You are on page 1of 5

DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY

NAME OF STUDENT: - RAHUL KUMAR DUBEY


ROLL NO. : - 2014087
SEMESTER: - 1ST
SUBJECT: - LEGAL METHOD
TITLE OF THE PROJECT: - ROLE OF EXECUTIVE IN EXECUTING LAW
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: - The researcher will have a doctrinal approach towards the
Project. Information for the Project will be collected from Books, Journals and Internet.

INTRODUCTION
The Executive is part of government that has the sole authority and responsibility for the
daily administration of the state. Executive means leader of office or many office run. The
executive branch executes or enforces the law. The division of power into separate branches
of government is central to the idea of the separation of powers.
The separation of powers system is designed to distribute authority among several branches
an attempt to preserve individual liberty in response to tyrannical leadership throughout
history. The executive officer is not supposed to make laws (the role of the legislature) or
interpret them (the role of the judiciary). The role of the executive is to enforce the law as
written by the legislature and interpreted by the judicial system.
The executive can be the source of certain types of law, including decree or executive order.
Executive bureaucracies are commonly the source of regulations.
In a presidential system the leader of the executive branch is both the head of state and head
of government. In a parliamentary system, a cabinet minister responsible to the legislature is
the head of government, while the head of state is usually a largely ceremonial monarch or
president.

What are the functions of executive in executing the Laws?


The executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy
enacted and funded by the legislative branch. In the modern state a variety of functions are
performed by the executive, as stated below.
1. Administrative Function:
The administration function of the executive includes the following:(a) Execution of Laws and Judicial Decision
(b) Maintenance of Law and Order
(c) Policy-Formation
(d) Appointment and Promotion

2. Diplomatic function

3. Military Function

4. Financial and Economic Function


(a) Budget-preparation
(b) Revenue-collection
(c) Auditing
(d) Economic policy

5. Judicial Function

6. Constituent Function

7. Legislative Function
(a) Law-Making
(b) To summon and provoke the House
(c) Promulgation of Ordinance
(d) Delegated Legislation

8. Welfare Function

9. Miscellaneous Functions

Increase in the Functions of the Executive


A review of the functions of the executive reveals that the executive is a functioning organ.
C. F. Strong opines that "in spite of the vast importance of the le function in modern
government, it tends to be overshadowed by the executive."
A number of factors has contributed to the enormous growth in executive functions in recent
time.
1. Complexities and Technicalities of Modern Life

2. Welfare of People
3. Overburdened Legislature
4. Planning
5. Delegated Legislation
6. Administrative Adjudication
7. Emergency Situations

Relationship between the Legislature and the Executive


According to Sidgwick, the relation between the legislature and executive is one of the
knotiest problems in the constitutional structure. Montesquieu and Blackstone maintained
that the three organs of government should be kept separate and distinct and one should have
no relation with the other.
But strict separation of powers is neither desirable nor practicable. The government is an
organic unity and the legislature and the executive must work in co-operation and
collaboration.
One cannot be strictly separate and independent of the other. It is observed in practice that in
every state the legislature partakes in the work of the executive and vice versa.

Relationship between the Executive and the Judiciary


It is accepted at all hands that the judiciary should be kept separate from the executive. The
judiciary is the guardian of the liberty of the people and this function can be performed
efficiently and honestly only when it is independent of the control of the executive.
If both these functions are combined in a single person as is the case with the Deputy
Commissioner in India, who combines in him the executive and judicial powers, the liberty of
the people cannot be safe at his hands.
As Montesquieu said, the executive will become oppressive. There shall be left no restraint
upon its officers and the rights of the people will depend upon their mercy.

Judiciary must be made independent of the executive. However, as the government is an


organism these organs cannot be separated completely. In a modern state executive performs
judicial and semi-judicial functions and the judiciary performs certain executive functions.

You might also like