Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
In the present study, high-speed and ultra-high-speed face milling of AISI H13 steel (4647 HRC) is conducted in order
to acquire a thorough understanding of the tool wear evolution process and tool wear mechanisms in high-speed hard
milling. According to the variation trend of the tool life with cutting speed, three cutting speed ranges are identified. For
different cutting speed ranges, the tool wear evolution process and typical tool wear mechanisms are analyzed and compared. It is found that the cutting speed of 1400 m/min can be considered as a critical value for both the average value of
the resultant cutting force and tool life. The analysis of the tool wear mechanisms show that, as the number of cutting
speed range increases, on the tool flank face, oxidation wear influences more greatly, while the effect of adhesive wear
decreases. In the speed range 1400 m/min \ v 4 2400 m/min, the abrupt flaking that occurred on the tool rake face
was mainly caused by the increase of tool temperature, mechanical impact and thermal impact.
Keywords
Tool wear, high-speed, face milling, AISI H13 steel
Introduction
The concept of high-speed cutting (HSC) was first proposed by Salomon1 by means of high-speed milling
tests. Better surface quality and higher machining efficiency are expected to be obtained using HSC technology. There have been many valuable researches on
surface quality, tool wear characteristics, optimization
of cutting condition and finite element modeling in the
field of high-speed milling.28
High-speed milling has been extensively used in the
manufacturing of aluminum aeronautical and automotive components so as to efficiently generate smooth
surfaces with high geometric accuracy. With the development of cutting tools and machine tools, HSC technology has been used to manufacture the mold and dies
in their hardened state. Hard milling can even be an
alternative for the grinding process in some cases.9 It
has advantages, such as reduction of machining costs
and elimination of part distortion caused by heat treatment, etc.
At high cutting speeds, the mechanical properties of
the cutting tool are weakened by the high cutting temperature. The tool wear increases dramatically, leading
to the short tool life and impaired surface integrity. It
is of great importance to assess the tool wear evolution
process and tool wear mechanisms in high-speed face
1685
Cui et al.
mechanisms are analyzed and compared for tools tested
within different cutting speed ranges.
Literature review
Previous studies on high-speed milling of hardened steels
have concentrated mainly on end milling and side milling
operations. Some of these previous researches focused
on the investigation of surface roughness in end and side
milling. Ghani et al.10 stated that when high cutting
speed, low feed rate and low depth of cut were adopted,
good surface finish can be obtained in semifinish and finish machining of hardened AISI H13 steel. Vivancos et
al.11 presented a mathematical model for the surface
roughness in high-speed ball-end milling of hardened
steels using design of experiments. Vivancos et al.12 conducted a study of the surface roughness obtained in
high-speed side milling of hardened die steels. The influences of cutting parameters were studied by means of a
2421 fractional factorial design of experiments.
Many other studies have concentrated on tool performance and tool wear mechanisms in end milling.
High-speed milling of hardened steels was conducted
by Fallbohmer et al.13 to determine the performance of
advanced cutters and identify recommended cutting
speeds and feed rates. Machining time and surface finish focused on the investigation. Toh14 investigated and
evaluated different cutter path orientations in highspeed finish milling of hardened steel. It was found that
employing a vertical downward orientation achieved
the longest tool life. But vertical upward orientation
was generally preferred in terms of workpiece surface
roughness. Aslan15 studied the performance and wear
behavior of different cutting tools in end milling of
X210 Cr12 cold-work tool steel (62 HRC). The results
showed that cubic boron nitride (CBN) tools exhibited
the best cutting performance in terms of both flank
wear and surface finish. End milling of AISI D2 tool
steel (58 HRC) was conducted by Koshy et al.16
Analysis of flank wear indicated that chipping, adhesion and attrition were the governing mechanisms
responsible for tool wear. The workpiece surface
roughness was in the range 16 mm Ra for carbide
ball-nose end mills. Ghani et al.17 investigated the wear
mechanism of TiN-coated carbide and uncoated cermets tools at various combinations of cutting parameters in end milling of hardened AISI H13 tool steel.
Urbanski et al.18 studied the tool wear, workpiece surface roughness and cutting force in high-speed ball-end
milling of hardened AISI H13 hot work steel.
Relatively few researches have been conducted in
the field of face milling of hardened steels. Ultra-highspeed face milling experiments for cast iron, AISI 1045
tempered carbon steel and AISI 1045 hardened carbon
steel were performed by Liu et al.19 using different cutting tools, such as polycrystalline cubic boron nitride
(PCBN), ceramic, coated carbide and fine-grained
carbide. The tool wear types vary with different
1686
Cr
Si
Mo
Ni
Fe
0.200.50
0.320.45
4.755.50
0.801.20
0.801.20
1.101.75
00.30
Bal.
the evolution of tool temperature. The simulation process was set to be consistent with the actual milling
condition.
