Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Working capital management is the device of finance. It is related to current assets
and current liabilities. Working capital is very significant for playing day to day expenses
and long term liabilities.
The term Working Capital refers to the day to day requirements of the business.
The business needs WC for the procurement of raw materials, payment of wages and other
direct costs. The maintenance of WC is inevitable in every firm. The maintenance of WC
helps the firm in smooth production of goods and services.
The amount of WC varies from business to business. It depends upon the nature and
size of the business.
2011-2012
Page 1
2011-2012
Page 2
2011-2012
Page 3
The operating cycle of manufacturing business can be shown as given in the following chart.
Account Receivables
Sales
Cash
Finished goods
Raw materials
Work in progress
2011-2012
Page 4
Cash
Sales
Finished goods
What mix of long term, financing and short term financing should the firm employ to
support Current Assets?
2011-2012
Page 5
2. SEASONALITY OF OPERATIONS
2011-2012
Page 6
3. PRODUCTION POLICY
A firm marketed by pronounced seasonal fluctuations in its sales may pursue a
production policy which may reduce the sharp variations in working capital
requirements. For example, a manufacturer of ceiling fans may maintain a steady
production throughout the year rather than intensify the production activity during the
peak business season. Such a production policy may dampen the fluctuations in
working capital requirements.
4. MARKET CONDITIONS
The degree of competition prevailing in the market-place has an important
bearing on working capital needs. When competition is intense, a larger inventory of
finished goods is required to promptly serve customers who may be inclined to wait
because other manufacturers are ready to meet their needs. Further, generous credit
terms may have to be offered to attract customers in a highly competitive market.
Thus, working capital needs tend it be high because of greater investment in finished
goods inventory and accounts receivable.
5. CONDITIONS OF SUPPLY
The inventory of raw materials, spares and stores depends on the conditions of
supply. If the supply is prompt and adequate, the firm can manage with small
inventory. However, if the supply is unpredictable and scant, then the firm, to ensure
continuity of production would have to acquire stocks as and when they are available
and carry larger
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 7
6. PRODUCTION POLICIES
The production policies pursued by the management have significant effect on
the requirements of WC of the business. The production schedule has a great
influence on the level of inventories. The decision of the management regarding
automation etc, will also have its effect on WC requirements in case of labor
intensive industries the WC requirements will be more in case of capital intensive of
highly automation plant, the requirements of long term funds will be more.
7. NATURE OF THE BUSINESS
WC also depends upon the nature of the business. The public utility like
railways, electricity etc, have very little need of WC since, most of their transactions
are on cash basis and moreover, they will not require large inventories. On the other
hand, ordinary manufacturing and trading concerns require sufficient WC since they
have no invest substantially in inventories and debtors.
9. CREDIT POLICY
A company, which allows liberal credits to its customer may have a higher
sales but will need more WC as compared to a company which has a efficient debt
collection, machinery and observing strict credit terms. This is because in the case of
former company, a substantial amount of its funds will get tied up in its sundry
debtors. The WC can also be effected by the credit facilities enjoyed by the company.
2011-2012
Page 8
2011-2012
Page 9
INVESTORS:
The term inventories include stock of raw materials, work in progress and finished
goods. The estimation of each of them will be made as follows;
WORK IN PROGRESS:
The cost of work in progress includes stock of raw materials, wages and
overheads. In determining the amount of work in progress, the period for which
goods will be in the course of production process is most important.
FINISHED GOODS:
The period for which the finished goods have to remain in the warehouse
before sales is an important factor for determining the amount licked up in finished
goods.
SUNDRY DEBTOR:
The amount of funds locked up in sundry debtors will be computed on the basis of
credit sales and the time lag in collecting payments.
2011-2012
Page 10
SUNDRY CREDITORS:
The lag in payment to suppliers of raw materials, goods, etc., and the likely credit
purchases to be made during the period will help estimating the amount of creditors.
OUTSTANDING EXPENSES:
The term lag in payment to wages and other expenses will help in estimating the
amount of outstanding expenses.
2011-2012
Page 11
2011-2012
Page 12
IMPORTANCE OR ADVANTAGE
OF ADEQUATE WORKING
CAPITAL
GOODWILL:
Sufficient amount of working capital enables a firm to make prompt payments
and makes and maintain the goodwill.
EASY LOANS:
Adequate working capital leads to high solvency and credit standing can
arrange loans from banks and other on easy and favorable terms.
CASH DISCOUNTS:
Adequate working capital also enables a concern to avail cash discounts on
the purchases and hence reduces cost.
