Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMPETITIVENESS
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR WATER
RESOURCES: ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION
NOVEMBER 2011
This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International
Development. It was prepared by DAI.
DOCUMENT 71
MOROCCO ECONOMIC
COMPETITIVENESS
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
FOR WATER RESOURCES: ASSESSMENT &
EVALUATION
Tel: (212) 05 37 63 05 59
Fax: (212) 05 37 63 05 61
andrew_watson@dai.com
http://www.mecprogram.ma
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1
2.
2.1
2.1.1
General information............................................................................................................ 3
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
Groundwater.......................................................................................................................... 4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.2
2.2.1
General information............................................................................................................ 5
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.3 MAJOR WATER ISSUES SPECIFIC TO THE RIVER BASINS OF OUM ER RBIA AND
MOULOUYA.................................................................................................................................................. 7
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.5
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................24
OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 26
IMPORTANT FEATURES OF WMS .................................................................................................... 26
Automated Watershed Delineation ............................................................................................. 26
Integrated GIS Tools .......................................................................................................................... 27
Floodplain Modeling and Mapping .............................................................................................. 27
2D (Distributed) Hydrology ........................................................................................................... 27
Data Compatibility ............................................................................................................................. 28
APPENDIX 2: FEATURES AND APPLICATIONS OF RIBASIM ..............................................30
OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 30
Field of application ............................................................................................................................ 30
OTHER APPLICATIONS OPTIONS ..................................................................................................... 31
Reservoir operation........................................................................................................................... 31
Water management option ............................................................................................................. 31
Evaluation of Basin performance ................................................................................................. 31
Hydro-power production ................................................................................................................ 31
Hydrologic routing ............................................................................................................................. 32
Groundwater ........................................................................................................................................ 32
Integration of water quality modeling ....................................................................................... 32
Modeling of agriculture water demand ..................................................................................... 32
Integrated GIS Tool ............................................................................................................................ 33
ii
1. INTRODUCTION
Under task 2.2.3 of MEC program: Development of Information Management Tools for River
Basin Agencies and ORMVAs, Dr. Driss Ennaanay and Dr. Tim Martin supported the national
MEC consultants - Mr. Mustapha El Haiba and Dr. Driss Ouazar - on various activities. They
made several visits - Dr. Martin in March 2011 (5 days), Dr. Ennaanay in August 2011 (12
days) and both in September 2011(7 days) - to work with Oum Er Rbia (ABHOER) and
Moulouya (ABHM) River Basin Agencies to achieve the following:
1) Analyze the existing data requirements for modeling purposes.
2) Evaluate existing modeling tools.
3) Assess the expertise of technical staff in modeling and IMS.
4) Identify specific Information Management System (IMS) needs.
5) Develop a framework and tasks for IMS implementation and development.
The IMS Team launched the preliminary tasks needed to implement the Watershed Modeling
System (WMS) (Appendix 1) and its hydrological models for incorporation into the IMS. Dr.
Ennaanay led hydrologic and river basin modeling workshops for the technical staff of both
agencies. Workshop discussions focused on the strengths and limitations of the RIBASIM
(Appendix 2) and WMS models. Both models have been acquired by the agencies and the
Secretariat d Etat Charg de lEau et de lEnvironnement (SEEE) and will be implemented in
major river basin agencies throughout the country.
The team identified, and will present in this report, the needs of river basin agencies in
hydrological and river basin modeling, particularly since both agencies will be using WMS
and RIBASIM. Based on the assessment and evaluation of the existing models and technical
expertise, the team recommends identified tasks and has designed an IMS to implement in
phase 3 of the MEC task 2.2.3. We believe this approach will help river basin agencies handle
water management activities and meet the overall goals of USAID-MEC.
