You are on page 1of 85

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Introduction says, Stress has become so familiar word that experts from medical, HRD,
management fields and yoga experts give much stress on defining stress and managing stress.
Indeed, stress has been woven into the fabric of life today. It starts from birth and if ignored ends
only with death. No person in this universe is free from some amount of stress. In fact, anything
hat makes us tense, angry or frustrated is stress. Dr. Hans Seyle, the noted experts on the stress
says, Stress, like relatively, is a scientific concept, which has suffered from the mixed blessing
of being too little understood.

Stress is common in all strata of society and all age groups though the intensity,
magnitude and visual symptoms differ from individual. A certain amount of stress is, however,
desirable individual; to give required stimulation to overcome obstacles that may prevent a
person in achieving his ultimate goal. At times, we even invite mild stress to avoid boredom and
development some motivation for a given activity.Dr. G. Wilkinson in his paper in the British
Medical Association Publication has defined stress through the following equation:
Levels of stress = Environmental stressor + stress Response + Significance of Event

Department of Business Administration

Page 1

CHAPTER - II
COMPANY PROFILE

Tanfac, one of indias largest suppliers of fluorine chemicals incorporated in 1972, is a joint
sector company promoted by the aditya birla group of companies i.e. grasim industries limited,
hindalco industries limited, pilani industries & investment corporation limited (PI&ICL) and
tamilnadu industrial development corporation (TIDCO). Its plant and facilities are spread over
60 acres in the chemical complex of SIPCOT at cuddalore near pondicherry, about 200 kms from
chennao, India
Tanfac is engaged in the manufacture of inorganic fluorine basid chemicals such as
aluminium fluoride, anhydrous hydrofluoric acid, sodium silica fluoride, ammonium bifluoride,
potassium fluoride, cryolite and various other organic fluorine based chemicals.
Tanfac believes in continuous improvement which leads to excellence. Our effort to achieve
excellence on all spheres set us apart from others and has earned our global presence.
Excellence for us is an ever moving target like the never ending journey of the sun.

TECHN OLOGY TIE UPS:

Davy process (formerly BUSS AG), Switzerland- for aluminium fluoride (know-how
and equipment)

CHENCO, germany- for hydrofluoric acid (know-how and equipment).

Grasim industries limited- for sulphuric acid/oleum (design and erection)

END USE/APPLICATIONS:
Inorganic fluorine based chemicals manufactured by TANFAC

have vital applications in

industries as varied as aluminum smelting, petroleum refining, refrigerant gases, steel re-rolling,
glass, ceramics, sugar, fertilizers, heavy water etc.

Department of Business Administration

Page 2

Organic fluoro chemicals are used as intermediates in the manufacture of pharmachemicals and
agrochemicals.
It focuses on variety of spoecility fluorides which are developed and manufactured depending on
specific requirement of customers.
Tanfac is an ISO 9001 , 14001 , TPM certified company.
VISION:
To become the largest Indian fluorine chemical producer and one among the five leading, cost
effective and large-scale international producers of aluminum fluoride, through expansion and
diversification, utilizing our core strength, ie, expertise in fluorine chemical technology.
MISSION

Maximize overall equipment effectiveness.

Establish positive work culture.

Organize work place to prevent losses,

Induce all employees towork as ONE TEAM,

Satisfy all stake holders.

STRATEGY:

Core competency leadership in fluorine business

Bench-marking with the best in the world,

International image through quality, knowledge integration and open learning


organization.

Focus on research & development for widening of product base.


ACHIVEMENTS:
Largest producers of anhydrous hydrofluoric acid and aluminium fluoride in India.
Market leader in ALF and HF in domestic market.

Department of Business Administration

Page 3

First fluorine chemical company in India and fifth in the world to get ISO 9002
certification in early 1994 and upgraded to ISO 9001:2000 revision in the year 2003.
First fluorine chemical manufacturing company in India to achieve ISO 14002:1996.
Implementing TPM (total productive maintenance) with the help of JIPM (Japanese
Institute of Management), Japan, for delivering quality products manufactures in
conditions that make optimum use of people, resources and materials.
Received consistent safety awards from the government for the standards and practices
maintained at our plant.
One of the 15 signatory members to Responsible care from India.
Received an A1+ credit rating by investor guidance body ICRA.
Earned a reputation in tamilnadu as a Good Corporate Citizen for their forward looking
policies and maintenance of all round greenery with zero pollution and zero accidents.
Maintaining continuous and steady growth in terms of production capacity and sales.
INORGANIC CHEMICALS:
Aluminium fluoride.
Anhydrous Hydrofluoric Acid.
Cryolite (Granular).
Dilute Hydrofluoric Acid.
Hydrochloric Acid HCL.
Oleum.
sulphuric acid.
Sulphuric Acid.

