Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sunil Kumar
Sumit Kumar
Sukhpreet Singh
- EVENT
Study using Nuclear Emulsion
The glycerin works as plasticizer for preventing nuclear emulsion stack from
breaking. It may be pointed out that about 71% of interactions occur with heavy
emulsion nuclei (AgBr), approximately 25% due to light emulsion nuclei, i.e.
Carbon, Nitrogen & Oxygen (CNO) and only 4% with hydrogen nuclei. However
the cross-section of reactions with heavy, light and hydrogen nuclei depends on the
mass and energy of projectile. It is well known that the nuclei of nuclear emulsion
having average atomic mass <A>=73, mainly consist of CNO group with <A>=14,
the AgBr group <A>=94 and hydrogen <A>=1.
Formation of the latent image
When a charged particle passes through nuclear emulsion with the AgBr crystals
suspended, it loses its energy by electromagnetic interactions. The energy lost by
the charged particle is transferred to the electrons of the atoms. As result of this,
the later goes to an excited state. If the energy transferred to the electron is greater
than the ionization potential of the atom, the electron is free to move from atom
and the atom is said to be ionized. It may be mentioned that the most important
mode of energy loss of a charged particle is the ionization and it depends on the
charge and velocity of the particle. The characteristics of the track depend on the
nature and velocity of charged particle. Higher the velocity of the charged particle,
rarer will be grain formed by it and vice versa. Sometimes it happens that the
electron receives energy, which is quite enough for further ionization and thus
secondary tracks are observed projecting out of the primary track of the particle.
These secondary tracks are termed as -rays. The number of -rays coming out
also depends upon the charge and velocity of the particle. As the particle traverses,
the direction of its track also fluctuates along its length due to statistical
combination of coulomb-scattering.
When a silver halide crystal absorbs light or ionizing radiation, it has the effect of
liberating mobile electrons and electron deficient bromine atoms. Transfer of an
electron from an adjacent bromine ion, which in turn creates an electron
deficiency, can overcome the electron deficiency of the bromine atom. In this way,
a positive hole can move through the crystal lattice. This electron deficiency may
also be known as a positive hole.
It is important for latent image formation that a significant proportion of electrons
and positive holes are trapped separately, otherwise they could recombine and
regenerate halide ions. The silver halide crystal contains free (interstitial) silver
ions, which can move through the lattice. When an interstitial silver ion encounters
a trapped electron, the charges are neutralized and an atom of metallic silver is
formed. The single atom of silver is unstable but, while it exists, it increases the
efficiency of the site as an electron trap. In this way a stable nucleus of four or
more atoms of silver can be built up. The site is then known as a latent image
centre, and that entire crystal may be reduced to metallic silver on development.
Development
Photographic development is the process by which the latent image contained in an
emulsion is made visible by the reduction of silver ions in the silver halide crystal
to metallic silver.
When developing nuclear emulsions, a developer is usually chosen which reduces
those crystals containing a latent image centre completely and leaves those not
containing a centre unchanged. The development time used for processing material
should be sufficient for those crystals with a latent image centre to be reduced
completely, but not so long that unexposed crystals are developed. In practice, a
certain number of crystals will be developed even though they do not contain a
latent image centre. These grains, when developed, constitute what is known as fog
or background.
Developing agents may be divided into two main groups, depending on the source
of silver ions for reduction. In practice, most developers give a combination of the
two sorts of development.
The first group is known as physical developing agents. In physical development,
silver ions are provided from the solution in the form of a soluble complex. These
are deposited on the latent image centre and are reduced to metallic silver. This
produces spherical particles, the precise shape of which is affected by pH.