2011-2012
Page 13
2011-2012
Page 14
Favorable demographic distribution with rising working population and middle class
urbanization
2011-2012
Page 15
Robust production
AUTO COMPONENT:
The auto components industry production, in India, is estimated at around Rs 1212
billion in 2009-10. The industry has been reducing its dependence on the domestic
automobile industry over the long time; it also continues to maintain its ability of being costcompetitive and technically proficient in niche segments. These factors along with foray of
Indian auto component players in the international markets through acquisitions have
enhanced the industrys popularity among international original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs) in terms of their outstanding needs. Currently domestic OEMs account for around
67% of the total auto component production off takes, whereas the replacement and export
segments account for around 21% and 12% respectively. The industry is largely fragmented
with over 558 players operating in the organized segment and many unorganized players
catering to the replacement demand. However, with auto OEMs adopting vendor
rationalization, proportion of the organized segment is likely to increase over the long term.
2011-2012
Page 16
AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY:
Automobile Industry wheels the growth of the economy. And the evolution of the
automobile component industry predictably followed the evolution of the automobile of the
auto industry itself.
A second phase in the evolution saw many established Indian companies tie up with
western manufacturers for technical collaboration. In some cases, efforts at export were
initiated, usually with the help of the foreign collaborated.
The auto component industry received a major boost along with the auto ancillary in
the 1980s. Annual growth was usually over ten percent and industry wide sales more than
doubled between 1984-1985 and between 1989-1990. Industry sales figures from 1988-1989
included 39 percent related to engine components, 24 percent for transmission and steering
parts, 17 percent for suspensions and brake parts, and about 8 percent for auto electrical
parts.
The arrival of the Japanese in the Indian industry (for cars, trucks and two-wheeler)
saw a major source of joint- ventures emerges in the 1980s.
In automobile industry, particularly in MCV (medium commercial vehicles) and
HCV (heavy commercial vehicle ) segment, the shift is towards multi axle vehicles due to its
carrying capacities and effectiveness. This trend is likely to continue during the years to
come. However rising cost of steel is a cause of concern for number of vehicles sold in the
market.
2011-2012
Page 17
INDUSTRY GROWTH:
The Rs. 126.80 billion Indian Auto ancillary industry witnessed a growth in output of
5.4% in value terms FY-98-99.
FY 98-99 signaled after a 2years shrimp in demand growth fuelled by a showdown in
automobile growth. The favorable bend continues through FY-99-2000, on the back of
enhanced demand from the automobile sector of random sample survey of 33auto tanks
ancillaries companies conducted by the business world magazine revealed that automobiles
ancillaries companys recorded 20% higher sales during Apr-June 1999 are compared to the
same period during the previous year.
While demand growth in the auto ancillary industries is as same drives by the growth
in demand for automobiles, replacement demand accounts for the bulk of the growth in the
2011-2012
Page 18
COMPANY PROFILE
Established in 1981, Automotive Axles Limited (AAL) is a joint venture of a Fortune
500 company, Kalyani Group and Arvin Meritor Inc., USA (formerly the automotive
division of Rockwell International Corporation). With manufacturing facilities located at
Mysore, the company is currently the largest independent manufacturer of Rear Drive Axle
Assemblies in the country. Over the years, AAL has developed an impressive domestic OEM
clientele that includes Ashok Leyland, Telco, Vehicle Factory, Jabalpur, Mahindra &
Mahindra, Volvo and Bharat Earth Movers. AAL exports axle parts to USA, and Italy.
The infrastructure at AAL spans highly specialized manufacturing processes
involving Friction Welding, CO2 Welding, CNC Machining, Flexible Machine Centers and a
range of specially built machines for production of Axles and Brakes. The facilities also
comprise Gleason Gear Manufacturing Equipment backed by a modern Heat Treatment Shop
including Continuous Carburizing and Sealed Quench Furnaces.
PROMOTERS OF AAL
ARVIN MERITOR
2011-2012
Page 19
KALYANI GROUP
The Kalyani Group is one of the leading Industrial Houses in India, with a sharp
focus on primarily four sectors, viz. Engineering Steel, Automotive & Non-Automotive
Components, Renewable Energy & Infrastructure and Specialty Chemicals. The Group's
Annual Turnover is over USD 2.4 billion and has joint ventures with some of the world
leaders such as ArvinMeritor, USA, Carpenter Technology Corporation, USA, Hayes
Lemmerz, USA, FAW Corporation, China, Gerdau SA, Brazil etc
Bharat Forge Limited, the flagship company of the group is a global forging
conglomerate. With a global capacity of over 750,000 TPA spread across 12 locations and 6
countries - four in India, three in Germany, one each in Sweden, Scotland, USA and two in
China, Bharat Forge has the capability to meet the global demands of its customers with
seamless engineering and design support. BFL manufactures a wide range of safety and
2011-2012
Page 20
2011-2012
Page 21
Brake assemblies
Providing value for customers through innovative solution quality product and
exceptional services.
