Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oil and gas reservoirs in faulted siliciclastic formations are difcult to exploit. By
integrating seismic data, detailed core information, and wellbore and production
data, geoscientists can now model fault behavior and incorporate the results into
reservoir uid-ow simulators. This integrated process improves prediction of fault
behavior, and reduces the uncertainty and risk associated with complex traps.
Kip Cerveny
BP Alaska
Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Russell Davies
Rock Deformation Research (RDR) USA Inc.
Dallas, Texas, USA
Graham Dudley
Richard Fox
BP
Aberdeen, Scotland
Peter Kaufman
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Rob Knipe
Rock Deformation Research Ltd
University of Leeds
Leeds, England
Bob Krantz
ConocoPhillips
Houston, Texas
For help in preparation of this article, thanks to Karen Dawe,
Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, Newfoundland,
Canada; Jayne Harnett, RDR, Leeds, England; and David
McCormick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
FMI (Fullbore Formation MicroImager), MDT (Modular
Formation Dynamics Tester), OBMI (Oil-Base MicroImager),
Petrel and RFT (Repeat Formation Tester) are marks
of Schlumberger.
38
Oileld Review
Winter 2004/2005
39
1
2
3
2
2
3
> Relating fault types to stress orientation. The Andersonian theory explains the three main fault types
relative to the principal stress orientation. These include the normal-fault style, in which 1, the
largest in-situ stress, is vertical (top); the reverse-fault type, in which 1 is horizontal, and 3, the
smallest in-situ stress, is vertical (middle); and the wrench, or strike-slip, fault type, in which both 1
and 3 are horizontal (bottom).
Clay content, %
5
15 25 35 45 55 65
0
0
km
1.0
miles 0.6
> Interpreting faults from seismic data and modeling using software tools. Complex fault architecture
in exploration and development scenarios can be made more understandable with the use of
powerful mapping and imaging software such as the Petrel workow tools application. In this
example, color-coded stratigraphic intervals in the hanging wall and footwall are juxtaposed against
the modeled fault surfaces in three dimensions.
40
Oileld Review
~15
Fragmentation
%
tio
grega
Disag
zonermediate
(inte content)
clay
Protoclasite
cata rmediate
(inte content)
clay
tion
grega
Disag
zone-poor)
(clay
10
Protoclasites
cata -poor)
y
(cla
50
%
te
clasi
Catarmediat)e
e
t
(in content
clay
te
clasi
Cata-poor)
(clay
90
te
clasi
Cata-rich)
y
(cla
Clay
conte
nt
Lith
sta ificati
te
on
Ultraclasite
catay-rich)
(cla
r
a
ati
on
Protoclasite
cata -rich)
(clay
hif
ic
tio
grega
Disag
e
zon -rich
(clayoplastic)
hydr
sm
y- s
la e
C eri
s
Ultraclasite te
cata rmediat)
(inte conten
clay
Ultraclasite
catay-poor)
(cla
Lit
d
lithifie
d
Poorly
thifie
li
Partly
hified
t
li
Well
Fragmentation
Clean tones,
sands
silts
100
%
te
ca
li k
si or
lo k
yl w c
h eo
P am t-r
fr ul es
fa ri
se
Winter 2004/2005
,
tones
Clays s
le
a
h
e
s
Impusr tones,
sand
s
silt
t
onten
Clay c
40%
h
ric
z- s n
rt gie tio
ua lo a Q ho rm ult
lit efo ) fa ries
(d nd se
ba ck
ro
C
B
A
Undeformed
sandstone
C
ac
at
ite
la s
1 mm
cm
in.
cm
> Fault-rock classication relating clay content, fragmentation and lithication. The original host rocks
include clean sandstones with less than 15% clay, impure sandstones with 15 to 40% clay, and
claystones and shales with greater than 40% clay. Fragmentation and lithication progress throughout
a faults history and produce one of the three types of fault rocks from each host as shown in the
lower portion of the diagram. Photographs at bottom illustrate different forms of fault rocks, including
(A) disaggregated and cemented (left), (B) phyllosilicate-smear framework (center) and (C) clay-smear
fault rocks (right).
41
faults, and give rise to damage zones. An understanding of fault-damage zones is crucial in
modeling fault behavior and its impact on
reservoir performance.
Fault-Zone Architecture Characteristics
An appreciation of fault-damage zone complexity can be obtained through careful study of
faults in outcrops. Surface exposures allow
geoscientists to observe fault architecture in
detail and in a 3D spatial context and scale
not afforded by subsurface investigation.
