Professional Documents
Culture Documents
()I)
Copyright Q 1992 Pergamon Press Ltd.
LAINE
30093,
U.S.A.
1991)
Micromeritics,
Abstract-The pore size distribution of activated carbon prepared from coconut shell employing different activation methods was investigated. Physical activation with pure CO? at 8aOC resulted in a
bimodal pore size distribution featuring both the widest macropores and the narrowest micropores
among the samples studied. The introduction of potassium phosphate as a catalyst for the gasification
with CO: led to a decrease in macropore volume and diameter, and to a slight increase in micropore
diameter. Wider micropores and significant mesoporosity resulted when employing chemical activation with phosphoric acid at a lower temperature (500C). Surface area was found to increase with
increasing median micropore diameter between about 7-15 A. Three simple schemes were proposed
depicting the effect of the preparation method on pore size distribution.
1. INTRODUCTION
2. EXPERIMENTAL
601
:.
1
J. LAINEand S. YUNES
602
Figure 1 shows that the isotherms are type I. However, upon examination of the very low pressure
range (P/PO < 0.1) in a semi-log plot (Fig. 2), it
appears that the isotherm shape varies from one sample to another. According to classification referred
to elsewhere[7], they may be assigned to either type
V (Cl and C2) or type III (C3).
Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize data derived from
characterization of the activated carbons.
Real density values (Table 1) suggest that the porosity increases in the order Cl > C2 > C3. This
trend is also followed by the micropore volume (Table 2). However, macropore volume follows an opposite order (Table 3), indicating that real density is
not affected by the macropore, but by the micropore
volume.
As expected, micropore surface areas (Table 2)
are significantly larger than macropore surface area
(Table 3); however, macropore volumes (about 0.61 g/cc) are larger than micropore volumes (about
0.2-0.5 g/cc).
Table 2 shows that the Langmuir plot produces
larger surface areas than the t-plot, and the latter
produces smaller pore volumes than the HorvathKawazoe method. Table 2 also shows that surface
area increases with increasing median micropore
diameter.
tln 1
400
,.
..
I-
+-J-j , , , , , , , , , 1
0.1
0.2
0.3
RELATIVE
Fig. 1. Adsorption
0.4
c3,::
;
__:r,A
::
IO-
10-a
RELATIVE
PRESSURE,
0.5
PRESSURE,
06
0.7
0.8
0.9
(P/PO)
_,
IO-'
(P/P,)
......
..,..,.................
,......... c3
350
....,....
0
300
.........
\
_____----i 250 /_-_---c2
<f
d 2(JrJ
;
:
Cl
6 150
::
4 100
...
400
Cl
c2
c3
2.131
1.987
1.834
603
plot
r-plot
Langmuir plot
Sample
Area (mig)
Area (mz/g)
Median pore
diameter (A)
Cl
C2
c3
750.6
1014.2
1360.4
696.1
959.4
1341.2
0.222
0.312
0.491
0.255
0.359
0.521
7.x
8.h
14.7
Cl
-.
-4
1
i
Total intrusion
volume (ml/g)
Cl
C2
C3
0.990
0.667
0.645
Total macropore
area (mig)
51.0
105.2
138.3
J. LAINE and S.
l.O-
YUNES
Graphite : diPi
3*35B
0.2-
0.6-
0.4-
izi33+
cp:
0.2-
o.o-1.0-
c,
: //.-5T-
10-20;
0.*-
0.2
0.0
1.0
Acknowledgements-The
authors would like to thank Alvaro Calafat and Santiago Simoni for the preparation of
the carbons.
0.8
~FERENCES
0.6
1.
0.4
Properties
0.2
0.0
2.
I ,
too
,,/,,,,,
$0
DIAMETER,
,,,
/,,,,,,
0.1
,/,,,,
0.01
3.
4.
(mIcrometera)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.