MISSION:
2011-2012
Page 22
Establish and implement suitable environment and safety practice system to fulfill
our business plan. .
QUALITY POLICY:
AAL is aiming to be a world class Automotive Tier I organization through total
employee involvement by:
Exceeding business plan objectives providing value to customers through
innovative solution, production quality & exceptional services.
Continual improvement of QMS.
Out Perform Competitors strategies by developing Customer Loyalty with
differentiated products, superior service and competitive Pricing.
Co-ordination in all departments to serve customers, in time every time.
2011-2012
Page 23
2011-2012
Page 24
Hypoid-Generic gearing.
2011-2012
Page 25
OWNERSHIP PATTERN
AAL is a Joint venture between Kalyani group and Meritor, USA.AAL was promoted
as a Joint venture by the Kalyani group and Rockwell Corporation, USA (35.52% stake) in
1981. AAL is a 30.30 crore project at Hootagalli, Mysore. AAL entered the capital market
with a public issue.
2011-2012
Page 26
Ownership
Share holding %
Promoters
10,735,081.00
71.04
Bodies Corporate
1,734,318.00
11.48
FIs/Banks
113
FIIs
24,976.00
0.17
NRIs/OCB
49,495.00
0.33
Mutual Funds
1,384,668.00
9.16
Others
1183324 7.83
7.83
Total
15,111,975.00
100
2011-2012
Page 27
: Registered office
Hootagalli Industrial area
Off Hunsur Road, Mysore
Financial year
Listing
Stock Codes
BSE-505010 NSE-AUTOAXLES
Demat ISIN Number: INE449A01011
Dematerialization
Share Capital
151,119,750
Chairman
B.N.Kalyani
President
Ashok Rao
Product
Axles
COMPETITORS INFORMATION
Axle India
American Axles
Tata Motors
INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES:
AAL has 50acres of land allotted by KIADB at Hootagalli, Mysore, of which 18 acres
have been utilized. The infrastructural facilities include;
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 28
TRAINING CENTRE:
The new training centre up, on the model of a finishing school with infrastructure
for CNC machining, material handling, welding, assembly and disassembly along
with simulation for off line programming
2011-2012
Page 29
2. QUALITY:
Continually improve Effectiveness and Efficiency of Quality Management
Systems to maintain a distinguishable competitive Edge as viewed by Customers.
4. COMPETITION:
(Neutralize) Out Perform Competitors strategies by developing Customer
Loyalty with differentiated products, superior service and competitive Pricing
5. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE:
Exceed our financial and growth objectives through aggressive
implementation of our Business Plan
2011-2012
Page 30
Overall growth-204
Overall profitability-169
2011-2012
Page 31
Bill of Material
Quotation call
Selection of vendor
Purchase order
Inward Stores
Quality Control
Inspection
Rejected
Accepted
Main Stores
Assembly
2011-2012
Customer
Page 32
2011-2012
Page 33
Soft Elements
Strategy
Shared Values
Structure
Skills
Systems
Style
Staff
"Hard" elements are easier to define or identify and management can directly
influence them: These are strategy statements; organization charts and reporting lines; and
formal processes and IT systems.
"Soft" elements, on the other hand, can be more difficult to describe, and are less
tangible and more influenced by culture. However, these soft elements are as important as the
hard elements if the organization is going to be successful.
The way the model is presented in the Figure below depicts the interdependency of
the elements and indicates how a change in one affects all the others.
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 34
STRATEGY:
Strategy is a plan for an organization, which formulates to gain a substantial
advantage over the competition. Strategy is the art of devising and employing a system of
activities that mobilizes all resources towards a valuable goal. Strategy is the determination
of basic long term goals and objectives of an enterprise, and the adoption of course of action
and the allocation of resources available for carrying out these goals.
In other words, the route that the organization has chosen for its future growth; a plan
an organization formulates to gain a competitive advantage.
Waste elimination strategy:
The majority of quality efforts focus on two things: quality control, based on
standards and inspection and quality prevention, based on techniques such as error profiling.
