Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPE 12909
Bit Optimization for Positive-Displacement
Motors
by R.S.Dyer,SiiDyna-Dri//
Member SPE-AIME
Copyright
1984 Society
of Petroleum
Engmeem
of AlME
This paper wss presented at the 1984 Rocky Mountain Regional Meehng held m Casper, WY, May 21-23, 1984. The material is subject to correction by
the author. Permission to copy IS restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Writs SPE, 6200 North Central Expressway, Drawer 64706, Dallas,
Taxas 75206 USA. Telex 730989 SPEDAL.
ABSTRACT
T~~
basic
fiak;~e
Of
dr~ll~nq
with
Positive
displacement motor is different than that of conventional rotary drilling and often necessitates
different decisions regarding bit choices and recommended operating parameters. For best results,
separate bit optimization studies and recommendations
should be prepared during the planning stages of a
well for possible motor runs. Several factors should
be considered in determining bit choice and bit
configuration. Many of these factors are used in
selecting bit type, such as rock bit, diamond, or
polycrystalline diamond bit. Other factors determine
choice within a specific bit category, as well as
choices in hydraulics parameters and performance
expectations.
INTRODUCTION :
Current drilling trends dictate the employment
of cost conscious employees and service companies
that offer cost-effective methods of drilling. It
is generally accepted that the iiltiirate
test of ccst
effectiveness is determined by examining the results
in terms of cost-per-foot. The lower the cost-perfoot, the less expensive it will be to drill the
well, or any section of a well.
*,ere =Ze ~ap.y petb.QdS
of
eliminating costs and
thereby reducing cost per foot. Most fall into two
categories. The first category is the reduction of
drilling time by increasing rate of penetration.
The second category may be summed up as the elimination or reduction of undesirable delays. Exampies of delays are:
nDmTMT7.ATT(3N
. . . ... . .. ----
2)
3)
4)
170rmations
1)
5)
2)
Fishing jobs;
6)
Hole Conditions
~)
Sidetracks;
7)
4)
5)
6)
Hole problems;
7)
Rig repairs,
153
2
1)
SPE 12909
Excluding a targeted directional run and sidetracks, the three most common motor run objectives are
1)
2)
Deviation Control
3)
sPE 12909
.
S. Uyer
Quantifiable terms are those i5eztifiable parameters that can be applied to standard cost-per-foot,
heakeven footage, and breakeven ROP formulas. Most
1)
non-quantifiable terms fall into the second category
>f cost reduction mentioned in the Introduction-the elimination of undesirable delays. These includ[
such things as elimination of fishing trips, prevention of sidetracks, and reduction of casing wear. Bvel
though these items cannot readily be calculated into
stafii!=rd
cost formulas, it is apparent that a motor nu
may
successful in minimizing such delays could more than
the
~ay for itself.
Regardless of the objective, standard cost formJlas can be applied in selecting a bit that will pro3uce the best results-- i.e., lowest cost-per-foot for
the run. There are three basic steps involved:
~)
Reviewing such information will reveal a formations peculiarities in a specific area and at the
particular depth. Patterns of bit choice aiidbit wszr
will emerge that will influence bit choice end design
SPE 12909
---Iur.
l..
L1lC
.-+
u,
dx
ruP. .
ting pattern might be changed, such as using ridge. tQ reduce diamond breakage.
settzng iiiM.q?lleas &zesIn extreme cases, it may be effective to consider a
diamond impregnated bit.
If fracturing is present, it is often a practice
to include a percentage of carbonado diamonds in the
nose and throat to insure against premature bit failure
High formation dip angles may necessitate sacrificing
length of gauge if dropping or building angle is impor
tant.
Finally, how the formation reacts to good bit hyd
raulics will influence the determination of the total
flow area of the bit relative to expected fluid volume
to be used. Keep in mind that parameters often presen
in a diamond bit drilling situation, i.e., deep hole
and higher mud weights, often result inhighhydrostati
pressures which tend to hinder the transfer of drilled
cuttings from the bottom of the hole to the annulus.