2. PRESENTATION OF
HYDROLOGICAL FEATURES
OF THE OUM ER RBIA AND
MOULOUYA RIVER BASINS
AND EXISTING HYDRAULIC
INFRASTRUCTURE
2.1
2.1.4 Groundwater
Groundwater resources are relatively important and include several aquifers of high interest,
including:
The Tadla confined aquifer (called the Turonian aquifer): This confined aquifer extends
over an area of 10,000 km2. It consists of limestone and dolomites/limestone geological
formations. The thickness of the aquifer varies from 20 m at the outcropping areas to 80 m
south, on the edge of the Atlas area.
The aquifer of Beni Amir: This is an unconfined shallow aquifer which extends over an area
of 600 km2, and where groundwater flows through geological formations of marls limestone, and conglomerates having a thickness that varies between 50 and 100 m.
The aquifer of Beni Moussa: This is an unconfined, shallow aquifer extending over an area
of 885 km2 where groundwater flows through limestone and marl-limestone geological
formations of the Quaternary. The thickness of the aquifer is approximately 150 m near the
river Oum Er Rbia, and increases towards the Atlas Mountains where it may reach 300 m.
According to the PDAIRE studies, the global groundwater balance in the Oum Er Rbia river
basin is marked by a significant deficit of about 147 Mm3/y. Groundwater abstractions
amount up to 638 Mm3/y, nearly 50% of the total amount groundwater recharge estimated
at 1,331 Mm3/y.
4,170 Mm3 of surface water, are used in irrigation (90%), and municipal and industrial
water (8%), and sanitary flow (2%).
333 Mm3 of groundwater are used in irrigation (85%), and for drinking water supply
(15%).
Irrigation water needs have increased from 2,000 Mm3 in 1980 to over 2,500 Mm3 in 2006.
But, over the past 25 years, the irrigation water demand has never been satisfied. The
average deficit is about 33% with a maximum deficit of about 67%.
2.2
A zone of semi-arid climate with two seasons: a mild winter with a significant amount
of rain during the period of OctoberMay, and a hot and dry summer during the
period JuneSeptember. This zone is located north of the basin along the
Mediterranean coastal area.
The rest of the basin where the climate is arid with low precipitation and dry weather,
which may last year round. Winters are often long and cold, while summers are very
hot. The climate of this area is influenced by the relief barriers made of the Middle
Atlas Mountain, the Rif Mountains and the Beni Snassen, which block the humid air
masses coming from the Atlantic Ocean.
The annual average rainfall may exceed 600 mm in the summits but remains less than 350
mm within the coastal plains. The average annual rainfall is approximately 245 mm, with a
minimum of 110 mm, and a maximum of 515 mm (chains of Bni Snassen, and upstream in
Middle Atlas Mountains). Mean monthly temperatures range from 18 C to 29 C, and the
minimum monthly average temperatures may reach 2 C.
58 river flows gauging stations ( including recording river water levels stations)
29 rainfall gauging stations
11 recording rainfall stations
18 weather stations, including a number of automatic whether stations allowing real
time data transmission and acquisition installed by MEC project. These station will be
used for flood forecasting
153 piezometers
506 Mm3 of surface water are allocated to irrigation (86%) and to municipal and
industrial water supply (14%)
380 Mm3 of groundwater used for irrigation (75%) and for municipal supply (25%)
The total irrigated area is approximately 73,874 ha, of which 58,343 ha are large irrigation
schemes and 15,531 ha are medium and small irrigated schemes.
2.3
The studies of the water master plans (PDAIREs) being finalized by both river basins agencies
have highlighted a number of significant water resources challenges in both river basins,
besides the existing constraints associated with the institutional framework weaknesses.
Briefly these challenges can be summarized as follows:
This problem also affects the Moulouya river basin. Since its commissioning in 1965, the
large dam reservoir of the basin Mohamed V has seen its capacity reduced from 726 Mm3 to
331 Mm3 in 2005 (a capacity lost of about 46%).
3. EVALUATION OF
EXISTING MODELING
DATA
Both river basin agencies have accumulated important databases as time series and
geographic information system (GIS) files. Most of these databases are in somewhat
organized format, scattered in different data storage units from flash disks, external hard
drives, to central servers. Both agencies have and use BADRE21, a Water Resources Database
developed by the SEEE and which hosts part of the agencies water resources information
including climatic data and streamflow data. The rest of the databases about reservoirs, GIS,
groundwater, and water quality collected from the agencies monitoring networks are stored
in Microsoft Excel or Microsoft Access.