Importantly, much of what determines faultsealing properties occurs at subseismic scales
and within the fault-damage zone. Consequently,
Tip-damage zone
Wall-damage
zone
Linking-damage
zone
Outer
damage zone
> Fault-zone classications. A 3D conceptual diagram illustrates the inner and outer damage volumes
associated with faults. The map view overlay of the fault propagation through the host rocks
indicates three distinct zones, which are the tip-damage zone (red), the linking-damage zone (light
blue) and the wall-damage zone (green). Fault tip lines are shown in black.
42
> High-precision mapping of the Moab faultdamage zone. Global positioning systems (GPS)
and rover units, which determine exact survey
locations, were used to record discrete features
and position them with high precision.
Secondary structural elements, such as faults
and fractures, were tagged with key geologic
attributes to capture the complexity and scale of
the fault damage.
Oileld Review
SW
NE
Entrada
sandstone
Moab,
Utah
USA
Hanging
wall
Detailed mapping
area
Footwall
Vantage point of
upper photo
Entrada
sandstone
Approximate
NE
100
ft
328
> The Bartlett Wash study area, Moab, Utah, USA. A photographic cross section along the Moab fault allows illuminating views
of the complex fault-zone architecture within the detailed mapping area (top). An aerial view (bottom) from the footwall to the
hanging wall shows another perspective of the sharp contact formed by the Moab fault.
Winter 2004/2005
43
44
Approximate
m
25
ft
82
> Mapping the Moab fault zone. More than 70,000 structural features were mapped at the Bartlett
Wash site to populate an analog model of the fault-damage zone (top). The density of small faults
within the damage zone of the main segment of the Moab fault decreases as distance from the
main fault increases. Red fault traces are within the inner damage zone, while yellow features are
within the outer damage zone (bottom). Powerful software tools allow geologists to use innovative
techniques like virtual eld trips, capturing the knowledge and experiences of team members
at the site.
fault for small hydrocarbon columns. The hydrocarbons may migrate at a slow rate, but hydraulic
resistant sealing provides an effective seal over
geological time. At the base of the hydraulicresistance zone, P c is equal to P t . Relative
permeability to hydrocarbon at this elevation is
zero, but increases above this point in a transition
zone from membrane sealing up to geologically
signicant leakage because of an increase in the
relative permeability. Geologists consider
hydraulic-resistance seal failure significant
once the leakage rate exceeds the hydrocarboncharge rate, at which point hydrocarbons
stop accumulating.
Water-pressure differences in the reservoir
across a fault or in fault ll inuence the height
of the resulting hydrocarbon column. Higher
water pressure in the aquifer outside the trap,
for example, leads to water flow into the
reservoir if the hydrocarbon saturation in the
fault zone is less than the irreducible water
Oileld Review
Winter 2004/2005
Pc
S wirr
Hydrocarbon
pressure
Pc = Pt
Ht
Hydraulic
seal failure
Hydraulic
resistant
seal
Depth
Hydrostatic
pressure
Pt
Membrane
seal
Pe
Free-water level
Pressure
Fractional
mercury [Hg] saturation
> Capillary pressure diagram. The pressure-depth plot (left) shows the
capillary pressure, Pc, as the difference between the pressures of water and
hydrocarbon with depth. The hydrocarbon has a steeper pressure gradient
than the water, so the capillary pressure increases above the
free-water level (FWL) where the capillary pressure is zero. The plot on the
right shows a typical mercury-injection capillary pressure curve as
measured in the laboratory. The entry pressure, Pe, is the pressure at which
the hydrocarbons rst enter the sample. A hydrocarbon-column height, Ht,
can be trapped below the threshold capillary pressure, Pt, and seals by
membrane sealing. Trap geometries may allow hydrocarbon columns to
exceed this height. The hydrocarbon ow across the seal above Ht is
possible at a rate dependent on the relative permeability of the seal.
1
Basin A - quartz-cementation
influence at depth > 3 km
Basin B - moderate cataclasis
Basin C - strong cataclasis
5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
Average permeability, mD
45
b
Potential leak
Depth
> Allan diagram. Based on seismic data and wellbore information, Allan
diagrams demonstrate the juxtaposition relationships across a fault plane.
These diagrams are often used to identify potential petroleum leak points
(red) along the fault strike.
Triangle Diagram
0
Throw, m
50
100
150
200
Sand
Depth
Shale
Sand
A
Shale
Block
Diagram
Sa
nd
Sa
nd
A
Sand
Sand
> Analyzing juxtaposition. A juxtaposition triangle diagram (left) allows simple and quick evaluation
of stratigraphic juxtaposition scenarios, for example when a reservoir, Sand A, is juxtaposed against
an impermeable shale that provides a seal. Another scenario might identify a sand-against-sand
placement that fails to provide an adequate seal for hydrocarbon trapping. Lithology is shown on
the left; the horizontal axis shows the amount of throw; and the diagonal, dashed arrows show the
juxtaposition scenario at a specied throw and layer. The block diagram (right) is presented to show
a 3D representation.
