Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
Properties of cement
Description
of
test
Test results
obtained
with papercrete.
setting
time
II. OBJECTIVES
The major Objective of the project is replacing the costly
Requirements of
65 minutes
Min. 30minutes
270 minutes
Max. 600minutes
following characteristics,
Required
Cost effective
Environmental friendly
Less weight
Inflammable
Easily available
m /kg
Fig . Cement
412.92
investigation
Page 49
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
3.995
Special Issue-1,
Issue October 2014
ISSN: 2321-9653
2321
Fig GGBS
QUARRY DUST: Getting good Quarry dust free from
organic impurities and salts is very difficult in now a day.
While adding the Quarry dust to the mix. And the Quarry
dust should be in uniform size i.e., all the Quarry dust
table
Property
Quarry dust
Natural sand
Specific gravity
2.54-2.60
2.60
than cellulose.
1720-1810
1460
1.20-1.50
Nil
Nil
1.50
12-15
06
Zone II
Zone II
Bulk
relative
3
texture. Clay,
lay, rice husk ash is added to make the cellulose
density (kg/m )
Absorption (%)
Moisture
content
(%)
Fine particles less
than 0.075mm (%)
Sieve analysis
very smooth.
Page 50
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
segregation.
should be between 6 to 7.
AND PLASTER
rebound
Page 51
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
random and they are stacked length wise, along the width
ABSORPTION
CRUSHING STRENGTH
SOUNDNESS
struck each other. The bricks should not break and a clear
STRUCTURE
A brick is broken and its structure is examined. It
should be homogeneous, compact and free from defects
Page 52
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
FIBROUS CONCRETE
polymer like
environmental.
PADOBE
Cement
brick. This earth should have clay content more than 30%.
GGBS
Quarry dust
may crack while drying, but adding paper fiber to the earth
Paper
Fibrous concrete
Padobe
fibrous materials
Fidobe
ECO FRIENDLY
Page 53
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
MANUFACTURING OF BRICKS
were removed.
There was no clear past details about the project. And there
is no hard procedure for casting the bricks. So the
MOULD PREPARATION
After collecting all the materials, a mould was
prepared. A typical mould is shown in the below figure.
Fig.
Immersed
Fig. Mould
This mould was non-water absorbing in the size
of 230mm length, 110mm wide and 80mm deep. The
shorter sides of the mould are slightly projecting to serve
as handle. And joints were made without any hole or gap
Fig. Paper Pulp
to avoid leakage.
Page 54
Paper
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
Fig. Mixing
Ingredients (%)
ificat
S.No.
first and kept separately .This was done just before the
Dr
Dr
ion
Ce
arr
GGBS
Mar
me
ap
% of weight
nt
er
du
of cement
101
Fixi
st
mixing starts.
Fixit
302
Super
Latex
1.
2.
P1
P2
20%
30%
20%
20%
50ml
50ml
3.
P3
50%
20%
50ml
Page 55
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
WEIGHT
Table : Weight of Papercrete Bricks
S.No.
Identification
% 0f
Mark
GGBS
1.
P1
20
2.
P2
30
3.
P3
50
Dry
Weight
(kg.)
1.773
1.842
1.862
the brick.
Page 56
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
3.995
Special Issue-1,
Issue October 2014
ISSN: 2321-9653
2321
rd
COMPRESSION TEST
of conventional brick
weight only. So this bricks are light weight and it will also
reduce total cost of construction due to the reduction in
dead load.
WATER ABSORBTION TEST : Dry the specimen in
ventilated oven at a temperature of 105C to 115C till it
attains substantially constant mass. Cool the specimen to
room temperature and obtain its weight (M1) specimen too
warm to touch shall not be used for this purpose. Immerse
completely
mpletely dried specimen in clean water at a temperature
out any traces of water with damp cloth and weigh the
WATER
ABSORPTION
TEST
PAPECRETE BRICKS
OF
to half compression.
hours)
Trail
Mix
20%
30%
50%
40.11%
33.85%
23.74%
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
G-20%
G-30%
G-50%
P1
P2
P3
24 HOURS
time.
Page 57
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
3.995
Special Issue-1,
Issue October 2014
ISSN: 2321-9653
2321
brick. While the scratch was made with the help of finger
formula,
BRICKS
14 Days)
Trial
Mix
were taken and they were struck with each other. The
30%
50%
STRUCTURE TEST
In this test, the bricks were broken and the
5.9
7.5
8.7
7.5N/
10
8.7N/
2
8
6
G2
4
2
0
P1
P2 14 DAYS P3
HARDNESS TEST
In this test, a scratch was made on brick surfaces.
This test was carried out for all the three proportions of
Page 58
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
NAILING
out to find out whether bricks hold the nail or not. A nail
was hammered in the brick and a screw is also screwed in
not hold nails any better than dry wall, but screws worked
well and hold a considerable weight. So, the screws are the
Page 59
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
First, the brick was wiped with cloths and all the
foreign matters were removed.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
papercrete.
From the above experimental studies we can conclude that,
FIRE
for the bricks. This test was carried out only for fibrous
Page 60
www. ijraset.com
SJ Impact Factor-3.995
Sludge,
Construction
and
Building
and
Thermal
Envelope
Council
Pulp
and
Paper
Mill
Residuals,
Page 61