Most people do not realize the effect that the overall manufacturing system has on quality.
Waste elimination in the manufacturing environment usually thought of in terms of cost
reduction, can have a dramatic positive impact on improving quality.
Systematic elimination is a cornerstone of lean systems thinking. Unfortunately,
waste elimination is typically viewed as an opportunity to improve efficiency v\s the equally
important measure of effectiveness. A relentless focus on eliminating waste will have
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 35
2011-2012
Page 36
Chief Financial
Officer & Co.
Secretary
Divisional
Manager IT /MIS
Financial
Controller
GM-MFG.
Engg&Qt
Qt.
Assurance
Management
Representatives
Materials
Secretarial
SQA
GM-Strategic
Sourcing
Mfg.
Engg&IndE
ngg
Capex
New
Products
GM Material
GM Prod &
Maintenance
New Source
Dept
Prod. Shops
Dev.
Activities
for New
Products
Prod. Shops
2011-2012
Plant
Engineer
PPS/MPS &
Stores
Company
Metallurgist
Admin.
&Pres Off
Security
Page 37
Provide all hardware and software, and other facilities connected with data
transmission.
Protect the entire information heritage and guarantee the data integrity,
2011-2012
Page 38
Timing
A shift
7.00 AM to 3.00 PM
B shift
3.00 PM to 11.00 PM
C shift
11.00 PM to 7.00 AM
G shift
8.30 AM to 5.00 PM
All employees are required to report for duty 15 minutes before the beginning of the
shift. An employee working in a place in any shift cannot leave the work place at the end of
his/her shift without handing over the charges to the reliever.
Out Pass:
Staff can go outside during office hour only after submitting the Out Going
Pass(duly signed by the concerned H.O.D) at the Security Department.
SHARED VALUES
It means that employees share its same guiding values and mission, that is, on
excellently managed company has a driving propose and philosophy that is known and
practiced by everyone.
The values shared by the member of an organization are:
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 39
STYLE:
Style is one of the seven levels, which top managers can use to bring out
organization change. Organization differ from each other in their style of working in an
organization, according to the Mckensys frame work becomes evidently through the pattern
of actions taken by members of the top management team over a period of time. The aspects
of business must emphasized by members of the top management tend to be given more
attention by people down in organization.
Style of leadership or relationship refers to the manner in which an individual uses his
or her talents, values, knowledge, judgment and attitudes -to lead and relate to others. Style
expresses the persons character. Style is the leadership approach; also the way in which the
employees in the organization present themselves to the outside world, to suppliers, and
customers. In simple words, a style is the pattern of behavior, which a leader adopts in
influencing the behaviour of his followers (Subordinates) in the organization context.
a. TOP DOWN / BOTTOM UP APPROACH:
AAL practices both, Top-down & Bottom-up approach of Decision Making. The
Major decisions pertaining to the Organization are taken by the Top Management. Suppose A
breakdown of machine occurs & the machine has to be replaced, the higher level
management is informed about it. The top management decides on the replacement of the
machine. Suppose a minor problem pertaining to the canteen facilities occurs, this is solved
by the low & Middle Management, who have the Authority to take Decisions. Here the
bottom-up approach is adopted.
2011-2012
Page 40
STAFF:
Staffing is the process of acquiring human resources for the organization and assuring
that they have the potential to contribute the achievement of organization goals.
The company is accommodating various employees, they comprise of staff,
personnel, workers and trainees, most of them are from Mysore City. The company continues
to have cordial and harmonious relations with its employees. The company has various
training programmes organized to be in line with changing business environment. Several
training programmes, standard to the need of the individual employees and also to meet the
requirements of ISO 9001, QS 9000, ISO 14001 and TS 16949 certifications.
To further enhance employee involvement, suggestion scheme was launched in the
year 2003. Employees have been trained in areas like technical, soft skills, visit to leading
industries to understand the best practices, TS 16949 awareness programme.
The total manpower of AA L is 2,500 at present. This includes trainees, casuals and
peripherals.
2011-2012
Page 41
500
Workmen
655
Total manpower
1,155
95
Total
1,250
Others Casual
1,100
2,350
Peripherals
150
2,500
2011-2012
Page 42
Classroom Instructions.
2011-2012
Page 43
2011-2012
Page 44
OPPORTUNITIES:
An opportunity is a favorable situation in the firms environment. Major opportunities of
AAL ltd are:
An unfulfilled customer need.
Arrival of new Technique
Removal of International Trade Barriers
Increased Demand of Axles.
