Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v i d e n cand
e fcardiovascular
o r p r a cdiseases
tice
ABSTRACT
Rsum
Key words: association; atherosclerosis; cardiovascular diseases; cause; evidence; periodontal diseases
INTRODUCTION
Throughout ancient history, Assyrians, Egyptians, Greeks,
Romans and others pointed out that oral infectious
diseases, such as periodontitis or dental caries, can affect
systemic health and disease.1,2 During the last decade of
the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century,
the so called focal infection theory was postulated on
the basis of publications and oral presentations provided
by the American microbiologist, Willoughby Dayton
Miller,3,4 and the British physician, William Hunter.5,6
This is a peer reviewed article. Submitted 12 Oct. 2011; Revised 5 Mar. 2012; Accepted 13 Mar. 2012
* Periodontist; Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Perio C Dent, LLC., Douglasville, Georgia, USA.
Correspondence to: Dr. Sotirios Kotsovilis; sot.kotsovilis@yahoo.gr
132
Strength of
association
Janket et al.
200321
1.19 (1.081.32)
Weak
Khader et al.
200322
1.13 (1.011.27)
Weak
Meurman et al.
200423
1.20 (1.081.32)
Weak
Meta analysis*
Bahekar et al.
200725
Mustapha et al.
200726
1.75 (1.322.34)
Humphrey et al.
200827
Periodontitis:
1.24 (1.011.51)
Gingivitis:
1.35 (0.792.30)
Weak
High
Moderate
Moderate
Weak
Weak
Description
The stronger the association (as measured using appropriate statistical methods) between the suspected
aetiological factor and the specific effect (disease under investigation), the firmer the hypothesis becomes
that the nature of this association is causal.
2. C
onsistency of the
association
The hypothesis of a causal association between the presumptive aetiological factor and the specific effect
or disease is strengthened or supported when it is consistently and repeatedly reported in numerous
studies differing in various characteristics, such as populations, examiners, methods, circumstances, places,
and times.
3. Specificity of the
association
The speculation that the nature of the association is causal is strengthened or supported:
if the suspected aetiological factor is reported to be associated only with the specific effect or disease
among various effects considered; or
if the specific effect is reported to be associated only with the presumptive aetiological factor among
various suspected aetiological factors.
4. Temporal relationship
of the association
(temporality)
A necessary condition for a given factor to be the cause of a specific effect (disease) is that this factor must
always precede the onset of the specific effect.
If the frequency and/or the severity of a specific effect (disease) increases with the dose/degree/amount of
exposure to a suspected aetiological factor, a doseresponse relationship exists between the presumptive
aetiological factor and the specific effect. This strongly indicates the concomitant presence of a causal
association between the suspected aetiological factor and the specific effect.
6. Biological plausibility
The hypothesis of a causal association between the suspected aetiological factor and the specific effect
(disease) is strengthened:
if the presumptive causal association appears to be consistent or compatible with accepted biological
knowledge; and
if biological mechanisms can be documented by which the suspected aetiological factor could be able
to cause the specific effect.
7. Coherence
The presumptive causal association between the suspected aetiological factor and the specific effect
(disease) should not seriously conflict with currently established theory and knowledge in a specific field or
other related fields.
8. Experiment (experimental
evidence)
The hypothesis of a causal association between the suspected aetiological factor and the specific effect
(disease) is substantially reinforced if the specific effect can be altered (reduced or prevented) as a result of
experimental interventions that affect (reduce or eliminate) the suspected aetiological factor.*
9. Analogy
In certain circumstances, the hypothesis of a causal association between the suspected aetiological factor
and the specific effect (disease) would possibly be strengthened if analogy existed with the effect of
another proven (true) aetiological factor or the proven (known) aetiology of another disease.
* More generally, this criterion could include the conduction of animal experiments in which the disease is experimentally reproduced after
exposure to the presumptive aetiological factor, as well as human intervention studies or trials in which appropriate intervention can
reduce or eliminate the disease.2
Degree of fulfillment
Partial fulfillment
Partial fulfillment
Partial fulfillment
Partial fulfillment
Partial fulfillment
6. Biological plausibility
Complete fulfillment
7. Coherence
Partial fulfillment
Partial fulfillment
9. Analogy
Partial fulfillment
138
DISCUSSION
This review summarized and critically evaluated the
available evidence using systematic reviews and meta
analyses concerning the statistical strength and the
causal or non causal nature of the association between
periodontal and cardiovascular diseases.
The existing systematic reviewswithout meta
analyses19,20 or with meta analyses2128 revealed that the
majority of observational studies tended to demonstrate
a statistically significant positive association between
the two diseases, independent of traditionaleither
documented or still dubious as specifically reviewed45
cardiovascular risk factors. The strength of this statistical
association could be regarded as weak to moderate (Table
1). Significant concerns with respect to these findings are:
a) whether the reported statistically significant positive
associations are real associations, or
b) whether they are caused by residual confounding by
risk factors, such as smoking, common in periodontal
and cardiovascular diseases, or
c) whether they are caused by incomplete control of
potential confounding factors owing to incomplete
statistical adjustment.58,59
After demonstrating the presence of a statistical
association between the two diseases, a deeper and more
detailed level of analysis in this review involved assessing
whether periodontal diseases might be causative factors
for cardiovascular diseases. The biological plausibility of a
causal association between periodontal and cardiovascular
diseases appears to have sufficient experimental evidence
mainly based on animal studies using the apoE-deficient
mouse model of atherosclerosis.73,7577 Prospective
cohort studies60,61 revealed that in a number of study
participants, periodontal disease that had been present
at the study baseline was associated with new events of
cardiovascular disease after baseline. However, the fact
that only the minority (less than 20%) of patients with
periodontal diseases at baseline subsequently developed
cardiovascular diseases,60,61 tends to favour a non causal
interpretation of the association between the two diseases.
In such cases, it is a requisite to additionally perform a
healthcare intervention aimed at reducing or eliminating
the suspected cause, provided that the disease state is not
irreversible, in which case an intervention strategy would
not be meaningful. If the reduction or elimination of the
suspected cause results in a reduction or elimination of the
disease, then the suspected cause is a true aetiology factor
for the disease, provided that no other factor has affected
the observed outcome, often practically too difficult or
impossible to ensure.
The classical clinical studies performed by the research
team of Le et al.29,30 demonstrated that dental microbial
plaque is the cause of gingivitis. The studies serve as a
characteristic example for the methodology that includes
prospective follow up, and then intervention that
affects the suspected cause of an effect or disease.29,30 In
these studies, bacterial accumulation on teeth induced
inflammation in related gingival tissues and subsequent
plaque removal resulted in the resolution of the clinical
signs of gingival inflammation.29,30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
140
142
Copyright of Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene is the property of Canadian Dental Hygienists Association
and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.