Prior to his first visit, Dr. Ennaanay provided a list of data requirements for WMS and Soil
Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) models for both agencies to start preparing for the modeling
activities. Earlier this summer, the Secretariat of Water and Environment decided to
standardize modeling tools and started the acquisition of WMS for all river basin agencies in
the country; part of a GIZ financed effort. Therefore we were asked to focus on this model for
all future hydrological modeling in both river basin agencies.
In Table 1, we summarize the data requirements for the WMS hydrological model (HSPF) for
both agencies. The table shows that most data needed in the hydrological modeling exist
except the digital elevation model (DEM) at 30 m, land use land cover (LULC) map, and soil
map.
The team was able to provide the DEM and the soil map that were downloaded from the
FAO GeoNetwork database (http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/main.home). As for the
other missing data, both agencies agreed to work with other stakeholders in the region to
generate the LULC maps and compile management practices for major agricultural cropping
systems.
Most of the data shown in Table 1 have been updated as part of the five-year master plan
and database, PDAIRE 2007. In various discussions, each river basin agency director and staff
reiterated strong interest in using the data outcome of this five-year revised master plan in
future IMS and modeling products. However, our evaluation and assessment of the nature
and quality of data show that time series are still missing data points and some GIS files are
miss-projected and need meta-data information. It is clear that more data management and
data quality control and assurance need to be administered on these data sets. Immediate
tasks should include analysis of time series data, design, and implementation of a correction
method that fills the missing data. Another task should focus on the GIS data sets to
organize them in a geodatabase with a single projection and data references.
Grid
Land use
land cover
Grid
Soil
Geology
Database
(horizon depth,
texture,
structure,
permeability,
organic
matter...)
Shapefile
Streams
Shapefile
Weather
stations
Shapefile
PHYSICAL
Rainfall
Elevation map,
generally it is 30m
resolution raster.
Derived and
classified from
Satellite images,
generally it is 30m
resolution
Database of tables,
raster and/or
shapefiles
Time series
CLIMATE
Air
temperature
(Min
and
Max)
Solar
radiation
Wind speed
Relative
humidity
Snow depth
Time series
Gaging
Stations
Latitude, longitude
and elevation of
weather stations
within and
surrounding the
basin.
Daily time series for
long period. If HSPF
model is used for
WMS, we will need
hourly time series
for at least couple of
stations.
Daily time series
Time series
Time series
Time series
Time series
Shapefile
Map showing
location of different
gaging stations +
Information on the
station (start/end,
type, )
HYDROLOGICAL
10
Important
information for
ground water
modeling
Streams
Diversions
Reservoirs
Flows
Shapefile
Shapefile
Time series
Irrigation
Wells
GROUNDWATER
WATER QUALITY
MANAGEMENT
shapefile
Time series
Shapefile
Existing
aquiferwater table
map
Monitoring
points
Map
Nutrients
Time series
Sediments
Agricultural
Practices
Map
time series
Types
and
timing
Map showing
location of different
point sources +
Information on the
station (start/end,
type, )
Map showing
location of different
diversions +
Information on the
station (start/end,
type, )
Map showing
reservoirs +
information on
reservoirs (type,
start, )
Streamflow,
reservoir outflows,
diversion flows,
point sources flows
Time series for
gaging stations,
diversions, point
sources.
Map showing major
wells + information
on wells (type,
latitude, longitude,
depth,..)
Map showing
groundwater extent
+ information (type,
)
Map showing
monitoring sites
(latitude, longitude,
type, frequency,..)
