Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 3
2/9/2013
Page 2 of 3
Given the go-ahead, Enki and his half-sister, Ninki (Nin-khursag) created man,
Homo sapiens, using genetic manipulation. They did so, allegedly, for the sole
purpose of having workers to mine the gold for the Anunnaki, and thereby to quell
the mutiny! The actual creation of Homo sapiens, as depicted in the ancient
Sumerian texts in detail, was done by cross-breeding Homo erectus with that of the
extraterrestrial Anunnaki! In other words, were all half-breeds! (Except for a few
notable personalities such as described in the Epic of Gilgamesh, who might better
be described as one-third breeds. No kidding.)
Ninki, the Lady of Life (now we know where she received her title!), carried the first
mixed worker to term and gave birth to a being she called the Lulu. Later,
fourteen birth goddesses (female Anunnaki) were used to produce additional
workers. This solution was only a moderate success in that the Lulu was a hybrid
and incapable of procreation (just as the mule, a cross between horse and donkey,
cannot reproduce itself).
In addition, the birth goddesses had become weary of continually being pregnant!
Accordingly, it was back to the drawing board for Enki and Ninki. More work had to
be done in genetically engineering a self-replicating, humanoid creature to be used
as a slave.In the process, they may have encountered more than one dead end. It is
possible, for example, that the legends of strange creatures and mythological
monsters (from a Cyclops to a Hydra) may have arisen from the early experiments in
genetic engineering, those which did not quite work quite so well. Cyclops, for
example, was listed as the son of Neptune, the God of the Ocean -- another likely
name or title for Enki (who was given the oceans as his bailiwick, and who was
identified in the Sumerian texts with the planet Neptune. There is also the possibility
that both the Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon species were simply different models of
the genetic engineering project, and created for different forms of work -- ostensibly
the Neanderthal being the mine workers, and Cro-Magnon being the new, improved
version of Homo sapiens for the purposes of housework and domestic servants.
The latter may also have been the precursor of Homo sapiens sapiens.
Eventually, Enki and Ninki were able to modify the genetic structure of the Lulu in
order for it to be able to produce itself. Yea! They thus created the Adama.
Significantly, they did so without Enlils knowledge or approval! (Enki and Enlil did
not really get along, a conflict stretching over eons.)
Once the interbreeding began to show some significant results, several Lulus were
taken to Mesopotamia to work in agriculture (in Enlils backyard, so to speak).
There, they aided the Anunnaki efforts to raise food for themselves and their new
workers. According to the Sumerian texts, Enlil created an E.DIN, a special place
where new strains of edible crops could be developed and later implemented. Lulus
were placed inside Edin, but without Enlil having learned of the Lulus recently
acquired talent for procreation.
When the obvious result becoming obvious even to Enlil -- when the Lulus had in
effect eaten from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil (e.g., sexual knowing),
the result was the Adamas expulsion from Edin. At the same time, Enki, their
paternal creator, became the god who clothed the now homeless Adam and Eve
on their way out the door.
The apparent duality of God in the book of Genesis is thus explained by the often
opposing actions of Enki and Enlil. Enlil expels Adam and Eve; Enki clothes them.
Enlil gives the old heave ho to Cain; Enki protects him. Enlil brings about a flood;
Enki assists a Noah in building an ark. And so forth and so on. Even the Jesuits of
the Catholic Church have begun to acknowledge the reality of at least two gods in
the story of Genesis. Considering what we know of the Anunnaki and the elohim,
2/9/2013
Page 3 of 3
there are a whole slew of Gods and Goddesses in the story of Genesis.
The scientific confirmation for the creation of mankind from Homo erectus comes in
part from two sources. The first is the result of research by Cann, et al [3], where it
was shown that mitochondria DNA (a form of DNA transmitted only maternally] could
be shown to postulate a single woman living in Africa approximately 250,000 years
ago who became the mother of every human being now living on the planet. Later,
Dorit, et al [4] found no intraspecific polymorphism whatsoever in a gene paternally
inherited, and concluded a date of the last common male ancestor to be roughly
270,000 B.C.E. These dates tie in well with Sitchins argument, and tend to conflict
with a purely evolutionary theory of humans evolving naturally from a survival of the
fitness type scenario.
The conclusion is that Adam and Eve were real, possibly Lunatics, and were
created by the genetic manipulation of cross-breeding Homo erectus with
extraterrestrials from the planet, Nibiru. As such, they began a dynasty (i.e. The
Adam's Family) of beings who lived to a much riper age than Homo sapiens
sapiens are generally expected -- just part of their genetic heritage from the
Anunnaki, who apparently live for hundreds of thousands of years. (There are,
apparently, advantages to being a half-breed.)
Epic of Creation
Chronicles of Earth
Go ye forth to:
Adams Family
Zecharia Sitchin
Deluge
Laurence Gardner
Immanuel Velikovsky
_______________________________
References:
[1] Gardner, Laurence, Genesis of the Grail Kings, Bantam Press, NY, 1999.
[2] Sitchin, Zecharia, The 12th Planet, 1976, The Wars of Gods and Men, 1985, The
Lost Realms, 1990, Avon Books, New York.
[3] Cann, R. L., Stoneking, M., and Wilson, A. C., Mitochondrial DNA and human
evolution, Nature, Vol 325, January 1, 1987.
[4] Dorit, R. L., Akashi, H., Gilbert, W., Absence of Polymorphism at the ZFY Locus
on the Human Y Chromosome, Science, Vol 268, May 26, 1995.
[Feedback]
2/9/2013