Emerging customers like Eicher motors, Swarajmazda motors and Mahindra &
Mahindra, Ashok Leyland.
Expansion of new business like purchase of break units, this helps to explore their
marketing opportunities in all over the country.
Growing commercial vehicle segment due to improved infrastructural segments in
Indian market.
The higher range products gaining more prominence.
The company has embarked upon a major drive to introduce new products, with the
changing customer requirements. The products line up over the next one year include
Two-speed axle, Planetary Hub reduction axles, High end coach axle and off highway
axles,
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 45
THREATS:
A threat is a major unfavorable situation in the firms environment. It is a key
impediment to the firms current and desired future position. Major threats of AAL are;
New regulations
Increased Trade Barriers
Increasing price of raw materials Ex: Steel
New Entrants (competitors)
An emerging competition Axles india ltd. (TVS Ltd.)
Emerging competition from overseas company Axle manufacturing ( Indian based
company, collaboration with TONGIL, a Korean based company)
2011-2012
Page 46
The purpose of this chapter is to present a review of literature relating to the working
capital management. Although working capital is an important ingredient in the smooth
working of business entities, it has not attracted much attention of scholars. Whatever
studies have conducted, those have exercised profound influence on the understanding of
working capital management good number of these studies which pioneered work in this area
have been conducted abroad, following which, Indian scholars have also conducted research
studies exploring various aspects of working capital. Special studies have been undertaken,
mostly economists, to study the dynamics of inventory investment which often represented
largest component of total working capital. As such the previous studies may be grouped into
three broad classes
1) Studies conducted abroad,
(2) studies conducted in India, and
(3) Studies relating to determine of inventory
Investment
Studies on Working Capital Management
Studies adopting a new approach towards working
capital management are reviewed here.
Sagan in his paper (1955),
perhaps the first theoretical paper on the theory of working capital management,
emphasized the need for management of working capital accounts and warned that it could
vitally affect the health of the company. He realized the need to build up a theory of
working capital management. He discussed mainly the role and functions of money
manager inefficient working capital 48management. Sagan pointed out the money managers
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 47
Propositions:
Proposition I If the amount of working capital is to fixed capital, the amount of risk
the firm assumes is also varied and the opportunities for gain or loss are increased. Walker
further stated that if a firm wished to reduce its risk to the minimum, it should employ
only equity capital for financing of working capital; however by doing so, the firm reduced
its opportunities for higher gains on equity capital as it would not be taking advantage of
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 48
Proposition II:
The type of capital (debt or equity) used to finance working capital directly affects
the amount of risk that a firm assumes as well as the opportunities for gain or loss. Walker
again suggested that not only the debt-equity ratio, but also the maturity period of debt would
affect the risk-return trade-off. The longer the period of debt, the lower be the risk. For,
management would have enough opportunity to acquire funds from operations to meet the
debt obligations. But at the 50same time, long-term debt is costlier. On the basis of this, he
developed his third proposition:
Proposition III:
The greater the disparity between the maturities of a firms debt instruments and its
flow of internally generated funds, the greater the risk and vice-versa. Thus, Walker tried to
build-up a theory of working capital management by developing three prepositions.However,
Walker tested empirically the first proposition only. Walkers Study would have been more
useful had he attempted to test all the three propositions. Weston and Brigham (1972)
further extended the second proposition suggested by Walker by dividing debt into
long-term debt and short-term debt. They suggested that short-term debt should be used in
place of long-term debt whenever their use would lower the average cost of capital to the
firm. They suggested that a business would hold short-term marketable securities only if
there were excess funds after meeting short-term debt obligations. They further suggested
that current assets holding should be expanded to the point where marginal returns on
increase in these assets would
increases.
2011-2012
Page 49
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Ratio
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio
2:1
1.87:1
2.29:1
2.69:1
b) Quick Ratio
1:1
1:1
1.35:1
1.66:1
a) Debt Ratio
30%
72%
78%
2:1
0.5067
0.341
0.4129
1.5067
1.341
0.4129
Leverage Ratios
8times
08.53
03.97
05.40
13.02
04.33
05.92
02.09
00.90
01.78
08.55
03.24
04.53
Profitability Ratios
11.45%
04.76%
09.86%
07.46%
03.62%
06.60%
c) Return on Equity
32.83%
55.45%
46.22%
2011-2012
Page 50
b. Quick Ratio:
Quick ratio is also known as acid test or liquid ratio, the term liquidity refers to the
ability of a firm to pay its short-term obligations as and when they become due. It
establishes a relationship between quick or liquid assets and current liabilities.