Lagrangian formulation embedded in the package
(Deform 3D) was applied in the modeling of the face
milling. Geometries of the workpiece and the single
insert cutter are shown in Figure 2. Tetrahedron elements were employed in the meshing of the cutter and
the workpiece. Re-meshing technology and local
refining technology were used in the workpiece meshing. The boundary conditions were specified to constrain the top surfaces of the tool in vertical
directions. The tool rotated at the specified cutting
speeds. The workpiece was constrained in vertical and
lateral directions on the bottom surface. The initial
temperature of the workpiece and cutter was set to be
20 C. The tool was modeled as a rigid but heat transfer body.
Adopting a suitable material-constitutive model for
the workpiece is essential for successfully simulating
the metal cutting process. The JohnsonCook model
has been used by many researchers to investigate high
strain rate and high temperature deformation behavior
of steels. The JohnsonCook constitutive equation was
used as
"
! #
e
Ta Tr m
n
s = A + Be 1 + C ln
1
Tm Tr
e
0
1
1687
Cui et al.
Figure 3. The evolutions of Fra, Frim, Tha and Thim with cutting
speed v: (a) the evolutions of Fra and Tha with cutting speed v; (b)
the evolutions of Frim and Thim with cutting speed v.
1688
Figure 4. The evolutions of tool life and tool wear with cutting speed v (fz = 0.04 mm/tooth, ap = 0.20 mm): (a) the evolution of
tool life L with cutting speed v; (b) the evolution of tool wear in cutting speed range 1 (200 4 v \ 1000 m/min) ; (c) the evolution
of tool wear in cutting speed range 2 (1000 4 v 4 1400 m/min) ; and (d) the evolution of tool wear in cutting speed range 3
(1400 \ v 4 2400 m/min).
for both the mechanical load and tool life. At this critical cutting speed, a relatively low value of the average
resultant cutting force and a relatively long tool life can
be obtained at the same time.
In different speed ranges, namely 200 m/min 4 v
\ 1000 m/min (speed range 1), 1000 m/min 4 v 4
1400 m/min (speed range 2) and 1400 m/min \ v 4
2400 m/min (speed range 3), the characteristics of the
tool wear evolution process differs greatly, as shown in
Figure 4.
It can be seen from Figure 4 that, in speed ranges 2
and 3, the tool wear increases rapidly at the end of tool
life, which is different from those of the tools tested in
speed range 1. In speed range 1, the wear rate changes
little in the whole tool life, though it becomes a little
higher when approaching the end of tool life. While in
speed range 2, when the tool flank wear is more than
0.2 mm, tool wear increases rapidly. As for speed
range 3, the wear rate is relatively small when the tool
wear value is below 0.1 mm. However, when 0.1 mm
is surpassed, the tool wear rate becomes much higher,
and the tools are worn out with a high value of tool
wear.
It can be seen from Figure 3 that, although the average value of resultant cutting force has a decreasing
trend in speed range 2, these values are still high.
Moreover, the higher cutting speed leads to higher
tool temperature, and more severe mechanical and
thermal impact. When the tools are tested in speed
range 3, the loading condition is more fierce than that
in range 2, as shown in Figure 3. Under such severe
loading conditions, as for flank wear, a vicious circle
will probably be obvious at the end of tool life: the
more severe tool wear leads to higher cutting force,
higher tool temperature, and more severe mechanical
impact and thermal impacts, all of which subsequently lead to higher tool wear rate. At the end of
tool life, the flank wear value is relatively high and
the effects of this vicious circle are greater, explaining
the rapid increase of tool wear.
1689
Cui et al.
Figure 5. SEM images of the typical worn tool tested in speed range 1 (v = 400 m/min, fz = 0.04 mm/tooth, ap = 0.20 mm).
1690
Figure 6. SEM images of the typical worn tool tested in speed range 2 (v = 1000 m/min, fz = 0.04 mm/tooth, ap = 0.20 mm).
1691
Cui et al.
Figure 7. SEM images of the typical worn tool tested in speed range 3 (v = 2200 m/min, fz = 0.04 mm/tooth, ap = 0.20 mm).
Conclusions
Experiments and finite element simulations were
conducted in this article so as to acquire a thorough
understanding of tool wear mechanisms in high- and
ultra-high-speed face milling of hardened steel, and
1692
2.
3.
1. Salomon CJ. Process for machining metals of similar acting materials when being worked by cutting tools. German
patent, 1931, Number 523594.
