Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Mass transfer systems based on electrokinetic phenomena (i.e., capillary electrochromatography (CEC)) have shown
practical potential in becoming powerful separation methods for the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. A
mathematical model has been constructed and solved to describe quantitatively the profiles of the electrostatic potential,
pressure, and velocity of the electroosmotic flow (EOF) in charged cylindrical capillaries and in capillary columns packed
with charged particles. The results obtained from model simulations (i) provide significant physical insight and
understanding with regard to the velocity profile of the EOF in capillary columns packed with charged porous particles
which represent systems employed in CEC, (ii) provide the physical explanation for the experimental results which indicate
that the velocity of the EOF in capillary columns packed with charged porous particles is a very weak function (it is almost
independent) of the diameter of the particles, and (iii) indicate that the intraparticle velocity, vp,i , of the EOF can be greater
than zero. The intraparticle Peclet number, Pe int rap , for lysozyme was found to be greater than unity and this intraparticle
convective mass transfer mechanism could contribute significantly, if the appropriate chemistry is employed in the mobile
liquid phase and in the charged porous particles, in (a) decreasing the intraparticle mass transfer resistance, (b) decreasing the
dispersive mass transfer effects, and (c) increasing the intraparticle mass transfer rates so that high column efficiency and
resolution can be obtained. Furthermore, the results from model simulations indicate that for a given operationally
permissible value of the applied electric potential difference per unit length, Ex , high values for the average velocity of the
EOF can be obtained if (1) the zeta potential, zp , at the surface of the particles packed in the column has a large negative
magnitude, (2) the value of the viscosity, m, of the mobile liquid phase is low, (3) the magnitude of the dielectric constant, ,
of the mobile liquid phase is reasonably large, and (4) the combination of the values of the concentration, C` , of the
electrolyte and of the dielectric constant, , provide a thin double layer. The theoretical results for the velocity of the EOF
obtained from the solution of the model presented in this work were compared with the experimental values of the velocity
of the EOF obtained from a fused-silica column packed with charged porous silica C 8 particles. Systems with four different
particle diameters and three different concentrations of the electrolyte were considered, and the magnitude of the electric
field was varied widely. The agreement between theory and experiment was found to be good. 2000 Elsevier Science
B.V. All rights reserved.
182
Keywords: Electroosmotic flow; Charged porous particles; Electrochromatography; Intraparticle electroosmotic flow;
Intraparticle convective flow; Intraparticle Peclet number; Capillary columns
1. Introduction
In high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) a liquid is driven through a packed bed by
the application of a hydrostatic pressure, while in
capillary electrochromatography (CEC) a potential
difference (an electric field) across the length of the
column is used to drive the mobile liquid phase
through a packed bed by electroosmotic flow (EOF)
[19]. The method of CEC uses packed fused-silica
capillaries and modified capillary electrophoresis
(CE) equipment, and therefore, one could consider
that CEC is a hybrid separation method of CE and
Micro-HPLC [7,8]. The fused-silica capillaries have
inside diameters of 50100 mm and are packed with
HPLC stationary phases. The motion of the liquid
under electroosmotic flow (EOF) arises in the electrical double layer at the liquid solid interface. The
EOF originates within the electrical double layer
which exists at surfaces such as those of silica and
octadecylsilica that bear fixed negative charges while
the solution in contact with such surfaces contains an
excess of positively charged ions. A charged sheath
is formed around a core of uncharged liquid by this
excess positive charge which is located very close to
the surface [5], and shear develops within the sheath
when an electric field is applied across the length of
the fused-silica capillary. The developed shear
moves the charged sheath and the core of uncharged
liquid towards the negative electrode. In CEC, the
electrolyte that follows the solute(s) of interest as it
(they) migrates along the column, is the same as the
electrolyte that precedes it.