Chemical developing agents make up the second group and are more usually
chosen when processing nuclear emulsions. However, the choice between a
physical developer and a chemical developer will largely depend on the grain
structure required in the processed image. In chemical development, silver ions are
provided from the silver halide crystal containing the latent image centre. The
action of a chemical developer produces a mass of filaments bearing little
resemblance to the original crystal.
a) Shrinkage:
The fixing stage stops the growth of filaments, and residual Ag and Br and
other chemicals are then washed away, leaving only the gel with the
developed grains. The reduction in mass usually produces also a shrinkage
of the emulsion film (normally in the range 20% to 50%), which can be
compensated if needed by the addition of glycerin.
b) Linear Distortions:
After washing and drying, mechanical tensions on the plastic support or at
the surface may produce linear shifts in the position of grains. Such effects
can produce linear distortion, which is due to constant stress field on the
emulsion medium.
c) Parabolic Distortion:
During all the procedures, if a stress arises at the support surface (bottom),
and no stress is applied externally, the stress field has to decrease from
inside outwards. The simplest approximation is a linear decrease of the
stress, which produces a constant gradient of viscous shear and parabolic
distortion altering the originally straight path of an ionizing particle.
Because of shrinkage and distortion, microtracks detected by human operators or
by automatic systems need to be corrected.
Scanning
The process of searching the position of the events caused by the collision of the
projectile and emulsion nuclei in nuclear emulsion is known as scanning of events.
There are two types of scanning:
i.
ii.
Area scanning
Line scanning
Area scanning is used in the present experiment. In case of area scanning, the full
depth of the pellicle is examined by rolling the fine focus of the control Z of the
microscope. While observing the layers of nuclear emulsion one continuously goes
on looking for the disintegrations present in the field of view and before shifting
the field more than one traverse must be made along the Z-motion. The field of
view is shifted along the X-motion of the microscope only when the whole X-strip
of the pellicle is computed. On computing the X-strip one should switch on to the
next X-strip by giving the displacement in Y-direction equal to or less than one
field of view. Similarly, the whole area of the pellicle is scanned out.
Methods for measurement of track parameters
The commonly used observable properties of a track in emulsions are
I.
II.
III.
IV.
Range
Ionization
Scattering
Multiplicity
Measurement of these quantities can provide information about the mass, charge
and energy of the particle forming track. In this particular experiment, we are
concerned with the range of in nuclear emulsion. So we will discuss only the
method for range measurement.
Measurement of Range
- Event
These secondary particles then undergo electromagnetic and nuclear interactions to
produce yet additional particles in a cascade process. Figure 1 indicates the general
idea. Of particular interest is the fate of the charged pions produced in the cascade.
Some of these will interact via the strong force with air molecule nuclei but others
will spontaneously decay (indicated by the arrow) via the weak force into a muon
plus a neutrino or antineutrino:
+ + +
+
The muon does not interact with matter via the strong force but only through the
weak and electromagnetic forces. It travels a relatively long instance while losing
its kinetic energy and decays by the weak force into an electron plus a neutrino and
antineutrino. We will detect the decays of some of the muons produced in the
cascade. (Our detection efficiency for the neutrinos and antineutrinos is utterly
negligible.)
+ + + +
+ +
The event was first discovered and analyzed by C. F. Powell of Bristol in 1947, for
which accomplishment he was awarded the Nobel Prize. In analyzing the event he
discovered the positive pi-meson which has a mass of approximately 272 electron
masses.
Notice the track of the pi-meson has increasing grain density and increasing
scattering as one proceeds along the track toward the first decay process. This is an
indication of the energy loss of the particle as it proceeds through the emulsion. In
the first decay process the pi-meson decays into a mu-meson and a neutrino. There
is no explicit experimental evidence for the existence of the neutrino here,
however, it must be postulated in order to conserve momentum. Note the sudden
change in grain density at the point of decay; evidently a new charged particle, the
mu-meson, has been formed in the decay process since the grain density suddenly
Fig: Carried by History: Cesar Lattes, Nuclear Emulsions, and the Discovery of the Pi-meson,
Physics in Perspective, ISSN 1422-6944, Volume 16 Number 1
becomes less. The mu-meson has a mass of approximately 210 electron masses.
