2B m4 25 Sonja Michelle Wolferts a 443 W. 1780 N us Orem, Utah 84057 Telephone: (801) 427-3215 IN THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT UTAH COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH BRIAN EDGAR WOLFERTS, AFFIDAVIT IN RESPONSE TO AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIAL MASTER SANDRA N. DREDGE Petitioner, vs. Case No. 074100003 SONJA MICHELLE WOLFERTS, Judge: David M. Mortensen Respondent. Commissioner: Thomas Patton 1, SONJA MICHELLE WOLFERTS, do hereby depose and state under oath, that the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief: 1. Sandra Dredge is Special Master. (A) For years Petitioner has been filing show causes against me or reporting frivolous, false or exaggerated claims. (B) Pve had some stress about contact with him, since he will say anything whether or not there is any truth to it. (C) Petitioner has often used reports about the children in his attempts to legally harass and control me, reporting on his show causes that [ had been trying to take the children out of state, had them around alcohol, have bribed them with candy and gum to say things, havemissed visits, that I am doing things I never have been with the children’s phone calls, ete, ete. His accusations do not seem to have an end and I believe he knows these kinds of things are not at all true. He recently said that I was a ‘meth user.” i. He used to not leave me alone and when I would lock doors to try and escape would often force his way through. ii. Tbelieve he has been legally using the children in a similar manner in attempts to exercise control over me. iii, [have given him every important piece of information about the children and cooperated on any and every important issue. iv, He has been using the children and the legal system in a frivolous manner. (D) Petitioner has accused me of alienation, when his own behavior and false accusations cause some who closely encounter him to be wary i. He has always told me the children manipulate me and lie about things. ii, Tused to believe and go along with everything he said. iii, When our youngest was 3 and often asking me not to leave her alone with him, I believed him when he told me she just made a lot of things up. iv. [thought maybe she clung to me so much only because she young and wasn’t used to me not being around, and there had never been any merit to what she said. y, [don’t ever want to assume he has done things he may have never done, but I also} don’t want to continue to assume what he says about how the children supposedly manipulate and lie. (©) Since 2007 Petitioner has continued to report things that have never taken place to the Special Master. (®) I don’t know if'anyone understands that he may be doing some of the things he is reporting, (GI appears to me that Petitioner and his attorney have been attempting (0 use the Special Master to cause more legal problems.20 2 a 23 24 (H)Petitioner and his attorney have met with the Special Master Sandra Dredge, Petitioner filed his show cause together along with the last complaint the Special Master filed, and Sandra has also been forwarding our emails only to his attorney and not mine. 2, Ido not believe there have ever been any compliance issues. The only person reporting my supposed continual involvement of the children in our divorce issues has been Petitioner. (A) [have not talked with the Special Master for more than 45 minutes over the last 2 ‘years, and cannot assume the same for Petitioner and his attomey. (B) On November 14, Sandra issued an order that I contact Dr. Blakelock by November 18". (C) [called the number Sandra sent—it was disconnected. nn then later re-sent me another number. (D) Sandra had given me the wrong informat (Attachment A--Email) 3. Our December 18", 2008 hearing was the hearing to have Dr. Blakelock assigned as the custody evaluator. This hearing had nothing to do with any failure to comply on my part 4, & 5. [contacted Dr. Blakelock on time and Brian and I began meeting with Dr. Blakelock in January (A)Dr. Blakelock mentioned that we did not have to continue on with the evaluation and we could decide to stop and mediate at anytime. (B) asked Brian if he would like to do this and he would not (C) Dr. Blakelock mentioned that since Brian had just completed testing with Dr. Ririe that he could possibly use some of that same testing for the custody evaluation. (D) I agreed, suggesting to Brian that maybe he could save some money that way. 6. Dr. Blakelock told me that I could make payments. I let him know that I was trying to sell my car or get a loan and get a couple of large payments to him very soon, 7. Polygraph testing was taken on January {* , and both the children and I had met with Dr, Blakelock and completed numerous psychological evaluations January through March. (Attachment B—Polygraphs) ®