Experimental results from CEC and HPLC systems [7,8] indicate that CEC offers the following
advantages when compared to HPLC: (i) higher
column efficiency in CEC than HPLC due to the
flow profile of EOF in CEC [5,7], and (ii) there is no
column pressure drop limitation in CEC (CEC does
not need any pump to maintain a hydraulic flow
since the movement of liquid in CEC occurs by
EOF) and, thus, micron and submicron size particles
can be used [8] as packing materials in CEC and
183
2. Mathematical formulation
=? r v 5 0
(1)
S D
1
1 ]s=Cd 2 = 1 r g
8p
=?s=Cd 5 2 4prcd
(2)
(3)
184
d 2 vx
1
]]
1 ]
r
dr 2
cd
(4)
S D
P
C
0 5 ] 1 rcd ]
r
r
(5)
C 5 F (r) 1 G (x)
(6)
(7)
(8)
S
D
ez F
expS 2 ]]D
kT
ez 1 F
C1 5 C1` exp 2 ]]
kT
C2 5 C2`
(9)
(10)
When the Debye length is sufficiently small compared to the capillary radius, the double layer is in
contact with an electroneutral core region and C1`
and C2` represent the concentrations of the cations
and anions, respectively, in that region. When the
double layers overlap, Eqs. (9) and (10) remain
valid, but now C1` and C2` represent fictitious
concentrations at large distances from the axis where
the potential F due to the double layer is zero (in
this case, C1` and C2` denote bulk solution concentrations outside the capillary where F 50). The
space charge density, rcd , is the sum of the ionic
charge concentrations at any point and is given by
the expression:
(11)
D
DG
ez 1 F
rcd 5 No e z 1 C1` exp 2 ]]
kT
ez 2 F
1 z 2 C2` exp 2 ]]
kT
(12)
S S DD
ezF
rcd 5 2 2No ezC` sinh ]]
kT
(13)
By combining Eqs. (3), (6), and (12) and considering that the dielectric constant, , is independent of
space, the expression for the equilibrium diffuse
double layer is obtained and its form is as follows:
dF
S DS]
D5
dr
ez F
4p
2 ] F N e Sz C expS 2 ]]D
kT
ez F
1 z C expS 2 ]]DDG
kT
d 2F
1
]]
2 1 ]
r
dr
S D
dF1
4p ze
at r 5 R, ]] 5 ]] d
dr
kT
1`
2`
(14)
d 2 F1
1
]]
1 ]
r
dr 2
(15)
where
ezF
F1 5 ]]
kT
(16)
kT
l 5 ]]]]
8p No e 2 z 2 C`
1/2
(17)
Eq. (15) is the classical PoissonBoltzmann expression and the parameter l is called the Debye length
and is often used to represent the characteristic
thickness of the double layer.
In this work, systems involving symmetric electrolytes are examined and, thus, Eq. (15) is used in
order to obtain the radial distribution of the electrostatic potential F that is due to the double layer. The
boundary condition of Eq. (15) at the centerline of
the capillary is as follows:
dF1
at r 5 0, ]] 5 0
dr
(18)
S D
4p ze
at r 5 R, n ?=F1 5 ]] d
kT
185
(19)
(19a)
(20)
After Eq. (15) has been solved by using the boundary conditions given by Eqs. (18) and (20), the
gradient of F1 at r5R can be evaluated and then the
value of d could be determined from Eq. (19a). By
examining the mathematical structure of Eqs. (15),
(16) and (18)(20), one could observe that since the
gradient of the electrostatic potential at the wall of
the cylindrical capillary is constant ssdF / drdu r 5R 5
s4p /ddd because the values of and d are constant,
then the value of the zeta potential, zw (F u r 5R 5 zw ),
at the capillary wall would increase as the radius R
of the capillary decreases; the experimental data of
Zhmud [29] confirm this theoretical result. The effect
on the velocity, vx , of the increase in the value of zw
when the radius, R, of the capillary is very small and
the double layers overlap, could be important. Therefore, it is worth examining and comparing the results
for systems where (i) the value of the zeta potential,
zw , is taken to be constant for all values of R (the
boundary condition given by Eq. (20) is used for Eq.
(15)), and (ii) the gradient of the electrostatic
potential at the capillary wall is taken to be constant
for all values of R (the boundary condition given by
Eq. (19a) is used for Eq. (15)). It is very important to
be able to determine the value of the fixed charge
density, d, at the capillary wall, since in CEC
systems involving the adsorption of adsorbate molecules it is possible that the value of d could vary
with the loading of adsorbate and this could influence the magnitude of the EOF.
