Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 of 24
Title: Concept paper on reporting and compliance checking for the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC)
Version no.: Final
Date: 30 November 2009
History : A concept paper on reporting is s the first step in developing reporting (and/or making
information available) on floods. The document has been subject to several rounds of consultation with
WG F on Floods, including Member States and stakeholders experts. Water Directors gave final
endorsement of this concept paper on 30.11.2009.
Disclaimer : This technical document has been developed through a collaborative programme involving
the European Commission, all the Member States, the Accession Countries, Norway and other
stakeholders and Non-Governmental organisations. The document should be regarded as presenting aan
informal consensus position agreed by all parties. However; the document does not necessarily represent
the official, formal position of any of the partners. Hence, the views expressed in the document do not
necessarily represent the views of the European Commission.
Contacts:
Maria Brttemark (DG ENV) (Maria Braettemark@ec.europa.eu), Jorge Rodriguez Romero (DG ENV)
(Jorge.rodriguez-romero@ec.europa.eu),
More information
Workprogramme 2010-2012 of WG F and the Common Implementation strategy, including the mandate of
WG F is available here : http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/flood_risk/index.htm
More information on Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October
2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks is available here :
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/objectives/implementation_en.htm
2 of 24
Table of contents
1.
2.
3.
Introduction .........................................................................................4
The reporting obligations of the Floods Directive ...........................6
The need for information on flooding at the European level...........8
3.1
The European Commission ...............................................................8
3.1.1
Background ................................................................................8
3.1.2
Compliance checking .................................................................8
3.1.3
Informing and encouraging active participation of the public ......9
3.1.4
Agreement on what shall be reported, why, how and how the
information will be used. .........................................................................10
3.2
Other users needs for information ...................................................10
3.2.1
JRC ..........................................................................................10
3.2.2
EEA ..........................................................................................11
3.2.3
Civil protection ..........................................................................11
3.2.4
DG Regio..................................................................................11
4.
The Water Information system for Europe......................................12
4.1
Background .....................................................................................12
4.2
Reporting using WISE .....................................................................12
5.
Visualisation of reported information .............................................15
5.1
Introduction......................................................................................15
5.2
Visualisation ....................................................................................16
5.3
Visualisation in WISE - example from WFD.....................................18
5.4
Possible visualisation of Floods Directive information .....................19
5.4.1
Map of RBDs and UoMs...........................................................19
5.4.2
Significant floods in the past.....................................................19
5.4.3
Potential flood risk receptors ....................................................20
5.4.4
Potential significant flood risk areas .........................................20
5.4.5
Flood hazard maps and flood risk maps...................................20
5.4.6
Flood Risk Management Plans.................................................21
6.
Road map to reporting of the Floods Directive ..............................22
Annex A: List of proposed Reporting Sheets...........................................23
Annex B: Thematic spatial satasets covered by the INSPIRE Directive 24
3 of 24
1.
Introduction
4 of 24
Look Out!: Key principles for reporting for the Floods Directive
1. Information and data reported for the Floods Directive should
include that:
which is explicitly required by the Floods Directive; , and
other information that:
would add significant value for the public, the European
Commission and other users; or
required by the Commission to meet its duty of checking;
compliance of the Directive within the EU.
where such information can be produced and provided by the
Member States without significant additional cost or effort beyond
that necessary for implementation of the Directive.
2. Geographic information provided should be compliant with the
requirements of the INSPIRE Directive.
3. An appropriate balance should be sought between information
displayed and visualised at the European level through WISE and at
a national level through national systems, avoiding where possible
and in particular, the duplication of reporting at the two levels, and the
need to prepare or significantly reformat work already undertaken for
the sole purposes of reporting.
4. Flooding is defined in the FD as the temporary covering by water
of land not normally covered by water. The visualisation of flood
related information at the European level must therefore consider
both the potentially impacted land related features (e.g. human
dwellings) as well as the source of the flooding e.g. water courses,
coastal waters and lakes.
5 of 24
2.
