Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_____________
which preserves
- segmentable
- durational
- reversible, bidirectional (Physics)
Humans experience space and time
- unidirectinally
- irreversibly. We can only refer to
events by choosing
The
3 The clock time (public time): established on the periodicity of some observable natural
phenomena.(time measured by mechanical devices, clocks, etc. i.e. revolution of the
earth round its own axis, the coming of seasons).
C. To be able to order perceived events, one has to set them in relation to one
another. Events occur either - before or
- after or
- simultaneously
The axis of orientation has a source event, relative to which a chronological
order can be established for the perceived events: they can be either taking
place simultaneously with the source event of the axis, or they can occur
sequentially (before/after). To establish what kind of events can serve as
source events for axes of orientation, THE MOMENTS OF SPEECH are
considered as the primary axis of orientation. Two perceived events are
sequential or simultaneous only in terms of an observer. But the order of
events is not the same for all observers. Because of the existence of SPACE
and the distinct velocities of light and sound, by convention, simultaneity and
sequnetiality of events are converted at SPEECH TIME into a construct of 3
points:
- moment of speech (locating speaker in time and relative to the speech
event;
- other events (present/past/future). In actual speech, the primary axis
of orientation is the speech moment: NOW (present point - PP):
_________________________________
__________________________________
________________________
____________________________________________
Tense is deictic, it grammaticalizes features of the context of utterance. NOW
is central according to which PAST and FUTURE represent axes of orientation
(directions).
Hans Reichenbach (1947) gave a semantic interpretation of Tense in terms of
PRIMITIVES (ST, ET, RT) along the axis of time representation; these primitives
are translated into time specifiers in the language: tense realization (tense
inflection(s)) and time adverbials (temporal phrases).
Speech time (ST)
Reference time (RT) - T indicated by the S need not be the same as ST.
Event time (ET)
Examples:
(1)
(4)
ST = now
RT ST
ET RT
(5)
John will have eaten the cake.
ST = now
RT ST (after)
ET
RT
In Reichenbachs theory : the number of possible tenses is the number of
possible ST, RT, ET configurations, structured by the operations of sequency
and simultaneity. Each tense need not appear in any one specific language,
rather this theory delimits the range of tenses a G chooses from in
constructing the particular tense Grammar of a natural language.
of time, e.g. then, yesterday, 2 h ago etc. which are deictically interpreted and
create a retrospective axis of orientation, the axis of the past. Along this axis
events are interpreted according to the same spatio-temporal relations of
simultaneity, anteriority or posteriority. Hence, at ST NOW, the content of the
event or state is recollected:
e.g. a. I bought this bronze statue when I was in Naples.
b. I misplaced my pencil a moment ago and I can't find it.
The past tense is used to represent an act as done, or as regularly or habituallt
don in time wholly past at the present moment, although it may have been
performed only a few seconds before. So, according to this characterization,
the simple past can be defined as describing a situation that occurs before the
present moment at a definitely specified time (in the past0: yesterday, last
week etc. If we analyse a sentence like:
The lightning struck a house yesterday,
the temporal adverbial yesterday specifies a definite time in the past; the past
tense inflection (-ed)+definite past time
ET - nonspecified, ET = RT
ATR [RT ST; ET= RT ].
The past tense is used to locate an event or state at some specified time in
the past. The content of the event or state is recollected at ST. Past time
adverbials are most frequently associated with the simple past tense:
yesterday, last NP (night, week, month, year) etc. the other say, once, two
days ago, in the year 1901, on MOnday, in June, when I was a child etc.
All these adverbs specify a definite point or interval of time in the past.
a). Cases with no time adverbial specification, where the adverbial can be
inferred from the larger context in which a S occurred:
e.g.
b). Past Tense without adverbial specification: I've been in Switzerland once.
How did you like it?
It was glorious. We had beautiful
weather all the time.
The present perfect is used to introduce an event unspecified that takes place
anterior to ST in a period that began in the past and includes ST. So the frame
of reference is established: PAST for the discourse. when refrence is resumed
to the already introduced event, it is made by a definite past time specifier,
i.e. the simple past tense.
c). A third case - the simple past tense can be used without a definite
indication of time when a comparison is drawn bet. present and past
conditions:
e.g.
Jespersen: such vague implications of the past are ususally expressed by the
frequentative: used to, which denotes repeated action but also permanent
state in the past: I used to live in Chelsea (no time specification - state)
Conclusion: All these examples show the deictic use of the simple past tense,
i.e. oriented to ST, in combination with a deictic temporal adverbial. Besides
the deictic use, the simple apst tense is also apparent in the narrative mode,
i.e. non-deictically, to narrate situations that happened at a time before now,
but which is not given. Such S s inform of situations ordered with the aid of
common information not present in the psentences themselves.
"she sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue. Her
head was leaning against the window curtains.... ("Eveline', J.Joyce)
In the non-deictic, narrative mode, the past tense is used without temporal
adverbs, as its main function is to convey information about the events,
sattes, processes that make up the fiction network.
