<70%
Retraining

Partial Performer
70-84%
Retraining

Performer
85-94%
OK

Significant Perfoemer
95-99%
OK

Marks(Pre)

Marks(Post)

Diff( Post -Pre)

Growth Level
(%)

% Achieived

5
6
8

13
10
12

8
4
4

19

35

16

53
27
27
36

87
67
80
78

Exceptional Performer
.=100%
OK

Remarks

Performer
Non performer
Partial Performer

Level 1(For the Employee)

COMPANY NAME
Training Feedback Form
Course Name:
Trainer Name:
From Date:
To Date:
Venue:
Rating Scale:

Time: From
Strongly Agree - 4

Agree - 3

Disagree - 2

To
Strongly Disagree - 1

1
2
3

Course
Your personal objectives for attending the program were achieved
The material/handouts were relevant and useful
The course content has enhanced your knowledge/skills

4
5
6
7

This program increased your capability to perform your current or future job
The exercises provided were useful in better understanding
Theory covered was useful in understanding the practical application
The duration of the program was adequate

There was clarity on how to apply the tools/concepts to your present job
Total( /32)
Learning
The practical activities helped enhance your knowledge
You will be able to apply the knowledge in your workplace
This training will help you perform better in your job
The topics covered were logically sequenced
Total( /16)
Facilitator
The facilitator was well prepared and organized
The facilitator had a good command over the subject
The facilitator was able to encourage participation during the class
The facilitator was polite and approachable
The facilitator was clear in communicating ideas/info.
Relevant examples were used during the program
The course was conducted in a pleasant and positive atmosphere
The facilitators pace of program delivery was good
The facilitators presentation style was Excellent
The facilitators voice projection and clarity was clear
The facilitator was able to respond to queries effectively
The time allotted for questions and queries was enough
Your queries and doubts were sufficiently answered
Total( /52)

1
2
3
4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Rating

0
Rating

0
Rating

What did you like most about the training?

What were your objectives for this programme ?

Do you find practical approach towards selection of topics ?

How would you go about implementing the learning down the line towards team

Susggestion for Improvements

Name:________________________________
Designation:___________________________

Department:__________________

COMPANY NAME
Training Feedback Form
Name of the course:
Participants Name:
Date:
Trainers Name:

Time

From:

To:

Rating Scale:
2
Far below Expectation

3
Good

Program Content Rating

Sr.No.

4
Very Good

5
Exceeded Expectation

Statements

The objectives of the course

Pre informed about the course

Content of the course

The duration of the course

Enhancement of skills and knoweldge

Clarity on how to apply the tools/concept to your present job.

Trainers Rating
Sr No.

Statements

Activities carried out in the session

Presentation style of trainer

The trainers command over the subject

The trainers clarity in communicating ideas/information

Approachability of Trainer

The use of relevant examples during the program

The trainers effectiveness in responding to queries

The trainers ability to motivate the group

Overall effectiveness of the trainer.

Key learning from the program
Suggestion/Improvements
Comments if any:
Thanks for the valuable feedback

TRAINING FEEDBACK FORM

COURSE CON

Participant

Name of the course Faculty

Uncertainity
Measurements

Date

pre-informed
about course

Objective
4
3

3
3

4/11/2008

Percentage

COURSE CONTENT
Content of
course

Knowledge
Duration of Enhanceme
course
nt
3
2
3
3
2
3

Clarity of
applying
tools to
present job Percentage % Average
3
51
3
3
49
3
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
4

Activities
carried
3
3

TRAINER'S EVALUATION
Clarity in
Approachabi Use of
Presentation Command
communicat lity
relevant
style
over subject ing ideas
of Trainer
examples
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
4

effectiveness
in responding
quries
3
3

motivate group
3
3

overall
effectiveness
3
3

Percentage
%
Average Remarks
58
3
Good
62
3
Good
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
0
#DIV/0!
4

COMPANY NAME
Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form
Level 2 ( For the Superior)
Name of the course:
Name of the Superior :
Effectiveness date:

Training Date:
Rating scale:
0
Not
Applicable

1
Far below
expectation

2
Below
Expectation

3
4
5
Met
Above
Exceeded
Expectation Expectation Expectation

STATEMENT
1. As a result of training there are has been a positive change in the behavior or
performance of the participant.
2. The participant is making good use of the training given to him/her.
3. The training has resulted in the development of new skill/skills in the Participant.
4. The participant is sharing his knowledge/ ideas / skills learnt during the training with
his colleagues.
5. The colleagues of the participant also acknowledge the improvement in his
behavior / performance.
6. The participant has given feedback about the concepts he learnt to his superior.
7. This training program has significantly helped the participant in his / her personal
development.
8. The benefits achieved from the training is worth the cost incurred on it.
9. The objective of the training program has been fulfilled
Total Score at Level 2:
Comments:
Any suggestions to make the training program more effective:
Name & Sign of HOD:
For HRD

% Score at level 2 =
Criteria: If %score> 60, effectiveness is ok else Training officer jointly meet with HOD
& concern participant for deciding futher coarse of action:
Remarks:

NAME

valuation Form

Participant's Name

SCORE

0%

0%

0%

0%

Not OK

Not OK

Not OK

Not OK