By considering Eqs. (6), (7), (13), and (16), as
well as that vx 5 vx (r) and P/ x 5 0, Eqs. (4) and
(5) take the following forms when symmetric electrolytes are used:
186
dv
D5
S DS]
dr
d 2 vx
1
]]
2 1 ]
r
dr
SD
1
2 2No ezC` sinhsF1d ] s 2 Exd
m
(21)
dF
D
S DS]]
dr
dP
kT
0 5 ] 2 2No ezC` sinhsF1d ]
dr
ez
(22)
(23)
at r 5 R, vx 5 0
(24)
at r 5 0, P 5 P0
(25)
(26)
3
F drag 5 g ]
4
3
p
p xp,un
(28)
2
d vx p,un
1 dvx p,un
3
m ]]]
1 ] ]] 5 g ]
2
r
dr
4
dr
SD
12
S DS]]
pd D
s6pm d p vx p,und
3
p
(29)
2p R
E E v r dr du
x
S D1E
2
0 0
kvx l 5 ]]]]
5 ]2
pR 2
R
vx r dr
(27)
SD
d vxp,un
1 dvxp,un
k
]]]
1 ] ]] 5 ]
2
r
dr
dp
dr
where
S Dv
2
x p,un
(30)
gs1 2 bd
k 5 3 ]]]
2
1/2
(31)
S D
k
vx p,un 5 BI0 ]r
dp
(32)
2 p R27 l
(33)
S D
k
I 0 ]r
dp
vx p,un 5 (vx u r 5R27 l ) ]]]]]
,
k
I0 ]sR 2 7ld
d
0 # r # R 2 7l(R
187
(34)
EE
vx p,un r dr du
S D
2
kvx p,un l 5 ]]]]]]
x ( ]2
2
psR 2 7ld
R
0
R27 l
1E
vxp,un r dr x
S D1 S k l D 2
1 E S k D 2x
vx u r 5R27 l
]]]]]
I0 ](R 2 7 )
dp
2
5 ]2
R
R27 l
I0 ]r r dr
dp
(35)
188
2 p R ic
EEv
x p,c,w5p
r dr du
S D1 E
2
5 ]
R 2ic
vx p,c,w5p r dr x
(36)
vx p,c,wp 5 vx p,c,w5p
S D
k
I 0 ]r
zp
dp
1 1 2 ] (vx u r 5R27 l ) ]]]]]
,
k
zw
I0 ](R 2 7l)
dp
0 # r # R 2 7l(R
1S
(37)
kvx p,c l wp 5
3S D1 E
2
]
2
R ic
vx p,c,w5p r dr
zp
1 12]
zw
DS D1 S
2
]2
R
vx u r 5R27 l
]]]]]
k
I0 ](R 2 7l)
dp
D2
R27 l
1 E S D 24
k
I0 ]r r dr
dp
(38)
Ludtke,
private communication, 1999) indicate that
the value of zp becomes less negative than 264.1
mV as the value of the pH decreases below 8.0, while
the value of zp becomes more negative than 264.1
mV as the value of the pH increases above 8.0. We
want to consider the system where zp 5 264.1 mV,
because the experimental data for the average velocity of the EOF of the above mobile phase in a
fused-silica capillary of radius 50 mm packed with
porous silica C 8 particles have been measured (K.K.
Unger, private communication, 1999), for four different particle diameters (d p 50.2 mm; d p 50.5 mm;
d p 51.0 mm; d p 53.0 mm) and for different values of
the applied electric potential difference per unit
length, Ex . The radius, R ic , of the interstitial channels
for bulk flow by EOF in a fused-silica capillary
packed with silica C 8 particles is about one-third of
the particle radius, r p (K.K. Unger, private communication, 1999); for example, if the particle
radius, r p , is 0.25 mm (d p 50.5 mm), then the value
of R ic is taken to be equal to 0.0833 mm which
189
190
Fig. 1. Electrostatic potential, F, profiles at various values of R /l. The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0
and T5208C, and the value of the applied electric potential, Ex , is 60 kV/ m. (a) F (r 5 R) 5 zw 5 264.1 mV for all values of R and the
reported magnitude of d for each value of R /l is determined from Eq. (19a). (b) d 5 27004.94 esu / cm 2 for all values of R and the reported
magnitude of zw for each value of R /l is determined from Eq. (20).