Therefore, the use of high hydraulic horsepower at the
bit is even more desirable to insure blasting the cut
material away from the bit so the diamonds can continu
to shear new formation.
FORMATIONS
For instance, most modern drilling rigs can provide the additional pressure requirements of a positiv
displacement motor with little or no change in operating parameters. However, on occasion, limitations
by contractors on operating pressures prevent maximizing bit hydraulics. A complete hydraulic system
analysis, including insertions for motor values, may
reveal that additional pressures needed for the motor
run surpass the limits set. Thus, a compromise in TFA
For instance, mud and electric logs may reveal
such lithological properties as chert and pyrite inter- or nozzle selection may be necessary to effect the run
.,
1-:-L -..
.s
especially if fluid flow rates cannot be reduced. In
hr~a~.aqe
if IIOt preIWY
~awe a+.m.i+
------- _
>edaxng ti-nuxl
cases where toca~ prea.siize
6ZQFS &rG mt z limitation ~
?ared for properly. Thin layers of such materials
the only other restriction on bit hydraulics may be
should not warrant abandoning the project, especially
hole/mud conditions or motor bearing balance.
if rock bit life is short and trip time long. A different bit choice might be made, going to a rounder,
Certain hole and mud conditions may also affect
Elatter crown profile for example, and variations in
the choice of~t~
~aparticularbit.
Lost circuiiamond size might be necessary, such as using as
~at-or,~=t-ria~i fQrex~lef
canbe circulated through a
mall as 12-15 SPC set in triple or quadruple rows per
mud motor in limited concentrations, but will require,per
?ad in extremely hard, abrasive formations. ROP may
haps, anything from open nozzles on a rock bit to a
>e sacrificed somewhat, but increased on-bottom time
large TFA on a diamond bit. ObviouslY, serious lost
nay result in significant savings. Finally, the set-
156
S. Dver
SPE 12909
The operator projected trip time to be approximately 1 hr./1000. This meant that drilling the hole by
conventional rotary methods would produce excessivetri~
time coupled with projected short bit life and low footage. It was decided that the primary objective of the
motor run would be to maximize on-bottom drilling time.
Secondary objectives would be to reduce the possibility
-c
s.!
-k:
+-~a
rac~>ltinafrom
twist-offs or lost cone:
UL
LL.,Ll.ilg
..l=
----.
in the hole, and to prevent casing wear. Since thepriobjective
required endurance, it was decided to
~V
consider a diamond bit that had a moderate taper and
rounded crown profile. Working with the bit manufacturer already in contact with the customer, a HYC-730
was selected as likely to provide adequate endurance
and ROP to fit the objective. Initially, 7-8 SPC and
and extended gauge were considered.
Next, a cost analysis was done. (See figures 1 &
2) . Both a 90 and a 120-hour motor/diamond bit run
were considered as conservative minimum and maximum
hours. The more conservative run, the 90-hour run,
was presented to the customer. Projected savings ranged from $34,340 to $49,840. Since very little additional ROP was needed to breakeven with projected rotary
run costs, it was decided to at least consider somewhat
larger diamonds for slightly better ROP.
In this case, it was not possible to study offset
bit records, as there were none in that hole size in
the area. The projected rotary runs of 20 hours at 3/
hr. were extrapolated downward from large diameter runs
in the same formation. This was done in consultation
with the customer.
After considering the projected formations to be
drilled, coupled with the job objective and cost analt
was decided to make some detailed choices in
bit configuration. 5-6 SPC were chosen over 7-8 SPC in
order that some increase in ROP was possible. It was
felt that a 90-hour run could still be achieved, but
since more footage was likely to be made, the cost-perfoot would be less. Also, since some fracturing was
possible, it was decided to include 25-30% carbonado
diamonds in the nose and cone of the bit. Finally, a
3 extended gauge was specified. No chances were to be
taken on an out-of-guage hole and a resulting rock bit
run to bring the hole back to gauge.