The reporting obligations under the Floods Directive are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1
Subject
Main
Article
Transposition
Competent authorities
and Units of
Management if
different from WFD
Preliminary flood risk
assessment (PFRA)
17
3.2
(Annex 1
WFD)
4
Other
Articles
Respon
sibility
To
Report due
date
Frequency/
Review
MS
MS
COM
COM
By 26/11/09
26/05/10
3 months after
any changes
13.1.a
and b
MS
COM
22/03/12
13.2
MS
COM
22/03/14
7
Annex
13.3
MS
COM
22/03/16
13
MS
COM
22/12/2010
22/12/18, every
6 years
thereafter
22/12/19, every
6 years
thereafter
22/12/21, every
6 years
thereafter
na
16
COM
EP,
C
22/12/18
Every 6 years
thereafter
Notes:
C - Council
COM Commission
EP European Parliament
MS Member States
Therefore, there are five key reporting/notification milestones from Member States to
the Commission:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6 of 24
Even though it is proposed not to have a reporting sheet for Article 13, there will be
the same need to assess compliance and transparency of Member States (MS)
existing tools and methods. To identify which Member States plan to a make use of
the provisions of article 13, the Commission may write to MS after date (22.12.2010)
by which the output of the relevant implementation steps (assessments, maps, plans)
requesting evidence that the equivalent methods and tools are already in existence.
The relevant information would then have to be made available as soon as possible.
There would be a need for transparency and information on the status of the tools for
each of the steps required for the FD. The reporting sheets for the other relevant
Articles of the FD will, therefore, be looked at to see in particular what should be
reported for the purposes of Article 13. It should however be noted that criteria for
equivalence in Article 13 means to a large extent the same type of information as
required for flood hazard maps and flood risk maps (Article 6) and for flood risk
management plans (Article 7) would be needed. The reporting formats for Articles 13
should, therefore as far as possible, be the same for reporting under Article 6 and 7,
to enable the assessment of equivalence that will be considered on a case by case
basis treating all Member States on an equal basis. Further technical issues in
relation to the reporting of existing outputs of the relevant implementation steps
(assessments, maps, plans) will be considered in each reporting sheet and in
subsequent reporting format and reporting scheme documents.
Technical formats for the purpose of processing and transmission of data including
statistical and cartographic data to the Commission may be adopted (under Article
11) at least two years before the completion deadlines given in the relevant Article
deadlines, should this format be chosen. Hence the deadline for technical formats for
the PFRA is 22.12.2009, the hazard and risk maps, 22.12.2011 and the FRMP by
22.12.2013. These deadlines should be aimed at, also if the general approach as
developed for other water legislation is agreed, whereby reporting sheets informally
agreed by Water Directors and subsequent development of technical reporting
formats are chosen.
Article 9 of the FD requires coordination of the application of the FD with the WFD
focusing on opportunities for improving efficiency, information exchange and for
achieving common synergies and benefits having regard to the environmental
objectives laid down by the WFD. In particular the information contained in the flood
risk and flood hazards should be consistent with that presented in the WFD. The
maps and the flood risk management plans should also be coordinated with, and
may be integrated into the reviews of WFD pressures and impacts analysis and River
Basin Management Plans (RBMPs), respectively. The reporting and dissemination of
FD information to/from WISE will provide another opportunity for ensuring this
information exchange and synergies between the Directives.
The FD includes several information sharing and coordination requirement in such
international RBD.
In addition MSs have to, in accordance with Community legislation, make available
the PFRA, flood hazard and risk maps and the FRMP to the public (Article 10).
7 of 24
3.
The Commission also seeks information on the state of the environment and trends
including on flooding (usually in cooperation with EEA), and on implementation of
measures and objectives set to allow it to determine whether existing policies are
adequately protecting the environment and European citizens and could play a role in
relation to assessment on whether funds are adequately distributed. It also requires
certain information at European level to create a European-wide picture to inform the
public.
Article 16 of the FD specifically requires the Commission to report to the European
Parliament and Council on the implementation of the Directive by 2018 and every 6
years thereafter.
In terms of the FD reporting includes making available to the Commission (as well as
to the public), (e.g. PFRA, maps and plans) required by the FD as listed in Table 1.
In addition, in order to allow the Commission to fulfil its tasks of compliance checking,
a set of information related to details of the information, data, methods and
assessments used to produce the outputs as agreed with the MSs will be reported in
a standardised format through WISE. This will be used for the first steps in
compliance checking and it also has to cover the other purposes of WISE: providing
information at EU level and in particular on international RBDs.
To meet the Commissions needs, data must be reported (or made available) in a
clear and consistent way by all Member States. The information can be aggregated
and supplied at a higher aggregation level than may be required at, for example
Member State level. However, the Commission may need access to more detailed
information (e.g. by providing hyperlinks to more detailed documents or by requesting
more specific information or data) in cases where comprehension (e.g. of how a
result has been achieved) or compliance (e.g. with specific issues) is not clear.
