Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Promise, of planting nine (9) trees per order, together we could plant 486,000,000
trees, covering 810,001.61 acres, absorbing 12,150,000 tons of greenhouse gases –
every year”
Background
Global warming refers to the increase in the average temperature of the Earth's
near-surface air and oceans in recent decades and its projected continuation. The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes, "most of the observed
increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very
likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas
concentrations"1 via the greenhouse effect. Anthropogenic effects, processes,
objects, or materials are those that are derived from human activities, as opposed
to those occurring in natural environments without human influences. A scientific
consensus holds that man-made carbon dioxide is the primary factor driving climate
change 1'. This means such activities as flying, driving, eating red meat, non-
sustainable forestry practices and pretty much anything that burns gasoline adds
harmful carbon compounds into the atmosphere.Solutions
Either one can slow the rate of increase of greenhouse gasses and/or one can
actually focus on reducing the total amount. Slowing the increase means flying
less, driving less, carpooling, eating less red meat, purchasing products produced
locally, buying energy efficient compact fluorescent bulbs, lowering the
thermostat and purchasing renewable power. Reducing greenhouse gasses means
planting trees in a certain way. There is experimentation with adding iron
particles to the oceans but this approach is not yet scientifically proven to
work.TREE-PLANTING PROGRAMS FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION
Some companies have taken the approach towards funding reforestation as a way of
'going green' by offsetting the carbon they use. The major question businesses
have is: 'What type of reforestation program maximizes carbon sequestration and
overall positive publicity while minimizing potential negative backlash and
cost?'First, companies need to know that it is impossible to generically link the
planting of a tree to 'x' amount of carbon sequestration. As of June, 2007,
forestry science studies in carbon sequestration related to trees simply indicate
the following:
According to the US Forest Service, large diameter, long-lived, leafy trees tend
to be the most beneficial in regards to carbon sequestration. This is why
Atlanta's 9 million-plus (predominantly mature, broad-leafed) trees soak-up 46,345
tons of carbon each year but Calgary, Canada's nearly 12 million trees (many
conifers) only sequester 21,422 tons per year.