A hydraulics system analysis was then completed
using 3000 psi as maximum stand-pipe pressure. Althougk
the operating range for the 3-7/8-Delta1000 is 100150 GPM, it was quickly determined that 120 GPM would
be the maximum flow rate that could be iiseti
zntiremifi
within the contractors requested limitations. No hole
~roblems were expected, and the range of weight-on-bit
to be used was projected to be 6-8000 lbs.
DISPLACEMENT MOTORS
Bit:
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
Deviation:
II.
RUN RESULTS:
9820 - 10,998
1178
9820 - 10,517
179.5 hours drlg.
697 for 3.88/hr. average ROP
RUN #2:
10,517 - 10,998
92 hours drlg.
481 for 5.23/hr. average ROP
BIT USED:
HYC-730, 5-6 SK, .16 TFA, 3 Ext.
Gauge
WOB :
8-1OK -- Run #1
8K -- Run #2
ESTINATED SAVINGS: $59,548 (See figure 5)
SPE 12909
DEPTH :
FOOTAGE :
RUN #1:
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor:
Formation:
Mud :
Job Objective:
RECOMMENDATIONS : Since the motor to be used is a relatively slow-speed motor (125-188 rpm), it was decided to use the same bits as on location. Bit psi
requested was 750-850 psi. GPM requested was 9OO-1OOI
gpm. NOTE : The customer cooperated as fully as possible in compliance with the recommendations. The
criteria set to compete with on this job was the aver
age surface hole parameters accomplished by the customer in that area: 60 hours .oer run, 20.3/hr., $60(
hour fixed costs, 5.5 hours average trip time, averag
~G~t.3az.fe~t ~f $44,25/ft.
CASE HISTORIES
RESULTS :
I.
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor
Formations:
Mud :
Job Objective:
Bit:
Dull :
Footaae:
R;P :
Formation:
cost :
Run No. 1:
Run
U?,COMMENDATIONS
: A conventional diamond bit was recommended with a .40 TFA to create a bit psi for a
>alanced motor, and 3-4 SPC for extended bit life.
?rofile was a moderately tapered bit for good devia:ion control. NOTE : At pre-spud meeting with the
:ustomer, the possibility of using a stratapax bit
tas discussed. Motor supplier had mixed feelings
bout bit life due to abrasive sandstones in Mesaverde
md occasional sand stringers in Baxter in that area.
IISO, it was felt that the PCD may be too aggressive
satisfactory deviation control in this situation.
for
lngle prior to job was 5 and rotary ROP was 9.3/hr.
Ln the Mesaverde.
7ESULTS:
Run No. 1:
Bit:
Footaue:
R~P :
Formation:
Deviation:
Runs 2-5:
Two stratapax bits were run,
the S~CQEd for 8.5 hours.
the first for 26 Floiirs,
ROP for both was 15.5/hr. Both bits were quickly
dulled out. Angle built back to 5-1/2. The first
1
No.
2:
Bit:
Dull:
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
cost :
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor:
Formation:
Mud :
Job Objective:
s.
SPE 12909
RESULTS :
Run No. 1:
Bit:
Dul1:
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
Deviation:
Run No. 2:
Bit:
Dull :
Fmtacje:
ROP :
Formation:
Deviation:
NOTE :
Run No. 3:
Bit:
Dull :
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
Deviation:
RESULTS :
Dull :
Footage:
Rol?:
Deviation:
cost :
v.
Job Objective:
h.LA
nun
~a~~~lhr.
---
CASE HISTORIES #4
Fremont Countyr Wyoming
6,,
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor:
Formations:
Mud :
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor:
Formation:
Mud :
Job Objective:
Bit:
Bit:
Dull :
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
...
HYC 730T, .lbTFA, 5-6 SPC,
315 psi
20% worn
11,985-12,706 -- 721
138.5 hr. run; 5.2/hr.
Mowry, Muddy, Skull Creek
VI.
