This outline may be old, legally or factually incorrect, may feature spelling mistakes, and generally may not be as good as commercial outlines. Accordingly, these outlines come with NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
In downloading these agreements, you agree (1) to not use these commercially for any reason whatsoever, (2) to always attribute these to me (that is, even if you edit them, you must acknowledge I did the original work), and (3) not to bother me with legal questions I probably do not remember anyway.
This outline may be old, legally or factually incorrect, may feature spelling mistakes, and generally may not be as good as commercial outlines. Accordingly, these outlines come with NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
In downloading these agreements, you agree (1) to not use these commercially for any reason whatsoever, (2) to always attribute these to me (that is, even if you edit them, you must acknowledge I did the original work), and (3) not to bother me with legal questions I probably do not remember anyway.
This outline may be old, legally or factually incorrect, may feature spelling mistakes, and generally may not be as good as commercial outlines. Accordingly, these outlines come with NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
In downloading these agreements, you agree (1) to not use these commercially for any reason whatsoever, (2) to always attribute these to me (that is, even if you edit them, you must acknowledge I did the original work), and (3) not to bother me with legal questions I probably do not remember anyway.
(1) Intent (Cleveleand Park: intent to act not to cause
harm) RTT 1 (2) Contact (3) Causation (Garret: intent to act may indir. cause harm) (4) Harm Prima facie cases: Trespass to person Battery RST 13 Assault RST 21 Words + actions (Tuberville) RST 31 Emotional distress: perceive event contemporaneously + close family member to injured person RST 46 Trespass to land (Dougherty: strict liability for all damage, Smith: person giving threat forcing you onto land is responsible) RST 158 Trespass to chattels: dispossessing/interfering w/ property, strict liability RST 217/218 Conversion (Poggi: doesnt depend on intent/knowl.) Defenses Consent (Mohr: no emergency + no consent = wrongful, Hoofnel: consent forms in hospitals supersede prior intentions, Canterbury: consent requires full information) Consent implied in fact Emergency rule (Schloendorff: immediate action in med cases consent implied) Insanity isnt a defense (McGuire: intent matters) Defense of self/property (Courvoisier: reasonableness standard, Bird: can protect property; no traps) Self/others: (1) imminent peril (2) response to risk (3) proportionate response Property: (1) ask to leave (or sign/notice) (2) assault/battery (3) equivalence rule (proportionate response to resistance/attacks Necessity: overrides claim to land/property (Vincent: private necessity; limited privilege and liable for damage, Shuer: public necessity, no liability for damage) Negligence: reasonable care given circumstances RTT 3 (1) Duty (Palsgraf/Stone: foreseeability defines scope, Vaughan: reasonable person standard, Carrol Towing: duty to protect from harm when burden of precautions is less than probability/magnitude of harm) Custom: evidence of duty standard (T.J. Hooper: custom standard where custom risk, Lama: for med mal, show standard of care, failure to follow, directly caused harm with knowledge of alt.) NPS: violate a statute (Gorris/Abrahams: harm must be type statute was designed to protect, Hernan: doesnt matter if harm cause was type statute was designed to protect; argue both) RTT 14
License statutes (Brown: must show lack of license +
create a greater harm, Cook: unless one cause is violation of safety standards enforced by statute) natural, then no liability) Assumption of risk (Murphy: accept foreseeable risk if Severable liability: proportionate liability (Sindell: aware of potential for harm) market share liability, Murphy: 10% of market isnt Release of liability invalid if generally suitable for substantial enough of a share, McCormack: s lit., service is of importance/public nec., willing to serve establish share) anyone, bargaining advantage/stand. form contracts Indeterminate causes (Summers: if unable to determine (Tunkl, Dalury) which caused harm, but both could be resp., treat as joint Affirmative duties liability) RTT 28 Conduct more risk than no conduct, duty to Proximate cause: subst. factor in causing harm + no rule reasonable care RTT 7 relieving liab. = prox. cause RST 431 Actors conduct must create risk of harm RTT 37 Intervening 3rd person is superseding cause of harm Duty to prevent/minimize harm (Montgomery: applies unless actor reasonably should have realized creation where inaction/not performing duty effectively causes of situation allowing 3rd persons crime (Brower/Lane) injury) RTT 39 RST 448 Special relationships additional care RTT 40/41 Dependent causes: 2nd liable for incremental damages Services to reduce risk of harm duty of reasonable Danger invites rescue, liable to victim and rescuer care if failure increases risk or other relies RTT 42 (Wagner, Eckert) Gives aid to imperiled person duty to continue aid (4) Harm (Polemis: neg. if damage was fores., not nec. (Zelenko) RTT 44 most foreseeable) Cant prevent 3rd party aid (Soldano) RST 339 RIL: infer negligence from the fact that harm resulted Duty to rescue (Hurley: lic. to prac. medicine doesnt (Holshauer: to disprove need only show something else require you to help all patients) just as likely caused harm, Ybarra: Med Mal, unusual Duty of owners/occupiers (Rowland: where occupier injuries) RTT 17 knows of latent risk, must warn of condition) (1) Normally wouldnt happen without negligence Attractive nuisance doctrine: liable to kids if you (2) Other causes eliminated OR was relevant cause know kids come on, condition may cause harm, kids w/ exclusive control dont see risk, utility consideration, no reasonable care (3) didnt interfere w/ causal sequence to eliminate (Maalouf: relevant what harms the kid, Thin skull rule: take your victim as you find him not was attracts him to the land) RST 339 Strict Liability Landlord controls areas, duty to maintain safety Trespass to chattels/land (Levine) Vicarious liability (Bushey: bus. cant disclaim liability for Contracts (Doyle: if foreseeable that breach of contract actions of empl. if the class of action was fore., not exact will harm 3rd party, duty to all in fore. orbit of risk; most action, Riley: frolic/detour rule covers small deviat.) states, Strauss: no recovery to parties outside contract; No vic. liab. for indep. contractors except under NY rule) apparent/implied authority (Petrovich: apparent (2) Breach authority: principal creates appearance of authority, cant (3) Causation (GE: mechanism by which danger causes deny it; implied authority: agent doesnt have control harm + exposure = proof) RTT 26 over manner of doing work) Contributory negligence: no relief to (not used) Products liability Comparative negligence: liability in proportion to fault Sell/dist. prod. liable for harm by defect (Thomas: if (Li: pure apportionment of liability in proportion to fault) harm is foreseeable, Devlin: duty to anyone foreseeably Lost chance: prove proper care would have more than using product, Statler: beyond direct buyers) RTT:PL 1 likely cured/improved cond. (Verdicchio: show delay in No duty liability for patent dangers (Campo) treatment incr. risk of lost opportunity to treat) RTT 26 Use foreseeable hazard, duty to prevent risk of injury Multiple suff. causes: required that actions would have from hazard (VW) been a cause even w/out other causes Defective @ sale/distr., defect in manuf/design/ Joint liability: mult. obligors responsible for an entire instructions/warnings RTT:PL 2 loss (Kingston: even if two causes come together to Infer defect harm w/out proof of defect when incident ord. results from defect + no other causes RTT:PL 3
Margaret Fisher Knight v. Otis Elevator Company and Hartford Insurance Group and Atwell, Vogel& Sterling, Inc. v. Western Electric Company, Third-Party, 596 F.2d 84, 3rd Cir. (1979)