Department of Business Administration

Page 4

SPECIALITY INORGANIC FLUORIDES


Ammonium Bifluoride.
Cryolite (powder).
Fluoboric Acid.
Hexa Fluoro Phosphoric Acid*.
Magnesium Fluoride.
Potassium fluoborate.
Potassium Fluoride.
Potassium hexa Fluoro Phosphate.*
Potassium Silica Fluoride.
Potassium Titanium fluoride.
Potassium Zirconium Fluoride.
Sodium Hexa Fluro Phosphate.*
Sodium Silica Fluoride.

Department of Business Administration

Page 5

LINKS:
The Aditya Birla Group is a conglomerate or having companies operations spanning 16
countries across the globe. The flagship companies of the Group Grasim, Hindalco, Indal,
Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd and Indo Gulf are among Indias top 25 corporates.
company

key products/Services

Grasim

Viscose Staple Fibre, Cement, Textile & Fabrics, Sponge Iron

Hindalco

Aluminium, Aluminium products, copper, precious metal refining

Indal

Alumina, Aluminium products

Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd

Ready to wear branded apparel, Viscose Filament Yarn, Insulators,

Carbon Black, Textiles


Indo-Gulf

Fertilizers

Department of Business Administration

Page 6

CHAPTER - III
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
INTRODUCTION:
The work Stress is derived from the Latin term Stringers which means to draw tight.
Same define stress as the non. Specific response of the body to any demands made on it. when
the demands on an individuals exceed his capacity and adjustment resources stress occurs.

MEANING:
Stress is the general term applied to the pressure people feel in life. Stress on individuals
ranges from personal day to day life to their orgal activities. Stress is a costly business expense
that affects both employee health and company profit.

DEFINITION:
Hans Selye defines stress as An adoptive response to the external situation that results
in physical, psychological and/or behavioural deviation for organizational participants.
This stress is a mental, emotional or physical reaction resulting from an individuals
response to environmental pressure and similar stimuli. It refers to pressures people feel in life.
Hans Selye, the father of stress, believes that stress is the spice of life and absence of stress is
death. Different persons respond to stress full situations in different ways.

Department of Business Administration

Page 7

SYMPTOMS OF STRESS:

Nervousnes
s Instability
Digestive
Problem

Emotional
Instability

Excessive
use of
Alchocol or
drugs

High blood
processing

STRESS

Feelings of
Inability
Cope

Inability of
Relax

Uncooperative
Attitude

Chronic
worry
Seeping
problem
absenteeism

The source of stress come from are called stressors.

The stressors, or the so called

antecedents of stress come from both inside our body and mind and outside of ourselves. The
stressors thus fall logically into for categories viz., environmental, organizational, group and
individual stressors.

These are summarized in figure that thinking of stressors in various

categories will help us become more aware of stress in our lives. These are now discussed on by
one.
Department of Business Administration

Page 8

CAUSES OF STRESS:
ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSORS
Environmental factors do affect organization and thus have impact on stress also. The
environmental stressors to which an employees responds mainly include things such as fact
technological change, family demands and obligations, economic and financial conditions, race,
caste, class ethnic identity and transfer of late the phenomenal rate of social and technical change
has had its great impact on peoples life style which is carried over into their jobs. To mention
while medical science has increased the life span of the people by eradicating the life claiming
threats of many dreaded diseases on the one hand, the modern living style caught up in the rush,
mobile, urbanized and crowed has deteriorated the wellness and increased the potential for stress
on the job, on the other.

Department of Business Administration

Page 9

ORGANISATIONAL STRESSORS
Stressors occur not only outside the organization, but within it also organizational
stressors can be categorized into policies and strategies, structure and design, processors and
working conditions organizational changes to meet challenges are usually accompanied by
stressors.
GROUP STRESS
People are usually members of various formal and informal groups. The department or
section to which are belongs, for example is formal group. Group bears tremendous influence on
individual members behavior. The group therefore can also be a potential source of stress.
The group stressors can be categorized into three types.
i)

Lack of group Cohesiveness


Famous Hawthorne studies have made it clear that cohesiveness or togetherness
provides. Satisfaction to be employees. Lack of cohesiveness creates conflict which serves a
potential stressors for the employees.

ii)

Lack of Social Support


We all as the members of groups look for from co-members in times of both happiness
and sorrow. If we get this social support, we are much better off. If such a support is lacking
for an individual member. The same can also cause stress.

Department of Business Administration

Page 10

iii)

Interpersonal and Inter group Conflict

The incompatibility in term of needs and values between co-workers / colleagues


usually create interpersonal conflict. Likewise, variance in objectives and goals between
groups leads to inter group conflict.

