Professional Documents
Culture Documents
into the superficial cutaneous lymphatics. It is a tender, intensely erythematous, indurated plaque
with a sharply demarcated border. Its well-defined margin can help differentiate it from other skin
infections (eg, cellulitis). See the image below. (See Clinical Presentation.)[1]
Erysipelas has been traced back to the Middle Ages, where it was referred to as St. Anthony's fire,
named after the Christian saint to whom those afflicted would appeal for healing. Around 1095, the
Order of St. Anthony, a Roman Catholic congregation, was formed in France to care for those with
the ailment. At the time, several diseases were likely grouped under this eponym, including
ergotism and herpes zoster (shingles).
Historically, erysipelas occurred on the face, but cases today most often involve the legs. The group
A streptococcal bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes causes most of the facial infections; although it
can also cause erysipelas on the legs, an increasing percentage of lower extremity infections are
now being caused by nongroup A streptococci. (See Pathophysiology and Etiology.)
Patient education
Instruct patients to rest, elevate the affected area, and use cold compresses 4 times daily for 48
hours. Patients should return or see a primary care physician if they are experiencing an increase in
pain, fever and chills, redness, or other new symptoms. (See Treatment and Medication.)
Pathophysiology
In erysipelas, the infection rapidly invades and spreads through the lymphatic vessels. This can
produce overlying skin "streaking" and regional lymph node swelling and tenderness. Immunity
does not develop to the inciting organism.
Etiology
Streptococci are the primary cause of erysipelas.[2] Most facial infections are attributed to group A
streptococci, while an increasing percentage of lower extremity infections are being caused by non
group A streptococci. Streptococcal toxins are thought to contribute to the brisk inflammation that
is typical of this infection. No clear proof has emerged that other bacteria cause erysipelas,
although they coexist with streptococci at sites of inoculation.
The role of Staphylococcus aureus, and specifically methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA),
remains controversial. No conclusive evidence demonstrates a pathogenic role for staphylococci in
typical erysipelas. The infection's predictable response to penicillin, even when S aureus is present,
argues against S aureus as an etiologic agent. However, analogous to what occurs in bullous
impetigo or staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, exotoxins from coexisting S aureus may
account for the clinical presentation of bullous erysipelas.[3]
Risk factors
Predisposing factors in erysipelas include the following:
Arteriovenous insufficiency
Paretic limbs
Nephrotic syndrome
Vagrant lifestyle
Bacterial inoculation into an area of skin trauma is the initial event in developing erysipelas. Thus,
local factors, such as venous insufficiency, stasis ulcerations, inflammatory dermatoses,
dermatophyte infections, insect bites, and surgical incisions, have been implicated as portals of
entry. The source of the bacteria in facial erysipelas is often the host's nasopharynx, and a history of
recent streptococcal pharyngitis has been reported in up to one third of cases.
Preexisting lymphedema is a clear-cut risk factor for erysipelas. Recurrent erysipelas complicating
the lymphedema from breast cancer treatment is well documented.[5, 6] Lymphoscintigraphy in
patients with a first-time episode of lower extremity erysipelas has documented lymphatic
impairment in affected and nonaffected legs. Thus, subclinical lymphatic dysfunction is also a risk
factor for erysipelas.[7]
Erysipelas is found in lower extremities in 70-80% of patients; the face is affected in 5-20% of
patients.[10]
The patient may appear healthy or toxic depending on the extent of infection. Erysipelas begins as a
small erythematous patch that progresses to a fiery-red, indurated, tense, and shiny plaque, as
shown in the images below.
crucial because of potentially rapid progression. Aside from administration of antibiotics, patient
care includes the following:
Surgical care
Debridement is necessary only in severe infections with necrosis or gangrene.
Inpatient care
Hospitalization for close monitoring and intravenous antibiotics is recommended in severe cases
and for infants, elderly patients, and patients who are immunocompromised. It is also
recommended for patients who are unlikely to complete the course of treatment as a result of
psychosocial or economic reasons or significant underlying disease.
Streptococci cause most cases of erysipelas; thus, penicillin has remained a first-line therapy.[16, 17]
Penicillin administered orally or intramuscularly is sufficient for most cases of classic erysipelas
and should be given for 5 days, but if the infection has not improved, treatment duration should be
extended.
A first-generation cephalosporin or macrolide, such as erythromycin or azithromycin, may be used
if the patient has an allergy to penicillin. Cephalosporins may cross-react with penicillin and should
be used with caution in patients with a history of severe penicillin allergy, such as anaphylaxis.
Coverage for Staphylococcus aureus is not usually necessary for typical infections, but it should be
considered in patients who do not improve with penicillin or who present with atypical forms of
erysipelas, including bullous erysipelas. Some authors believe that facial erysipelas should be
treated empirically with a penicillinase-resistant antibiotic, such as dicloxacillin or nafcillin, to
cover possible S aureus infection, but supporting evidence for this recommendation is lacking. [3]
Two drugs, roxithromycin and pristinamycin, have been reported to be extremely effective in the
treatment of erysipelas. Several studies have demonstrated greater efficacy and fewer adverse
effects with these drugs compared with penicillin.[18] Currently, the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has not approved these drugs in the United States, but they are in use in
Europe.
The FDA recently approved 3 new antibiotics, oritavancin (Orbactiv), dalbavancin (Dalvance), and
tedizolid (Sivextro), for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. These
agents are active against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-susceptible and methicillinresistant S aureus [MSSA, MRSA] isolates), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae,
and Streptococcus anginosus group (includes Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius,
and Streptococcus constellatus), among others. For complete drug information, including dosing,
see the following monographs:
Oritavancin
Dalbavancin
Tedizolid
Pain control is essential to quality patient care. Analgesics and antipyretics ensure patient
comfort, promote pulmonary toilet, and have sedating properties beneficial to patients who
have sustained trauma or who experience pain.
This is the drug of choice (DOC) for treating pain in patients with documented
hypersensitivity to aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), who are
diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal disease, or who take oral anticoagulants.
View full drug information
The combination of oxycodone and acetaminophen is used for the relief of moderate to
severe pain. It is the DOC for aspirin-hypersensitive patients.
View full drug information
Aspirin blocks prostaglandin synthetase action, which in turn inhibits prostaglandin synthesis
and prevents the formation of platelet-aggregating thromboxane A2; it acts on the
hypothalamic heat-regulating center to reduce fever.
View full drug information
Ibuprofen is usually the DOC for treating mild to moderate pain, if no contraindications
exist. It is one of the few NSAIDs indicated for fever reduction.
Naproxen is used for the relief of mild to moderate pain. It inhibits inflammatory reactions
and pain by decreasing COX activity, which results in decreased prostaglandin synthesis.
Ketoprofen
Ketoprofen is used for relief of mild to moderate pain and inflammation. Small dosages are
indicated initially in small patients, elderly patients, and patients with renal or liver disease.
Doses higher than 75 mg do not increase the therapeutic effects. Administer high doses with
caution, and closely observe the patient's response.