Water quality
components time
series (nutrients and
other contaminants)
at specific
monitoring points
Bathymetry
For all agricultural
land
X: Data exists
11
12
4. HYDROLOGICAL AND
WATER RESOURCES
MODELING ASSESSMENT
In recent years, river basin agencies have externalized all activities related to modeling
development by hiring local and foreign consulting firms to design, implement, and run
models for daily water management activities. The agencies have used internal staff to
continue monitoring and evaluating activities
In this assignment, we examined different existing modeling tools that are in-house, most of
which were developed by Moroccan local firms in collaboration with foreign consulting firms.
Without exception, none of the models are being used routinely by the basin agencies in
their daily water management activities. Both agencies opted to develop and customize their
own simplified tools to run the daily simple water management tasks.
At the ABHOER, there is a version of RIBASIM (river basin modeling tool) that was developed
in 2000. This same version was updated by an engineering student at the Institut
Agronomique et Veterinaire Hassan II for his Masters thesis. We evaluated this model, which
still needs improvements such as incorporating groundwater and return flow from irrigation.
For all surface water management (modeling), the agency doesnt have a model to simulate
surface water. They use an Excel file that is updated daily based on the experience and
knowledge of the water engineer in charge. However, the agency has an ongoing
consultancy with NOVEC, a Moroccan consulting firm and CACG, a French consulting firm for
all annual and seasonal water planning scenarios. CACG-NOVEC uses a MIKE-Basin model,
which was not provided to the basin agency. So, for modeling each single scenario, the
agency needs the support of this consultant, creating dependency and a cost-effective
solution.
As per groundwater management and modeling, ABHOER has an ongoing contract with
ANZAR, a local firm for all their groundwater modeling purposes. They use modeling results,
but have no license, for the GMS model. So far, the agency has GMS models for two major
aquifers in the basin.
All models at ABHM were built by consulting firms either local or international. Similarly to
OER, the ABHM agency has on ongoing contract with CACG-NOVEC to run MIKE-Basin for all
water resources modeling scenarios that the agency develops. It is a black box process in
which the agency has no control. For all surface water modeling, the agency uses a nonfunction HEC-1 model that was built by NOVEC. The technician, who is in charge of
managing surface water modeling and simulation, uses an Excel file that has very limited
capabilities to manage inflow-outflow for reservoirs and diversions. There is significant
dependency on the soft expertise and knowledge of the experienced technician.
For all groundwater modeling activities, the agency uses the services of ANZAR consulting.
They use GMS results but have no GMS license in house.
13
14
5. EVALUATION OF HUMAN
TECHNICAL EXPERTISE
In both agencies, we identified two groups among the technical staff: One group, consisting
of four to five very experienced water technicians/engineers and a second group with six to
seven junior, entry-level, multi-disciplinary personnel. The junior level personnel have
background and training in subjects different than water such as ecology, biology,
biochemistry, law, and computer science.
Table 2 demonstrates the composition of the technical staffs background and expertise and
the current role of the two agencies.
Table 2: Description of Technical expertise within both agencies
ABHM
Technical Field
ABHOER
Hydrology
Hydrogeology
Staff
1Sr
1Sr, 1Sr
Comments
Good
Good
Staff
1Sr
1Sr, 1Jr
Comments
Good
Good
Hydrologic Modeling
1Sr
Limited to fair
1Sr
Limited to fair
Groundwater Modeling
1Sr
Limited to fair
1Sr
Limited to fair
1Jr
1Sr, 1Jr
1Sr
1Jr
0
Limited
Fair
Limited
Limited
1Sr
1Sr
1Sr
1Sr
1Jr
Limited
Fair
Good
Good
Limited
1Sr
Limited
1Sr, 1Jr
Good
1Sr
Good
15
16
6. WATER SYSTEM
MODELING AND
CAPACITY BUILDING
NEEDS
Based on the evaluation results presented above, we identified three major needs for both
agencies with different recommended intervention degrees:
1) Data management system: The scattered and disorganized data sets (time series
and GIS files) need to be hosted in one central system where everyone in the agency
can have access. Data will be quality controlled and the same data will be used for
various purposes.
