Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 10
Page 10
Page 11
Page 11
Appendix I Questionnaire
Appendix II References
Appendix III SPSS Result
Page 18
Page 21
Page 23
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 16
Page 16
Page 17
Appendix
Page 1
Chapter I
Introduction
1.1 Introduction
Airlines industry nowadays is very competitive and keeps growing. The competition in
airlines industry rises from both local and global competitors. Values offered by the
airlines companies are variative and that leaves the customer with many choices. Price
range, service quality, ease of ticketing, and boarding an clearence time might be one of
the customer preferences toward the airline service they choose. Beside the fact that
airlines industry is very competitive, it is also constantly growing.
Business activities, international trade, and tourism are few of many things that are
supported by airlines, and as those activities growing, the airline industry is growing as
well. The growth provides opportunities as well as various challenges to the airline
companies. The opportunities arise because of the increasing demand for the airline
services, while the challenges arise because of the growing numbers of demanding
customers that want a better service quality with better price, aside from the high level
of competition between the airlines.
The interest in studying the relationship between the Garuda Indonesia service and the
customer satisfaction is stimulated because Garuda Indonesia is one of the most
succesful airlines company in Indonesia, and it has expanded to become a global player
in the airlines industry as the brand awareness for Garuda Indonesia is growing fastly
The Impact of Garuda Indonesia Service Towards Customer Satisfaction
Page 2
due to its various partnership. Its recent partnership with Liverpool FC, whose fan based
is already 55 millions people in Indonesian only is one example. Also, there is the Garuda
Indonesia Experience concept that is offered by Garuda Indonesia, which is one of the
pre and in flight services that combines multi elements such as ease of bookings, In
Flight Entertainment system, and cabin comfort and services that is very competitive in
global level. The customer preferences toward this airlines evntough it is of the most
expensive in the local airlines industry also triggers me to study thoroughly about the
impact between Garuda Indonesia Service and its impact toward their customer
satisfaction.
The researcher has a curiousity of whether the concept of Garuda Indonesia Service
results in better customer satisfaction or not. If we think backwards, it is even more
crucial to inquire that whether the Garuda Indonesia service has anything to do with the
customer preferences toward this flag airlines. Furthermore, the researcher wants to
know in what parts of the Garuda Indonesia Service that satisfy customers the most, and
what part of it need the most attention to be improved.
Page 3
In points, these are the the inquiries that the researcher wants seek for an answer.
To what extent the Garuda Indonesia service become one of the customer
consideration of choosing Garuda Indonesia?
What features or elements in the Garuda Indonesia service satisfy customers the
most and the least?
This research will be significantly useful for related stakeholder in the airlines industry.
To Researcher : This research will help the resercher to anser researcher curiosity
regarding the relationship between Garuda Indonesia service and the customer
satisfaction. This research also can be a milestone for the researcher to conduct
more research in the future because of the learning process researcher went
through in conducting this research.
Page 4
In the sudy of this topic, the researcher will gather opinion and assesment from Garuda
Indonesia customer that have been in either domestic or international flight with
Garuda Indonesia. The questionaire will be spread both in papers to the passanger
waiting before they boarding in the airport. The researcher collects the data from
journals, aricles, and previous research related to the airlines industries and the
customer satisfaction in order to enrich the quality of the research.
Page 5
Chapter 2
Related Literature Review
2.1 Foreign Litearature
Passenger satisfaction in airline operations has become critically important and
(Dennett, 2000) suggest that as competition created by deregulation has become
more intense, service quality in the airline industry has also received more attention.
Airline companies also attempted to differentiate their services through the use of
computerized reservation systems which were also designed to create customer
loyalty in the distribution channels (Lee, 1996).
