Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doi:10.1088/0953-8984/26/11/115302
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
Department of Physics, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya 11600, Sri Lanka
E-mail: vapalkov@gsu.edu
Received 11 November 2013, revised 8 January 2014
Accepted for publication 16 January 2014
Published 3 March 2014
Abstract
We introduce a quantum dot in topological insulator nanofilm as a bump at the surface of the
nanofilm. Such a quantum dot can localize an electron if the size of the dot is large enough,
&5 nm. The quantum dot in topological insulator nanofilm has states of two types, which
belong to two (conduction and valence) bands of the topological insulator nanofilm. We
study the energy spectra of such defined quantum dots. We also consider intraband and
interband optical transitions within the dot. The optical transitions of the two types have the
same selection rules. While the interband absorption spectra have multi-peak structure, each of
the intraband spectra has one strong peak and a few weak high frequency satellites.
Keywords: quantum dot, topological insulator, absorption spectrum
(Some figures may appear in colour only in the online journal)
1. Introduction
confinement potential with smooth boundaries. Such nonconventional behavior of electrons in graphene is determined
by their unique low energy dispersion, which is gapless
and relativistic, while the corresponding states are chiral
[5, 6]. The electrons in graphene behave as massless Dirac
fermions.
Another system showing a dispersion law similar to that of
graphene and correspondingly similar localization properties
is that of the 3D topological insulators (TI) [713], which were
first predicted theoretically and then observed experimentally
in Bix Sb1x , Bi2 Te3 , Sb2 Te3 , and Bi2 Se3 materials. The
unique features of 3D TIs are gapless surface states with
a low energy dispersion; its law is similar to the dispersion
law of a massless Dirac fermion. Such relativistic dispersion
laws have been observed by different experimental techniques
[9, 10, 1221].
Like for graphene, the conventional quantum dots, which
can localize an electron, cannot be realized in TIs through an
electrostatic confinement potential. To introduce a quantum
dot in TI, one can consider a TI of finite nanoscale size
[22, 23] or introduce a gap in the dispersion law of the
surface states. Such a gap in the energy dispersion is opened
for TI nanofilm [2426]. Due to the finite extension of
the surface states into the bulk, the surface states at two
Printed in the UK
T M Herath et al
B1 2 + B2 k 2 + A22 k 2 ,
L
has two bands (branches): (i) the conduction band with
energy E + and positive effective mass at p = 0 and (ii) the
valence band with energy E and negative effective mass.
The band edges for TI nanofilm of thickness L are at E c (L) =
2
(D1 + B1 ) L 2 for the conduction band and at E v (L) = D1
p 2
A2
x p y y p x
h
2
p 2
+ B1 2 + B2 2 z z
L
h
= D1
L2
+ D2
h2
(1)
T M Herath et al
(7)
(8)
2 y
(10)
(11)
for > R, where the constants a j , j = 1, . . . , 4, are determined from the continuity of the wavefunction and its
derivative and from the normalization condition. Here =
k1,+ (E, L + h), q = k2,+ (E, L + h)/i, q1 = k1,+ (E, L)/i,
and q2 = k2,+ (E, L)/i. We also introduced the following
notation:
Q 1 = A2 ,
Q 2 = (D1 + B1 ) 2 /(L + h)2 + (D2 + B2 ) 2 E,
M1 = A2 q,
M2 = (D1 + B1 ) 2 /(L + h)2 (D2 + B2 )q 2 E,
31 = A2 q1 ,
32 = (D1 + B1 ) 2 /L 2 (D2 + B2 )q12 E,
F1 = A2 q2 ,
F2 = (D1 + B1 ) 2 /L 2 (D2 + B2 )q22 E.
3
T M Herath et al
(12)
(13)
T M Herath et al
Figure 3. The energy spectra of the TI quantum dot are shown as a function of the angular momentum m for different radii R of the quantum
dot: (a) 50 , (b) 100 , (c) 150 , and (d) 200 . At R = 50 there is only one energy level in the conduction band. The dotted lines with
arrows show the main intraband (labeled A) and interband (labeled B) optical transitions.
different radii R of the quantum dot: (a) 100 , (b) 150 , and
(c) 200 . The labels of the optical lines correspond to the labels of
the transitions in figure 3. The optical spectra have multi-peak
structure.
different radii R of the quantum dot: (a) 100 , (b) 150 , and
(c) 200 . The labels of the optical lines correspond to the labels of
transitions in figure 3. The optical spectra have one strong line with
small satellites.
T M Herath et al
electron density near the step-like defect [26]. For the localized
modes in the TI quantum dots, as follows from figure 6, there
is no enhancement or singularity near the boundary of the
quantum dot.
In regular semiconductor quantum dots without spinorbit
interaction the charge and spin densities are equal to each
other, 4charge () = 4spin (). With spinorbit interaction the
charge and spin densities are different [28, 29]. In topological
insulators, it is a strong spinorbit interaction that results in
such unique gapless surface states. Therefore, in TI quantum
dots, the spinorbit interaction, which is already included
implicitly in effective Hamiltonian (1), is expected to be strong.
In this case the electron charge density and spin density should
be strongly different. In figure 7 the electron spin density is
shown for a quantum dot of radius R = 150 for the two lowest
energy levels of the conduction band with angular momentum
m = 0. In figures 7(a) and (b) the electron spin density is shown
for spin up and spin down, respectively. The data show that
the electron density with spin down is almost 6 times smaller
than the corresponding density with spin up. The spin density,
which is shown in figure 7(c), is positive at almost all points.
Thus, in a TI quantum dot the spinorbit interaction does not
affect the electron spin strongly and the electron has almost
the same orientation of spin at all points within a quantum
dot. The spin density is also close to the charge density (see
figure 6(a)).
The reason for such a weak effect of the spinorbit
interaction on the localized electron states in the TI quantum
dot is related to the following property of TI nanofilm. For
homogeneous TI nanofilm with uniform thickness, the mixing
due to spinorbit interaction of the states with different spins
depends on the electron wavevector. For the TI nanofilm of
thickness 40 , the strongest mixing of 15% is realized at
the wavevector 0.03 1 . For other wavevectors the mixing
is smaller. For example, for the wavevector 0.01 1 the
mixing is 7%. The localized states of the quantum dot are
combinations of the plane waves, where the main contribution
comes from the 1/R 0.01 1 wavevector. For such a
wavevector, the mixing of the state with different spins is
small (7%), which is illustrated in figure 7. For example,
for the function number 1, shown in figure 7, the ratio of
coefficients Q 1 and Q 2 (see equation (5)), which determines
the mixing of the states with different spins, is Q 1 /Q 2 3.
As a result, the electron density with spin down is an order of
magnitude smaller than the electron density with spin up (see
also figure 7).
6
T M Herath et al
4. Concluding remarks