Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ngo Thanh Ha
Khuong Thi Thuy Tien
Tran Bich Phuong
Dang Khanh Linh
Dam Thi Tuyet
National Economics University
IS310 - Quantitative Analysis
Executive Summary
Specialty Toys, Inc. is a manufacturer of new and innovative childrens toys which includes
the Weather Teddy. The Weather Teddy has a built-in barometer that provides one of five
standard responses about the weather when a child presses the teddy bears hand. The
company recently reached out to our team to prepare a managerial report addressing, but not
limited to, the following issues: normal probability distribution in relation to demand
approximation, the probability of stock-outs for certain quantities and the projected profits
associated with certain order quantities. The purpose of this managerial report is to address
the concerns of the management team at Specialty Toys, Inc. and also to provide a
recommended order quantity for the Weather Teddy, the probability of stock-outs related to
specific order quantities, and the potential profits associated with certain order quantities.
At x = 30,000,
= 1.645
P(lower)
P(upper)
,9500
,0500
mean
std.dev
1,645
30.000
20.000
6.079
P(stockout) = 0.7939
Analysis: There is an approximately 79.39% chance that Specialty Toys will run out of the
Weather Teddy if the company orders 15,000 units.
@ 18,000
P(stockout) = 0.6293
Analysis: There is an approximately 62.93% chance that Specialty Toys will run out of the
Weather Teddy if the company orders 18,000 units.
@ 24,000
P(stockout) = 0.2546
Analysis: There is an approximately 25.46% chance that Specialty Toys will run out of the
Weather Teddy if the company orders 24,000 units.
@ 28,000
P(stockout) = 0.0934
Analysis: There is an approximately 9.34% chance that Specialty Toys will run out of the
Weather Teddy if the company orders 28,000 units.
Profit Potential
We looked at the profitability associated with three different quantities: 10,000, 20,000 and
30,000.
Order Quantity: 15,000
Unit
Sales
10,000
20,000
30,000
Total
Cost
240,000
240,000
240,000
Sales
at $24
at $5
240,000
360,000
360,000
25,000
0
0
Profit
25,000
120,000
120,000
Unit
Sales
10,000
20,000
30,000
Total
Cost
288,000
288,000
288,000
Sales
at $24
at $5
240,000
432,000
432,000
40,000
0
0
Profit
-8,000
144,000
144,000
Unit
Sales
10,000
20,000
30,000
Total
Cost
384,000
384,000
384,000
Sales
at $24
at $5
240,000
480,000
576,000
70,000
20,000
0
Profit
-74,000
116,000
192,000
Unit
Sales
Total
Cost
Sales
at $24
at $5
Profit
10,000
20,000
30,000
448,000
448,000
448,000
240,000
480,000
672,000
90,000
40,000
0
-118,000
72,000
224,000
Since net profit is fixed, the company will earn more money for each unit that is sold.
However, using net profit to determine the optimal order quantity is misleading since it gives
no consideration to lost sales due to insufficient inventory or losses related to excess
inventory sold for a reduced price.
Unit Sales
10,000
20,000
30,000
Total
Cost
371,008
371,008
371,008
Sales
at $24
at $5
240,000
480,000
556,512
65,940
15,940
0
Profit
-65,068
124,932
185,504
Recommendations
There were several different factors that we took into account when making our
recommendation and deciding on a suitable order quantity. Factors to consider included the
probability of a stock out, potential profits from several different possible quantities
demanded, loss of profits in the event a stock out does take place, and finally added revenues
associated with the discount sale of excess goods on hand.
After analyzing the results of our calculations based on managements expectations, we find
the probability of demand being greater than or equal to 15,000 or 18,000 units is too large
for these quantities to be sufficient. Ordering a quantity of goods at far below level s of
expected demand create a high probability (80% and 63%) that Specialty Toys will sell out of
Weather Teddy stock and lose sales revenue. The probability of stock outages occurring
drastically decrease to 25 % and 9% in forecasts of higher quantities demanded of 24,000 and
28,000 units, respectively.
In addition, a single-period inventory model recommends an order quantity that maximizes
expected profit based on the following formula:
P(Demand Q* )
cu
cu co
where P(Demand Q* ) is the probability that demand is less than or equal to the recommended
order quantity, Q * . cu is the cost of underestimating demand (having lost sales because of a
stockout) and co is the cost per unit of overestimating demand (having unsold inventory).
Specialty will sell Weather Teddy for $24 per unit. The cost is $16 per unit. So, cu = $24 - $16
= $8. If inventory remains after the holiday season, Specialty will sell all surplus inventory
for $5 a unit. So, co = $16 - $5 = $11.
10
P(Demand Q* )
8
0.4211
8 11
0.4211
0.5789
Q*
z = -0.20
The profit projections for this order quantity are computed below:
Order Quantity: 18,784
Scenario
1
2
3
4
Breakevent
Quantity
Order
10000
20000
30000
18784
9392
Gross
Profit
240000
480000
720000
450816
225408
Cost of
Good
Sold
160000
320000
480000
300544
150272
Net Profit
80000
160000
240000
150272
75136
Foregone
Sales due to
Inadequate
Inventory
-70272
N/A
N/A
N/A
-75136
9728
146624
116624
150272
0
The data in table above captures both the forgone profits and losses due to quantities
demanded differing from our recommended quantity ordered. We also realize the high
economic profit of the scenario where quantities demanded would actually equal our
recommended order quantity, $150,272. Lastly, we calculated the breakeven point in which
11
an actual demanded quantity of 9,392 would cause net profit to equal forgone sales due to
inadequate inventories.
Based on the information in the case, we recommend a quantity with a large probability of
meeting customer demand. In order to have a better understanding of the specific quantity of
units needed, more information is necessary including industry sales trends of recent products
and sales history of similar products. Given the risks associated with over purchasing,
Specialty Toys management would also need to provide the interval of probability in which
they expect to meet consumer demand.
Other options that we alternatively recommend would be to negotiate higher rates with
contract manufacturers to produce additional rush orders in October if demand is high when
the toys are released. Additionally, Specialty Toys could sign contracts with discount retailers
prior to October specifying a fixed unit price (above the reduced price the toys would be sold
at) for all excess toys to avoid excess loss.
12