Maintaining quality are the main concerns of business today. Providing quality is not
a concern of manufacturing companies alone. The delivery of high-quality service
becomes a marketing requirement among air carriers as a result of competitive
pressure (Ostrowski, 1993). (Chang, 2002) argue that quality in airline service is
difficult to describe and measure due to its heterogeneity, intangibility, and
inseparability, and only the customer can truly define service quality in the airline
industry (Butler, 1992).Previous airline service studies are concentrated in modeling
the effect of perceived service quality at the aggregate construct level, though
examining the effects of individual dimensions of service attributes has potentially
great utility for airline managers (Patterson, 1997).The perceptions of airline service
quality are quite diverse and do not seem to fit any single existing quality model such
as the service quality (Haynes, 1994).
(Kotler, 1996) defined customer satisfaction as the level of a persons felt sate
resulting from comparing a products perceived performance or outcome in violation
to his/her own expectations. So, customer satisfaction could be considered a
comparative behavior between inputs beforehand and post obtainments.
(Cronin, 1992) originate empirical provision for the idea that perceived service
quality led to satisfaction and argued that service quality was actually an antecedent
of consumer satisfaction. (Hubbert, 1994) determined that service encounter
The Impact of Garuda Indonesia Service Towards Customer Satisfaction
Page 6
satisfaction was quite distinct from overall satisfaction and perceived quality. Service
quality will vary; the definitions are all formulated from the customer perspective:
that is, what customers perceive are important dimensions of quality.
2.2 Local Literature
As mentioned by (Umar, 2003), service in general is the good feeling that is given to
someone else with ease and satisfying his/her needs. Service quality, according to
(Tjiptono, 2005), is a measurements on how good a service can meet its customer
expectation.
To make the measurements and judgements of a service quality easier, a tool called
SERVQUAL has been developed. SERVQUAL (service quality) is a multi item scale that
can be used to measure the customer perception of a quality of service that covers
five dimensions (Manulang, 2008) :
1) Tangibles : A companys ability to show its existance to the external parties.
Appearence, companys infrastructure and its environment is a real proof of the
service given.
2) Reliability : An ability to provide the promised service in accurate, satisfying, and
in timely manner.
3) Responsiveness : An ability to react and help the customer quickly and accurately
with clear information delivery.
4) Assurance : A guarantee in the form of knowledge, courtesy, and ability thatcan
build customers trust toward companys service.
5) Empathy : Giving attention and care personally towards customer in order to
understand what their needs and wants.
2.3 Theoritical Framework
This research is meant to understand the relationship between a service concept namely
Garuda Indonesia Experience and its impact towards Garuda Indonesias customer
satisfaction. As the Garuda Indonesia Experience itself is essentialy an integrated service
provided by the airline, its quality measurements can be done by covering 5 dimension of
Page 7
service which are tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empaty, using
SERVQUAL method.
In this research, the topic is narrowed by focusing on the customer satisfaction as a result of
the service concept impementation. So the customer satisfation can be classified as
dependent variable, while the quality of service concept (Garuda Indonesia Experience) that
is viewed in five dimension (tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy)
can be classified as independent variable.
Dependent
Variable
Independent
Variable
Tangibles (X1)
Reliability (X2)
Customer
Satisfaction
(Y)
Responsiveness
(X3)
Assurance (X4)
Empathy (X5)
Page 8
Passanger : a traveller on a public or private conveyance other than the driver, pilot,
or crew
Responsivenes : An ability to react and help the customer quickly and accurately
with clear information delivery
Service : A type of economic activity that is intangible, is not stored and does
not result in ownership. A service is consumed at the point of sale.
Page 9
Chapter III
Research Methodology
3.1 Research Design
This research is designed to answer researchers curiosity regarding the impact of Garuda
Indonesia service towards customer satisfaction, so the research will be conducted
quantitatively. Quantitative method is method that focuses on derivation of conclusion from
existing data using proven statistical or general quantitative methods. In the group we
encounter different modelling methods for information of business systems. (Mundar,
2012). Despite the quantitative measurements this research use, in the questionaire there
will be also questions that need descriptive answer regarding which features of Garuda
Indonesia service that the respondent fell most contributing to their satisfaction, and th ey
feel the least contributing thus need some improvement in that features.