2. Liu N and Loftus M. Prediction of surface quality from
ball-nose milling in high-speed machining applications.
Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2006;
220(4): 571578.
3. Axinte D and Dewes R. High-speed milling of AISI H13
hot-work tool steel using polycrystalline cubic boron
nitride ball-nose mills: From experimental investigations
and empirical modelling to functional testing of the
machined surfaces. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering
Manufacture 2010; 224(1): 1524.
4. Zhou L, Wang CY and Qin Z. Tool wear characteristics
in high-speed milling of graphite using a coated carbide
micro endmill. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2009; 223(3): 267277.
5. Soo SL, Aspinwall DK and Dewes RC. Three-dimensional finite element modelling of high-speed milling of
Inconel 718. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2004; 218(11): 15551561.
6. Toh CK. Tool life and tool wear during high-speed
rough milling using alternative cutter path strategies.
Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2003;
217(9): 12951304.
7. Lopez de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sanchez JA, et al. Cutting conditions and tool optimization in the high-speed
milling of aluminium alloys. Proc. IMechE, Part B: J
Engineering Manufacture 2001; 215(9): 12571269.
8. Toh CK. A modified offset cutter path strategy for highspeed rough milling hardened steel. Proc IMechE, Part
B: J Engineering Manufacture 2003; 217(8): 11611166.
9. Iqbal A, He N, Li L, et al. A fuzzy expert system for
optimizing parameters and predicting performance measures in hard-milling process. Expert Sys Appl 2007;
32(4): 10201027.
10. Ghani JA, Choudhury IA and Hassan HH. Application
of Taguchi method in the optimization of end milling
parameters. J Mater Process Technol 2004; 145(1): 8492.
1693
Cui et al.
11. Vivancos J, Luis C, Costa L, et al. Optimal machining
parameters selection in high speed milling of hardened
steels for injection moulds. J Mater Process Technol 2004;
155156(13), 15051512.
12. Vivancos J, Luis CJ and Ortiz JA. Analysis of factors
affecting the high-speed side milling of hardened die
steels. J Mater Process Technol 2005; 162163; 696701.
13. Fallbohmer P, Rodriguez CA, Ozel T, et al. High-speed
machining of cast iron and alloy steels for die and mold
manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 2000; 98(1):
104115.
14. Toh CK. Cutter path orientations when high-speed finish
milling inclined hardened steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol
2006; 27(56): 473480.
15. Aslan E. Experimental investigation of cutting tool performance in high speed cutting of hardened X210 Cr12
cold-work tool steel (62 HRC). Mater Des 2005; 26(1):
2127.
16. Koshy P, Dewes RC and Aspinwall DK. High speed end
milling of hardened AISI D2 tool steel (similar to
58 HRC). J Mater Process Technol 2002; 127(2): 266273.
17. Ghani JA, Choudhury IA and Masjuki HH. Wear
mechanism of TiN coated carbide and uncoated cermets
tools at high cutting speed applications. J Mater Process
Technol 2004; 153154(13): 10671073.
18. Urbanski JP, Koshy P, Dewes RC, et al. High speed
machining of moulds and dies for net shape manufacture.
Mater Des 2000; 21(4): 395402.
19. Liu ZQ, Ai X, Zhang H, et al. Wear patterns and
mechanisms of cutting tools in high-speed face milling.
J Mater Process Technol 2002; 129(13): 222226.
20. Siller HR, Vila C, Rodr guez CA, et al. Study of face
milling of hardened AISI D3 steel with a special design
of carbide tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2009; 40(12):
1225.
21. Chen L, El-Wardany TI, Nasr M, et al. Effects of edge
preparation and feed when hard turning a hot work die
steel with polycrystalline cubic boron nitride tools. CIRP
Ann Manuf Technol 2006; 55(1): 8992.
22. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML.
Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. 1st
ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 1995.
Appendix
Notation
yield strength
radial depth of cut
axial depth of
hardening modulus
strain rate sensitivity
average value of the resultant cutting
force
difference between the maximum and the
average resultant cutting force
maximum value of the resultant cutting
force
feed rate
tool life
thermal softening coefficient
strain hardening exponent
absolute temperature
highest tool temperature
average value of the highest tool
temperature
difference between the average value and
maximum value of the highest tool
temperature
melting temperature
reference temperature
maximum value of the highest tool
temperature
cutting speed
s
e
e
e0
shear stress
shear strain
shear strain rate
reference plastic strain
A
ae
ap
B
C
Fra
Frim
Frm
fz
L
m
n
Ta
Th
Tha
Thim
Tm
Tr
Thm