Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WATER
a n d
SERVICES
Te c h n i c a l
AND
THE
C o n f e r e n c e
NEW
ENERGY
CHALLENGES
AUTHOR: Alexandrescu Simona Adina (Miron), Luca Mihail, Alexandrescu Aurora, Mnescu Andreea
Platinum Sponsor
Silver Sponsor
OPERATING
COSTS
ELECTRIC
ENERGY COSTS
MEINTENANC
E COSTS
OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS
ELECTRIC
ENERGY COSTS
OBJECTIVE
FUNCTIONS
NUMBER OF
PUMP SWITCHES
CONSTRAINTS
PRESSURE FROM
DEMAND NODES
>0
TOTAL
VOLUME
DEFICIT = 0
EVALUATE THE
OBJECTIVE
FUNCTIONS
REPRODUCTION
1. Recombination
2. Mutation
ARCHIVE
SELECTION
from archive through
binary tournament method
CONSTRAINT HANDLING
Invalid solutions are dominated by the valid ones;
When two solutions are invalid, the one with lower
pressure violations dominates the other;
For two solutions, the one with a lower total
volume deficit dominates the other;
Matlab Algorithm:
Input:
- text file which describes the regional water
supply system;
- initial population size;
- maximum population size;
- maximum archive size;
- maximum number of generations varies
from an execution to another;
- number of parents;
- mutation probability;
- recombination probability;
- individual mutation probability;
- Individual recombination probability.
EPANET_SPEA.m
SPEA2.m
F1.m
Output:
- Pump schedules presented as
binary values that correspond to
each time window.
F2.m
RESULTS
Duration
Electric
energy
cost
(RON)
Number of
pump
switches
No. of
pressure
condition
breaking
EPANET
errors
Total
volume
deficit
5H -8M 3S
3H 11M 6S
3H 11M 6S
3H 58M 8S
3H 58M 8S
4H -25M -30S
5H -17M 10S
5H -8M 3S
6H -12M -5S
6H -8M 37S
6H -8M 37S
6H 11M 35S
8H -27M 52S
8H -27M 52S
8H -27M 52S
6H -3M 21S
6H -3M 21S
6H -3M 21S
7H 1M -17S
7H -30M -19S
7H 9M 6S
8H -23M 21S
8H -23M 21S
8H -23M 21S
7H -48M 0S
7H -48M 0S
6H 38M -15S
7H 8M 6S
7H 13M 5S
5570
5189
5666
5795
6363
5662
5511
5570
5357
5357
5744
6017
5777
6146
5589
5605
5533
5565
5489
5428
5489
5421
5420
5404
5403
5276
5253
5118
5118
60
63
70
59
62
54
57
60
57
57
61
56
58
68
57
56
54
55
54
56
54
55
54
54
54
55
55
53
54
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-20
65
22
22
14
99
43
60
46
46
60
2
-30
1
1
0
3
-2
0
-7
0
0
1
-1
0
-1
-1
-1
0
CONCLUSIONS
Time controlled pumps with schedules optimized by SPEA2 algorithm have an
operational cost lower than the one obtained by water level controlled pumps.
In this paper the best pump schedule given by SPEA2 algorithm generates an
operational cost lower with 34 % than the one generated by the water level
controlled pumps.
In order to find good solutions for complex problems like the one presented in
this paper, it is necessary to use either a large number of generations.
The method presented in this paper is a cheap and efficient way to lower the
operational costs.
An important disadvantage of the presented method is that pumps can be turned
on or off only at the start of each hour.