Figure 1
Three main questions currently relate to the reported WFD data and information:
Are the reports complete (provision of mandatory fields) and clear (values in
code lists correct and numeric/character values in correct minimum/maximum
ranges)?
Are the reports understandable (sense check)?
Are the reports compliant
o with regard to key issues (conformity checking) involving for some
issues the use of appropriate indicators?
o after in-depth assessment?
There are two parts to conformity checking: checking methodologies and checking
data or results.
A similar procedure is envisaged for the FD.
3.1.3
Obligations on public availability of information arise from Article 10 of the FD. The
main tools/outputs to be made available to the public are:
9 of 24
In addition, Articles 9 and 10 also require that Member States undertake a public
participation campaign in the process of preparing the flood risk management plans,
and as appropriate, in coordination with the WFD. Ensuring transparency of key
information in WISE will facilitate this process, not the least in an international river
basin/unit of managements.
3.1.4 Agreement on what shall be reported, why, how and how the
information will be used.
The proposed reporting sheets are listed in Annex A of this document. These are to
be developed starting at the beginning of 2009, and shall include more detail on the
information that is needed by the Commission in terms of checking MS compliance
with the FD, and for ensuring a consistent level of information informing the general
public on the hazard and risk of flooding at the European level.
Examples of indicators that could be used for compliance checking, visualisation and
representation of reported information, for example, in the WISE viewer are given in
Section 5. Once agreed and finalised with MS and other users the information would
then be incorporated and specified within Reporting sheets which would be the next
step in establishing the reporting process for the FD (see section 6). Examples of
indicators will be will be further developed in agreement with MS and will be
integrated into reporting sheets.
The reporting sheets will explain why the information is needed and how the
information will be used. Finding the right balance between reporting and visualising
information at the European level and keeping information to be made available in
national databases/flood maps on-line needs to be found. WISE shall be used to
provide a link from the European level to nationally stored information and to provide
certain information at aggregated level.
JRC
The DG Joint Research Centre provides research based policy support to other
Commission DGs. To carry out this support more accurately, the items provided for
the Floods Directive will be very beneficial. For floods, JRC assists DG ENV and DG
REGIO with the following activities:
European Flood Alert System (EFAS): early warning on river floods for
National Authorities and the Commissions Civil Protection
3.2.2 EEA
The European Environment Agency (EEA) is an agency of the European Union. Its
task is to provide sound, independent information on the environment.
Regarding the data management, EEA cooperates with DG ENV in the development
and maintenance of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE). WISE
contains so far the compliance related information under the WFD and the UWWTD,
as well as voluntary SoE information related to these directives and the wider EEA
work (stemming from the Eionet). Other directives including the FD are currently
integrated.
The EEA uses the SoE information in WISE in the context of its mandate to publish
every 5 years reports on state, trends and outlooks of the Environment. To this
purpose EEA collects regularly data via its network, develops indicator and wider
assessments on environmental themes. This includes issues such as mapping the
impacts of natural disasters and technological accidents (including the recurrence of
flood events in Europe), climate change and water adaptation issues including
flooding and climate change impact report which includes indicators on water
quantity, river flows, floods and droughts. Aggregated information on past floods
(frequency, duration, location per RB) and an ongoing record of current floods and its
impacts would facilitate the state and trend analysis in this area.
3.2.4 DG Regio
The Structural Funds, in particular the European Regional Development Fund and
the Cohesion Fund can finance preventive (infrastructure) investments including for
flood protection. The European Regional Development Fund can also contribute to
financing infrastructure-related research and technological development.
The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) also can intervene to finance recovery
operations, depending on the scale of damage which occurred.
Transparent information at the European level on the assessment and management
of floods according to the Directive can be beneficial for the management of such
funds. The flood risk maps will allow DG REGIO to evaluate the MS applications
more accurately and quickly.
11 of 24
4.
4.1 Background
The Water Information System for Europe (WISE) is an umbrella term for a wider
initiative to modernise and streamline the collection and dissemination of information
related to European water policy. The overall objective of this process is the
development of a new, comprehensive, shared European data and information
management system for water, including river basins. The system should be based
on the concept paper and should be fully implemented by 2010. This objective and
the detailed concept paper for WISE was agreed by the EU bodies (DG ENV, JRC,
ESTAT and EEA) leading the WISE process and the (then) EU25 Member States,
Norway, Bulgaria and Romania during the Water Directors meeting in November
2003. The starting point for WISE is reporting for the Water Framework Directive.
WISE is further developed and maintained mainly (with resources) from DG ENV and
EEA.