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor:
Formations:
Mud :
Job Objective:
Bit:
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
Survey:
Run No. 2:
Bit:
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
Survey:
Run No. 3:
Bit:
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
Survey:
Run No. 4:
Bit:
Footage:
ROP :
Formation:
Survey:
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor:
Formation:
Mud :
Job Objective:
Bit:
Dull:
Footage:
ROP :
cost :
VIII :
Location:
Hole Size:
Motor:
Formation:
Mud :
Job Objective:
RR of No. 3
6531-7545 -- 1014
211 hr. run; 4.8/hr.
Hilliard, 1st Frontier
7545 / 1-1/2
RESULTS :
SPE 12909
RESULTS :
Run No. 1:
RECOMMENDATIONS : A medium-hard formation bit was recommended with a relatively shallow cone angle. 3-4
SPC were recommended, set in double rows per pad for
longer bit life, and diamond grit was recommended in
the throat and gauge rows along with a 3 extended
gauge. A TFA of .30 was recommended and diamond quality recommendations were for West African Premium diamonds. Previous rotary runs were averaging 183 in
28 hours for an average ROP of 6.55/hr. Cost-perfoot was $126.23/ft. NOTE: Without proper analysis,
an alternate bit choice was made.
RESULTS:
Bit:
Dull :
Footage:
ROP :
cost :
s. Dyer
I
sPE 12909
)
I
I
The
will
DATE:
QRILLIHG
Bit
Cost.
w/MOTOR
CONVENTIONAL
CONDITIONS
.
-BC
2720.00
Operating
Orilling
Trip
Cost/Hr.
Hours.
Flours.
.
.
Footage/Footage
Conventional
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Proposed
FC
&3
DC
20
Bc
2720
.
.
..0.
FID
6800.00
RC
270.83
.RD
I.<l- /.9
+U>.UL
DC
20
.DD
10
c .
*TD
10
60
. . . . . . . . . F~
.TC
FC
3.0
+ RC
270.93
ROP
cO17Vf2ntiOnal
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
5/83
36o
/hr.
(Dc
20
TC
10
Cost/Foot
FC
C/F
Breakeven
Footage
= $
60
180.74Ift.
(( RD465.62)
(DD
90 )) +
(( Rc270.83
C/F
BF
Breakeven
Penetration
285.57
= BF
286
DD
Anticipated
(TD~))
(B06800
180.74
3.17
hr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...=
190.74 /ft.
90
ROP w/Motor
ANTICIPATED
20)
/ft.
4.0/hr
AnticipatedSavingsw/Motor
TOTAL
=
SAVINGS
=
Fig.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . =$
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
143.37
30.39
1130x 30.30/ft
.............. = $34340.00_
lDrilling
cost analysisExample
1.
/ft.
/ft.
DEP2S:
MUD WC:
9920
9.00
~;!o ~-------------
-----------
GPlL4-----------ACCUM D
P-DROP
P-DROP
.-------------1010
FLOW RATE :
ACCUM D
P-DROP P-DROP
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LSNGTH
DATE :
DRILLING
sit
.
cost .
..
Total
Opsrating
Orilling
Trip
C.ast/Hr.
Hours .
Hours
.
.
FootagelFootage
Conventional
ROP
cOnvent iOnal
Cost/Foot
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~c
60
Oc
20
EC
272o,
Prormsed
Bc2720.
270.83
. RC
. no.
..R0
..oo.~
..
oo.
..oc
20.....
..
Tc
. Fc
lo.....
60
465.62
0~
BIT4
-------------
TOTAL
To.
lo
. F,o,
270.83
(OC
FC
360.98
256.54
191.07
LNR/MTR
LNR/DC
LNR/DP
ON BlT4
------------
1.39
339.37
22!3.03
92.56
BORE VSL
1.39
340.66
563.69
656.25
1.95
476.23
313. D7
92.56
482.48
1307.20
ACCUM rD
ANN VEL
P-DROP
P-DROP
------------------------------------5.24
42.21
2,34.90,
661.49
703.70
938.60
-.
.
