Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Mathematics
Tarbiat Modares University
P. O. Box: 14115-170
Tehran, Iran
e-mail: moussavi.a@modares.ac.ir
2Mathematics
1. Introduction
The concept of BL-algebras was introduced by Hajek [5] in order to
provide, an algebraic proof of the completeness theorem of basic logic
(BL, for short). Soon after, Cignoli et al. in [2], proved that Hajeks logic
really is the logic of continuous t-norms as conjectured by Hajek. At the
same time started a systematic study of BL-algebras, too. Indeed,
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 06F35, 03G25.
Keywords and phrases: BL-algebra, n-fold (positive) implicative filter, n-fold fantastic basic
logic, n-fold fantastic BL-algebra, (weak) n-fold fantastic filter.
Received September 1, 2009; Revised September 26, 2009
2009 Scientific Advances Publishers
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
28
29
the notion of n-fold fantastic filters. We prove that, every n-fold fantastic
BL-algebra is also an (n + 1) - fold fantastic BL-algebra, but by an
example, we show that the converse is not true. Some characterization
for a BL-algebra to be n-fold fantastic, is given. We define n-fold fantastic
filters, after that we state the equivalent conditions for n-fold fantastic
BL-algebras. By [8], every n-fold positive implicative filter is an n-fold
implicative filter, but the converse is not true. We show that, under some
conditions, an n-fold implicative filter is an n-fold positive implicative
filter.
2. n-Fold Fantastic BL-Algebras
Definition 2.1. A BL-algebra is an algebra ( A, , , , , 0, 1 ) of
type (2, 2, 2, 2, 0, 0 ) satisfying the following axioms:
(BL1) ( A, , , 0, 1 ) is a bounded lattice,
(BL2) ( A, , 1) is a commutative monoid,
(BL3) and form an adjoint pair; i.e., c a b, if and only
if a c b for all a, b, c a,
(BL4) a b = a (a b) ,
(BL5) (a b) (b a ) = 1.
Proposition 2.2 [3, 4, 5]. In each BL-algebra A, the following
relations hold for all x , y, z A :
(p1) x (x y ) y,
(p2) x ( y (x y )) ,
(p3) x y, if and only if x y = 1,
(p4) x ( y z ) = y (x z ) ,
(p5) If x y, then y z x z and z x z y,
(p6) y ( y x ) x ,
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
30
(p7) y x (z y ) (z x ) ,
(p8) x y ( y z ) (x z ) ,
(p9) x y = [(x y ) y] [( y x ) x ].
In what follows, let n denotes a positive integer and A a BL-algebra,
unless otherwise specified. For any element x of A, let x n denotes
x K x , in which x occurs n times, and x 0 = 1.
Theorem 2.5 [8, Theorem 4.6]. Let F be a filter of A. Then for all
x , y, z A, the following conditions are equivalent:
31
(iii) x n +1 y F implies x n y F ,
(iv) x n ( y z ) F implies ( x n y ) ( x n z ) F .
Definition 2.6. A nonempty subset F of A is called an n-fold positive
Theorem 2.7 [8, Theorem 6.2]. Every n-fold positive implicative filter
of A is a filter of A.
Theorem 2.8 [8, Theorem 6.3]. Let F be a filter of A. Then for all
x , y, z A, the following conditions are equivalent:
it satisfies 1 F and:
(f7) x , y, z A , z ( y x ) F , z F imply ((x y ) y )
x F.
Theorem 2.10 [7, Theorem 4.2]. Every fantastic filter of A is a filter
of A.
Definition 2.11. Axioms of an n-fold fantastic basic logic are those of
BL plus
(( n v/ ) v/ ) v/ ,
where
n = K for n times,
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
32
1.
have
(( x n y ) y ) x = y x ,
for all x , y A. Since x m x n , we get
y x = (( x n y ) y ) x (( x m y ) y ) x .
33
(( x m y ) y ) x y x.
Thus
(( x n +1 y ) y ) x = y x ,
which shows that A is an m-fold fantastic BL-algebra.
c
1
0
0
0
a
a
b
a
c
c
1
c
1
a
0
c
a
c
b
1
c
1
1
equivalent:
(i) A is n-fold fantastic,
(ii) ( x n y ) y ( y x ) x , for all x , y A,
(iii) x n z y z , z x y x ,
(iv) x n z y z , z x , y y x ,
(v) y x ( x n y ) y x .