46
Oileld Review
Zone
HostRock
Lithology
10 100 1,000
mD
%
0 20 40 60 80 0
Fault throw, m
0
A
A
Footwall (FW) reservoir lithology
3,540
3,580
3,600
50
75
100
125
150
B
Reservoir against
younger stratigraphy
in hanging wall
C
D
E
F
3,620
Core depth, m
3,560
25
3,660
3,680
3,640
Reservoir against
older stratigraphy
in footwall
No
phyllosilicate
data
Fault-Rock/Seal Type
0 0.5 1.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Sand
Net/
Gross
Plug Porosity, %
Host-Rock Lithology
High-permeability
sandstone
Sandstone
Impure sandstone
Phyllosilicate-rich
(including shale)
Cemented sandstone
A
B
C
D
E
F
3,520
Plug Permeability
Phyllosilicate
> Integration of fault-rock data with juxtaposition triangle diagrams. Incorporating stratigraphic information, log data and core
data (left) with juxtaposition information (right) provides fault-rock types and distribution for a range of fault throws. In this
normal-fault example, the diagram identies a smear from impure sandstone from Zone C that forms a seal across from the
high-permeability sandstone reservoir in Zone E.
Winter 2004/2005
47
48
Compartments
B-16 16
E-dip
B-16 2
B-16 4
Fault trend
N-S
NW-SE
W-dip
NE-dip
B-16 17
SW-dip
H
Bonavista
platform
re fa
ult
Na
ut
F
K
N D
lt
G
R
FF
EE
BB W
sf
P
V
ilu
au
M ur
km
CC
AA
DD
miles 1.2
St. Johns
CANADA
Halifax
Hibernia
USA
Oileld Review
100
Fault throw, m
200
Juxtaposition
Sand in FW and HW
Sand against sand past other lithologies
Impure sand in FW and HW
Impure sand against impure sand
past other lithologies
Shale-rich in FW and HW
Shale-rich against shale-rich past
other lithologies
Layer 1
Layer 2
Upper
Medial shale
Upper
sandstone
Shale
Basal
sandstone
Layer 3
Middle
Shale
Sandstone
0
Basal
Shale
100
Fault throw, m
200
Sandstone
Cataclasites
Layer 1
Lithofacies (volume-shale derived)
Sandstone-dominated
Mixed heterolithic
Shale/mudstone dominated
Phyllosilicateframework
fault rocks
(PFFR)
Phyllosilicaterich
Layer 2
Sand in FW and HW
Sand against sand past other lithologies
Impure sand in FW and HW
Impure sand against impure sand
past other lithologies
High potential for PFFR
(shale-rich in FW and HW )
Phyllosilicate-rich fault rocks (clay smears)
High potential for phyllosilicate-rich
(clay smears)
Upper
Medial shale
Upper
sandstone
Shale
Basal
sandstone
Layer 3
Middle
Shale
Sandstone
Basal
Shale
Sandstone
> Juxtaposition (top) and fault-seal (bottom) diagrams for Hibernia Well B-16 2. The juxtaposition diagram identies a sand-against-sand juxtaposition at a
75-m [246-ft] throw. In this scenario, a Layer 2 sandstone in the hanging wall (HW) is dragged past other lithologiesimpure sandstones and a medial
shalein the footwall (FW) and is juxtaposed against the basal sandstone in the upper Layer 3 interval. This represents a possible leak area. However,
when clay smearing is taken into account, the predicted potential leak area is reduced signicantly.
20. Doughty PT: Clay Smear Seals and Fault Sealing
Potential of an Exhumed Growth Fault, Rio Grande Rift,
New Mexico, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists Bulletin 87, no. 3 (March 2003): 427444.
Winter 2004/2005
49
1,600,000
140,000
120,000
1,200,000
100,000
1,000,000
80,000
800,000
60,000
600,000
40,000
400,000
1,400,000
20,000
200,000
0
0
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
Year
50
Oileld Review
km
miles
Prudhoe Bay
Alaska
USA CANADA
Anchorage
> Fault map of Prudhoe Bay eld. The structural complexity of Prudhoe Bay eld is demonstrated by
a fault map that shows extensive faulting throughout much of the eld.
Ta
r
ge
Plan View
Example of
previous well plan
Plan for
losses
Kickoff point
Crossfault at high
shale-gouge ratio
Winter 2004/2005
51