There are several aspects which illustrate what WISE is (or will be), in particular:
Other directives including the FD are currently integrated. The link to the Eurostat
water reporting is under development.
In summary, depending on the context, WISE can refer to an initiative, a concept, a
process, an information system, a set of rules or tools for reporting, a dataset or
component or something else. More information on WISE construction, development
plans and principles are available in the WISE Concept paper (2003), GIS Guidance
document and the WISE implementation plan (2006).
Directive1. In addition, WISE includes other water-related datasets such as EionetWater developed by EEA for SoE reporting (now known as WISE-SoE), and will
include those datasets arising from relevant water research projects.
As indicated above it is intended that WISE will be the basis for reporting on the
Floods Directive (FD). The practical steps to achieve this include:
the Commissions and other users needs for information including for
compliance checking (a legal obligation on the Commission) (section 3);
leading to the production of reporting sheets with the exact contents of the
reports that will be agreed with Water Directors (section 6 and Annex);
Data definition/
requirements
Submission
Delivery database
Acceptance
Production
databases
EU Databases
(Spatial) reference datasets
WISE viewer,
GIS visualisation
Version of 04/09/08
Compliance-check
databases DG ENV
Legal, political,
Assessment, compliance
Analytical databases
JRC, EEA
Step 6:
Purposeoriented
databases
Analysis/Scenarios
The development of WISE is being carried out in two main stages (Figure 3). At first
the output side (in particular the WISE public viewer) was set up and launched to the
public in March 2007. The more complex and demanding development of the input
side of the system is due to be completed in 2010.
Figure 3
WISE development from now to 2010 focusing first on the streamlining
of output and then on input data flows
WISE Implementation plan : http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/waterframework/transp_rep/pdf/wise_ip_2006_2010.pdf and the 2003 WISE concept paper :
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/transp_rep/pdf/2003_concept_report.pdf This concept latter
was adopted before the Floods Directive was proposed, hence no specific reference to the Directive, but the principle
of streamlining of reporting is stated. Water Directors confirmed that Floods Directive reporting should take place via
WISE in the CIS and WG F work programmes for 2007-2009.
13 of 24
2007
EOINET
water /
SoE
Member
Member
states
states
Member
Member
states
states
Member
Member
states
states
Member
Member
states
states
Report
Net
State of
envment
Bathing
water D
Urban
WWD
2010
Member
Member
states
states
WISE
Public
Viewer
WFD
WISE
Public
WFD,
UWWD
Report
Net:
Push/
Pull
Protocols
EIONET
Water
ESTAT
Other
policies/
users
WISE:
Access
Protocols
OUTPUT
INPUT
Member
Member
states
states
WISE
Expert
WISE
Analysis
In the longer term WISE will be developed and operated as a distributed data
management system. This means data would be stored at different nodes (at
Member State or local level) and information could be shared between all
participating nodes. For the purpose of information sharing and exchange all
participating nodes would have to be interoperable2. Data would be exchangeable
and services would be able to access and process data from different nodes. The
aim is to operate WISE as a distributed system by 2015.
The development of this distributed data management system will be important for
the future reporting under the Floods Directive, not the least as regards enabling
flood maps in the appropriate scale for their purpose to be made available to the
Commission and the public alike.
The INSPIRE Directive (2007/2/EC) entered into force on 15 May 2007 and its
successful implementation will go a long way towards overcoming existing
inefficiencies relating to the use and usability of spatial data stored by public
authorities. The Directive requires the adoption of Implementing Rules covering
such aspects as metadata, data specifications and data and service sharing. The
Implementing Rules have to be adopted between 2008 and 2012 and will come into
force between 2010 and 2019. WISE is the "water pillar" of INSPIRE, and reporting
via WISE will be INSPIRE compliant as the two systems develop in synergy.
It should be noted that the INSPIRE Directive should ensure that spatial data sets
and services are interoperable in accordance with the INSPIRE Implementing Rules.
The relevant spatial data themes are included in Annex B. This will be important
development for in particular future flood mapping in the EU, and shall be fully taken
into account in developing reporting formats for the Floods Directive. The issue of
licensing arrangements for the sharing of spatial data sets and information will also
Interoperability in the ESDI context means that each Member State maintains its own infrastructure, but adopts a
framework that enables existing spatial data sets to be linked from one Member State to another (e.g. via
transformation)
14 of 24
be addressed by INSPIRE: experience with reporting for the WFD has highlighted
this potential problem.