The researcher has developed a timeline in conducting the research step by step to meet
the deadline of every single activity in the whole research. Below is a table showing the time
frame of the research:
Time
Activities
Page 10
Page 11
In order to obtain the primary source of data, the researcher has prepared the
questionnaire, and it will be spread to the people who fit the criteria to be the sample of
this research
3.4 Research Instrument
The research basically relies on questionnaire and literautre study of both foreign and local
related to the topic of the research. Specifically, in the questionnaire there will be inquiries
regarding the gender of the respondents and their age to identify the demography of the
respondents. There will be questions regarding the five variable and its indicator which will
be shown below:
Variable
Indicator
Measurement
Tangibles (X1)
Plane type
Interval Scale
Facility
Flight Attendance Neatness
Equipment Sophistication
Brochure aesthetics
Reliability (X2)
Accuracy
of
promises
Punctuality
Procedure Implementation
Concern
Sincererity of the employee
Responsivness (X3)
Clarity of information
Interval Scale
Timing of assistance
Accuracy of asistance
Readiness to assist
Willingness to assist
Assurance (X4)
Trust
Interval Scale
Security
Comfort
Page 12
Courtesy
Insurance
Empathy (X5)
Personal Attention
Interval Scale
Feeling satisfied
Giving reccomendation
Repeat purchase
Price to quality assumption
Meting expecation
Page 13
Sample Size:
To determine the sample size, researcher uses Slovin equation:
In which:
n = sample size
N = Population size
e = error
Population size (N), which is taken from the number of Garuda Indonesia passanger
perday, is 54322 and error estimaton is 10%, so the sample size is:
In which:
Y
= Customer satisfaction
= Constant
Page 14
x1
= Tangibles
x2
= Reliability
x3
= Responsiveness
x4
= Assurance
x5
= Empathy
Page 15
Page 16
instrument and the test scores. Hence, it is the researchers responsibility to assure high
consistency and accuracy of the tests and scores
3.7.2 Validity
The traditional criteria for validity find their roots in a positivist tradition, and to an extent,
positivism has been defined by a systematic theory of validity. Within the positivist
terminology, validity resided amongst, and was the result and culmination of other
empirical conceptions: universal laws, evidence, objectivity, truth, actuality, deduction,
reason, fact and mathematical data to name just a few (Winter, 2000).
Validity determines whether the research truly measures that which it was intended to
measure or how truthful the research results are. In other words, does the research
instrument allow you to hit "the bulls eye" of your research object? Researchers generally
determine validity by asking a series of questions, and will often look for the answers in the
research of others.
(Wainer, 1998) describe the validity in quantitative research as construct validity. The
construct is the initial concept, notion, question or hypothesis that determines which data is
to be gathered and how it is to be gathered. They also assert that quantitative researchers
actively cause or affect the interplay between construct and data in order to validate their
investigation, usually by the application of a test or other process. In this sense, the
involvement of the researchers in the research process would greatly reduce the validity of
a test.
Page 17
Appendix
Appendix I
Questionnaire
The Impact of Garuda Indonesia Service Towards Customer Satisfaction
Firstly, let me introduce myself. My name is Giovani Septio, a student in President University
majoring in Management study program, concentrate in International Business and currently
enrolled in 8th semester. My intention in sending the form is to ask for your help in filling this
questionnaire, which I will use to construct my Final Project in Research and Methodology subject.
This questionnaire consists of 3 (three) parts, which are: A) Personal Information; B) General
Instruction; C) Statement of Garuda Indonesia Service Impact to the Customer Satisfaction. I would
like to say thank you for your willingness to spend your time to fill this questionnaire.