INDIVIDUAL STRESSORS

Apart from the stressors discussed so far (environmental, organizational and group) there
are also individual factors which serve as stress. There are

i)

Role of conflict and Ambiguity


Individual employees have multiple roles to play within as well as outside the
organization such as superior, subordinate, colleague, family community and so on, these
roles are a set of expectations that other members have of an employees.

ii)

Personality traits
Personality affects behavior. Personality traits vary from individual to individual.

iii)

Life and carrier changes


Lifes changes may be slow (getting older) on sudden (the death of a spouse).

Particularly sudden changes have dramatic effect on people. The medical researchers have
verified that more the person experiences sudden changes; the poorer will be his subsequent
health.

Department of Business Administration

Page 11

The same is true for career or nature of job and responsibility, underemployment
or over employment etc. can be stressing provoking besides certain situations are peculiar to the
Indian workers which add to tension and stress to them.

Experts on stress management are of the view that a lot of stress in Indian case is
due to demands placed on time and finance from family, relations, friend, community leisure
and relationship the we have in our family and social lives.

CONSEQUENCES OF STRESS
1. ON THE INDIVIDUAL
a) Physical: Headache, indigestion, insomnia, heart trouble
b) Mental:

Anxiety, irritability, lack of clear thinking, inability to relax,

frustration, helplessness, loneliness, etc.


c) Behaviour: Excessine smoking or drinking, withdrawal from relationships,
speech disturbances.
2. ON THE ORGANIZATION
Low productivity, poor quality, higher costs, increased absenteeism, low job satisfaction,
accident proneness, poor interpersonal communications.

Department of Business Administration

Page 12

TYPES OF STRESS
Stress can be functional, contributing to glow up, or dysfunctional, contributing to
burnout. The first has been called

eustress and the second distress.

EUSTRESS
Eustress is the stress of achievement, triumph, and exhilaration
DISTRESS
Distress is the stress of disappointment, inadequacy, defeat and helplessness.
HOW TO MANAGE STRESS
INDIVIDUAL LEVEL:

a) Exercises: Physical and mental exercises helps to reduce emotional imbalance. Physicians
advise walking and other exervises in the morning, regular eating and sleeping habits and yoga
are very helpful.

b) Know yourself: A study should be made to find our ones strength and weakness,
opportunities and threats. A periodical analysis of these factors will provide better understanding
of self and the work around us which helps to reduce stress.

Department of Business Administration

Page 13

c) Forecasting and preparing: Advance thinking and foresight helps a manager to reduce risk
involved in decision making. Proper allocation of resources is also helpful.

d) Organise work and time: We need to separate work from home. Break the routine in the
form of a small vacation or picnic. Share problems with spouse and friends.

e) Develop positive attitude: A positive attitude to both life and work does reduce stress. Make
positive use of stress. This helps to develop and correct perspective and to regain control over
the stress causing strategies. Accept things through which your cannot change.

f) Have Faith: Faith in ones deity can reduce stress. The reciting of GAYATRI MANTRA or
merely OM/AUM for those who follow this faith can reduce stress. This mantra is said be the
gist of vedic Philosophy.

g) Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) Technique: This is a dynamic action oriented learning
process where individuals are made to recognize the futility or irrationality of their firm beliefs
and viewpoints and develop rational beliefs and viewpoints.

Department of Business Administration

Page 14

ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL:
Like an individual, an org can also help manage stress through various low proactive
interventions, some of these
1. Setting clear objectives:
Organization should set clear objectives for its members. This helps minimize roll
ambiguity which usually filters down the Organization in the form of neuoris.
2. Stress Audit
Pestonjoa has suggested stress audit as one of effective productive intervention to combat
stress, according to him, when an organization decides to have a scientific peep into mental &
physical health status of its backbone group (Executives, the exercise is called stress audit)
3. Counselling:
Counseling is yet another proactive strategy to be used by Organization to deal with
stress. Counseling to employees in the matters like career planning to provide them clarity in
their job rolls, helping them in identifying their strengths & Weakness help them better cope with
stress.
4. Spread the message:
Spreading the message about the importance of regular habits of work, leisure, proper
diet, exercise and mental peace among the organizational members helps them better cope with
stress.

Department of Business Administration

Page 15

5. Fit between person and work:


Research evidence shows that striking a fit between worker and his/her works
environment serve as one the best strategy to manage stress. This congruence can be attained
linking the worker to the job characteristics, far high internal motivation, high quality
performance, high work satisfaction, and low absenteeism and turn over.
6. Clarity in rolls:
It shows that defining individual rolls through roll efficiency helps them reduce their roll
shared stresses. This is so as a result of an individuals, movement from a reactive. i.e., roll
taking behavior to a proactive i.e. roll-making behavior.
INDIAN METHODS OF MANAGING STRESS
Indian philosolhy consisting of Upanishada, Vedanta, etc. is very helpful in winning
stress. Dr. Sathish Chandra Pandey has given the following Indian model of stress management.
(i)

Develop a strong philosophical base of combining different Indian values.