The timetable for full implementation of INSPIRE, with all components expected to be
in place gradually between 2010- 2018, means that full INSPIRE compliance of
Floods Reporting can only be expected by the 2nd cycle. In the 1st cycle a two phased
approach is foreseen, where by in the short term (until 2012) whereby the reporting
formats would be developed according to the current capacity and architecture of
WISE, whereby on the longer term (2013-2018) the technical reporting formats and
visualisation would be developed to be fully INSPIRE compliant. This will in particular
have an impact on reporting of flood hazard and risk maps.
Both the long terms and short term however requires that the content of what is to be
reported is to be determined in the reporting sheets as soon as possible (by end
2010). At the same time it is important for those responsible for implementation and
reporting of the Floods Directive are involved in the development of relevant
components of INSPIRE (Implementing Rules for annex II on natural hazard zones
for instance).
5.
5.1 Introduction
The intention is to disseminate certain aspects of the reported FD data and
information via WISE, and where necessary, appropriate and possible, provide links
to data and information from other sources such as national flood maps which can
provide a higher resolution than WISE which will be more appropriate for flood
mapping purposes (larger scale than 1:250.000).
As Figure 2 illustrates the WISE viewer will provide public or restricted access to the
information reported to or held in WISE. This will be a subset of the whole
information, and the information may need to be pre-processed, for example, in order
to be visualised at different scales, etc.
The concept of the WISE map viewer is to package pre-defined maps and queries
within a web-based interactive interface. The default view of each map is at
European level, typically showing data aggregated to either Member State or River
Basin District. The pre-defined maps and queries present the information submitted
by Member States as a single merged dataset at European level.
As the user zooms in the classified features (e.g. monitoring stations in the WFD
context) are shown and the user can click on them to retrieve further information.
Information is output either through a map pop-up or a table in a separate tab.
Context for the map is provided in a Map explanation tab, giving a short textual
explanation of the definition and background to the map, and a Related links tab. It
is possible to search different features on the map through a search box on different
layers.
For other themes and Directives (e.g. relating to the Water Framework, Urban
Wastewater Treatment or Bathing Water Directives, WISE-SoE, etc) data can be
15 of 24
aggregated to either the Member State or River Basin District levels, adding value to
this comparable European view. Experts for the respective field are responsible for
ensuring the data displayed in the WISE map viewer has been through a quality
checking procedure.
Adding a flood theme with relevant layers will enable coordination and information
exchange within the principle of integrated river basin management plans, for
instance by visualising protected drinking water abstraction areas at risk from
flooding.
This section gives a brief overview and list of the maps, figures and tables that could
in the future be included in the WISE-viewer.
5.2 Visualisation
The focus on visualising information reported on implementation status and
compliance of directives will be on European overviews and individual country/RBD
representations (using maps). This will be accompanied by the use of derived and
detailed indicators of key aspects and issues associated with implementing water
directives.
WISE Reference GIS datasets provide the basis against which comparable statistics
and indicators are calculated. WISE Reference GIS datasets are based on nationally
reported data from the Member States for use at different scales. Features at
European, national and regional levels are linked through vertical integration using
coding. The WISE Reference GIS datasets include, for example, main rivers
(catchment area >500 km2), main lakes (surface area >100 km2) and water bodies
including all transitional and coastal water bodies.
Visualising flooding information at a European level presents a number of significant
technical challenges. The final inclusion of visualisation proposals in the WISE
viewer will depend on some of the following factors:
codes and scale) and represents the same level of risk across all European
countries. This would require harmonisation of national methods and datasets
between MS, or at least generalisation of datasets before making them available for
presentation at the European level. In other words, interoperability would be required.
This is currently not possible as there are many differences in national flood related
methods and outputs (e.g. maps) which MS are likely to continue to use, however
with common metadata rules technical solutions to the issues addressed here are
easier to find.
However, harmonised spatial datasets as required by INSPIRE may be able
contribute to interoperability and the reporting and dissemination of more comparable
information at the European level in the longer term. This would mainly be resolved
at the river basin district level. National maps will be published in national languages
and to overcome such linguistic differences, multilingual translations of mapping
legends, a multilingual thesaurus/glossary etc could be developed and made
available in WISE.
