Professional Documents
Culture Documents
bstract
Key
_________________________________ I n t r o d u c t i o n ______________ __
F in a n c ia l P e r f o r m a n c e M
easurem ent
(R eturn
on
In v e s t m e n t )
Perform ance m easurem ent using ROI was developed until early 20th
century. T his instrum ent is m uch influenced by business tradition o f 19th century
that generally m easures perform ance based on ratio between net earnings and
sales revenue or costs o f operation. In early 19th century, businessm en (ownerentrepreneur) usually concentrated on one single econom ic activity, therefore it
is favorable to use operating ratio o f costs to revenue or return on sales to
m easure their profitability (K aplan and Atkinson 1998, 500).
B usiness m odel o f 20th century is different from previous century. 20th
century business is not only focused on one single econom y activity, but more
than one. O riginally, business activities were separated and independent,
afterw ard they w ere integrated; for exam ple, to coordinate and allocate
resources, a different activity is needed, such as producing, buying, and selling
activity. Therefore, a new m easurem ent is required to m easure profitability o f a
com pany. The m easurem ent is return on investm ent (RO I) w hich is initiated by
DuPont Pow der C om pany that established in 1903. The m easurem ent is a
com bination o f return on sales and assets turnover (K aplan and A tkinson 1998,
500).
B ased o n the explanation above, we see that in 19th century ownerentrepreneur held an essential role in business. Therefore, the prim ary attention
o f the business is return o f capital invested in the business. The proper
m easurem ent on that point in tim e is the com parison o f net earnings and sales
revenue or costs o f operations. On next period, ow ners role still apparent
(although the structure o f ow ner him self is no longer individual, but collective
and the business structure is m ore com plex). It is reflected on the m easurem ent
utilized, that is, return on investm ent (ROI) w hich represents the prim e interest
o f the ow ners o f capital.
In the context o f accounting, the first model is reflected in proprietary
theory, w hile the second is represented in entity theory. Under the former,
proprietor or ow ner turn out to be the center o f attention. It m eans, ail accounting
concepts, procedures, and regulations are form ulated based on the interest o f the
ow ner (Kam 1990, 302; see also C hatfield 1977, 220). U nder the latter, the
ow ner is still the center o f attention. The difference only appears in the
In the context o f micro and current circum stances, one form o f the
structural violence is the partial m easurem ent o f m anagem ent perform ance that
m easured by ROI. This m easurem ent is obviously the prim ary tool for ow ner to
control a com pany in order to maintain and develop capital. Such condition is
indeed existing in our society, and even losing control. Thus, no one can escape
from this collision circle.
Based on the above description, it is perceived that principal-agent model
is full o f self-interest. As com m only known, self-interest is the basic value o f
capitalism . The value fundam entally transform s hum an life. It is a sort o f life
that entraps hum an being into m aterialistic and hedonic netw orks o f life. Human
being as the creator cannot control his/her own creation and entraps him /herself
into the creation. He/she is entrapped him self/herself in capital accum ulation and
m aterial accum ulation.
_________B a l a n c e d S c o r e c a r d : A n A l t e r n a t i v e M
e a s u r e m e n t ?_________
ROI is the real m easurem ent that is created for the interest o f owners.
Many people have understood the w eaknesses o f the instrum ent. There is a need
to invent an alternative one. An instrum ent that currently becom es a center o f
attention is B alanced Scorecard (BS).
This instrum ent is formed to
com m unicate various related organizations objectives that have to be achieved
on the bases o f capacity and innovation, not based on physical activity (Kaplan
and A tkinson 1998, 368) as we notice in the 19th and 20th century m odels.
BS has four perspectives, namely: (1) financial perspective; (2) custom er
perspective; (3) internal business process perspective; and (4) learning and
growth perspective. Financial perspective is still utilizing financial perform ance
m easurem ents as indicators w hether com panys strategy, im plem entation, and
execution have contributed to the bottom -line im provem ent. M easurem ent in this
perspective usually covers operating income, return on capital em ployed, or
econom ic value added.
C ustom er perspective gives its concern to custom ers. Under the
perspective, custom ers and m arket segm ents identified in a certain business units
which in turn their m easurem ents are linked to custom er satisfaction, custom er
retention, new custom er acquisition, custom er profitability, and market and
account share on m arket objective.