(ii)

Create awareness among organization members about these values

(iii)

Develop training programmes for executives and other staff members for their
total personality development based on Indian values, so that they can develop
their own strategies for coping with their organizations stressors.

(iv)

There must be compulsory course on Indian philosophy in professional


management course.

(v)

Popularizing Indian values among organizational members will be helpful in


reducing unnecessary individual and group conflict, power politics and stress in
Indian organization.

Department of Business Administration

Page 16

(vi)

Stress management programmers for employees must be based on sharing


different philosophical values and developing strategies through group learning.

(vii)

Organizations must include these training programmers as integral part of their


life.

Occasionally, organizational programmers may not be helpful in the

members through such training programmers. It will work as the best preventive
strategy for stress management at organizational level.

Department of Business Administration

Page 17

CHAPTER IV

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES
To know the cause for the stress experienced by the employees in their work
environment.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

1. To identify the cause of the stress faced by the employees.

2. To find out how the employees manage stress in their work environment.

3. To find out whether the employees stress affects their social behavior

4. To identify whether the employees stress has an impact on their job performance.

Department of Business Administration

Page 18

NEED AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY

1. To evaluate the employees stress management system.

2. To attain the required satisfaction in work environment.

3. To highlight the promotional policy to enhance the employees.

4. To adopt defense mechanism for future oriented.

5. To analyses stress management program.

Department of Business Administration

Page 19

CHAPTER V
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research methodology is a systematically solve the research problem.

It may be

understood of study, how research is done of scientifically. The method adopted in collecting
the data analysis and interpretation of data.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Research design is basic frame work which provide guidelines of whole research
methodology.
The choice of the research design depends on depth and extend of data required the cost
and benefits of the research the urgency of the work and time available for completing it.

For this study, exploratory research design is selected and used to define research
problems and to clarify concepts.

Department of Business Administration

Page 20

SAMPLE SIZE
The sampling size was limited in number.

So we considered 50 samples of the

employees interviewed through direct.

SAMPLING METHOD
In this study RANDOM sampling method adopted.

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The questionnaire was found to the most suitable type of research instrument. It is a set
of question presented to respondent for their answer.

METHOD OF DATA COLLECTIONS:


The sample were collected through questionnaires method. The data were collected
randomly. The data used in this study are both primary and secondary data where collected from
the various sources like manuals company records and relevant books.

Department of Business Administration

Page 21

AIDED WORK
This survey was conducted in Cuddalore, ASIAN PAINTS LTD., for the period of 45
days.
STATISTICAL TOOLS
PERCENTAGE METHOD
The percentage of method was extensively used for analysis and interpretation of data. It
can be generally calculated as follows.

Number of respondents favourable

x 100
Total respondent

Department of Business Administration

Page 22

CHAPTER VI
LIMITATIONS OF STUDY

1. There may be some bias in the answer of respondents.

2. The primary date have been collected using questionnaire, which has the know problem
of respondents not giving factual information about the occurrence of occasions.

3. Some employees even suspected the objective of the study and fair to respond.

4. Through confidentially were provided workers refuse to answer some vital question.

5. The time duration allotted for this study is very short for collective adequate data.

Department of Business Administration

Page 23

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION


TABLE-1
AGE GROUP

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

21 - 30 years

27

54%

2.

31 - 40 years

17

34%

3.

Above 41 Years

06

12%

Total

50

100%

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred that 54% of the respondents are belong to the age group
between 21 to 30 years, 34% of the respondents were belong to 31 to 40 years and 12% of the
respondents are above 41 years.

Department of Business Administration

Page 24

CHART 1

AGE GROUP

60%

54%

Percentage

50%
40%

34%

30%
20%

12%
10%

0%
21 - 30 years

31 - 40 years

Above 41 Years

Respondent

Department of Business Administration

Page 25

TABLE-2
GENDER CLASSIFICATION

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Male

50

100%

2.

Female

0%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION

From the above table inferred that all the 100% of the respondents were male gender and
0% of the respondents belong to female gender.

Department of Business Administration

Page 26

CHART 2
GENDER CLASSIFICATION

Female, 0%

Male, 100%

Department of Business Administration

Page 27

TABLE-3
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

HSC

10

20%

2.

Diploma Holder

11

22%

3.

Under Graduation

15

30%

4.

Post Graduation

11

22%

5.

