Environmental sustainability- meeting the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs: Encompasses keeping populations densities below the carrying capacity of a region Facilitating the renewal of renewable resources Conserving and establishing priorities for the use of non-renewable resources, conserving and establishing priorities for the use of nonrenewable resources Keeping environmental impact below the level required to allow affected systems to recover and continue to evolve How concept could be applied to an individual person: Low-carbon bus Electric cars Bike-hire schemes Public transport improvements Better insulated homes Brownfield as opposed to greenfield development Planting more trees Tourism, agriculture and forestry Each sector has its own impact on the environment which can be modified by careful management Describe the scenarios shown in Figure 1a and 1b Business as usual scenario and ecological debt o The ecological debt will steadily increase (y=x) with no biocapacity reserve o Limited efforts are made in terms of environmental sustainability and the problem gets steadily worse o Human populations in the most marginal areas will be affected first but gradually environmental problems will encompass more and more regions and their populations Return to sustainability o With environmental sustainability at the forefront of policymaking o Graph shows ecological debt being gradually reduced until once again the planet has a biocapacity reserve and it is living within its means o Requires political will by governments on national and international basis o Demands limits on the actions of individuals and organizations whose behavior damages the environment for personal and organizational gain o Sustainability need not require a reduction in the quality of life, does not require a change in attitudes and values toward less consumptive lifestyles o Maintaining social capital including that devoted to health, education, housing and the rule of law
Environmental Sustainability Index
Benchmark the ability of nations to protect the environment over the next several decades Integrates 76 data sets into 21 indicators of environmental sustainability : o Tracking natural resource endowments, past and present pollution levels, environmental management efforts and the capacity of a society to improve its environmental performance o 5 broad categories o Environmental systems o Reducing environmental stresses o Reducing human vulnerability to environmental stresses o Societal and institutional capacity to respond to environmental challenges o Global stewardship Higher the ESI score, the better the situation with regard to environmental sustainability But the ESI does not include a number of important measures because of a lack of comprehensive data at present They do not consider waste management, wetlands destruction and exposure to heavy metals Difference in ESI: The HICs tend to have a higher ESI score compared to LICs. Countries such as Brazil, Canada, Australia and Finland have rather high ESI score (Finland ESI of 75.1) LICs have rather low ESI scores of around 29.2 such as North Korea Countries in Africa are in the middle quartile with Gabon with 61.7 The Role of National Parks and other protected areas: To preserve the unspoilt natural condition of habitats Analysis of Figure 3 Development and environmental sustainability: