H J AMES J OHNSON

HUMAN RIGHTS § CIVIL RIGHTS § CORRUPTION § MEDIA

D EFA M AT I O N § P R O F E S S I O N A L N E G L I G E N C E L AW
1 S T F L O O R 1 4 1 O S B O R N E S T R E E T S O U T H YA R R A V I C T O R I A 3 1 4 1
TELEPHONE: +613 9279 3932 FA C S I M I L E : + 6 1 3 9 2 7 9 3 9 5 5

Sunday 2 August 2009 ***

IMPORTANT COMMUNICATION

TO: Ms Miranda Milne (CEO Legal Practitioners TO: Ms Jennifer Sheehan

Liability AVOIDANCE Committee “LPLAC”) (Associate to Associate Justice Lansdowne)
By Facsimile: 9670 5538 By Facsimile: 9603 6050
TO: Mr Joe Saltalamacchia CC: Ms Cath Mukhtar
Prothonotary, Supreme Court of Victoria (Associate to Associate Justice Daly)
By Facsimile: 9603 9400 By Facsimile: 9603 9320
(please copy to Justice Kaye)
TO: Ms Rena Sofraniou CC: Mr Peter Rashleigh
(barrister funded by LPLAC for Harwood (solicitor funded by LPLAC for barrister Richard
Andrews Lawyers) By Facsimile: 9229 5050 Ingleby) By Facsimile: 9274 5111
TO: Ms Radhika Mendis CC: Mr Howard Obst
(solicitor funded by LPLAC for Harwood (solicitor funded by LPLAC for barrister Graeme
Andrews Lawyers) Devries) By Facsimile: 9605 3499
By Facsimile: 9670 2723
CC: Ms Allison Grice CC: Ms Margaret McNamara (solicitor to the legal
(solicitor funded by LPLAC for Berry Family practitioners non-regulator "LSC")
Law) By Facsimile: 9603 9320 By Facsimile: 9679 8101
CC: Mr Gerry Davies (solicitor not funded by LPLAC TO: Berry Family Law
representing Dr David List) By Facsimile: 9399 9006
By Facsimile: 9600 0894

Dear Brothel-gate participants

AUSSIES IN WONDERLAND: WITCH HUNT, WATERGATE, WATERLOO – VICTORIAN SUPREME COURT

PROCEEDINGS 9665 OF 2007, 9263 AND 10222 OF 2008 AND 3731 AND 3766 OF 2009
Message for all addressees
1. I attach my further responses to the 6 LPLAC funded parties scandalous Masters Court applications for
acquittals without trial before pleadings are settled and the copy cat application by looney tunes psychologist
David List. While I have drawn up separate document for looney tunes List, of course both sets of
submissions are relevant to both sets of applications.
2. I will circulate the (substantial) substantiating attachments once I have compiled and worked out how to
distribute them. I expect to do this before the end of this week.
3. I also expect to file and serve these submissions and all attachments, cross-file and serve, in all 5 numbered
parts of these proceedings before the end of this week.

MELBOURNE'S PRETTY WOMAN FRAUD AND SUPREME COURT BROTHELGATE CORRUPTION TRIALS Page 1 of Many
 Message for Her Honour, Associate Justice Daly
4. I apologise your Honour for not being able to deliver these responses or the additonal Affidavit materiall for
the bizarre Legal Services Commissioner costs application (part heard). The 30 July 2009 timetable that
you proposed on 9 July 2009 has proven woefully too short.
5. I intend with Your assumed acquiescence, to deliver these additional assigned tasks as follows:
a. Complete these responses to the 5 vexing oppresing and abusing applications by the defendant
lawyers and looney tunes List this week (I'm happy to substantiate all my allegations of fact – as my
responses and the attachments do).
b. Complete, file and serve my Further Amended Counterclaims before the end of this week
c. Complete and file the additional LSC cost application Affidavit materials, before the end of this week.
2. Obviously, there is a lot of emotional anguish and torment for me in having to attend ot these task, and
continually repeat and resubstantiate these tales of abuse and corruption, just in order to keep my legal
rights mere options (as Professor Richard A Posner defines them) alive. Of course, this is exactly the
'smash him, smash him, smash him' tactics that the LPL(E)C and its hired and insured aggressors are
playing against me. Not very grown up , or very human are they? I am hopeful that their unlawful and
childish (?) tantrumic behaviours will settle down and some adult like negotations, or at least conversations,
might be possible, once Your Honour has thrown out these abusive applications and the LPL(E)C and its
hirelings and insureds start to accept their legal responsiblities, something like the way that responsible
mature adults might do.
3. Media and fraud investigations of these corruption plays by the Cressy lawyers, and her lawyers lawyers,
LSC, LPL(E)C are also taking up quite a bit of my time, as is the basic challenge of staying alive and at least
a little bit health in my current endangered circumstances (It's not all dodging fire bombs and collecting snail
mails your Honour). These investigations are starting to extend to Ms Cressy's lawyers lawyers lawyers,
which is obviously getting a bit unpalatable. Lawyers lawyers lawyers lawyers. I hope we don't get to that
stage and don't want to even think about that, even in jest.
4. I hope Your Honour is not too upset by my proposed path to substantial compliance with your orders of 9
July 2009.
5. I also attach as requested a copy of my latest (fourth version) of my Notice of Appeal in that bit of these
proceedings numbered 3731 in the Court of Appeal. It is currently being reworded for Justice Kayes latest
revolutions in the law of civil (without trial or process) procedure on 25 June 2009, as described in these
submissions and transcribed in their attachments.
6. And I attach a copy of a recent Herald Sun report of our brilliant Victorian Attorney-General's latest triumph
in his war to give Victorian's basic human rights and introduce standards and accountabilities for all 3
branches of the legal profession (you can't have the first, without the latter, er first, er can you?). The latest
triumph a judicial reform school and ombudsman's scheme. And I don't think that the Attorney-General has
done this solely because of my anti-corruption petitions to him. Something tells me, call it human intiution,