Others

03

06%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION

From the above table inferred 30% of the respondents are having Under Graduate, 22%
of the respondents are Diploma holders, 22% of the respondents are Post Graduate, 20% of the
respondents have studied upto HSC and 6% of the respondents qualification with others.

Department of Business Administration

Page 28

CHART 3
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

30%
30%

22%

22%

Percentage

25%

20%

20%
15%
6%
10%
5%
0%
HSC

Diploma
Holder

Under
Post
Graduation Graduation

Others

Respondents

Department of Business Administration

Page 29

TABLE - 4
MARITAL STATUS
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Married

30

60%

2.

Unmarried

20

40%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 60% of the respondents are married person, and 40% of the
respondents are unmarried person.

Department of Business Administration

Page 30

CHART 4
MARITAL STATUS

Unmarried,
40%

Married, 60%

Department of Business Administration

Page 31

TABLE - 5
SALARY WISE CLASSIFICATION
S.NO

Particulars

1.

Below 5,000

2.

No of Respondent

Percentage

0%

5,001 10,000

17

34%

3.

10,001 15,000

20

40%

4.

Above 15,000

13

26%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION

From the above table inferred 40% of the respondents are earn 10,001 15,000, 34% of
the respondents to earn 5,001 10,000, 26% of the respondents to earn above 15,000 and 0% of
the respondents to earn below 5,000.

Department of Business Administration

Page 32

CHART 5
SALARY WISE CLASSIFICATION

40%
34%

40%
35%

26%

30%
25%

20%
15%
10%
5%

0%

0%
Below 5,000

Department of Business Administration

5,001
10,000

10,001
15,000

Above
15,000

Page 33

TABLE - 6
EXPERIENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

0 - 5 years

23

46%

2.

6 to 10 years

12

24%

3.

11 to 15 years

10

20%

4.

Above 15 Years

05

10%

Total

50

100%

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 46% of respondents have below 5 Years experience, 24%
of the respondents have 6 - 10 Years experience, 20% of the respondents have 11 - 15 years
experience and 10% of the respondents have above 15 years experience.

Department of Business Administration

Page 34

CHART 6
EXPERIENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION

46%
50%

Percentage

40%
24%

30%

20%

20%

10%

10%
0%
0 - 5 years

6 to 10
years

11 to 15
years

Above 15
Years

Respondent

Department of Business Administration

Page 35

TABLE - 7
FEEL PRESSURE IN WORK
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Many times

25

50%

2.

Some times

25

50%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 50% of the respondents are feel pressure in work and 50%
of the respondents are feel pressure in work.

Department of Business Administration

Page 36

CHART 7
FEEL PRESSURE IN WORK

Some times
50%

Department of Business Administration

Many times
50%

Page 37

TABLE - 8
DEFECT HAPPENDED WHEN PRESSURE ARISE

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Physical

26

52%

2.

Mental

24

48%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION

From the above table inferred 52% of the respondents feel physical pressure affect the
production and 48% of the respondents feel mental pressure is reason for defect the production.

Department of Business Administration

Page 38

CHART 8
DEFECT HAPPENDED WHEN PRESSURE ARISE

48%

Respondents

Mental

Physical

46%

52%

48%

50%

52%

54%

Percentage

Department of Business Administration

Page 39

TABLE - 9
RELATIONSHIP WITH CO-WORKERS
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Cordial

28

56%

2.

Not Cordial

22

44%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 56% of the respondents feel that they have cordial
relationship with peers cordial relationship helps the workers to co-operate with each other to
achieve common objectives. But 44% of the respondents feel that they do not have cordial
relationship with peers.

Department of Business Administration

Page 40

CHART 9
RELATIONSHIP WITH CO-WORKERS

Not Cordial,
44%

Cordial, 56%

Department of Business Administration

Page 41

TABLE - 10
STRESSED AREAS
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Work

20

40%

2.

Relationship

09

18%

3.

Family event

14

28%

4.

Other

07

14%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 40% of the respondent stress is feel in work, 28% of the
respondent stress is feel in family event, 18% of the respondent stress is feel in our relationships
and 14% of the respondents stress is feel in other.

Department of Business Administration

Page 42

CHART 10
STRESSED AREAS

40%
40%
35%

28%

Percentage

30%
25%

18%

20%

14%

15%
10%
5%
0%
Work

RelationshipFamily event

Other

Respondent

Department of Business Administration

Page 43

TABLE - 11
PRESSURE TIME
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Heavy work load

26

52%

2.

Low work load

08

16%

3.

Night Shift

16

32%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 52% of the respondents feel pressure arise in heavy work
load, 32% of the respondents pressure feel in night shift and 16% of respondents pressure feel in
low work load.

