Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter
Quality
26
27
Employee Involvement
q A key element of Total Quality Management
1. Cultural change
a. Top management must motivate cultural change.
b. Everyone is expected to contribute.
c. External customers buy the product or service.
d. Internal customers are employees in the firm who rely on output of other
employees.
An assembly line is a chain of internal customer-supplier relationships, with an
external customer purchasing the finished goods.
[Mention Kawaski, Photo 5.2]
2. Teams
a. Differ from more typical working group
q Common commitment to overarching purpose.
q Shared leadership roles.
q Performance judged by collective efforts.
q Open-ended discussion is valued in meetings.
q Team members do real work together rather than delegate.
b. Managements role in successful teams
q Assign meaningful projects.
q Create positive environment for meetings.
q Team members should create clear rules.
q Set some immediate performance-oriented tasks and goals for early successes.
q Consult people outside the team for ideas, inspiration.
q Team members should spend lots of time together.
q Have ways other than direct compensation to give the team positive
reinforcement.
c. Three approaches to teamwork
q Problem-solving teams (quality circles)
q Special-purpose teams
q Self-managing teams, the highest level of worker participation
28
2.
Continuous Improvement
q Based on the Japanese concept, kaizen
q The philosophy of continually seeking ways to improve operations.
q Not unique to quality. Applies to process improvement as well.
1. Getting started with continuous improvement
a. SPC training
b. Make SPC a normal aspect of daily operations.
c. Build work teams and employee involvement.
d. Utilize problem-solving techniques within the work teams.
e. Develop operator process ownership.
2. Problem-solving process: The Deming Wheel
a. Planselect a process needing improvement, document process, analyze data, set
improvement goals, discuss alternatives, assess benefits and costs, develop a plan
and improvement measures.
b. Doimplement plan, monitor improvements.
c. Checkanalyze data to evaluate effectiveness of the plan.
d. Actdocument and disseminate improved process as a standard procedure.
E. Improving Quality Through TQM [Mention The TQM Wheel. Emphasize its cyclical
nature, i.e., it never ends]
1. Purchasing considerations
a. Buyer must emphasize quality, delivery, and price.
b. Work with the supplier to obtain defect-free parts.
c. Specifications must be clear and realistic.
d. Allow time to identify qualified suppliers.
e. Improve communication between purchasing, engineering, quality control, and
other departments
2. Product and service design
a. Design changes can increase defect rates.
b. Stable designs reduce quality problems.
c. Stable designs may become obsolete in the marketplace
Use Application 5.1: Reliability Analysis (AP 5.1) for a reliability example. The short
answers are 74.48% for the old car and 68.52% for the new car.
3. Process design [Mention First National Bank of Chicago.]
a. New equipment can overcome quality problems.
b. Concurrent engineering ensures that production requirements and process
capabilities are synchronized. [Mention Teradyne, Photo 5.2.]
29
30
G. Variation in Outputs
q All sources of variation can be attributed to one of two source categories: common
causes and assignable causes.
1. Common causes
a. Random, or unavoidable sources of variation within a process
b. Characteristics of distributions
q Meanthe average observation
q Spreadthe dispersion of observations around the mean
q Shapewhether the observations are symmetrical or skewed
c. Common cause variation is normally distributed (symmetrical) and stable (the
mean and spread do not change over time).
2. Assignable causes
a. Any cause of variation that can be identified and eliminated.
b. Change in the mean, spread, or shape of a process distribution is a symptom that an
assignable cause of variation has developed.
c. After a process is in statistical control, SPC is used to detect significant
change, indicating the need for corrective action. [Emphasize this point.]