Have youe ever traveled with Garuda Indonesia Airlines?
a. Yes
b. No
A. Personal Information
Full Name:
Gender:
a. Male
b. Female
Age:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
<20
21 30
31 40
41 50
>50
B. General Instruction
In this section you are asked to give an opinion on how much the following statement in
accordance to Garuda Indonesia Service Impact to the Customer Satisfaction. Please rate the
Page 18
following statement according to Strongly Disagree (SD), Disagree (D), Neither Agree or Disagree
(N), Agree (A), and Strongly Agree (SA).
Choose 1, if you are Strongly Disagree (SD) with the statement
Choose 2, if you are Disagree (D) with the statement
Choose 3, if you are Neither Agree or Disagree (N) with the statement
Choose 4, if you are Agree (A) with the statement
Choose 5, if you are Strongly Agree (SA) with the statement
Variable: Reliability
Garuda Indonesia is keeping their promises
Garuda Indonesia is departure according to the schedule
The procedure is implemented correctlly
Garuda Indonesia concern to the customers' wants
Garuda Indonesia employees are sincere to help the
customers
Variable: Responsiveness
Garuda Indonesia deliver clear information
The assistance Garuda indonesia gives right on-time
Garuda Indonesia always ready to assist the customer
The assistance of Garuca Indonesia is accurate
The employees and flight attendance are willing to help
Variable: Assurance
Garuda Indonesia give trust to the customer
The security in the plane is good
Garuda Indonesia give comfort to the passanger
Garuda Indonesia give insurance to the passangers
The courtesy of flight attendance is good
Variable: Empathy
Garuda ndonesia gives personal attention
The Impact of Garuda Indonesia Service Towards Customer Satisfaction
Page 19
my
From your opinion, what elements of Garuda Indonesia service that is most and the least
contributing to your satisfaction?
Thank you, this marks the end of the questionnaire. I personally would like to say thank you very
much for the valuable time you have spent to fill my questionnaire.
Page 20
APPENDIX II
REFERENCES
Bitner, M.J. and Hubbert, A.R. (1994), Encounter satisfaction vs. overall satisfaction and quality,
Sage Publications, pp. 72-94.
Butler, G. F. and Keller, M. R. (1992). The cost-constrained global airline industry environment:
what is quality?,Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 46, pp.599-618.
Chang, Y. and Keller, M. R. (2002). A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines,
European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 139, pp. 166-177.
Charles, C. M. (1995). Introduction to educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, Longman.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Toronto: Holt,
RineHart, and Winston, Inc
Cronin, J.J. and Taylor, S.A. (1992), Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, pp. 55-68.
Dennet, C.E., Ineson, M., Stone, G.J., and Colgate, M. (2000), Pre-Bookable Services in the Chartered
Airline Industry: Increasing Satisfaction through Differentiation, The Service Industries
Journal, Vol. 20 (2), pp. 82-94.
Haynes, R., & Percy, J. (1994). Perception paradox: Airline service quality issues, Proceedings of
Decision Sciences Institute - Annual Meeting, Vol.3, pp. 1950-1952.
Joppe, M. (2000). The Research Process, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills: Sage
Publications.
Lee, Moonkyu and Cunningham, L.F. (1996), Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry,
Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 50, No 2, Spring: pp. 57-72.
Manullng, Ida (2008), Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Jasa
Penerbangan PT. Garuda indonesia Airlines Di Bandara polonia Medan, USU e-repository
Ostrowski, P. L., OBrien, T. V., and Gordon, G. L. (1993). Service quality and customer loyalty in the
commercial airline industry, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 32, pp. 16-28.
Page 21
Patterson, P.G., & Spreng R.W. (1997). Modeling the relationship between perceived value,
satisfaction, and repurchase intentions in business-to-business, services context: An empirical
examination, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 8(5), pp. 414-434.
P. Kotler and G. Amstrong (1996), Principles of Marketing, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Tjiptono, Fandy, and Gregorius Chandra (2005), Service: Quality and Satisfaction, Andi Publication,
Yogyakarta.