Department of Business Administration

Page 44

CHART 11
PRESSURE TIME

52%
60%
50%
Percentage

32%

40%
30%
16%

20%
10%
0%
Heavy work
load

Department of Business Administration

Low work load


Respondent

Night Shift

Page 45

TABLE 12
CONFLICTS HAPPENED WITH SUPERIOR
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Many times

19

38%

2.

Sometimes

08

16%

3.

Never

11

22%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION

From the above table inferred 40% of the respondents agreed conflict happened to
superior in some times and 38% of the respondents agreed conflict happened to superior in many
times and 22% of respondents are agreed dont happened conflict with superior.

Department of Business Administration

Page 46

CHART 12
CONFLICTS HAPPENED WITH SUPERIOR

Never, 22%

Many times,
38%

Sometimes,
16%

Department of Business Administration

Page 47

TABLE 13
THINK FAMILY SITUATION IN WORK PLACE

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Always

21

42%

2.

Some times

24

48%

3.

Never

05

10%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 45% of the respondents says some times in thinking about
the family situation in work place, 42% of respondents are thinking always and 10% of
respondents are never.

Department of Business Administration

Page 48

CHART 13
THINK FAMILY SITUATION IN WORK PLACE

48%
42%

Percentage

50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%

10%

Always

Some times

Never

Respondents

Department of Business Administration

Page 49

TABLE 14
COMPANY POLICY

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Always

13

26%

2.

Some times

22

44%

3.

Never

15

30%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 44% of the respondents are says the company policy is
sometimes creating to stress in our work, 30% of respondents are feel in never and 26% of
respondents feel in many times.

Department of Business Administration

Page 50

CHART 14
COMPANY POLICY

50%

44%

45%
40%
35%

30%
26%

30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Always

Some times

Never

Respondents

Department of Business Administration

Page 51

TABLE - 15
UNFAVOURABLE WORK ENVIRONMENT

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Always

15

30%

2.

Some times

18

26%

3.

Never

17

24%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 30% of the respondents are says unfavorable work
environment is always creating to stress in our work, 30% of respondents are says in sometimes
and 24% of respondents are says in never.

Department of Business Administration

Page 52

CHART 15

UNFAVOURABLE WORK ENVIRONMENT

30%
26%

30%

24%

Percentage

25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Always

Some times

Never

Respondents

Department of Business Administration

Page 53

TABLE - 16
INADEQUACY OF ESSENTIAL EQUIPMENT

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Always

12

24%

2.

Some times

24

48%

3.

Never

14

28%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 48% of the respondents feel unadequancy of essential
equipment is creating to stress in our work in sometimes, 28% of respondents are feel never and
24% of respondents are feel in always.

Department of Business Administration

Page 54

CHART 16
INADEQUACY OF ESSENTIAL EQUIPMENT

Percentage

48%
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%

28%

24%

Always

Some times

Never

Respondents

Department of Business Administration

Page 55

TABLE-17
(i)

S.NO

Particulars

SHOT TEMPERED

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Yes

32

64%

2.

No

18

36%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 64% of the respondents are shot tempered and 36% of
respondents are not shot tempered.

Department of Business Administration

Page 56

CHART 17
(ii)

SHOT TEMPERED

No, 36%

Yes, 64%

Department of Business Administration

Page 57

TABLE 17
CONTROLLED TEMPERED

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Always

11

22%

2.

Some times

15

30%

3.

Never

06

12%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 30% of the respondents are controlled our tempered in
sometimes, 22% of respondents are controlled our tempered in always and 12% of respondents
are not controlled our tempered.

Department of Business Administration

Page 58

CHART 17
CONTROLLED TEMPERED

30%
30%
22%

Percentage

25%
20%
12%

15%
10%
5%
0%
Always

Department of Business Administration

Some times
Respondents

Never

Page 59

TABLE 18
INTERNAL COMPETITION BETWEEN WORKERS

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Many times

14

28%

2.

Some times

21

42%

3.

Never

15

30%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 42% of the respondents are says competition between
workers, 30% of respondents are says the competition is not between workers and 28% of
respondents are says in many times.

Department of Business Administration

Page 60

CHART 18
INTERNAL COMPETITION BETWEEN WORKERS

Many times,
28%
Never, 30%

Some times,
42%

Department of Business Administration

Page 61

TABLE 19
ECONOMIC PROBLEM

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Many times

23

46%

2.

Some times

16

32%

3.

Never

11

22%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 46% of the respondents are says economic problems many
times creating to stress in our work, 32% of respondents are says sometimes and 22% of
respondents are says never.

Department of Business Administration

Page 62

CHART 19
ECONOMIC PROBLEM

Never, 22%

Many times,
46%

Some times,
32%

Department of Business Administration

Page 63

TABLE 20
SPENDING OF TIME TO REDUCE STRESS

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Many times

18

36%

2.

