Entropy Project Update for Richard Skifton

Utilizing Dr. McIlroys flat plate

data set for Entropy calculations
Integral modeling of flat plate BL
Helping at the MIR lab

Richard at the MIR lab

Example flat plate model with FST and FPG

(from Dr. McIlroys flat plate study, McIlroy and Budwig, 2007)

Integral modeling of flat plate BL (using -

correlations)
Cf vs. x

U1=1.518m/s
U2=4.28m/s
=1.32*10-5m2/s
L 88
L=1.88m
Tripped @ 144mm

0.1

Cf

Cf
CfNoPressureLaminar
CfN P
CfNoPressureTurbTripped
T bT i d

0.01

110

0.5

(meters)

1.5

Integral modeling of flat plate BL (using -

correlations)
Momentum
o e u Thickness
c ess

U1=1.518m/s
U2=4.28m/s
=1.32*10-5m2/s
L 88
L=1.88m
Tripped @ 144mm

610

withPressure

Laminar
Turbulent
Tubulent With Pipe Data

(meteers)

410

210

0.5

(meters)

1.5

Integral modeling of flat plate BL (using -

correlations)
Y+ of 10
Y

U1=1.518m/s
U2=4.28m/s
=1.32*10-5m2/s
L 88
L=1.88m
Tripped @ 144mm

410

yWithPressure
yLaminar
yTurbTripped

(meterrs)

310

210

110

Issue: PIV
spatial
resolution

0.5

(meters)

1.5

Entropy Generation
Calculations
Mean

Equation 8 in Walsh, McEligot,

Brandt, and Schlatter (2011)
2

R
Reynolds
ld St
Stress production
d ti

Normal Stress
production
Energy Flux

Apply
pp y to tripped
pp flat p
plate BL with p
pressure g
gradient, FST, and rough
g
surfaced patch (McIlroy and Budwig, 2007). Utilizing the trapezoidal
method for the numerical integration.

Smooth flat plate with pressure gradient

Exampleofexperimentalmeasurementsat3locations(ydir)
35

30

25

y
y(mm)

20

700
812

15

916

10

~(99%U
(99%Umax)

0
600

650

700

750

800
x(mm)

850

900

950

Entropy Generation
i
along
l
plate
l
20.00
18.00
16.00
14.00

S{}+

12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0 00
0.00
0.0

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0
1000.0
1200.0
Location on Plate (mm)

1400.0

1600.0

1800.0

2000.0

Figure 6 from Walsh, McEligot, Brandt, and Schlatter (2011)

Example of entropy calculations for 4 locations

N i magnitude
Notice:
i d and
d sign
i changes
h
Normal
Energy
Stress
Flux
Production

x
(mm)

Mean

Re Stress
Production

700

4.54

-0.05

0.04

0.02

4.54

916
6

12.19

0.10

0.43

0.34

13.07

1020

14.95

-0.01

0.22

0.27

15.42

1400

13.12

0.05

0.09

-0.18
8

13.08
8

Total

Alternate data set with a small rough

patch incorporated into the model

Rough
Rough patch
patch data
Rough patch
centered at
x=700mm

Rouch patch located from

x=650mm to x=750mm.
x=750mm

Entropy generation Smooth vs. Downstream Rough

patch plate
20.00
18.00
16.00
14 00
14.00

S{}+

12.00
10.00

Smooth
Rough

8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0

200

400

600

800

1000
x (mm)

Rough patch location

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Flow parameters for FPG study

McIlroy and Budwig (2007)

Experiment
i
Design
i Discussion
i
i
Pressure Gradient?
Oil kinematic viscosity: 13.9 cSt, 13.9 x water, 13.9 x 10-6 m2/s
Oil d
density:
i 0.831
8 k
kg/m
/ 3
Plate length: up to 2 m
Freestream velocity: up to 1.8 m/s
Rex for ZPG case: up to 2
2.6
6 x 105

DNS ffrom T
Tamer Z
Zaki
ki and
dK
Kevin
i N
Nolan
l
plotted by Don M.

To-dos for Spring

p g 2011:
Spatial resolution
2D PIV
PIV, 105mm lens
lens, Bellows
Design work:
- Leading edge
- Flat plate model: 1) ZPG and 2) APG
Uncertaintyy analysis
y on 2D PIV