Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Before we turn to the dissertation report, I would like to add a few heartfelt words for
the people who have been part of this dissertation by supporting and encouraging me.
Opportunity to express my Honour, Respect, Deepest Gratitude, and Genuine regards
to my guide Dr. G.S.MANJUNATH for giving me all guidance and valuable suggestions
required for my dissertation work apart from being a constant source of inspiration and
motivation.
I convey my sincere thanks to Asst Prof. S. M. Patil for their kind support which
helped me to complete this dissertation successfully.
I express my sincere thanks to the Prof. and Head of Department of Civil
Engineering Dr. V. G. MutalikDesai and PG coordinator Dr. Vinod Hosur for their kind
co-operation and constant encouragement.
I am immensely thankful to our beloved Principal, Dr. A. S. Deshpande, whose
constant support had provided me a platform to present my idea in a creative manner.
I would like to express appreciation to all My Friends for their moral support and
warm wishes which helped me to complete this dissertation successfully.
Finally I attribute all my success in life to My Parents for their moral and intellectual
support in carrying out the PG programme in Structural engineering. It is my greatest
pleasure to dedicate this achievement to My Parents.
ABHINANDAN KORI
M-Tech IV semester
(Structural Engineering)
ABSTRACT
Major hazards from earthquake, storms, tsunami in recent decades have brought
increasing awareness among structural engineers and construction professionals.
Earthquakes etc. produce large amount of lateral forces, ordinary frame buildings are not so
good to sustain these lateral forces, and one has to improve lateral strength of building to
resist these lateral forces that comes from these causes. Shear walls in buildings are better
solution to counteract these forces.
In present work, an attempt has been made to study the effectiveness of orientation
and position of shear walls in resisting lateral forces. It has been found that any location and
orientation of shear wall is not effective. For better and economical solution, shear wall
should be at appropriate locations. In present work, the effect of different combinations of
location and orientation is studied. Three building frames with (B+G+11), (B+G+20),
(B+G+30), storey residential building have been chosen the study in earthquake zone 3 in
India. Soil conditions considered are soft, medium, and hard. Analysis is carried out using
Etabs software.
The effect of position and orientation of shear wall on lateral displacement, storey
drift, storey shear, shear force and bending moment in column and natural period are
evaluated and compared with the corresponding storey results for bare frame. The effect of
different soil conditions is also incorporates. On the basis of this work, results have been
obtained and the most effective location of the shear wall is found out, i.e. outer periphery of
building that are provided in the corner of building which resist horizontal forces.
ii
CONTENTS
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
1.4 Background
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 General
10
2.2 Remarks
16
17
18
18
18
20
20
22
22
23
23
iii
24
24
24
24
25
25
26
27
27
37
52
52
53
76
77
REFERENCES
78
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
TITLE
No
1.1
Page
No
2
1.2
1.3
1.4
3.1
17
3.2
21
4.1
25
5.1
30
5.2
31
5.3
32
5.4
33
5.5
34
5.6
35
5.7
29
5.8
27
6.1
38
6.2
39
6.3
40
6.5
44
6.6
44
6.7
45
6.9
49
6.10
49
6.11
51
6.12
36
6.13
37
7.1
56
7.2
56
7.3
7.4
57
57
7.5
58
7.6
59
7.7
60
7.8
Storey drift at each floor level for different soil type (Model 1)
63
7.9
Storey drift at each floor level for different soil type (Model 2)
63
7.10
Storey drift at each floor level for different soil type (Model 3)
64
7.11
64
7.12
65
7.13
67
7.14
67
7.15
70
7.16
70
7.17
71
7.18
71
7.19
72
7.20
74
7.21
74
7.22
52
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table
. No
5.1
Page
. No
30
5.2
Gives the Storey drift for different models, at each floor level.
31
5.3
Gives the storey shear at each floor level for different models
32
5.4
33
5.5
34
6.1
38
6.2
39
6.3
40
6.4
41
6.5
42
6.6
43
6.7
45
6.8
46
6.9
47
6.10
48
6.11
50
6.12
51
54
7.1
7.2
TITLE
54
vii
7.3
55
(model 4)
55
7.5
58
7.6
59
7.7
60
7.8
storey drift at each floor level for different soil type (model 1)
61
7.9
storey drift at each floor level for different soil type (model 2)
61
7.10
storey drift at each floor level for different soil type (model 3)
62
7.11
storey drift at each floor level for different soil type (model 4)
62
7.12
65
7.13
66
7.14
66
7.15
storey shear at each floor level for different soil type (model 1)
68
7.16
storey shear at each floor level for different soil type (model 2)
68
7.17
storey shear at each floor level for different soil type (model 3)
69
7.18
storey shear at each floor level for different soil type (model 4)
69
7.19
72
7.20
73
7.21
73
7.22
75
7.4
viii