You are on page 1of 7

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

Human Resource
Management
ELEVENTH EDITION

1. Explain what is meant by reliability and validity.


2. Explain how you would go about validating a test.
3. Cite and illustrate our testing guidelines.

GARY DESSLER

4. Give examples of some of the ethical and legal


considerations in testing.

Part 2 | Recruitment and Placement

5. List eight tests you could use for employee selection,


and how you would use them.

Chapter 6

6. Explain the key points to remember in conducting


background investigations.

Employee Testing and Selection


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
All rights reserved.

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook


The University of West Alabama

Why Careful Selection is Important

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

62

Avoiding Negligent Hiring Claims


Carefully scrutinize information on employment
applications.

The Importance of
Selecting the Right
Employees

Get written authorization for reference checks, and


check references.
Save all records and information about the applicant.

Organizational
Performance

Costs of
Recruiting and
Hiring

Reject applicants for false statements or conviction


records for offenses related to the job.

Legal
Obligations and
Liability

Balance the applicants privacy rights with others need


to know.
Take immediate disciplinary action if problems arise.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

63

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 61

Basic Testing Concepts

64

Sample Picture Card from Thematic Apperception Test

Reliability
 Consistency of scores obtained by the same person

when retested with identical or equivalent tests.


 Are test results stable over time?

Validity
 Indicates whether a test is measuring what it is

supposed to be measuring.
 Does the test actually measure what it is intended to

measure?

Source: Reprinted by permission of the publishers from Henry A. Murray, THEMATIC


APPERCEPTION TEST, Plate 12F, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1943.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

65

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

66

Types of Validity

How to Validate a Test


Steps in Test Validation

Test
Validity

Criterion
Validity

Content
Validity

Face
Validity

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 62

67

Examples of Web Sites Offering Information


on Tests or Testing Programs

Analyze the Job: predictors and criteria

Choose the Tests: test battery or single test

Administer the Tests: concurrent or predictive validation

Relate Your Test Scores and Criteria: scores versus


actual performance

Cross-Validate and Revalidate: repeat Steps 3 and 4


with a different sample

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 63

68

Expectancy Chart

www.hr-guide.com/data/G371.htm
Provides general information and sources for all types
of employment tests.
http://buros.unl.edu/buros/jsp/search.jsp
Provides technical information on all types of
employment and nonemployment tests.
www.ets.org/testcoll
Provides information on over 20,000 tests.
www.kaplan.com
Information from Kaplan test preparation on how
various admissions tests work.

Note: This expectancy chart shows the


relation between scores made on the
Minnesota Paper Form Board and rated
success of junior draftspersons.

www.assessments.biz
One of many firms offering employment tests.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 61

Example: Those who score between 37


and 44 have a 55% chance of being
rated above average and those scoring
between 57 and 64 have a 97% chance.
69

Testing Program Guidelines

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Test Takers Individual Rights and


Test Security

1. Use tests as supplements.

Under the APAs standard for educational and


psychological tests, test takers have the right:

2. Validate the tests.


3. Monitor your testing/selection program.

 To privacy and information.

4. Keep accurate records.

 To the confidentiality of test results.

5. Use a certified psychologist.

 To informed consent regarding use of these results.

6. Manage test conditions.

 To expect that only people qualified to interpret the

scores will have access to them.

7. Revalidate periodically.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

610

 To expect the test is fair to all.

611

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

612

FIGURE 64

Legal Privacy Issues

Sample Test

Defamation
 Libeling or slandering of employees or former

employees by an employer.

Avoiding Employee Defamation Suits


1. Train supervisors regarding the importance of

employee confidentiality.
2. Adopt a need to know policy.
3. Disclose procedures impacting confidentially of

information to employees.

Source: Courtesy of NYT Permissions.


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

613

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Using Tests at Work

Computerized and Online Testing

Major Types of Tests

Online tests

614

 Telephone prescreening

 Basic skills tests

 Offline computer tests

 Job skills tests

 Virtual inbox tests

 Psychological tests

 Online problemproblem-solving tests

Why Use Testing?

Types of Tests

 Increased work demands = more testing

 Specialized work sample tests

 Screen out bad or dishonest employees

 Numerical ability tests

 Reduce turnover by personality profiling

 Reading comprehension tests


 Clerical comparing and checking tests

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

615

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 65

Types of Tests

616

Type of Question Applicant Might Expect


on a Test of Mechanical Comprehension

What Tests
Measure

Cognitive
(Mental)
Abilities

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Motor and
Physical
Abilities

Personality
and
Interests

Achievement

617

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

618

FIGURE 66

Sample Personality Test Items

The Big Five


Extraversion

Emotional Stability/
Neuroticism

Conscientiousness

Source: Elaine Pulakos, Selection Assessment


Methods, SHRM Foundation, 2005, p. 9.

