Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spring 2006
Rashmi Ramachandran
University of Texas at Dallas
School of Arts & Humanities
Office: 4.118
Phone: 972-883-2018
(Please use this # to contact me only during my office hours.)
Email: rramacha@utd.edu
Course Description
This course focuses on critical thinking by using an integrated approach to writing that
teaches various rhetorical strategies for reading and constructing arguments, both written and
visual. You will learn to read texts critically according to key components in argumentative
discourse (i.e., claims, grounds, explicit and implicit assumptions, fallacies, etc.) and to
recognize the different purposes of argument. You will write and revise three to four papers
based on issues and controversies raised in the various texts read during the semester. The
assignments will give you extensive practice in reading critically and writing according to the
rhetorical conventions of an argumentative essay.
Attendance Policy
Because participation is vital to successful completion of Rhetoric 1302, you should attend
every class. If you must be absent, check with your classmates or with me for any work you
missed that can be made up. Catching up on what you have missed is solely your
responsibility. Much of the work is done collaboratively in class. Alternative assignments
are generally not given, nor can the instructor “re-teach” missed classes for individual
students. If you miss more than three classes, your grade will be negatively affected
and/or you may be encouraged to drop the class.
Chronic tardiness is unacceptable—two tardies will count as one absence—as are coming to
class unprepared, doing work that is not for this course during class, sleeping in class, or
using the computers or other personal electronic devices for personal messaging, research, or
entertainment. Please turn off cellular/mobile phones, pagers, and other personal
electronic devices during class.
All assignments are due on the date noted in the syllabus. If, for some reason, you are unable
to get to class, please make arrangements for your assignment/draft to get to me. I will not,
in any event, accept assignments that are sent to me as attachments by email.
Drop Policy
Office Hours
Please note my regular office hours above. You also can arrange to see me at other times that
are mutually convenient. Office hours belong to you just as much as our class time. Don’t
hesitate to take advantage of my availability and the help I am ready to offer. If you need to
contact me outside of class time or office hours, it is best to communicate with me by email.
Please use the office phone to reach me only during my office hours.
Email Policy
Disability Services
Students needing academic accommodations for a disability must contact the Office of
Disability Services (972-883-2098), to verify the disability and establish eligibility for
accommodations. Students with disabilities are responsible to make their disabilities
known and to meet all course expectations, including attendance, participation,
performance, and work standards.
Grading Policy
This class offers you an approach to learning that may be different from your past
experiences. Because the course is concerned with your development as a critical reader and
writer, the grading strategy will track and monitor that development. Your assignments will
not receive individual grades, but will receive individual attention from your classmates and
me. Your mid-term and final grades will be based on your portfolio of written observations
and your work samples, including collaborative work, three major essays, minor essays, and
your reflective writing. In the final step, you will argue for your grade by summarizing your
learning and estimating the grade that the evidence of your learning supports. In other words,
you will directly apply what you learn in this course, argumentative writing, by arguing for
your own grade. However, each component of the class is vital to a quality body of work:
your attendance, participation, promptness, level of writing, effective arguments, creativity,
collaboration, sound rhetorical skills, competent use of technology—all of these things and
more contribute to an outstanding portfolio.
Your goal is to demonstrate your development toward mastery of five course strands
(rhetoric, research, technology, collaboration, and critical thinking) and development across
five dimensions of learning (confidence and independence, skills and strategies, knowledge
and understanding, use of prior and emerging experience, and reflectiveness). These goals
will be discussed throughout the course.
The following grade criteria describe very general indicators that both you and your
instructor may take into consideration when assessing your work and progress in the
course. Your estimation of your mid-term and final grades should be more detailed and
specific and may include a ‘+’ or ‘–‘ if your work tilts above or below the central grade
for which you argue. But the final interpretation and assessment of your grade remains
the responsibility of your teacher.
C: Represents good (but average) participation in all course activities; all assigned work
completed, with generally good quality overall in course work. Evidence of some
development across the five dimensions of learning and five course strands.
Plagiarism Policy
Plagiarism is the representation of another person’s work as your own, whether you mean to
or not. For example, copying or paraphrasing passages from another writer’s work without
acknowledging that you’ve done so is plagiarism. Allowing another writer to write any part
of your essay is plagiarism. Copying or purchasing a paper from any source is plagiarism.
Plagiarism is a serious offense. The possible consequences range from failing the assignment
to failing the course, or worse. Each incident of plagiarism at UTD must be reported to the
administration. If you are not sure how to properly cite a quoted or paraphrased source, or if
you need help with the format of a citation, check with the New Century Handbook and/or
with your teacher. Although you can (and, in fact, should) seek help and advice from friends,
classmates, tutors, and others, be sure that your written work is your own.
See the Undergraduate Catalog for information about the consequences of Scholastic
Dishonesty, or view the policy here (which is also a link on the Rhetoric Program website):
http://www.utdallas.edu/student/slife/dishonesty.html.
Major Assignments
First Essay: An essay that presents a definition or evaluation argument using the principles
and criteria in Everything’s an Argument (Chapter 9 or 10).