The ongoing MEC effortto strengthen the monitoring network to allow acquisition
of climate datawill improve the data situation for both agencies. This data
acquisition system can be easily implemented and linked to water supply and flood
forecasting systems. The fully functional system will improve water management and
river basin short-term operations and enhance flood preparedness.
2) Functional in-house modeling tools: Most of the tools used by both agencies are
black boxes, and require continuous dependency upon the consulting firms that do
not have the means to evaluate and control the quality of the modeling results. The
agencies need in-house models that they can understand and modify for scenarios
related to their respective water supply and demand issues. This ability will allow
them to run as many scenarios as they want, cost effectively. This functionality will
also allow them to verify and quality control future work and modeling projects
conducted by consulting firms. Such tools can also be used to simulate impacts of
various climate change scenarios on water supply, soil erosion, and reservoir
management. These tools will reduce the agencies vulnerability to climate change by
enhancing their preparedness and improving their adaptation mechanisms.
3) Strengthen technical capacity: Throughout this short-term assessment, we
identified that both agencies need immediate intervention to build and strengthen
their technical capacities. Continuity, longevity, and sustainability of water
management are at risk in Morocco, and in particular in these agencies, even though
the Central Department in Charge of Water and Environment (SEEE), in collaboration
with the German Cooperation Agency GIZ, has recently organized, , for all the river
basins agencies in Morocco, a basic training workshops on the following modeling
tools:
As mentioned above the licenses of these two modeling tools are being acquired by the
SEEE and will be installed as standard tools in all river basins agencies in Morocco.
17
It is useful that the USAID-MEC program builds upon the achievements of this initiative and
develops and implements a more comprehensive on-the-job training program to accompany
the river basins agencies of Oum Er Rbia and Moulouya in having WMS and RIBASIM fully
operational at the river basins levels.
18
19
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR IMS TASKS
Throughout this assignment, we evaluated the existing data and tools, and attentively
focused on understanding both agencies needs. We conducted our assessment with the
goal of designing and implementing a functional, useful, and practical IMS to help these
agencies effectively manage water resources at the basin level. We identified several tasks
that the agencies requested and need to be incorporated in the proposed IMS.
Table 3 describes IMS tasks and sub-tasks and provides a schedule for each of the tasks. In
various discussions with both river basin agencies and the two ORMVAs (Doukkala and
Moulouya), we identified 10 needed tasks described in Table 3. However, after discussion
with the MEC COP, we were asked to break the tasks into two groups: group one includes
task 1 to 6, called high priority and group two includes tasks 7 to 10, called needed when
financial resources are available. The purpose of each of the 10 tasks is described below:
Task 1: Watershed Modeling System (WMS) Hydrologic modeling: The purpose of this
task is to build a hydrologic model within the Watershed Modeling System (WMS) to
represent the natural system of the river basin. The WMS will be used in all simulations of
LULC future changes (new agriculture and irrigation districts), climate change scenarios, and
inflows for future dams and reservoirs. Under this MEC activity, we will enhance the WMS
that is under development by Riverside for ongoing World Bank climate change project in
Oum Er Rbia River Basin.
We are also proposing onsite training of the IMS units (three to four technical staff
members) within the two agencies. The development team will work closely with these units
to fully understand the model, build and run the river basin model, and interpret its results.
During the length of this project, we will provide technical support to the staff to ensure full
application and use of the system. This hands-on approach will facilitate successful user
adoption so to ensure agency staff will continue using the system after the project ends.
Task 2: River Basin Simulation (RIBASIM) Water resources modeling: The goal of this
task is to provide both agencies with a functional river basin water resources modeling
system to help with planning activities. We will set up, enhance and operationalize a system
for Moulouya using the RIBASIM model that is now under development in the ongoing
World Bank climate change project in Oum Er Rbia.