17 of 24
Figure 4
Figure 5
Summary statistics at the River Basin District level of water bodies not
at risk, possibly at risk and at risk of failing WFD environmental
objectives
18 of 24
20 of 24
The Commission will wish to check that the requirements laid down in the FD have
been complied with in the production of these maps, and in particular that
international transboundary flood risk issues have been dealt with appropriately. In
addition a comparison of the level of hazard being assessed will be made between
MSs RBDs and UoMs to highlight best practice and areas of potential shortcomings
in terms of safeguarding European citizens.
Reporting sheets for the flood hazard and flood risk maps will be developed at a later
stage in the process of developing reporting for the FD.
21 of 24
6.
A. This concept document represents the first step in the process of developing
reporting for the Floods Directive. It was discussed at the October 2008 meeting of
Working Group F on Floods, and also with the WFD CIS Working Group D on
Reporting and the WISE Steering Group. The latter comprises representatives of the
Commission, EEA, JRC and Eurostat. It is expected that the concept report will be
largely finalised and agreed after a round of comment and revision by the first half of
2009.
B. The next step in the process will be the development and agreement of
Reporting sheets that will describe in detail the information required. This approach
has successfully been used for reporting under the WFD. There will be a separate
sheet for each main element of the required information such as on Competent
Authorities, Units of Management and PFRAs. Each sheet contains an explanation of
why the information is needed, how the Commission will use it and details of the
geographic information, data and textual information required. An example, the
Competent Authority Reporting sheet for the WFD is available in the "Updated
reporting guidance 2004-2005" available on CIRCA (see reporting sheets CA1 and
RBD1)
A drafting group was set up at the WG F meeting in October 2008 with the task of
developing reporting sheets starting with sheets for Competent Authorities (CA),
Units of Management (UoM) (other than WFD RBDs) and components of the
Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment. It is anticipated that drafting of the first
Reporting sheets will start during the early part of 2009 and be completed and
approved by Water Directors by end of 2009.
C. Once Reporting sheets have been finalised and agreed the next step will be the
development of appropriate tools for the first reporting/notification steps for the
CA, UoM and PFRA. For the WFD this has been facilitated by the use of XML
reporting schemas and EEA Reportnet tools. GIS information has been reported as
GML or shape files. Such tools may be developed and used for FD reporting with the
aim of completion during the latter part of 2009, and testing during 2010.
D. During 2010 it is proposed that all Reporting sheets for remaining reporting
requirements will be completed. Reporting formats for remaining sheets (flood
hazard and flood risk maps and FRMP) will be developed and tested during 2010
and 2011.
E. A work plan for the consideration of Floods Directive relevant items in the
implementation of INSPIRE will be developed.
F. A workplan for development of relevant complements to Member States reporting
into WISE, such as the creation of a database on past floods will be developed for
action at Community level.
22 of 24
Annex A :
A. CA (Competent Authorities)
B. UOM (Units of management)
C. PFRA (Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment)
D. FHM (Flood Hazard and Flood Risk Maps)
E. FRMP (Flood risk management plans)
23 of 24
Annex II
1. Elevation: Digital elevation models for land, ice and ocean surface. Includes terrestrial
elevation, bathymetry and shoreline.
2. Land cover: Physical and biological cover of the earth's surface including artificial
surfaces, agricultural areas, forests, (semi-)natural areas, wetlands, water bodies.
3. Orthoimagery: Geo-referenced image data of the Earth's surface, from either satellite or
airborne sensors.
4. Geology: Geology characterised according to composition and structure. Includes
bedrock, aquifers and geomorphology
Annex III
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Statistical units
Buildings
Soil
Land use
Human health and safety
Utility and governmental services includes utility facilities such as sewage, waste
management, energy supply and water supply, administrative and social governmental
services such as public administrations, civil protection sites, schools and hospitals.
7. Environmental monitoring facilities
8. Production and industrial facilities
9. Agricultural and aquaculture facilities
10. Population distribution demography
11. Area management/restriction/regulation zones and reporting units
12. Natural risk zones: Vulnerable areas characterised according to natural hazards (all
atmospheric, hydrologic, seismic, volcanic and wildfire phenomena that, because of their
location, severity, and frequency, have the potential to seriously affect society), e.g.
floods, landslides and subsidence, avalanches, forest fires, earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions.
13. Atmospheric conditions
14. Meteorological geographical features
15. Oceanographic geographical features
16. Sea regions
17. Bio-geographical regions
18. Habitats and biotopes
19. Species distribution
20. Energy resources
21. Mineral resources
24 of 24