3. Quality measurements
a. Variablesa characteristic measured on a continuous scale
q Advantage: if defective, we know by how muchthe direction and magnitude
of corrections are indicated.
q Disadvantage: precise measurements are required.
b. Attributesa characteristic counted in discrete units, (yes-no, integer number)
q Used to determine conformance to complex specifications, or when measuring
variables is too costly
q Advantages:
Quickly reveals when quality has changed, provides an integer number of
how many are defective
Requires less effort and fewer resources than measuring variables
q Disadvantages:
Doesnt show by how much they were defective, the direction and
magnitude of corrections are not indicated
Requires more observations, as each observation provides little information
31
4. Sampling
a. Complete inspection
q Used when
Costs of failure are high relative to costs of inspection
Inspection is automated
b. Sampling plans
q Used when
Inspection costs are high
Inspection destroys the product
q Some defectives lots may be purchased and some good lots may be rejected
when
The sample does not perfectly represent the population
Testing methods are imperfect
q Sampling plans include
Sample size, n random observations
Time between successive samples
Decision rules that determine when action should be taken
c. Sampling distributions
q Sample means are usually dispersed about the population mean according to
the normal probability distribution (reference the central limit theorem
described in statistics texts). [It is important to distinguish between the
distribution of sample means and the process distribution itself.]
5. Control charts
a. Used to judge whether action is required
b. A sample characteristic measured above the upper control limit (UCL) or
below the lower control limit (LCL) indicates that an assignable cause
probably exists. [Be sure that the student understands that the UCL
and LCL are not product or service specifications.]
c. Steps for using a control chart:
q Take a random sample, measure the quality characteristic, and calculate a
variable of attribute measure.
q Plot the statistic; if it falls outside the control limits, look for assignable causes.
q Eliminate the cause if it degrades quality. Incorporate the cause if it improves
quality. Recalculate the control chart.
q Periodically repeat the procedure.
d. Indicators of out of control conditions
q A trend in the observations (the process is drifting)
q A sudden or step change in the observations
q A run of five or more observations on the same side of the mean (If we flip a
coin and get heads five times in a row, we become suspicious of the coin or
of the coin flipping process.)
q Several observations near the control limits (Normally only 1 in 20
observations are more than 2 standard deviations from the mean.)
32
where
Or we could use Table 5.1 to find A2, which when multiplied by the
previously determined R, places UCL and LCL three standard deviations
above and below the mean.
UCLx x A2 R
LCLx x A2 R
33
p1 p
n
34
where
c c
Plot the number of defectives on a chart. If it is outside the range between the
upper and lower control limits, search for the assignable cause. If cause is
found, do not use these data to determine the control limits.
c. The Poisson distribution mean and standard deviation are both described using the
same number, c . The mean equals c , and the standard deviation equals c .
d. We set upper and lower control limits in a manner similar to p-charts.
e. Use Application 5.4: c-Chart for Attributes (AP 5.4) for an example of a cchart.
q
I. Process Capability
q Control limits are based on the mean and variability of the sampling
distribution, not the design specifications. [This is an important point that is
difficult for the students.]
1. Defining process capability
A process is capable when
q The specified tolerance width is greater than range of actual process outputs
and
q The process is centered near the nominal or target value
a. Process capability ratio
q Compares the tolerance width (upper spec lower spec) to the range of actual
process outputs. The portion of a distribution within 3 of the mean will
include the vast majority (99.74%) of the actual process outputs.
q The process is capable when the ratio
Cp
q
Upperspecification Lowerspecification
1.00
6
Process capability ratios greater than one (say 1.33) allow for some shift in the
process distribution before bad output is generated.
35
L
x Lower specification Upper specification x O
,
M
P
3
3
M
P
N
Q
If the process capability index is less than one, the process center is too close to
one of the specification limits and will generate too many defects.
2. Determining the capability of a process using continuous improvement
Step 1. Collect data, calculate mean and standard deviation for the process.
Step 2. Construct the process control charts.
Step 3. Compare the random samples to the control limits. Eliminate the assignable
causes and recalculate the control limits as appropriate until 20 consecutive
random samples fall within the control limits. This indicates that the process is
in statistical control.
Step 4. Calculate the process capability ratio and the process capability index. If the
process is capable, document changes to the process and monitor the output
using control charts. If it is not capable, eliminate the causes of variation and
recalculate the control limits. Return to step 3.
Use Application 5.5: Process Capability Analysis (AP 5.5) to bring together the
concepts of statistical control and process control.
3. Quality engineering
q An approach combining engineering and statistical methods to optimize
product design and manufacturing processes
q Before Taguchi, managers assumed the goal was to produce products falling
anywhere between their design tolerances.
q Quality loss function is optimum (zero) when the products quality measure is
exactly on the target value.
q Continually search for places ways to reduce all variability
q
36
37