191
Fig. 2. Velocity, vx , profiles at various values of R /l. The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C,
and the value of the applied electric potential, Ex , is 60 kV/ m. (a) F (r5R)5 zw 5 264.1 mV for all values of R and the velocity profiles are
determined from the solution of Eqs. (15), (18), (20), (21), (23), and (24). The reported magnitude of the average velocity, kvx l, for each
value of R /l is determined from Eq. (27). (b) d 5 27004.94 esu / cm 2 for all values of R and the velocity profiles are determined from the
solution of Eqs. (15), (18), (19a), (21), (23), and (24). The reported magnitude of the average velocity, kvx l, for each value of R /l is
determined from Eq. (27).
192
Fig. 3. Pressure difference, P(r) 2 P0 , profiles at various values of R /l. The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH
8.0 and T5208C, and the value of the applied electric potential, Ex , is 60 kV/ m. (a) F (r5R)5 zw 5 264.1 mV for all values of R and the
pressure difference profiles are determined from the solution of Eqs. (15), (18), (20), and (21)(26). The reported magnitude of the pressure
difference, P(r 5 R) 2 P0 , between the capillary wall and the centerline for each value of R /l is determined from Eq. (26). (b) d 5 27004.94
esu / cm 2 for all values of R and the pressure difference profiles are determined from the solution of Eqs. (15), (18), (19a), and (21)(26).
The reported magnitude of the pressure difference, P(r 5 R) 2 P0 , between the capillary wall and the centerline for each value of R /l is
determined from Eq. (26).
193
Fig. 4. Average velocity, kvx l, versus R /l for different values of the applied electric potential, Ex . The liquid solution is 80%
acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
Fig. 5. The effect of the particle diameter, d p , on the velocity, vx p,un , profile in a charged cylindrical capillary packed with uncharged
(neutral) particles; R550 mm, F (r5R)5 zw 5 264.1 mV, and Ex 560 kV/ m. The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl
at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
194
Fig. 6. Average velocity, kvx p,un l, versus Ex , for different values of the diameter, d p , of the uncharged (neutral) particles packed in a charged
cylindrical capillary of radius R550 mm; two different values of the conductivity factor, x, are examined and F (r5R)5 zw 5 264.1 mV.
The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
195
Fig. 7. The wall effect on the velocity, vx p,c,w5p and vx p,c,wp , profiles in a charged cylindrical capillary column packed with charged
particles for different values of the zeta potential, zw , at the wall and for different particle diameters, d p ; R550 mm, zp 5 264.1 mV,
F (r5R)5 zw and Ex 560 kV/ m. The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
196
Fig. 8. Average velocity, kvx p,c l w5p , vs. Ex , for different values of the diameter, d p , of the charged particles packed in a charged cylindrical
capillary of radius R550 mm; two different values of the conductivity factor, x, are examined and F (r5R)5 zw 5 zp 5 264.1 mV. The liquid
solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
Fig. 9. Average velocity, kvx p,c l w5p , vs. the particle diameter, d p , of charged particles with zp 5 zw packed in a charged cylindrical capillary
of radius R550 mm for different values of Ex ; x 50.707 and F (r5R)5 zw 5 zp 5 264.1 mV. The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25
mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
197
Fig. 10. Average velocity, kvx p,c l wp , vs. the particle diameter, d p , of charged particles with zp zw packed in a charged cylindrical capillary
of radius R550 mm for different values of Ex ; x 50.707, zp 5 264.1 mV and F (r5R)5 zw . The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25
mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
Fig. 11. Comparison of the theoretical results with the experimental data of the average velocity, kvx p,c l w5p , of the EOF in a fused-silica
capillary of radius R550 mm packed with porous silica C 8 particles; zw 5 zp 5 264.1 mV and F (r5R)5 zw . The liquid solution is 80%
acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl at pH 8.0 and T5208C.
198
Fig. 12. Comparison of the theoretical results with the experimental data of the average velocity, kvx p,c l w5p , of the EOF in a fused-silica
capillary of radius R550 mm packed with porous silica C 8 particles of diameter d p 50.2 mm, for three different values of the concentration,
C` , of the electrolyte; zw 5 zp and F (r5R)5 zw . The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% C` mM TrisHCl (80:20, v / v) at pH 8.0 and
T5208C.