938.60
58.50
245. OIL
525.00
997.10
1242.11
1867.11
100 GPM
BEARINGS
BIT PRESSURE
MOTOR 143AOED
48o
ACCUM aD
P-DROP
P-DROP
,------------------
433.17
307.85
217.28
@
1.95
479.19
791.26
883.82
120 GPM
7.35
59.24
329.73
891.17
950.42
1280.15
1280.15
88.38
352.82
625.00
1368.53
1721.35
2346.35
2346.35
TOTAL
/hr.
3.0
+ RC
ANN VSL
ANNULUS
------------------------------------
6800.00
402.07
1089.33
9820
w/ HOTOR
.
CONVENTIONAL
CONOITION5
SE
DP
cc
MTR
BIT
9256
540
23
----1
----
5/8?
sORE vEL
elms
+TC
20
10
DEPTH :
1B67 .11
100 GPM
MUD w,
10900
--------------100
120 GPMI
10.50
-----------1.20 GEM-----------ACCUM ,D
BDRB OsL
P -DROP
B0P33 VEi,
P-DROIP
P-ORDP
P-DRDP
LsNGTS
Boss
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- ------FLOW RATS :
60
GIPM-----------
ACCOM D
C/F
180.74
Breakeven
Footage
(( R0465.62)
8F
Ift.
(oO&))
((RC~
Cl~
Breakeven
Penetration
m
-u
m
w
%0
362.85
BF
363
00
120
(TO&))
ROP w/HOtOr
Anticipated
.0
4,01hr
sAVINGS
1080
9256
540
23
-----1
-----
180.74
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . =$
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -$
1130 X 44. I!/ft
F@. Z-Drilling
sost analy8is-Example
SE
DP
DP
Dc
MTR
BIT
+ (Bo~)
Ift.
Antlcipsted
TOTAL A~\ClpATEO
+ 20)
2.
180.74
Ift.
1:)6.63
Ift.
44.11
/ft.
$49?144.00
402.07
402.07
1089.33
1.69
48.04
4,11.71
2!70.65
1.12.33
1.69
49.73
461.43
732.08
844.41
10900
ACCUM D
ANN VEL ------------------------------------------P-DROP
ANN VBL
P-OROP
ANNuLus
----------------------------OR/MTR
OH/CC
OH/DP
LNR/DP
LNR/DP
468.49
306.53
204.62
181.07
181.07
13.62
95.55
22.42
:269.16
33.26
1268.42
100 GPM
68.2!5
285. S5
625.00
BEARINGS
BIT PRSSSURE
MDTOR m2+om
100 GPM
120 GPM
2247.51
19.12
120.09
31.47
377.82
46.69
11 S9.02
1279.16
1310.63
1688.45
1735.14
1735.14
103.11
411.62
625.00
1336.67
1622.51
2247.51
-----------octal
ON BTU
------------
2.37
69.80
647.71
1027.62
1139.95
ACCUM ID
P-DROP
P-DROP
---------------------
562 .1S
367.83
245.54
217.28
217.28
95B.03
943.58
965.99
1235.16
1268.42
-------------
2.37
67.43
577.91
379.91
112.33
482.48
482.48
1307.20
120 GPM
1838.25
2249.817
2874 .e17
2874. U7
Fig., 4Hydraulic
This
Cost
Analysis
was
calculated
for
the
section
of
hole
drilled
with
cost
footage
was
calculated
was 60 ft.;
using
an
estimated
operating
hour.
ROTARY COST:
Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$2720.00
Total Operating Cost/Hour ............................. 270.83
20 hrs.
Drilling Hours ....................& ...................
10 hrs.
Trip Hours ............................................
60 Ft.
Footage. ..............................................
Bit
charges)
Footage Drilled
(13,600) + [($270.83) (302)] + ($57,974.75)
1178 ft.
MOTOR RUN COST/FOOT
$130.19
ROTARY COST/FOOT
$180.74
$59,547.90
Fig. 5-Postjob
cost analysis.
SP E129L9