Reprinted by
permission of Society
for Human Resource
Management via Copyright
Clearance Center.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 67

Openness to
Experience

Agreeableness

619

Example of a Work Sampling Question

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

620

Work Samples and Simulations

Measuring Work
Performance Directly

Work
Samples

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 62

621

Evaluation of Assessment Methods on Four Key Criteria


Costs
(Develop/
Administer)

Management
Assessment
Centers

Video-Based
Situational
Testing

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

622

Background Investigations and


Reference Checks

Applicant
Reactions

Assessment Method

Validity

Adverse Impact

Cognitive ability tests

High

High (against minorities)

Low/low

Job knowledge test

High

High (against minorities)

Low/low

More favorable

Personality tests

Low to
moderate

Low

Low/low

Less favorable

Biographical data
inventories

Moderate

Low to high for different types

High/low

Less favorable

 Reference checks

Integrity tests

Moderate
to high

Low

Low/low

Less favorable

 Background employment checks

Structured interviews

High

Low

High/high

More favorable

 Criminal records

Physical fitness tests

Moderate
to high

High (against females and


older workers)

High/high

More favorable

Situational judgment tests

Moderate

Moderate (against minorities)

High/low

More favorable

Work samples

High

Low

High/high

More favorable

Assessment centers

Moderate
to high

Low to moderate, depending


on exercise

High/high

More favorable

Physical ability tests

Moderate
to high

High (against females and


older workers)

High/high

More favorable

Somewhat favorable

Investigations and Checks

 Driving records
 Credit checks

Why?
 To verify factual information provided by applicants.

Note: There was limited research evidence available on applicant reactions to situational judgment tests and physical ability tests. However,
because these tests tend to appear very relevant to the job, it is likely that applicant reactions to them would be favorable.

 To uncover damaging information.

Source: Elaine Pulakos, Selection Assessment Methods, SHRM Foundation, 2005, p. 17. Reprinted
by permission of Society for Human Resource Management via Copyright Clearance Center.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Miniature
Job Training
and
Evaluation

623

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

624

FIGURE 68
Reference
Checking
Form

Background Investigations and


Reference Checks (contd)
Former Employers

Current Supervisors

Sources of
Information

Commercial Credit
Rating Companies

Written References

Social Networking Sites

Source: Society for Human Resource


Management, 2004. Reproduced with
permission of Society for Human Resource
Management in the Format Textbook via
Copyright Clearance Center.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

625

Limitations on Background Investigations


and Reference Checks

Background
Investigations
and
Reference Checks

626

Making Background Checks More Useful


1. Include on the application form a statement for
applicants to sign explicitly authorizing a
background check.

Legal
Issues:
Defamation

Employer
Guidelines

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

2. Use telephone references if possible.


3. Be persistent in obtaining information.
Legal
Issues:
Privacy

4. Use references provided by the candidate as


a source for other references.
5. Ask openopen-ended questions to elicit more
information from references.

Supervisor
Reluctance

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

627

Using Preemployment Information Services

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 63

628

Collecting Background Information

Suggestions for collecting background information include the following:

Acquisition and Use of Background Information


1

Disclosure to and authorization by applicant/employee


Employer certification to reporting agency

1.

Check all applicable state laws.

2.

Review the impact of federal equal employment laws.

3.

Remember the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.

4.

Do not obtain information that youre not going to use.

5.

Remember that using arrest information will be highly suspect.

6.

Avoid blanket policies (such as we hire no one with a record of workers compensation claims).

7.

Use information that is specific and job related.

8.

Keep information confidential and up to date.

9.

Never authorize an unreasonable investigation.

10. Make sure you always get at least two forms of identification from the applicant.

Providing copies of reports to applicant/employee

11. Always require applicants to fill out a job application.

Notice of adverse action to applicant/employee

13. Particularly for executive candidates, include background checks of such things as involvement
in lawsuits, and of articles about the candidate in local or national newspapers.

12. Compare the application to the rsum (people tend to be more imaginative on their rsums
than on their application forms, where they must certify the information).

14. Separate the tasks of (1) hiring and (2) doing the background check (a recruiter or supervisor
anxious to hire someone may cut corners when investigating the candidates background).