199
200
columns packed with impermeable spherical particles. If the value of the connectivity parameter,
n T,ic , of the interstitial channels of bulk flow in the
packed capillary column [12,13] has a very high
value and the particles are permeable, then the value
of x could be higher than 0.707; thus, the value of
x 50.850 was arbitrarily selected to represent such a
hypothetical packed capillary column. The results in
Fig. 6 clearly indicate that the value of the average
velocity kvx p,un l of the EOF in a charged capillary
column packed with neutral particles, increases with
increasing values of Ex , d p , and x. The results also
show that the increase in the value of kvx p,un l as Ex
increases, is linear. Furthermore, the results indicate
that for particles of diameter, d p , in the range of
0.51.0 mm, the values of kvx p,un l differ from each
other by insignificant amounts when the value of Ex
is between 10 and 30 kV/ m, while at values of Ex
higher than 30 kV/ m there are some very small
differences in the values of kvx p,un l.
201
1999) by Ludtke
[36]. The value of the conductivity
factor, x, that was found to provide the best fit
between the experimental data and the theoretical
values, is 0.716. The charged particles used in the
experiments are porous silica C 8 particles whose zeta
potential, zp , at their surface was measured and
found to be equal to 264.1 mV in the mobile liquid
solution indicated in the figure caption. The charged
porous particles were packed in a fused-silica capillary of radius R550 mm and length L58.5 cm, and
the system was such that zw ( zp 5 264.1 mV; the
value of the parameter b was equal to 0.35. The
pore size distribution of these particles [8,36] indicates that the pore radii are large enough that the
theoretical results in Fig. 2a,b of this work would
indicate that the velocity of the EOF could be greater
than zero in a substantial fraction of the pores in the
particles. The occurrence of intraparticle EOF could
affect the value of the conductivity factor, x
[12,13,16,17,34], and since the value of x 50.716
202
points. Ludtke
[36], Ludtke
(private communication,
1999) and Unger (private communication, 1999)
have indicated that they are aware that their experimental measurements may not only reflect the
velocity of the EOF in the packed capillary column
but they might contain contributions by the frits and
the unpacked part of the capillary column. Even
though there may be certain inaccuracies in their
experimental data, the agreement between theory and
experiment is very gratifying. The results in Fig. 11
showed that the agreement between theory and
experiments involving fused-silica capillaries packed
with charged porous particles whose diameters
ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 mm, was good. That agreement together with the agreement shown in Fig. 12,
provide significant evidence for the capability of the
theoretical model presented in this work to describe
the velocity field of the EOF in CEC systems.
It is important to mention here that the values of
the zeta potential, zp , shown in Fig. 12 are very
comparable to the value of 264.1 mV which represents the magnitude of the zeta potential, zp , measured experimentally [36] at the surface of charged
porous silica C 8 particles of diameter 0.5 mm in a
mobile liquid phase of 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM
TrisHCl (80:20, v / v) at pH 8.0 and T5208C. In
203
204
Fig. 13. Average velocity, kvx p,c l w5p , of the EOF in a cylindrical capillary column of radius R550 mm packed with charged particles of
diameter d p 51.0 mm for different values of the viscosity, m, and dielectric constant, , and for two different values of the applied electric
potential difference per unit length, Ex . The concentration of the symmetric electrolyte is C` 525 mM; zw 5 zp 5 264.1 mV; F (r5R)5 zw ;
and T5208C. (a) Ex 560 kV/ m, and (b) Ex 5120 kV/ m.
205
Fig. 14. Average velocity, kvx p,c l w5p , of the EOF in a cylindrical capillary column of radius R550 mm packed with charged particles of
diameter d p 53.0 mm for different values of the viscosity, m, and dielectric constant, , and for two different values of the applied electric
potential difference per unit length, Ex . The concentration of the symmetric electrolyte is C` 525 mM; zw 5 zp 5 264.1 mV; F (r5R)5 zw ;
and T5208C. (a) Ex 560 kV/ m, and (b) Ex 5120 kV/ m.
vp,i 5 kvx l x
(39)
206
Fig. 15. Average velocity, kvx p,c l w5p , of the EOF in a cylindrical capillary column of radius R550 mm packed with charged particles for
different values of the zeta potential, zp , at the surface of the particles and of the applied electric potential difference per unit length, Ex , and
for two different values of the particle diameter, d p . The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl (80:20, v / v); zw 5 zp ;
F (r5R)5 zw ; and T5208C. (a) d p 51.0 mm, and (b) d p 53.0 mm.