Umar, Husein (2003), Riset Pemasaran dan Perilaku Konsumen, PT Gramedia, Jakarta.
Wainer, H., & Braun, H. I. (1988). Test validity. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
Winter, G. (2000). "A comparative discussion of the notion of validity in qualitative and quantitative
research". The Qualitative Report, 4(3&4). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
Page 22
APPENDIX III
SPSS RESULT
Validity Test Result
Variable: Tangibles
Correlations
Plane
Pearson Correlation
Plane
Sig. (1-tailed)
1,000
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total1
Total1
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
Facility
Pearson Correlation
Facility
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total1
Total1
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
FlightAttNeatne
Total1
ss
Pearson Correlation
FlightAttNeatness
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total1
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
1,000
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Page 23
Correlations
EquipmentSoph
Total1
istication
Pearson Correlation
EquipmentSophistication
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total1
**
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
BrochureAesthe
Total1
thics
Pearson Correlation
BrochureAesthethics
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total1
1,000
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Variable: Reliability
Correlations
Promise
Pearson Correlation
Promise
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total2
Total2
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Page 24
Correlations
Punctuality
Pearson Correlation
Punctuality
Total2
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total2
**
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
Procedure
Pearson Correlation
Procedure
Total2
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total2
**
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
Concern
Pearson Correlation
Concern
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total2
Total2
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Page 25
Correlations
Sincerity
Pearson Correlation
Sincerity
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total2
Total2
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Variable: Responsiveness
Correlations
ClarityofInfo
Pearson Correlation
ClarityofInfo
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total3
Total3
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
TimingofAssista
Total3
nce
Pearson Correlation
TimingofAssistance
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total3
1,000
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
AccofAssist
Pearson Correlation
AccofAssist
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Total3
Pearson Correlation
Total3
1,000
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
Page 26
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
Readiness
Pearson Correlation
Readiness
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total3
Total3
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
Willingness
Pearson Correlation
Willingness
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total3
Total3
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Variable: Assurance
Correlations
Trust
Pearson Correlation
Trust
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total4
Total4
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
1,000
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Page 27
Correlations
Security
Pearson Correlation
Security
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total4
Total4
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
Comfort
Pearson Correlation
Comfort
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total4
Total4
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Correlations
Courtesy
Pearson Correlation
Courtesy
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total4
Total4
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Correlations
Insurance
Pearson Correlation
Insurance
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Total4
Pearson Correlation
Total4
1,000
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
Page 28
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Variable: Empathy
Correlations
PersonalAttenti
Total5
on
Pearson Correlation
PersonalAttention
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total5
**
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
OperationHours
Pearson Correlation
OperationHours
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total5
Total5
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
UnderstandingN
Total5
eeds
Pearson Correlation
UnderstandingNeeds
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total5
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
1,000
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Page 29
Correlations
Goodwill
Pearson Correlation
Goodwill
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total5
Total5
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
Tolerance
Pearson Correlation
Tolerance
Sig. (1-tailed)
1,000
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total5
Total5
Sig. (1-tailed)
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Correlations
FeelingSatisfied
Pearson Correlation
FeelingSatisfied
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total6
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Total6
1,000
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Page 30
Correlations
Reccomend
Pearson Correlation
Reccomend
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total6
Total6
Sig. (1-tailed)
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Correlations
RepeatPurchas
Total6
e
Pearson Correlation
RepeatPurchase
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total6
1,000
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Correlations
AttPricetoQualit
Total6
y
Pearson Correlation
AttPricetoQuality
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Total6
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
1,000
**
,000
30
30
**
1,000
,000
30
30
Page 31
Correlations
MeetingExpecta
Total6
tion
Pearson Correlation
MeetingExpectation
Sig. (1-tailed)
**
,000
N
Pearson Correlation
Total6
1,000
30
30
**
1,000
Sig. (1-tailed)
,000
30
30
Reliability
Variable: Tangibles
Excluded
Total
%
30
100,0
,0
30
100,0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
,840
Facility
stication
Total1
hics
Plane
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Facility
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
FlightAttNeatness
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
EquipmentSophistication