During the model development stage, we will provide on-the-job training of the IMS units at
both agencies to set up, calibrate, run, and interpret model results. This onsite training, in
addition to technical support during the length of this project, will build each agencys
internal capacity and ensure full application and continuity of model use after the end of the
project.
Task 3: Study Tour for ABH, ORMVA, and SEEE managers: This tour will be a valuable
opportunity for Moroccan water managers to meet with U.S. water managers in various U.S.
federal, state, and local water agencies. They will visit and experience different information
management systems, water modeling systems, and decision support systems. During the
tour, they will also learn how these technologies have been used to improve water
management.
Task 4: Data management: We are proposing to organize data in a centralized database
and implement GIS tools to homogenize data sets for each agency. Most of the data still
needs substantial quality control and quality assurance work. This task will allow us to fill the
missing gaps in various time series (climate and runoff), correct and georeference GIS files,
and build metadata files for different data sets.
20
Task 5: Climate change decision support tool: This task will use results from Riversides
ongoing World Bank climate change project in OER. We will be incorporating seven climate
change scenarios results in this decision support tool. Riverside has developed and
implemented this tool in various river basins in the U.S. as shown on this website:
www.climatechangedss.com. The climate change decision support tool will allow the OER to
disseminate climate change impacts to the larger public community.
Task 6: Irrigation management: The ORMVA of Doukkala is undergoing substantial
irrigation conversion projects in an effort to improve water efficiency and increase
productivity. We are proposing to implement a drip irrigation advisory and scheduling
system in one pilot irrigation sector. This system will use and utilize weather data generated
and produced by the weather stations that were acquired and installed by MEC. This will help
farmers effectively use their water quotas between two irrigation periods (generally two
weeks).
Under this same task, the ORMVA of Moulouya wants to apply remote sensing techniques to
estimate consumptive use in their irrigation sectors. This will allow the ORMVA to effectively
estimate water balance and groundwater abstractions in the district.
Task 7: Water harvesting: During our September trip, we attended a water master plan
discussion in Oujda (Moulouya region). Many stakeholders highlighted the need for water
harvesting projects in the region. Water harvesting is considered an important approach to
save rain and runoff water for irrigation and domestic use. We identified this task as an
priority since the region is experiencing drier climate and rain patterns are more irregular
and intense.
Task 8: Water quality: Intensive agricultural practices, especially in the irrigated areas, have
impacted the quality of surface waters and more negatively the groundwater resources that
are shallow in these zones. Incorporating non-point sources water quality, especially
nitrogen, into modeling activities in both agencies will address this issue. This modeling
effort will help the ORMVA and ABH to zone the risk areas and target their outreach
activities.
Task 9: Forecasting and modeling applications: Both agencies expressed the need for
incorporating forecasting systems for water supply and flooding into the modeling systems.
These systems will incorporate and use the real-time climate data sets that are collected
using the existing system and the additional weather stations that MEC has installed in
various areas within the two river basins. These applications are very critical for improving
water management and flood preparedness in both regions.
Task 10: GIS and remote sensing applications: In collaboration with both agencies, we
identified the need to improve the existing GIS databases by building a decision support
interactive tool for GIS data analysis.
We also highly recommend using remote sensing techniques to generate a LULC map for
both agencies to provide important information that is missing for the entire country.
Under this same task, both agencies have requested help and support in estimating
consumptive water use in the entire basin with focus on estimating groundwater and riverwater abstractions in irrigated areas along the river courses.