Normally quick ratio standard is 1:1 it is more rigorous and penetrating rest of
liquidity position. The quick ratio of AAL in 2006-07 was 1.12 higher than the
standard and also it is observed that there is decrease in the ratio in 2007-08 and there
after it increased. It shows that the company can convert its current assets quickly in
order to meet its current liabilities.
2. LEVERAGE RATIO:
a. Debt ratio:
It is used to analyze the long term solvency of a firm. The debt ratio mentioned in the
table means that lenders have financed to that extent. The percentage of debt is 45%
in 2006-07, 30%in 2007-08, 72% in 2008-09 and 78% in 2009-10. It obviously
implies that owners have provided the remaining finances. And it clearly shows that
in the last 2 years lenders have contributed more funds than owners.
2011-2012
Page 51
3. ACTIVITY RATIOS
a. Inventory Turnover Ratio
Inventory turnover ratio measures the velocity of conversion of stock into sales.
Usually, a high inventory turnover velocity indicates efficient management of inventory
because more frequently the stocks are sols; the lesser amount of money is required to
finance the inventory. A low inventory turnover ratio indicates an inefficient management of
inventory. A very high turnover of inventory does not necessarily imply higher profits.
The profits may be low due to excessive cost incurred in replacing stock in small
lots, stock-out situations, selling inventories at very low prices etc. It was 7.99 in 2006-07
and it is increased to 8.53 in 2007-08. And then there is fall in the ratio to 3.97 in 2008-09
and slowly increased in the year 2009-10 to 5.4
2011-2012
Page 52
2011-2012
Page 53
c. Return on equity:
A return on shareholders equity is calculated to see that profitability of owners
investment. The shareholders equity or net worth will include paid up share capital, share
premium and reserves and surplus less accumulated losses. ROE indicates how well the firm
has used the resources of owners. This ratio is, thus of great interest to the present as well as
the prospective shareholders and also of great concern to management, which has the
responsibility of maximizing the owners welfare.
National School of Business, Bangalore
2011-2012
Page 54
2011-2012
Page 55
Work-in-
Finished
Stores
Materials( )
Progress( )
Goods( )
Spares( )
2006-2007
453,435,106
206,505,966
23,576,756
76,734,002
2007-2008
565,657,953
137,938,152
86,063,039
85,470,687
2008-2009
372,360,517
125,015,696
30,554,982
71,729,344
2009-2010
664,339,994
142,337,405
21,464,741
74,622,177
Year
&
400,000,000
Work-in-Progress
300,000,000
Finished Goods
200,000,000
100,000,000
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2011-2012
Page 56
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
Inventory( )
760,251,830
875,129,831
599,660,539
902,764,317
Working Capital( )
889,179,134
873,163,787
820,834,623
1,473,552,300
0.86
0.73
0.61
Inventory to working
capital Ratio
2011-2012
Page 57
0.73
Inventory
0.61
0.6
Working
capital
0.4
0.2
0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2011-2012
Page 58
2006-07
Net sales( )
Closing inventory( )
760,251,829
875,129,831
671,599,461
1,237,474,792
Ratio
7.99
8.53
3.97
5.4
42.18
90.79
66.69
Inventory
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
holding
period=365days/ITR(In 45.07
days)
8.53
7.99
7
6
5.4
5
3.97
Net Sales
Closing
Inventory
3
2
1
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2011-2012
Page 59
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Materials consumed( )
4,232,175,644
5,214,018,254
1,754,148,545 4,743,006,541
401,581,518
509,546,529
469,009,235
518,350,255
10.54
10.23
3.74
9.15
34.16
35.18
96.25
39.34
2011-2012
2009-10
Page 60
10.23
10
9.15
Average raw
material
inventory
Marerial
consumed
8
6
3.74
4
2
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2011-2012
Page 61
2006-07
Cost of production( )
Average
W-I-P
Inventory( )
Ratio
W-I-P
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
180,792,200
172,222,059
131,476,924
133,676,687
28.05
37.14
17.3
43.21
9.69
20.8
8.33
holding
45
40
37.14
35
30
28.05
25
20
Cost of
production
17.3
Average WIP
Inventory
15
10
5
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2011-2012
Page 62
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Net sales( )
6,071,948,684
7,468,481,318
2,663,042,384
6,679,949,978
Current assets( )
2,003,454,540
1,880,548,953
1,455,684,226
2,344,798,713
Ratio
3.03
3.97
1.83
2.85
2011-2012
Page 63
4
3.5
3.03
2.85
3
2.5
Net Sales
1.83
Current
assets
1.5
1
0.5
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Interpretation:
The current assets turnover ratio shows the company is using its current assets in efficient
manner to achieve targeted sales. There are small ups and downs in the ratio from 20072010.