207
Fig. 16. Average intraparticle velocity, vp,i , of the EOF in charged porous particles for different values of the tortuosity factor, t, and of the
mean pore radius, R pore , determined from the pore size distribution of particles having different porous structures. The liquid solution is 80%
acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl (80:20, v / v); the zeta potential, zw , at the wall (surface) of the pore of radius R pore is taken to be equal to
the value of the zeta potential, zp , at the surface of the particles, and F (r5R pore )5 zw 5 zp 5 264.1 mV; pH 8.0; T5208C; and Ex 560 kV/ m.
E E v r dr du
x
kvx l 5 ]]]]]
p R 2pore
R pore
S D1 E 2
2
5 ]]
2
R pore
vx r dr
(40)
208
Fig. 17. Ratio of the effective pore diffusion coefficient, Dp , of the solute to p Dmf for different values of the tortuosity factor, t, and of the
mean pore radius, R pore , determined from the pore size distribution of particles having different porous structures; p 50.49 and
Dmf 51.006310 210 m 2 / s.
209
Fig. 18. Intraparticle Peclet number, Pe int rap , of the solute versus the mean pore radius, R pore , determined from the pore size distribution of
particles having different porous structures, for various values of the applied electric potential difference per unit length, Ex ; the diameter,
d p , of the particles is equal to 1.0 mm. The liquid solution is 80% acetonitrile20% 25 mM TrisHCl (80:20, v / v); the zeta potential, zw , at
the wall (surface) of the pore of radius R pore is taken to be equal to the value of the zeta potential, zp , at the surface of the particles, and
F (r5R pore )5 zw 5 zp 5 264.1 mV; pH 8.0; and T5208C.
100 A).
In Fig. 17, the ratio of the effective pore diffusion
coefficient, Dp , of lysozyme to the product of the
particle porosity, p , with the free molecular diffusion coefficient, Dmf , of lysozyme is plotted versus
the tortuosity factor, t, for different values of the
mean pore radius, R pore . The effective pore diffusion
coefficient, Dp , of lysozyme was estimated
[12,13,47] from the expression:
210
Table 1
Values of the average velocity, kvx l (Eq. (40)), in cylindrical capillaries of varying mean pore radii, R pore , for the case where the value of the
zeta potential, zp , at the wall of the pores is kept constant and equal to 264.1 mV and for the case where the fixed charge density, d, at the
wall of the pores is kept constant and equal to 27004.94 esu / cm 2 a
Mean pore
radius,
R pore
(A)
R pore /l
30
50
75
100
2.02
3.36
5.04
6.72
kvx l
(mm / s)
kvx l
(mm / s)
1.217
1.791
2.203
2.441
1.423
1.936
2.308
2.522
sp Dmfd b
Dp 5 ]]]
t
(41)
td
Pe int rap 5 ]
tc
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
211
4. Conclusions
A mathematical model has been constructed and
solved to describe quantitatively the profiles of the
electrostatic potential, pressure, and velocity of the
electroosmotic flow (EOF) in charged cylindrical
capillaries and in capillary columns packed with
charged particles. The results obtained from model
simulations have (i) provided significant physical
insight and understanding with regard to the velocity
profile of the EOF in capillary columns packed with
porous charged particles which represent systems
employed in capillary electrochromatography (CEC),
(ii) provided the physical explanation for the experimental results which indicate that the average
velocity of the EOF in capillary columns packed
with porous particles is a very weak function (it is
almost independent) of the diameter of the particles,
and (iii) indicated that the intraparticle velocity, vp,i ,
212
5. Nomenclature
C1
C2
C1`
C2`
C`
CEC
Dmf
Dp
dp
Ex
e
EOF
F drag
F vis
I0
ix
k
L
No
n T,ic
n T,p
P
P0
Pe int
rap
R
R ic
R pore
rp
T
tc
td
v
vp,i
vr
vx
kvx l
vx,max
vx p,c,w5p
kvx p,c l wp
vx p,un
kvx p,un l
vu
x
z1
z2
z
213
Greek letters
a1
effective molecular radius of solute (m)
b
hindrance parameter that accounts for
steric effects and hindered diffusion,
dimensionless
G (x)
applied electric potential (Eq. (6)) (V)
g
dimensionless packing parameter (Eq.