In the perspective o f internal business process, com pany executives
identify critical internal process that should be undertaken by m anagem ent. It
some experts (tor instance, Ikeda i 992, O iwasuaK ; ^99, tiessu c .:0UUj
i rr.
ji ii ic> iall into the areas o f the exploitative character o f the ethics, ior i n s t a n t
exploitation tow ards labors, natural environm ent, hum an spiritual life, and su on
r he third w eakness is putting "the owners o f the capital - the captiaiisii.
'i.iiciiolders and creditors) as a center point o f strategic m anagem ent system
nii >act is proven by dem onstrating the following concept 01 Kaplan an::
N o rto n . -Vn. 6 I )
^nanciai
Djecuves .cpresent the long-term goai oi me
jfganization. io provide superior returns based on the capital
nvested in ihe unit. Using the balanced scorecaru aoes hul
oonllict with this vital goal. Indeed, the balanced scorecard can
make the financial objectives explicit, and custom ize financial
-)bjectives to business units in different stages o f their growth
and iife cy c le ... This linkage to financial objectives explicitly
recognizes that the long-run goal for the business is to generate
financial returns to investors, and all strategies, program s, and
initiatives should enable the business unit to achieve its financial
objectives (italics added).
The statem ent clearly explains that the long-term goal o f the com pany is
to provide superior returns based on the capital invested in the business. Based
on the capital-invested m eans the expected returns are for the ow ners o f the
capital (capitalists). W hile, the other sentence clearly states to generate financial
returns to investors , to produce returns for investors.
The fact is also supported by accounting body o f United States of
A m erica that form ulates the objective o f financial statem ents for as follow':
An objective o f financial statem ent is to provide inform ation
jsef'ul to investors and creditors for predicting, com paring, and
evaluating potential cash flows to them in term s o f am ount,
tim ing and related uncertainty (M atthew and Perera 1973, 76;
italics added).
Based on the description above, it is clear that the ow ners o f the capital
(investors and creditors) have significant position for the com pany to survive.
Therefore, the interests o f capitalists becom e a first priority in designing and
preparing financial statem ents. Furtherm ore, we notice that financial statem ents
are designed to m easure financial perform ance to m eet the capitalists interests
In other aspect, w e can say that BS is designed to meet the interests o f
only limited stakeholders, i.e. investors, customers, and em ployee. Under the
learning and grow th perspective, em ployee does get attention as seen on core
em ployee m easurem ents that consist o f em ployee satisfaction and em ployee
retention. H ow ever, it seem s that em ployee is m ade use o f by m anagem ent to
provide an excellent service to custom ers that by doing this, the com pany will
earn high returns. The custom ers also seem to be placed as an object that to be
well served so the com pany can gain high returns. Finally, we can see that the
first top rank o f stakeholders is investor. This m eans that the investor acts as a
subject who controls an object.
T he D ec o n str u c t io n E piste m o l o c y
of
P erform ance M
easurem ent
Based on the previous explanation, we know that (1) profit m axim ization,
(2) the ethics o f utilitarianism , (3) capitalists, and (4) limited stakeholders are the
central elem ents o f BS. In modern civilization, they have pow er to dom inate and
elim inate som ething else, that is, The O thers. This way o f thinking is
recognized as binary opposition. Binary opposition m eans tw o things always
in contradictory position (for instance, structure-substance, egoistic-altruistic,
m aterial-spiritual, econom y-social, and so on) that each part attem pts to
dom inate or elim inate the others.
This way o f thinking has a negative effect, since the concept itself does not
have a balanced value. W hile, the wisdom o f Islamic tradition (through the
concept o f pair), C hinese tradition (through the concept o f Taoism , i.e. the
balance o f yin and yang) (see C apra 1975; 1996), and Javanese tradition (through
a statem ent o f '"ngono yo ngono n in g yo ojo ngono w hich m eans more or less
do it, but do not be excessive) teaches us a sense o f balance, o f harm ony, and
o f justice. These traditions in the m odem civilization is m arginalized. They are
brushed off; brushed o ff from The C entral and trapped in a m arginal position.
Even, every effort that was done to dispose the O thers is actually an action to
trap ourselves or to dam age ourselves.