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
34
(( x n y ) y ) (( y x ) x ) = ( y x ) ((( x n y ) y ) x )
= ( y x ) ( y x ) = 1.
( y x ) ((( x n y ) y ) x ) = (( x n y ) y ) (( y x ) x )
(( x n y ) y ) (( x n y ) y )
= 1.
((( x n y ) y ) x ) ( y x ) y (( x n y ) y )
= ( x n y ) ( y y)
= (xn y ) 1
= 1,
and so ((( x n y ) y ) x ) ( y x ) = 1, that is, (( x n y ) y )
x y x. Hence, A is n-fold fantastic.
35
(iv)
(v). Let
x, y A
y x.
be such that
Note that
(iv) that ( x n y ) y x .
(v) (ii). Since x ( y x ) x , we have (( y x ) x )n y
x n y by induction. Since, y ( y x ) x , it follows from (p5) and
(v) that
( x n y ) y ((( y x ) x )n y ) y ( y x ) x.
This completes the proof.
a
b
1
0
0
0
a
0
0
a
a
b
0
a
b
b
1
0
a
b
1
0
a
b
1
0
1
a
0
0
a
1
1
a
a
b
1
1
1
b
1
1
1.
1
1
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
36
of A.
Proof. Let x , x y F . Hence, x y = x (1 y ) F . Since,
The following example shows that the converse of Theorem 3.4 is not
true.
Example 3.5. In Example 3.3, {1} is a filter. Since, 1 {1} and 1
with
y x F.
Let
x , y, z A
z ( y x ) F and z F . Then y x F
be
such
that
37
Since, F is n-fold fantastic filter, it follows from Theorem 3.6 (i) and (p4)
that
( y x ) ((( k n y ) y ) x ) = (( k n y ) y ) (( y x ) x )
= (( k n y ) y ) k F G.
every m > n.
Proof. Let F be an n-fold fantastic filter of A and for x , y A, y
xF
The following example shows that the converse of Theorem 3.9 is not
true.
Example 3.10. In Example 2.16, it is clear that F = {1} is a 2-fold
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
38
and
y x F.
F . By Corollary 1,
be such that
39
for every
x , y A. Then,
y k = y (( y x ) x ) = ( y x ) ( y x ) = 1 {1},
1 = (( k n y ) y ) k (( x n y ) y ) k,
so that
(( x n y ) y ) (( y x ) x ) = (( x n y ) y ) k = 1,
it means that, ( x n y ) y ( y x ) x. Hence by Theorem 2.17, A
is an n-fold fantastic BL-algebra.
and so
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
40
( x 2n 0 ) ( x n 0 ) F .
Since, F is an n-fold fantastic filter and ( x n 0 ) x F , by Theorem
3.6 (i), we have
(( x n ( x n 0 )) ( x n 0 )) x = (( x 2n 0 ) ( x n 0 )) x F .
On the other hands, since ( x 2n 0 ) ( x n 0 ) F , by (f4), we have
x F.
( k n y ) k = ( k n y ) ((( x n y ) y ) x )
= (( x n y ) y ) (( k n y ) x )
(( x n y ) y ) (( x n y ) x )
y x F.
41
0
0
c
0
a
0
b
0
1
0
0
1
c
1
a
1
b
1
1
1
b
1
b
1
b
1
b
1
References
[1]
[2]
C. C. Chang, Algebraic analysis of many valued logic, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 88
(1958), 467-490.
R. Cignoly, F. Esteva and L. Godo, Basic fuzzy logic is the logic of continuous t-norm
and their residual, Soft Comput. 4 (2000), 106-112.
[3]
[4]
[5]
M. SHIRVANI-GHADIKOLAI et al.
42
[6]
P. Hajek, What is mathematical fuzzy logic?, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157 (2004),
597-603.
[7]
M. Haveshki, A. Borumand Saeid and E. Eslami, Some types of filters in BLalgebras, Soft Comput. 10 (2006), 657-664.
[8]
[9]
[10]
E. Turunen, BL-algebras of basic fuzzy logic, Math. Soft Comput. 6 (1999), 49-61.
[11]