Some times

21

42%

3.

Never

11

22%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 42% of the respondents are sometimes spend with friends
or relatives, 36% of respondents are many times spend with friends or relatives and 22% of
respondents are never spend with friends or relatives.

Department of Business Administration

Page 64

CHART 20
SPENDING OF TIME TO REDUCE STRESS

22%

Respondents

Never

42%

Some times

36%

Many times

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Percentage

Department of Business Administration

Page 65

TABLE 21
EMPLOYEES CAN NOT COMPLETED YOUR WORK
HOW DO YOU FEEL?
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Sad

06

12%

2.

Tried

09

18%

3.

Anxious

07

14%

4.

Depressed

05

10%

5.

Tense

09

18%

6.

Angry

05

10%

7.

Irritable

09

18%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred employees can not completed our work 18% of the
respondents feel tried, 18% of the respondents feel tense in work, 18% of respondents feel
irritable in work, 12% of respondents feel sad in work, 10% of the respondents feel depressed in
work and 10% of the respondents feel angry in work.

Department of Business Administration

Page 66

CHART 21
EMPLOYEES CAN NOT COMPLETED YOUR WORK
HOW DO YOU FEEL?

Sad, 12%
Irritable, 18%
Tried, 18%

Angry, 10%

Anxious, 14%

Tense, 18%

Depressed,
10%

Department of Business Administration

Page 67

TABLE 22
STRENGTH OF EMPLOYEES
S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Self confidence

22

44%

2.

Powerful commanding

16

32%

3.

Adjustability

12

24%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 44% of the respondents are self confidence on their job,
32% of respondents are powerful commanding and 24% of respondents are adjustability.

Department of Business Administration

Page 68

CHART 22
STRENGTH OF EMPLOYEES

24%

Respondents

Adjustability
32%

Powerful commanding

Self confidence

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Percentage

Department of Business Administration

Page 69

TABLE 23
a. CONDUCTED ANY STRESS PROGRAM

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Yes

18

36%

2.

No

32

64%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 64% of the respondents are says the company cant
conduct any stress program and 36% of respondents are says the company conduct the stress
program in regularly.

Department of Business Administration

Page 70

CHART 23
a. CONDUCTED ANY STRESS PROGRAM

Yes, 36%

No, 64%

Department of Business Administration

Page 71

TABLE 23
b. REDUCE YOUR STRESS

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Yes

35

70%

2.

No

15

30%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 70% of the respondents are says their stress is reduced and
30% of respondents are says cant reduced our stress.

Department of Business Administration

Page 72

CHART 23
b. REDUCE YOUR STRESS

No, 30%

Yes, 70%

Department of Business Administration

Page 73

TABLE 24
STEPS TO REDUCES IN STRESS

S.NO

Particulars

No of Respondent

Percentage

1.

Walking

13

26%

2.

Yoga

17

34%

3.

Medicine

14

28%

4.

Others

06

12%

50

100%

Total

INTERPRETATION
From the above table inferred 34% of the respondents are says reduce the stress by yoga,
28% of respondents are says medicine, 26% of the respondents are says walking and 12% of
respondents are says reducing the stress by other factors.

Department of Business Administration

Page 74

CHART 24
STEPS TO REDUCES IN STRESS

40%
34%
35%
30%

28%

26%

Percentage

25%
20%
12%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Walking

Yoga

Medicine

Others

Respondents

Department of Business Administration

Page 75

CHAPTER VIII
FINDINGS OF THE STUDY

1.

54% of 21-30 years of age wise classification.

2.

100% male of sex wise classification of respondents.

3.

30% of UG holder at education qualification of respondents.

4.

60% of married of marital status of the respondents.

5.

40% of respondents are getting salary Rs.10,001-15,000.

6.

46% of the respondents have experienced in 0-5 Years.

7.

50% of equal respondents are feel pressure in work.

8.

52% of majority of respondents during happened work is reason for physical pressure in
work.

9.

56% most of the respondents have maintain better relationship with co-workers.

10.

40% most of the respondents are feel cause for stress our work.

11.

52 % most of the respondent feel heavy work load is arising from stress in our work.

12.

40% most of the respondents are said that sometimes conflict arising to superior.

Department of Business Administration

Page 76

13.

48% most of the respondents are sometimes affected stress in work place due to the
family situation.

14.

44% most of the respondents are said that sometimes company policy is creating to stress
in our work.

15.

30% most of the respondents are feel always the unfavorable work environment is
creating stress in our work.

16.

48% most of the respondents are feel sometimes an inadequency of essential equipment
is arising from stress in our work.

17.

(i) 64% most of the respondents are shot tempered

(ii) 30% most of respondents are controlled tempered in sometimes.