The destruction o f our natural
environm ent (flood and land erosion), econom ic crisis, political crisis, and social
crisis are arising because o f false concepts o f m odernism that places m oney or
capital above all - as The C entral .
Islam ic tradition in Holy Koran (for instance, QS 36:36) teaches us the
nature o f the w orld o f existence which always is in pair, that is, pair system o f
two opposing m atters (pairs o f opposite forces). O ther Q u ranic verse (QS 94:
6), i.e Behind a difficulty there should be an easiness, also show s the same
m atter, nam ely, the union o f two opposing m atters. This is the law o f nature; the
law o f God. Em pirically, we notice the law, for instance, in atom that has proton
to
and electron, in electricity that has positive and negative poles, and so on.
Islamic tradition believes that the two opposing m atters (opposite forces) are in a
unity (unity o f opposites), not tw o separated m atters (see Ali 1989, 1124).
The concept is not so different with the tenets o f Taoism . Taoism is a
system o f b elief that is more based on intuitive wisdom than rational knowledge.
One o f the concepts is that the world existence is governed by a dynam ic
interplay o f two opposing matters, i.e. Yin and Yang. In this regard, C apra
(197S, 102) says that
...all changes in nature as m anifestations o f dynam ic interplay
between the polar opposition yin and yang, and thus they (Taoist)
cam e to believe that any pair o f opposites constitutes a polar
relationship where each o f the two poles is dynam ically linked to
the other.
For W estern tradition, according to C apra (1975, 102), the idea that unites
two opposing forces is hard to recognize. Even, according to W atts (1979, 20),
the concept is a puzzling one, because the rational and m aterialistic western
civilization observe anything in a linear (not cyclic) m odel. Interdependency o f
two opposing m atters, according to this view, m eans rejecting a progress
(which is seen as a linear mode). All W estern views agree to say, m aking the
world better in a linear way o f thinking (that is different with Eastern
civilization which believes in cyclic m ode) - happy w ithout sad, rich w ithout
poor, and healthy w ithout being sick. These views are against the statem ent o f
Lao Tzu who says (C apra 1975, 103):
In order to contract a tiling, one should surely expand it first.
In order to weaken, one will surely strengthen first.
In order to overthrow , one will surely exalt first.
In order to take, one will surely give first.
W e ste rn tra d itio n is having difficulty to accep t th e co n c ep t th a t is
ev id en ced on its civilization. F o r in stan ce, in econom ics, th e re is a
co n c ep t o f tim e valu e o f m oney th a t is based on th e assu m p tio n o f
positive tim e p re fere n ce. T his a ssu m p tio n co n sid ers th a t an y th in g
w o rk s in a lin e a r m ode; c o m p a n y s objective is to gain a m axim um
p ro fit by n eg a tin g a possibility to su ffe r a loss. In this re g a rd , H ines
o pines th a t:
Both opposites exist in all life but one o f them may be
representing or neglected. Leading to an im balance in favor
o f the other. Such im balance becomes antithetical to survival,
12
Yang (M asculine)
In t e r n a l iz a t io n
______
of
Perform
the O
ance
th er s to
eco nstruct
e a s u r e m e n t __________________
in
other
H ow ever, the unity or the balance seems to be a pseudo one, because the
balancing values (i.e. fem inine values) sim ply being used to strengthen the
m asculine values. C onsequently, the m asculine values rem ain on top and
pow erful. It is evidenced by show ing the follow ing statem ent o f Kaplan and
N orton:
Eventually, all objectives and m easures in the scorecard
perspectives should be linked to achieving one or m ore
objectives in the financial perspective... (1996, 61).
Based on the statem ent above, financial perspective is the only preferred
perspective, while the others is placed on a m arginal position.
This evidence is illustrated for as follows:
This linkage to financial objectives explicitly recognizes that
the long-run goal for the business is to generate financial
returns to investors . and all strategies, program s, and
initiatives should enable the business unit to achieve its
financial objectives (Kaplan and Norton 1996, 61; italics
added).
The second evidence indicates that investor is on a special position.
Im plicitly, BS is designed to m eet the interest o f investors, i.e. satisfied financial
returns. C ustom er and em ployee are sim ply as the instrum ents that are exploited
for the interest o f investors to earn maxim um profit.