Among the possible semantic values of the PAST TENSE, we have to mention
the following (RT ST; ET = RT):
1. the habitual past (similar to the habitual S s in the present tense):
e.g.
John got up at noon vs. John got up at noon every day during his
childhood.
The past habitual can contain an adverbial that indicates the interval during
which the recurring event took place: during his childhood (RT).
Frequency specifications, common to present or past tense occurrences: 3
times a week, every afternoon, at 3 o'clock that year.
Habitual interpretations can be context-bound: At lunchtime, every day the
same thing happened: Mary ate an apple.
C. Smith (1978): An ambiguity with habitual past sentences occurs because
they may contain adverbials that specify the interval in wh. the repetition took
place: Jane swam from June to September (every year, during her childhood).
2. The simple past tense with Past Perfect value
As we know that the simple past is used to describe events that happen either
simultaneously or sequentially along the past axis of orientation, we have to
draw a semantic distinction bet. the foll. S s:
e.g.
ST
ET RT.
So, to underline, the past perfect interpretation of b. is based on our general
knowledge of the world we live in, more specifically about the way activities
sense that it is a fictional licence and it does not occur in everyday speech. It
is a use confined to literary style, more specifically to science fiction.
e.g. It was the year 3057. The interplanetary vehicle made a routine journey to
the Moon with 50 people on board.
The simple past tense in SF is used in virtue of the existent known convention
about recounting events, i.e. events that took place in the past. This
convention a make-believe technique: future events are recounted as if
being recollected, not anticipated, thus projecting the reader further in time
than the time specified in the narrative (retrospective view).
1. The simple Past tense referrring to the Present time
In everyday conversation a possible extension of the meaning of Paste tense is its use with present
time reference.
No adverbial specification occurs with such use. It is the context that disambiguates the use of the
past tense. The use of the simple past tense with present time reference describes events that
happened in the past and once performed, they cannot be changed after their occurrence. The context
in which it appears is that where the speaker elicits information from the listener.
e.g.
Despite the use of the past tense, the speakers wishes over the listener would probably be present.
The Present and Past are in fact interchangeable. Only, there is a difference in tone. The effect of the
Past is to make the request indirect and therefore more polite. It avoids a confrontation of wills.
III. The Present Perfect Tense
(RT = ST; ET RT)
The main problem with the description of the meaning of He went and He has gone is whether we
must interpret the two forms as forms of different aspect realizations (simple vs. perfect) or whether
we have to consider them as two different tense realizations (past vs. present perfect).
McCoard (1978): The English Perfect Tense choice and Pragmatic Inferences:
tackles the various interpretations given to the past tense and present perfect opposition: The
frequent question is whether the Perfect is a tense.
There are two basic perspectives from which we can interpret the present perfect in relation or in
opposition to the past tense:
a). The Indefiniteness Past Theory;
b). The Extended NOW theory (theory of inclusion)
a). If we take two sentences:
1.
He left today.
2.
From last Friday up till now I have had nothing but problems.
9.
On the other hand, there are temporal adverbials like: in the past, in past
years, in former years that usually occur with the preterit (past), but which
contextually can include the present moment, hence they co-occur with the
present perfect as well.
e.g. In past years I have been in England many times.
Once = formerly: It was a cathedral once.
= on one occasion: Ive only seen it once/I only saw it once.
Just now goes usually well with either tense:
I did it just now.
Ive just now received word from you.
At the lexicon level, Mc Coard proposed 3 different groupings of adverbs
according to their tense idiosyncrasies:
[+THEN]
[+/-THEN]
[- THEN]
long ago
long since
at present
5 years ago
in the past
up till now
since=formerly
once=one time
so far
yesterday
today
as yet
in my life
not yet
on those days
for 3 years
past
last night
recently
herewith,
in 1900
just now
at 3 oclock,
always, never
before
before now,
lately
no longer
As a conclusion, in order to reflect the opposition past-including the present
(present perfect) and past-excluding the present (past tense), we need to set
up the notion of INCLUSION. Anteriority is common to both the Perfect and
Past, but the anteriority of the past is always tied to the moment of coding,
whereas that of the perfect need not be. So, the category of inclusion emerges
when the past and perfect are competing in the same territory. The perfect
will indicate inclusion of the present NOW (RT=ST), will past will exclude the
present NOW (RT ST). In sum, the past time expressed by the perfect is not a
definite contextually determined time. The simple past indicates a contextually
defined parameter:
The present perfect shows that the event is to be located in an unspecified
interval of time from the past up to and including the present, hence:
will/shall;
Be about to.
Apart from the simple present (the only marked form of expressing
futurity), such forms belong either to the modal system or to the
aspectual paradigm. Therefore, Future tense is discarded in English.
Modal SHALL/WILL express prediction (epistemic value).