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
BrochureAesthethics
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Total1
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Page 32
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Corrected Item-
Squared
Cronbach's
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Total Correlation
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Deleted
Plane
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Facility
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
FlightAttNeatness
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
EquipmentSophistication
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
BrochureAesthethics
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Total1
10,8333
29,454
1,000
1,000
Scale Statistics
Mean
Variance
21,6667
Std. Deviation
117,816
N of Items
10,85431
Variable: Reliability
Valid
Cases
Excluded
Total
30
100,0
,0
30
100,0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
,840
Punctuality
Procedure
Concern
Sincerity
Total2
Promise
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Punctuality
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Page 33
Procedure
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Concern
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Sincerity
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Total2
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Corrected Item-
Squared
Cronbach's
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Total
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Correlation
Deleted
Promise
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Punctuality
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Procedure
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Concern
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Sincerity
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Total2
10,8333
29,454
1,000
1,000
Scale Statistics
Mean
Variance
21,6667
Std. Deviation
117,816
N of Items
10,85431
Variable: Responsivenes
Excluded
Total
%
30
100,0
,0
30
100,0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
,840
Page 34
TimingofAssista
AccofAssist
Readiness
Willingness
Total3
nce
ClarityofInfo
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
TimingofAssistance
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
AccofAssist
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Readiness
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Willingness
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Total3
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Corrected Item-
Squared
Cronbach's
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Total
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Correlation
Deleted
ClarityofInfo
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
TimingofAssistance
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
AccofAssist
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Readiness
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Willingness
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Total3
10,8333
29,454
1,000
1,000
Scale Statistics
Mean
Variance
21,6667
Std. Deviation
117,816
N of Items
10,85431
Variable: Assurance
Excluded
Total
%
30
100,0
,0
30
100,0
Page 35
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
,840
Security
Comfort
Courtesy
Insurance
Total4
Trust
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Security
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Comfort
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Courtesy
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Insurance
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Total4
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Corrected Item-
Squared
Cronbach's
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Total
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Correlation
Deleted
Trust
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Security
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Comfort
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Courtesy
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Insurance
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Total4
10,8333
29,454
1,000
1,000
Scale Statistics
Mean
21,6667
Variance
117,816
Std. Deviation
10,85431
N of Items
6
Page 36
Variable: Empathy
Excluded
Total
%
30
100,0
,0
30
100,0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
,840
OperationHours
UnderstandingN
Goodwill
Tolerance
Total5
eeds
PersonalAttention
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
OperationHours
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
UnderstandingNeeds
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Goodwill
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Tolerance
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Total5
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Corrected Item-
Squared
Cronbach's
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Total Correlation
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Deleted
PersonalAttention
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
OperationHours
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
UnderstandingNeeds
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Goodwill
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Tolerance
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Total5
10,8333
29,454
1,000
1,000
Page 37
Scale Statistics
Mean
Variance
21,6667
Std. Deviation
117,816
N of Items
10,85431
Excluded
Total
%
30
100,0
,0
30
100,0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
,840
Reccomend
Total6
ion
FeelingSatisfied
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Reccomend
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
RepeatPurchase
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
AttPricetoQuality
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
MeetingExpectation
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Total6
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Page 38
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance
Corrected Item-
Squared
Cronbach's
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Total
Multiple
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Correlation
Deleted
FeelingSatisfied
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Reccomend
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
RepeatPurchase
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
AttPricetoQuality
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
MeetingExpectation
19,5000
95,431
1,000
,802
Total6
10,8333
29,454
1,000
1,000
Scale Statistics
Mean
21,6667
Variance
117,816
Std. Deviation
10,85431
N of Items
6
Page 39