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Net sales( )
6,071,948,684
7,468,481,318
2,663,042,384
6,679,949,978
3,567,259,259
2,977,912,375
3,751,939,932
2.09
0.89
1.78
Ratio
1.73
2011-2012
Page 64
1.78
1.73
1.5
Net Sales
0.89
0.5
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
assets
turnover ratio
Net sales( )
Net fixed assets(
)
Ratio
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
6,071,948,684
7,468,481,318
2,663,042,384
6,679,949,978
1,515,545,659
1,686,710,306
1,522,228,149
1,407,141,219
4.0064%
4.4278%
1.7494%
4.7471%
2011-2012
Page 65
5
4.5
4.4278
4.0064
4
3.5
3
2.5
Net fixed
assets
1.7494
Net Sales
1.5
1
0.5
0
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2011-2012
Page 66
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Inventory( )
760,251,829
875,129,831
671,599,461
1,237,474,792
Total assets( )
3,751,939,932
Percentage
22%
33%
25%
23%
33%
30%
25%
25%
23%
22%
20%
15%
Inventory
10%
Total
assets
5%
0%
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2011-2012
Page 67
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Inventory( )
760,251,829
875,129,831
671,599,461
1,237,474,792
Current assets( )
2,003,454,540 1,880,548,953
1,455,684,226
2,344,798,713
Percentage
38%
46%
53%
47%
50%
40%
46%
38%
Inventory
30%
Current
assets
20%
10%
0%
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2011-2012
Page 68
Financial Ratios
The following table lists out the key financial ratios for 2007-08,08-09 and 09-10
Particulars
2007-08(%)
2008-09(%)
2009-10(%)
PBT/Total Income
11.35
4.68
9.80
PAT/Total Income
7.41
3.57
6.56
23.06
4.39
16.06
32.84
5.53
21.63
36.91
6.39
29.17
20.60
50.00
34.00
2011-2012
Page 69
2011-2012
Page 70
1,600,000,000
1,400,000,000
1,200,000,000
1,000,000,000
800,000,000
Series 1
600,000,000
400,000,000
200,000,000
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011-2012
Page 71
FINDINGS
1. The Gross Working Capital of the company was increases over the year because of
increase in Inventories.
2. The Net Working Capital of the company was increased in the year 2006-07,2007-08,
2008-09 but in the year 2009-10 it was decreases because of the increase in current
liabilities.
3. The Standard Current Ratio is 2:1. During the First two years i.e. 2005-06 and 2006-07
company was not maintained good current ratio compared to standard current ratio. In the
year 2007-08 and 2008-09 maintained a good current ratio compared to standard current
ratio. And then 2009-10 current ratios is decreasing because of the increases in the current
liabilities.
4. The Standard Quick Ratio is 1:1 and the company has not reached above standard level in
all the five years. It shows that companys liquidity position is not good.
5. The Current asset turnover ratio decreases in the year 2005-06 and 2006-07 and increase
in the year 2007-08 and 2008-09 increases it shows good sign for the companys growth.
But in the year 2009-10 again it decreases it is not a good sign for the companys growth.
6. Inventory to Net Working Capital Ratio is high in earlier years but in 2007 to 2010 it
decrease it shows that the under utilization of Net Working Capital.
7. An inventory to turn over Ratio is increasing so it means that increasing inventories held
up for sale.
8. Average collection of Debtors is very short it implies prompt payment by debtors.
2011-2012
Page 72
2011-2012
Page 73
2.
It is concerned with the decision about the composition and level of current
assets.
3.