21
Table 3: Proposed IMS tasks (1-6 High priority and 7-10 Needed)
Basic Development
1
WMS Watershed
Modeling System
Hydrologic modeling
xx
Enhancement
operationalisation
xx
xx
Technical Assistance
On-Job Training
xx
xx
Basic Development
2
Enhancement
operationalisation
xx
xx
Technical Assistance
On-Job Training
xx
xx
Preparation, hosting,
reporting
Data Management
Organizing climatic
and hydrologic data
Data organization
xx
xx
xx
xx
Irrigation
Management
Irrigation scheduling
and telemetry
22
RIBASIM Riverside
basin management
model
xx
Implementation
Technology transfer
Design irrigation
management services
xx
Implementation
xx
Evapotranspiration and
irrigation water balance
x
xx
xx
Q3
Q2
2012
Q1
Q4
Sub-tasks
ABHM
Task # Task
ORMVAD
ORMVA
M
ABHOER
2011
Table 3: Proposed IMS tasks (1-6 High priority and 7-10 Needed)
GIS application
Model set up
xx
xx
Modeling Nitrate
xx
xx
xx
xx
Forecasting:
Modeling
Applications of WMS
and RIBASIM
xx
xx
10
Q3
Q2
Q1
2012
xx
GIS/Remote Sensing
Applications applying
Land use and land cover for
remote sensing and
modeling and other
GIS techniques in
applications
irrigation management
Evapotranspiration for
irrigation and water balance
Q4
Sub-tasks
ABHM
Task # Task
ORMVAD
ORMVA
M
ABHOER
2011
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
23
8. CONCLUSION
The proposed set of tasks will be incorporated in a functional, useful, and practical IMS. It is a
product that includes items needed and requested by the agencies; it responds to their
needs. These are tasks that were identified by working with the river basin agencies and the
ORMVAs under this assignment. Our goal is to produce a comprehensive tool to help
improve the agencies water management. We will be working closely with all clients during
the length of this project to incorporate all necessary components of this IMS. We will
provide comprehensive onsite training to the IMS units in both agencies to ensure continuity
and sustainability of this system.
24
25
APPENDIX 1: FEATURES
AND APPLICATIONS OF
WMS
OVERVIEW
Use DEMs (grids) or TINs for delineation. This allows easy manipulation of the
elevation data in either type of dataset.
Add of any number of interior outlet points and the WMS subdivides the watershed
automatically.
Manipulate stream networks to represent man-made features or proposed changes
in the watershed.
As part of the delineation process, WMS finds all flow paths on the entire terrain model. This
allows one to inspect flow patterns anywhere inside/outside the watershed. Further, the
longest flow path in each sub-basin is stored for use with the Time of Concentration
Calculator.
26
2D (Distributed) Hydrology
A 2D hydrologic model is available in WMS. The GSSHA model is the perfect solution for
studies which require analysis of 2D surface flow and groundwater/surface water interaction.
The model uses a 2D finite-difference grid to analyze surface runoff, 1D channel hydraulics,
and groundwater interaction in a comprehensive hydrologic cycle model. Water quality and
sediment transport processes may also be modeled with GSSHA. Typical applications of this
model are:
27
Data Compatibility
WMS is compatible with numerous file formats. Some of the more popular data formats
supported by WMS are:
28
ArcGIS Raster (ASCII format) read elevation or attribute data in gridded format from
ArcGIS.
ESRI Shape files read all shapes and attributes into WMS.
DXF and DWG CAD files WMS now supports the latest versions of DXF and DWG.
TIFF, JPEG, and MrSID images images along with geo-referencing information can
be read by WMS.
29
APPENDIX 2: FEATURES
AND APPLICATIONS OF
RIBASIM
OVERVIEW
RIBASIM (River Basin Simulation Model) is a tool for river basins planning and management.
It is a generic model package for analyzing the behavior of river basins under various
hydrological conditions. The model package is a comprehensive and flexible tool linking the
hydrological water inputs at various locations with the specific water-users in the basin.
Field of application
RIBASIM is designed for any analysis that requires simulating the water balance of a basin.
The resulting water balance provides the basic information on the available
quantity of water as well as the composition of the flow at every location and at any time in
the river basin. It provides the means to prepare such balances in required detail. A number
of basin performance parameters are generated for evaluation of the simulated situations.