18.

42% most of the respondents are think internal competition between workers is creating
to stress in our work.

19.

46% most of the respondents are feel on economic problem many time creating to stress
in our life.

20.

42% most of the respondents are some time to spend with their friends relative to
reducing the stress.

21.

18% most of the respondents where cannot completed in work in due to tried, tension,
irritable.

Department of Business Administration

Page 77

22.

44% most of the respondents are says their greatest skills or strength is self confidence.

23.

(i) 64% most of respondents are says the company is not conducted in stress programme.

(ii) 20% most of respondents are reduce our stress.

24.

34% most of the respondents are taken step to reduce stress through yoga practice.

Department of Business Administration

Page 78

CHAPTER IX
SUGGESTION AND RECOMMENDATION

The company should retain the employees.

Working conditions changed based on our experience to arrange the work load.

To create employer & employee mutual relationship.

To reduce noise in working area.

The company provides recreational facility to the employee.

The company to facilitate loan for various economic conditions.

The company in take the employee to providing various allowances facilities.

The company to periodically providing Medical check-up to the employees to maintain


physical and mental healthness.

Department of Business Administration

Page 79

CHAPTER X
CONCLUSION
Thus the study helps to overcome several the occupational stresses in present situation &
many employees manage stress well.

Mainly all the concern should be take care of

Occupational Stress.

Research evidence inferred that stress is both helpful shows that many employees have
more work pressure. This heavy work pressure also result in poor concentration. They also have
health problems which in turn affects the performance. Therefore, they need to cope-up with
stress by adopting various like yoga & meditation, physical exercise etc., stress cannot be
eliminated fully but it could be managed effectively.

Department of Business Administration

Page 80

APPENDIX
A Study on stress Management in TANFAC LIMITED, SIPCOT, CUDDALORE
S.No

Name
a) 21 30 Years

1.

Age group

b) 31 40 Years
c) Above 41 Years
a) Male

2.

Sex
b) Female
a) HSC
b) Diploma Holder

3.

Qualification

c) Under graduate
d) Post graduate
e) others

4.

Designation & Department


a) Married

5.

Marital status
b) Unmarried
a) Below 5,000
b) 5,001 to 10,000

6.

Salaries
c) 10,001 to 15,000
d) Above 15,001

Department of Business Administration

Page 81

7.

How long are you working in this organization


a) 0 5 Years
c) 11 15 Years

8.

12.

c) Never

b) Mental

How is your relationship with Co-workers?


a) Cordial

11.

b) Sometimes

What defect happened when pressure arise?


a) Physical

10.

d) Above 15 Years

Are you feel pressure in your work?


a) Many times

9.

b) 6- 10 Years

b) Not Cordial

What areas in your life make you feel Stressed?


a) Work

b) Relationship

c) Family event

d) Others

Which time the pressure will arise to you??


a) Heavy work load b) Low work load
c) Night Shift

Department of Business Administration

Page 82

13.

Any conflict are happened to your Superior?


a) Many times

14.

b) Sometimes

Do you think Stress due to family situation?


a) Many times

15.

b) Sometimes

c) Never

Do you think company policy is one of the reason for stress?


a) Many times

16.

c) Never

b) Sometimes

c) Never

Do you think unfavorable work environment is one of the reason for stress in job
work?
a) Many times

17.

b) Sometimes

Do you think inadequacy of essential equipment may arise a stress in work?


a) Many times

18.

c) Never

b) Sometimes

c) Never

i) You are a shot tempered?


a) Yes

b) No

ii) If yes means, do you controlled your tempered?


a) Many times

b) Sometimes

Department of Business Administration

c) Never

Page 83

19.

Do you think internal competition between workers is are the reasons for arising
stress?
a) Many times

20.

b) Sometimes

c) Never

Do you feel you have time to spent with your friends (or) relatives?
a) Many times

22.

c) Never

An economic problem will arising the stress in your job?


a) Many times

21.

b) Sometimes

b) Sometimes

c) Never

Some times you can not completed your work how do you feel?
a) Sad

b) Tried

c) Anxious

d) Depressed

e) Tense

f) Angry

g) Irritable
23.

What are your greatest skill or strengths?


a) Self confidence

b) Powerful commanding

c) Adjustability
24.

i) The company is conduct any stress programme?


a) Yes

b) No

ii) If yes means, it is really reduce your stress?


a) Yes

b) No

Department of Business Administration

Page 84

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Human Resource Management
C.P. Gupta
Sultan Chand & Sons
Educational Publishers
2. Organisational Behaviour
S.S Khanka
Chand & Co Publishing House
3. Organisational Behaviour
K. Aswathappa
Himalay Publishing House

Department of Business Administration

Page 85

You might also like