Notice the increasing grain density and increasing scattering of the track of the mumeson; this is again evidence of the energy loss. At the end of the track of the meson another decay process occurs with the resulting production of a positron.
Notice that the track of the positron is much lighter than the tracks of either of the
two mesons which is an indication of the much smaller mass of the positron.
It has been verified experimentally that the energy of the mu-meson in this event is
characteristic, i.e. 4.1 MeV. When one finds an event like this in an emulsion It Is
very convenient because It makes possible the calibration of the emulsion as to
range energy relationships. The average range of the mu-meson produced in this
reaction is 590 microns in the Ilford G-5 emulsion. The range energy relationship
will vary somewhat for individual plates of the same type, however, 80 that the
occurrence of this event on a plate being scanned makes possible an internal rangeenergy calibration.
This event also gives a cross check on the spin of the pi-meson. From beta-ray
theory, the spin of the neutrino is one-half and the spin of the mu-meson is also
one-half. Then the spin of the pi-meson must be either 0 or 1. Independent
experimental evidence indicates that the spin of the pi-meson is actually 0.
Procedure
1. Calibrate the software (Scopeimage 9.0) to measure the range of muon
correctly (i.e. 1:100m).
2. Locate the pi mu event in the given emulsion plate on the computer screen
with the help of the microscope.
3. Use 10x lens for the better visibility of the event.
4. Keep the event in the center of the field view of microscope.
5. Now measure the range of muon.
6. Find the projection of track in x-y plane (Lp). Divide the whole range into
straight line segments and sum them.
7. Now find the depth of the track (d). Focus the microscope with the help of
the z-adjustment knob, 1st at the start of the straight segment and then at the
end. Find out z.
8. Now calculate the total length of the track.
9. Now see the energy and momentum values from the calibration graph
corresponding to the range of muon, hence find mass of neutrino.
Experimental Data :
Record :
Shrinkage factor of the emulsion plate = 2.5
Least count of the Z-scale = 2.34 m
Mass of = 139.567 MeV
Mass of = 105.559 Mev
Lp
Observation Table
Z1
Z2
d=Z
d*2.34=d'
(x10-6m)
d''=d'*2.5
(x10-6m)
(d'')2
Lp
(x10-6m)
Lp'2
Lp
(x10-6m)
72
70
-2
-4.68
-11.70
1.37E-10
26
6.76E-10
28.51
70
72
4.68
11.70
1.37E-10
124
1.54E-08
124.55
72
74
4.68
11.70
1.37E-10
103
1.06E-08
103.66
74
74
0.00
62
3.84E-09
62.00
74
72
-2
-4.68
-11.70
1.37E-10
86
7.40E-09
86.79
72
74
4.68
11.70
1.37E-10
122
1.49E-08
122.56
74
70
-4
-9.36
-23.40
5.48E-10
96
9.22E-09
98.81
70
70
0.00
11
1.21E-10
11.00
70
70
0.00
25
6.25E-10
25.00
Calibration Graph
Calculations :
Range of meson = 663m
For this range energy obtained from the Callibration graph, T = 6.5 MeV
From the energy conservation law
E = E + E
E = M - ( T + M )
E = 139.567 (6.5 + 105.659)
E = 27.408 Mev
For this range energy obtained from the Callibration graph, P = 66 Mev/c
P = -P
Mass of Neutrino
= 2 2
= (27.408)2 + (65)2
= 3473.8
= 58.3 MeV
References
1. Automatic microscopes for nuclear emulsion readout in highenergy and particle physics, Current Microscopy Contributions to Advances in
Science and Technology (A. Mndez-Vilas, Ed.), C. Bozza, T. Nakano, 2012
2. Measurement of the Lifetime of Muons and Pions, Advanced Laboratory
Experiments, Universitt Siegen, lecture notes by Prof. Dr. I. Fleck, 2009