The main applications of the model include:
30
Long-term basin planning: the preparation of long and mid-term basin plans (e.g.,
with a time horizon of 10 to 25 years). Various measures (technical, operational, and
institutional) can be analyzed with RIBASIM. Questions to be answered include: To
what extent is development possible? What potential conflicts among users may arise
and what are the impacts of various development alternatives?
Short-term (half- or one-year) water allocation scheduling: preparation of a seasonal
operation plan for the basin. RIBASIM can be used to determine a crop plan based on
reservoir storage and expected inflows.
In-season operation scheduling: during the season based on the actual situation in
the field, the actual rainfall and the updated forecasts an updated water allocation
schedule can be determined for the coming weeks or months. Questions that can be
answered include: What is the water allocation to users in case of water scarcity?
What is the impact of specific management options?
Flow forecasting systems: At any time, the flow, at various locations along the river, is
predicted based on forecasts of the catchment runoff and hydrologic routing of river
flow. The relevant question here is: What flow can we expect during the coming few
weeks or months at the intake of our drinking water reservoirs or irrigation scheme?
Model use as flow routing component within a Flood Early Warning System (FEWS):
Various hydrologic routing methods are available in RIBASIM (e.g., Manning formula,
Flow-level relation, two-layered multi segmented Muskingum formula, Puls method
and Laurenson non-linear lag and route method). The flow routing is executed on a
daily basis starting at any selected day for any number of days ahead.
Various outlets: main gate, turbine gate, spillway and any number of head sluices
Hydraulic characteristics of the reservoir and gates
Operation rule curves for flood control, maximum energy production, firm storage,
zoning of the reservoir storage and hedging (water rationing) of target releases
Hedging based on the target release (demand oriented) or based on the actual
storage (supply oriented)
Specific operation based on level control
Operation of groups of reservoirs in series and/or parallel
Operation based on expected reservoir inflow
Hydrological aspects: evaporation losses and rainfall input based on reservoir surface
area, seepage losses
Hydro-power station characteristics: head power capacity relation, head power
efficiency relation, discharge tail level relation, discharge head loss relation
Firm energy demand per time step with a water allocation priority fully taken into
account in the water allocation procedure on basin level
Computation of reservoir releases based on average reservoir level
Water allocation
Water shortages
Firm and secondary hydropower production
Overall river basin water balance (water accounting)
Flow composition
Crop production
Flood control
Water supply reliability
Groundwater use
Hydro-power production
Hydro-power production can be modeled at reservoirs hydro-power stations. Energy
production forms one of the water using activities in the river basins and is fully taken into
account in the water management options.
31
Hydrologic routing
RIBASIM accepts basically any time step size. However, most basin simulations are executed
on a:
Monthly basis
Half-monthly basis
Weekly basis
Daily basis
In most situations the selected simulation time is such that mass equations are used for the
simulations. In situations where this is not valid, RIBASIM offers various hydrologic channel
and reservoir routing procedure, such as:
Groundwater
RIBASIM contains a groundwater simulation component, which computes the aquifer water
balance taking into account the aquifer characteristics, the external inflows, groundwater
recharge, groundwater abstractions, and lateral flows:
32
Crop plan
Expected and actual rainfall
Reference evapotranspiration
Agriculture practice
Operation and irrigation water management
Actual field water balance
Crop survival fraction
Potential crop yield and production costs
RIBASIM has a fully interactive graphical tool for designing a crop plan. The crop plan
consists of the combination of cultivations, which are cultivated, the size of the cultivated
area, and the starting date of the cultivation. This tool is activated from the map. Using the
integrated agriculture water demand, water allocation, crop yield, and production costs
model, RIBASIM can be used for:
Map viewer
Interactive design of a river basin network schematization consisting of nodes and
links
Editing of attribute data of each node and link
Visualization of spatial and temporal data on maps
Presentation of data in form of various types of graphs
Animation of time series data
Optimized processing of very long time series with high speed
33