The first prim e w eakness o f BS, as m entioned before, is profit
m axim ization, which indicates the ability o f m anagem ent to generate utility over
dis-utility (revenues is higher than expenses). Profit is econom ic m aterial that
can be easily m easured. If we observe the table above, we will say that profit is
m asculine, because it has econom ic and m aterial elem ents, can be m easured
quantitatively by using certain accounting standards .
By using the synergy o f binary opposition, there should be som ething else
which functions as a couple o f profit that becom es the orientation o f
m anagem ent. The som ething m eant here is som ething that has contradict
character with the profit, i.e. a social thing (see table 1). The social thing
is som ething that accom panies (econom ic) profit .
Both ( social and
econom ic thing) should becom e an intact orientation for the m anagem ent. In
the context o f Islam ic, Tao, and Javanese tradition (or other traditions), social
14
character is not som ething new, because essentially this character is humanistic
culture. Therefore, it will not be a problem if the character is integrated to
econom ic affairs.
Little bit different with the description above, Sikula challenges us to
transform profit orientation to m oral one by saying
T he transform ation o f business, organizations, and society
requires new theories and m odels o f individuals and institutional
behavior. An exam ple o f a transform ational theory is moral
m axim ization ... My intent is to propose that m oral
m axim ization but that later it becom e a substitute and perm anent
replacem ent (1996, 96).
M oral is fem inine, w hile profit is m asculine. Since the m asculine
character has very strong pow er in business, Sikula (1996) attem pts
to replace m asculine character with the fem inine one. If w e use the
synergy o f binary opposition, then Sikulas (1996) suggestion will not
resolve the problem , because he replaces a pow er (profit
m axim ization) with other power (m oral m axim ization) that
consequently still generate im balance. It will be better if Sikula
(1996) opines that m oral m axim ization is a couple o f profit
m axim ization.
In Islam ic tradition, the merge o f the profit and moral is shown and
im plem ented in zakat. The tradition allows Someone to seek profit, but to earn
the profit he/she should obey shari'ah ethics (m oral). Then, if the profit has
been earned, som e o f the profit should be distributed to others who have a right
to receive. C learly, the zakat concept confirm s that zakat unites econom ic aspect
(m asculine) and social aspect (fem inine).
In this regard, Triyuw ono explains in more detail that zakat covers some
implications:
First, there is a transform ation from profit orientation to a
zakat one. This im plicates that profit achievem ent is not the
ultim ate goal o f a com pany, but as ju st a m iddle goal.
Second, since the orientation is zakat , then all com panys
operations should com ply with the ethics and m orality o f
shari'ah. Third, zakat covers the unity o f egoistic and
* Zakat is Islam ic tax; tax system that based on Islamic tenets.
16
Process Perspective.
The third w eakness o f BS is placing capitalists in the highest position
am ong other stakeholders. As m entioned before, capitalists are special subjects,
and conversely, other stakeholders (custom er, em ployee, m anagem ent, supplier,
governm ent, etc) are the controlled objects. In that hierarchy, it is likely that
capitalists exploit stakeholders and environm ent (see C hw astiak 1999). The
tendency to exploit is possible because the econom ic authority is in one hand,
that is, capitalist (Triyuw ono 2002).
T his concept is extrem ely egoistic (m asculine), since the concept negates
other stakeholders. Then, how are the custom ers? They, once again, are
controlled objects, they are sim ply an instrum ent utilized to increase the wealth
o f capitalists (shareholders and creditors). Kaplan and N orton say:
D ecreasing its own profitability to increase its custom er may
lead to satisfied and loyal custom ers but not happy
shareholders and bankers (1996, 92).
Based on the statem ent above, it seems that there is an unw illingness to
really satisfy custom ers. Because if this is done, then the welth o f capitalits will
be decreased. The egoistic character is justified by Smith,
It is not from the benevolences o f the butcher, the brewer, or
the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to
their own interest (Sm ith 1776, 27).
This character creates capitalistic business and econom ic system globally.
However, according to Tao, the character should be accom panied by altrusitic
one.
18
___________________________________C o n c l u s i o n ___________________________________
___________________________________R
e f e r e n c e s ____________________
20