Second Essay: An integrated textual and visual essay that examines and analyzes the
argument of a visual image (or images) using the criteria in Chapter 14 of Everything’s an
Argument.
First draft due: March 13
Final draft due: March 20
Third Essay: An essay that presents a causal or proposal argument using the principles and
criteria in Everything’s an Argument (Chapter11 or 12).
First draft due: April 7
Second draft due: April 14
Final draft due: April 21
Remember: All drafts and final drafts must be turned in to me in hard copy (using
MLA format and citation and including a Works Cited page) on the dates they are due.
Observations
You will write observations at least twice a week, based on a schedule of writing that I hand
out. This will focus your energies on different aspects and types of writing; they will not
involve research of any kind, but will be mostly personal narrative.
Syllabus Itinerary (subject to change; all changes will be handed to you in writing.)
[Assignments are due by the next class period unless noted otherwise]
[Assignments from Everything’s an Argument textbook will be denoted by EA]
Mon 1/9: In-class: Intro to course and Rhetoric program website; discussion of syllabus
Assignments : Read EA Ch 1 and supplemental readings handed out in class
Fri 1/13 In-class: Discussion of EA Chs 2-3 and reading; register for EA companion website
Assignments : Read EA Ch 4 and “Other People’s Secrets” (528) and “Mother-Daughter
Dance (531). Minor essay #1 assigned
Mon 1/16: MLK Day. Holiday.
Wed 1/18: In-class: Discuss EA Ch 4 and readings; Discuss findings from minor essay
#1assignment
Assignments : Read EA Ch 5, “On Covers of Many Magazines, a Full Racial Palette is Still
Rare” (509) and “Pledge for Children” (702)
Fri 1/20: Discuss EA Ch 5 and readings; Final draft of minor Essay #1 due in class.
Assignments : Read EA Chs 6-7 and “If Only We All Spoke Two Languages” (704)
Mon 1/23: In-class: Discuss EA Chs 6-7. Critical reading skills. Study habits self-evaluation
Part 1 & 2 assigned
Assignments : Read EA Ch 8 and “Why Fear National ID Cards?” (556)
Fri 2/3: Library Tour day; First draft of essay #1 due today.
Assignments : Read handout on MLA format and how to cite and create a works cited page;
Read EA Chs 18-20. Chs 18-20 are reference chapters and students are responsible for
understanding and putting into practice the principles therein.
Fri 2/10: In-class: Grammar, format, mechanics, evidence, fallacies, and plagiarism
discussion Teacher conference
Assignments : Continue work on essay # 1
Wed 2/15: In-class: Discussion of EA Ch 15; work in Visual Exercises application in class;
Progress and Grade evaluation assigned
Assignments : Record an observation in your LRO; Research image(s) to use for Visual
Rhetoric Essay #2 and bring some to class
Fri 2/17: In-class: Small group discussions of images and analysis of arguments in images
Assignments : Examine images in United Benetton ads
(http://www.benetton.com/html/whatwesay/campaigns/photogallery.shtml) and
Adbusters.org (http://adbusters.org/home/) website and note various arguments
Wed 2/22: In-class: Small group work on possibilities for visual rhetoric project
Assignments: Record an observation in your LRO; Work on format and media decisions for
visual project
Fri 2/24: In-class: Formulate initial ideas for visual rhetoric project
Assignments : Start sketching main visual project components and argument analysis
Mon 2/27: In-class: Discuss progress and grade evaluations; read student examples of the
same
Assignments : Continue work on visual project
Wed 3/1: In-class: See and discuss other student examples of visual rhetoric projects
Assignments : Complete first draft of Visual argument project due Mon 3/13; bring hard
copy of first draft to class on 3/13
Fri 3/3: In-class: Progress and grade evaluations due. In-class writing
Assignments : Work on revision of visual argument analysis paper
Week 3/6- 3/11; Spring Break
Mon 3/13: In-class: First draft of Visual argument due; peer reviews; Teacher-student
conferences on visual argument essay
Assignments : Complete final draft of Visual argument essay
Mon 3/20: In-class: Final draft of Visual argument due; continued discussion of online
readings
Assignments : Read EA Ch 11 and “$50,000 Offered to Tall, Smart Egg Donor” (649) and
“Hospice, Not Hemlock” (660)
Fri 3/31: In-class: Continued discussion of EA Ch 12 and assigned readings; small group
discussions of paper topics
Assignments : Refine paper topic and begin work on first draft
Mon 4/3: In-class: Thesis statement checkpoint; Teacher conference on paper topics
Assignments : Work on first draft of essay #3 due Friday 4/7
Fri 4/7: In-class: First draft of essay #3 due in class; Peer reviews of first draft of essay #3
Assignments : Continue working on essay #3 using peer feedback
Mon 4/10: In-class: Grammar workshop. Progress and Grade evaluation essays assigned
Assignments : Continue working on essay #3; Read EA Ch 14
Wed 4/12: In-class: Discussion of EA Ch 14; discussion of revision techniques and elevating
style; In-class writing on essay #3
Assignments : Continue work on essay #3
Fri 4/21: In-class: Final draft of essay #3 due in class; student evaluations