It is concerned with the decision about the composition and level of current
liabilities
2011-2012
Page 74
Sch
2007
2008
2009
2010
No.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
A. Shareholders Funds
a)
Share capital
151,119,750
151,119,750
151,119,750
151,119,750
1,104,850,372
1,547,782,739
1,596,089,987
1,887,618,85
1,255,970,122
1,698,902,489
1,747,209,737
3
2,038,738,60
B. Loan Funds
841,808,890
565,687,810
334,968,312
a)
177,345,781
155,033,794
119,184,071
1,019,154,671
720,721,604
454,152,383
633,122,251
1,29,600,000
140,250,000
141,700,652
73,482,013
2.404,724,793
2,559,874,093
2,343,062,772
706,604,264
Secured Loan
b) Unsecured Loan
C. Deferred
tax
liability
(net)
135,350,652
TOTAL
2,880,693,51
5
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
2,331,610,966
2,735,095,830
2,756,210,597
A. Fixed Assts
959,871,355
1,127,998,848
1,305,057,370
a)
1,371,739,611
1,607,096,982
1,451,153,227
Less
143,806,048
79,613,324
71,074,922
2,813,748,73
1,515,545,659
1,686,710,306
1,522,228,149
Accumulated
Depreciation
Net Block
1,485,589,99
b) Capital work-in-progress
@ cost
1,328,158,74
5
78,982,474
a)
Advances
875,129,831
875,129,831
599,660,539
1,407,141,21
Current Assets
651,004,904
651,004,904
671,599,461
Inventory
192,028,587
192,028,587
86,677,370
Sundry Debtors
162,385,631
162,385,631
104,894,686
1,880,548,953
1,880,548,953
1,462,832,056
2011-2012
Page 75
10
853,610,584
853,610,584
554,217,358
902,764,317
Provisions
11
153,774,582
153,774,582
87,780,075
1,237,474,79
1,007,385,166
1,007,385,166
641,997,433
a)
Current Liabilities
b) Provisions
89,716,376
873,163,787
873,163,787
820,834,623
114,843,228
2,559,874,093
2,559,874,093
2,343,062,772
2,344,798,71
TOTAL
650,037,957
221,208,456
871,246,413
1,473,552,30
0
2,880,693,51
9
2011-2012
Page 76
Schedule
2007
2008
2009
2010
No.
INCOME
Sales-Gross
6,944,474,039
8,479,599,543 2,907,992,368
7,323,622,368
872,525,355
1,011,118,225 244,949,984
643,672,064
6,071,948,684
7,468,481,318 2,663,042,384
6,679,949,978
Other Income
-operational
12
44,667,209
50,664,440
9,343,378
17,374,011
-others
13
57,901,221
8,571,885
32,365,240
22,948,186
6,174,517,114
7,527,717,643 2,704,751,002
6,720,272,175
EXPENDITURE
Raw Materials Consumed
14
4,232,175,645
5,214,018,254 1,754,148,545
4,743,006,541
Work In Progress
15
( 54,530,676)
14,990,233
( 7,670,908)
931,756,662,
1,171,608,390 533,499,600
1,080,555,899
75,206,409
63,858,774
46,874,483
35,552,339
170,903,725
208,937,965
184,972,134
209,956,144
5,355,511,766
6,673,413,616 2,578,059,889
6,061,400,015
819,005,348
854,304,027
126,691,113
658,872,160
245,700,000
284,000,000
44.645,000
224,500,000
( 16,798,724)
142,518
58,565,127
Selling Expenses
Interest
17
Depreciation
35,432,440
10,650,000
1,450,652
( 6,350,000)
1,600,000
1,800,000
779,689
( 164,689)
536,272,908
557,854,027
96,614,496
440,744,331
518,417,398
779,987,109
1,167,019,478
1,205,665,276
570,559
Available
For
1,054,690,306
2011-2012
1,337,841,136 1,263,633,974
1,646,980,166
Page 77
98,227,838
98,227,838
Interim dividend
90,671,850
Tax on dividend
32,103,510
16,693,820
7,017,237
21,334,236
53,700,000
55,900,000
9,661,450
44,100,000
779,987,109
1,167,019,478 1,205,665,276
1,453,094,142
No of Equity shares
15,111,975
15,111,975
15,111,975
15,111,975
35.49
36.91
6.39
29.17
CARRIED
18
TO
41,290,011
128,451,788
-
BALANCE SHEET
Interpretation:
From the above calculation the number of equity share should be 15,111,975 but EPS
is more in the year 2007 an increase in earning per will increase the company market value
and vice-versa
2011-2012
Page 78
Jain, M Y and Jain P K, Financial Management Texts and Problems, Tata McGraw
Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 3rd Edition, 1999
Pandey, I M, Financial Management, Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd, 8th Edition,
New Delhi, P K Madhavan, 1999
Wild, Tony, Best Practice in Inventory Management, Elsevier Private Limited, New
Delhi, Butterworth- Heinemann, 2nd Edition, 2002
www.autoaxle.com
http://www.accountingformanagement.com/stock_turn_over_ratio.htm#Definition
http://www.indiainbusiness.nic.in/industry-infrastructure/industrialsectors/automobile1.htm
www.google.com
2011-2012
Page 79