Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
Heart Failure (HF) has been one of the major health problems worldwide due
to lifestyle (education, diet, exercise, smoking, and socioeconomic) and poor quality
of life. According to Indonesias National Cardiovascular Center, HF is the most
common diagnosis with high mortality rate. Other than that, the number of
hospitalized heart failure patents is increasing in year 2007 to 2008, from 1409 to
1476 patients, in NCVC Jakarta.1 These numbers are estimated to increase
continuously throughout the coming years. Patients admitted to hospital are usually in
poor condition. The lack of awareness to heart failure diseases is due to ignorance, not
much of health insurance, and being far from hospital. There are several types and
numerous etiologies of HF, whereas Left Ventricular Diastolic Heart Failure
(LVDHF) is the most progressive ones.2,3
Left Ventricular Diastolic Heart Failure currently accounts for 40-50% of all
HF cases.4 This type of HF is a progressive disorder characterized by impaired left
ventricular (LV) relaxation, increased LV stiffness, escalated interstitial deposition of
collagen, and modified extracellular matrix proteins. Thus, blood pumped from the
left ventricle will be less than its normal capability. The onset of LVDHF is usually
asymptomatic (left ventricle myocardial remodeling causing diastolic dysfunction)
because of the compensation that the human body does. However, symptoms will
arise when the human body can no longer endure the problem and at this state it
becomes LVDHF. Since, the process of left ventricle myocardial remodeling starts
before the onset of symptoms, recent studies has emphasized on the detection of
subclinical LV diastolic dysfunction, as one of the earliest and most common cardiac
abnormalities which will develop into diastolic HF, and identification through risk
factors for HF.5
As described in the previous paragraph, LV diastolic dysfunction is a predictor
for cardiovascular disease6 and all-cause mortality7. According to a study in Europe,
specifically in Northern Belgium, on 539 randomly selected residents aged 37-68
years (mean aged 52.5) showed that the prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction was
high, 27.3%.5 On another recent study researching into 692 Japanese adult patients
with sinus rhythm, referred for a transthoracic echocardiography between JulyDecember 2007 (mean 59 15 years old; 50% women, 48% hypertension, 16%
diabetes, 26% overweight, 8% obese), showed that 78% of the population had
abnormal LV diastolic dysfunction.8 Both studies showed diastolic dysfunction is
common in older populations and often unaccompanied by overt congestive heart
failure.5,8
Formerly, cardiac catheterization was the gold standard to demonstrate
impaired relaxation and filling by making direct measurements. However,
echocardiography has replaced it as the most clinically used tool. Echocardiographic
techniques to assess early subclinical changes in diastolic LV function evolved
rapidly over the past 10 years. By evaluating mitral inflow pulmonary venous flow
Doppler, color M-mode velocity propagation, tissue Doppler imaging, and speckle
tracking, echocardiography is considered an accurate method for diagnosis and
grading diastolic dysfunction, despite of its high cost.9
Recent findings showed a significant association between LV diastolic
dysfunction and arterial stiffness using different markers, such as augmentation index
(AIx), brachio-ankle Pulse Wave Velocity (ba-PWV), carotid-femoral pulse wave
velocity, and cardio-ankle vascular index.10-13 Increased arterial stiffness results in
higher transmission velocities of both forward and reflected arterial pulse waves
causing the reflected waves to arrive earlier in the central aorta and augment pressure
in late systole. The augmentation of central aortic systolic pressure is typically
quantified as the increase of pressure from the first systolic shoulder to the systolic
pressure peak of the aortic pressure waveform and is expressed as a percentage of
central aortic pulse pressure (AIx).10 Beside that, the arterial stiffness also can be
expressed by another kind of marker called the PWV. PWV is simple and noninvasive in determining arterial stiffness. All arterial sites have potential interest.
Indeed, the forearm circulation is where blood pressureis commonly measured, and
the lower limb arteries are specifically altered by atherosclerosis. Measurement
oflocal carotid stiffness may also provide important prognosticinformation, since the
carotid artery is a frequent site ofatheroma formation. Oscillometric technique is used
in obtaining baPWV and the result has shown strong correlation with increased
cardiovascular events. Aside from that, carotid-femoral PWV has also been used in
the epidemiological studies demonstrating the predictive value of aortic stiffness for
1.0 was
that the pulsations in the bilateral radial arteries were similar, the right brachial artery
sistole blood pressure was measured. In order to measure the posterior tibial and
dorsalis pedis artery sistole blood pressure, a 12 cm-wide standard cuff for the upper
extremity was applied to the ankle, with the lower end of the cuff being placed about
3 cm above the malleoli and the contour adjusted to the conical shape of the lower
leg. The higher systolic pressure of the two inferior arteries was divided by the higher
systolic pressure of the arms to obtain the ABI. A mercury sphygmamometer and a
stethoscope were used.