MELBOURNE'S PRETTY WOMAN FRAUD AND SUPREME COURT BROTHELGATE CORRUPTION TRIALS Page 2 of Many
 that maybe some other citizen or so has made similar petitions. It's good stuff if the lawyers (and their
captivating notional regulators) don't stuff it up of course.

Messages for Miranda Miles / LPL(E)C and Victoria Marles/LSC employee solicitor Margaret
McNamara
7. Miranda, I repeat my previous settlement offers, save that having regard to the further anguish caused me
by your prolonging these legal proceedings (and furthering the abuse I have suffered at the hands of your
criminal insured and yourself, I hereby increase the figure to $25.0 M. I suggest you act fast before the odds
swing against you and yours once my legal reinforcements arise. I will circulate with the attachments, as
giggle foder, a copy of your articulate and incomplete but obviously heart felt consideration and reluctant
disinclination of my earlier offers. I'll also chuck in a couple of comics, lawyers jokes, that may cheer you up
some. One even has your name on it. And your body language (and letter language) suggests your mental
health stocks desperately need a little cheering.
8. As noted above, I will file and serve my Further Amended Counterclaims before weeks end. Inter alia, I am
joining you Miranda Milne and you (re-joining) Victoria Marles personally and in their public statutory
capacitiies to these proceedings as outlined in these submissions.
9. Ms Macnamara,
a. please treat these submissions (and, when I send them to you, the attachments) as formal
misconduct complaints to the Legal Services Commissioner under the Legal Practice Act against
each of the following Australian Legal Practitioners:
i. Miranda Milne;
i. Victoria Marles (in additoin to my unaddress complaints already on foot);
ii. Rena Sofraniou and her instructors, Lisa Newcombe and Rhadika Mendes at Lander &
Rogers;
iii. Richard Ingleby;
iv. Graeme Devries (in addition to my unaddressed complaints already on foot);
v. Mr Gleeson of the Victorian Bar
vi. Mr Other of the Victorian Bar
vii. Mr MacNamara of the Victorian Bar
viii. Mr David William Hanlon and Harwood Andrews (in addition to my unaddressed complaints
already on foot);
ix. Mr James Turnbull and Peter Berry of Berry Family Law (in addition to my unaddressed
complaints already on foot); and
b. please advise the time frame in which you expect to conduct these complaints. And please
explain the whistlblowers and other procedures you will put in place to manage the issues associated
with my existant and augmented complaints regarding Ms Marles.

MELBOURNE'S PRETTY WOMAN FRAUD AND SUPREME COURT BROTHELGATE CORRUPTION TRIALS Page 3 of Many
 c. I know from past, pre-Cressy v Johnson (part 3) days, that there is nobody in the Legal Services
Commissioner's office that has the legal or literary skills to read or respond to these complaints in
accordance with the legal requirements of the Legal Practice Act. My correspondences and the
submissions before Her Honour on 9 July 2009 readily substantiate these facts. I am happy to
second myself to the LSC at a reasonable rate to explain these and the no doubt thousands of
similaar claims that the LSC receives and rejects (in delerious denial) annually. I promise to use
bonnie wee little words, like Bill Clinton's speech writers, so that even someone like the
Commissioner who lacks year 7 legal studies knowledge might have a ghost of a chance of
understanding.

10. Ms Sofraniou and Ms Mendez, please comply with your Court undertakings made to Her Honour in the
Masters Court on 9 July 2009 regarding transcript ex poste haste. I shall raise this misconduct with Her
Honour ex poste haste the next scheduled hearing.
11. Miranda, I offer to allow you to withdraw these abusive and vexatious applications without my seeking full
litigant-solicitor costs against you and your insureds, provided you formally withdraw these (criminally) stupid
applications and pay me $33,000 fixed costs in cleared funds before the end of this week (time costed at
$550 per hour times at a ridiculously conservative 60 hours, inclusive of GST and discounted to encourage
you not to waste mine or Her Honours or even your own time with this stupidity without overtime or pain and
suffering loadings).
12. Ms MacNamara, I invite you too to withdraw your absurd and unlawful cost applications and will waive my
rights to seek costs on a full litigant-solicitor basis provided the LSC pays me $11,000 fixed costs in cleared
funds before the end of this week (time costed at $550 per hour times at a ridiculously conservative 20
hours, inclusive of GST and discounted to encourage you not to waste mine or Her Honours or even your
own time with this stupidity without loading for overtime or pain and suffering – excessive funny bone tingling
– loadings).

Kind regards from your most vexed, oppressed and abused

JAMES JOHNSON

MELBOURNE'S PRETTY WOMAN FRAUD AND SUPREME COURT BROTHELGATE CORRUPTION TRIALS Page 4 of Many