Source: Adapted from Jeffrey M. Hahn, Pre-Employment Services: Employers Beware? Employee Relations Law Journal 17, no. 1
(Summer 1991), pp. 4569; and Shari Caudron, Who Are You Really Hiring?, Workforce, 81, no. 12 (November 2002), pp. 2832.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

629

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

630

The Polygraph and Honesty Testing

Honesty Testing Programs:


What Employers Can Do

Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988

Antitheft Screening Procedure:

 Generally prohibits polygraph examinations by all

private employers unless:

 Ask blunt questions.

The employer has suffered an economic loss or injury.

The employee in question had access to the property.

There is a reasonable prior suspicion.

The employee is told the details of the investigation, as well


as questions to be asked on the polygraph test itself.

 Listen, rather than talk.


 Do a credit check.
 Check all employment and personal references.
 Use paperpaper-and
and--pencil honesty tests and

psychological tests.

 Exceptions:


Private security employees

 Test for drugs.

Employees with access to drugs

 Establish a searchsearch-and
and--seizure policy and conduct

National defense and security (FBI, DOE, and DOJ)

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 69

searches.
631

Handwriting Exhibit Used by Graphologist

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

632

Physical Examination
Reasons for preemployment medical
examinations:
 To verify that the applicant meets the physical

requirements of the position.


 To discover any medical limitations to be taken into

account in placing the applicant.


 To establish a record and baseline of the applicants

health for future insurance or compensation claims.


 To reduce absenteeism and accidents.
 To detect communicable diseases that may be

unknown to the applicant.


Source: Kathryn Sackhein, Handwriting Analysis and the Employee
Selection Process (New York: Quorum Books, 1990), p. 45.
Reproduced with permission of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

633

Substance Abuse Screening

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

634

Substance Abuse Screening (contd)

Types of Screening
Safety:
Impairment vs.
Presence

 Before formal hiring


 After a work accident
 Presence of obvious behavioral symptoms

Americans with
Disabilities Act

 Random or periodic basis


 Transfer or promotion to new position

Drug Free
Workplace Act
of 1988

Types of Tests

Ethical
and Legal
Issues

Recreational
Use vs.
Addiction

Intrusiveness of
Procedures

 Urinalysis
Accuracy of
Tests

 Hair follicle testing

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

635

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

636

FIGURE 610 Procedure in Complying with Immigration Law

Improving Productivity Through HRIS: Comprehensive


Automated Applicant Tracking and Screening Systems

1. Hire only citizens and aliens lawfully authorized to work in the


United States.
2. Advise all new job applicants of your policy.

Benefits of Applicant
Tracking Systems

3. Require all new employees to complete and sign the verification


form (the I-9 form) designated by the Immigration and
Naturalization Service (INS) to certify that they are eligible for
employment.
4. Examine documentation presented by new employees, record
information about the documents on the verification form, and
sign the form.

Knock out
applicants who
do not meet job
requirements

5. Retain the form for three years or for one year past the
employment of the individual, whichever is longer.

Allow employers
to extensively test
and screen
applicants online

6. If requested, present the form for inspection by INS or


Department of Labor officers. No reporting is required.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

637

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 611 Checklist: What to Look for in an Applicant Tracking System (ATS)

Can match
hidden talents
of applicants to
available
openings

638

KEY TERMS

The employer thinking of adopting an ATS should seek one that meets several
minimum functionality requirements. Among other things, the ATS should be:
Easy to use.
Capable of being integrated into the companys existing HRIS platform, so that, for
instance, data on a newly hired candidate can flow seamlessly into the HRIS
payroll system.
Able to capture, track, and report applicant EEO data.
Able to provide employee selection performance metrics reports, including time to
fill, cost to hire, and applicant source statistics.
Able to facilitate scheduling and tracking of candidate interviews, email
communications, and completed forms, including job offers.
Able to provide automated screening and ranking of candidates based upon job
skill profiles.
Able to provide an internal job posting service that supports applications from
current employees and employee referral programs.
Able to cross-post jobs to commercial job boards such as www.monster.com.
Able to integrate the ATS job board with your companys own Web site, for
instance, by linking it to your sites careers section.
Able to provide for requisition creation and signoff approvals.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

639

negligent hiring
reliability
test validity
criterion validity
content validity
expectancy chart
interest inventory
work samples
work sampling technique
management assessment center
situational test
video--based simulation
video
miniature job training and evaluation
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

640

You might also like