(28))
d
fixed charge density on the wall of a
charged cylindrical capillary or pore (C /
m2 )
214
Subscripts
x
denotes the direction along the axis of
the capillary column
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Professor K.K. Unger
Anorganische
and Dr S. Ludtke
of the Institut fur
Chemie und Analytische Chemie of Johannes Guten Mainz, Germany, for helpful disberg-Universitat,
cussions and for the experimental measurements
which appear in Figs. 11 and 12. Furthermore, we
References
[1] C.L. Rice, R. Whitehead, J. Phys. Chem. 69 (1965) 4017.
[2] V. Pretorius, B.J. Hopkins, J.D. Schieke, J. Chromatogr. 99
(1974) 23.
[3] W.-H. Koh, J.L. Anderson, AIChE J. 21 (1975) 1176.
[4] S. Levine, J.R. Marriott, K. Robinson, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday
Trans. II 71 (1975) 1.
[5] J.H. Knox, I.H. Grant, Chromatographia 24 (1987) 135.
[6] S.S. Dukhin, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 35 (1991) 173.
[7] M.M. Dittmann, G.P. Rozing, G. Ross, T. Adam, K.K.
Unger, J. Cap. Elec. 4 (1997) 201.
[8] S. Ludtke,
T. Adam, K.K. Unger, J. Chromatogr. A 786
(1997) 229.
[9] A.S. Rathore, Cs. Horvath, J. Chromatogr. A 781 (1997)
185.
[10] J.H. Knox, H.P. Scott, J. Chromatogr. 316 (1984) 311.
[11] F.A.L. Dullien, Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore
Structure, 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York, 1992.
[12] J.J. Meyers, A.I. Liapis, J. Chromatogr. A 827 (1998) 197.
[13] J.J. Meyers, A.I. Liapis, J. Chromatogr. A 852 (1999) 3.
[14] A.I. Liapis, Math. Model. Sci. Comput. 1 (1993) 397.
[15] A.I. Liapis, Y. Xu, O.K. Crosser, A. Tongta, J. Chromatogr.
A 702 (1995) 45.
[16] G.A. Heeter, A.I. Liapis, J. Chromatogr. A 711 (1995) 3.
Anorganische
[36] S. Ludtke,
Ph.D. Dissertation, Institut fur
Chemie und Analytische Chemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Uni Mainz, Germany (1999).
versitat,
[37] J.H. Petropoulos, A.I. Liapis, N.P. Kolliopoulos, J.K. Petrou,
N.K. Kanellopoulos, Bioseparation 1 (1990) 69.
[38] G.A. Heeter, A.I. Liapis, J. Chromatogr. A 734 (1996) 105.
J. Thommes,
[39] A. Ljunglof,
J. Chromatogr. A 813 (1998) 387.
P. Bergvall, R. Bhikhabhai, R. Hjorth, J.
[40] A. Ljunglof,
Chromatogr. A 844 (1999) 129.
[41] P.-E. Gustavsson, A. Axelsson, P.-O. Larsson, J. Chromatogr.
A 795 (1998) 199.
[42] L. Lloyd, F.P. Warner, J. Chromatogr. 512 (1990) 365.
[43] N.B. Afeyan, S.P. Fulton, N.F. Gordon, I. Mazsaroff, L.
Varady, F. Regnier, Bio / Technology 8 (1990) 203.
[44] N.B. Afeyan, N.F. Gordon, I. Mazsaroff, L. Varady, S.P.
Fulton, Y.B. Yang, F. Regnier, J. Chromatogr. 519 (1990) 1.
[45] A.I. Liapis, M.A. McCoy, J. Chromatogr. 599 (1992) 87.
[46] K.-C. Loh, D.I.C. Wang, J. Chromatogr. A 718 (1995) 239.
[47] D.D. Frey, E. Schweinheim, Cs. Horvath, Biotechnol. Prog. 9
(1993) 273.
215