Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Employee
Engagement
belal.reza@gmail.com
Contents
I. Chapter ONE: Introduction --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
II. Chapter TWO: Literature Review ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7
III. Chapter THREE: Methodology--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
IV. Chapter FOUR: Outcomes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18
V. Chapter FIVE: Discussion ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22
VI. Chapter SIX: Analysis and Final Conclusions --------------------------------------------------------------------- 24
VII. Bibliography ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 28
VIII. Appendix ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30
List of Tables
Table 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 17
Table 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19
Table 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19
Table 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20
there is a striking difference between the performances within the workplace of companies
that have a staff filled with highly engaged employees in comparison to the companies that
do not [Insert-9].
Nonetheless, being overly anxious or worried remains a top trend in todays world of
business which is a direct indication of the fact that engagement of employees within
companies overall is drastically declining over time. Employees are becoming more and
more uninvolved and disconnected from their companies in general [Insert-3, 4]. Normally,
these levels of engagement start off on the high note and then gradually will taper and drift
off over the first few years of the employees time working for their respective companies.
Eliminating decline in this area completely is impossible and improbable; there is always
going to be some present in the work environment regardless of how great the company
may be to their employees. However, this inevitability should not deter companies from
actively seeking out opportunities to get their employees engaged again at these very
moments to help minimise that overall decline [Insert-9].
Over 3,800 employees in Bangladesh work for Grameenphone, the multimillion dollar firm
of telecommunication [Insert-13]. This company conducted a survey recently that
discovered one out of every four of their workers is engaged to their company [Insert-13].
How does that compare with the rest of the world? Well, studies have confirmed that the
international average is about one out of every five [Insert-10]. Therefore, the workforce of
Bangladesh is more engaged than any other workforce around the world [Insert-11]. That
same survey also concluded that Bangladeshis are able to identify very closely with the
overall principle of engagement. How so? The reason behind the engagement of close to
70% of them is due to the fact that they believe in the vision of the company and trust in
their abilities and efforts to reach the objectives and goals that they have set out for
themselves. Over 80% have a full understanding how what they do each and every day on
the job contributes to the big picture of their success.
Even though there had been numerous studies conducted on between individual companies
as well as studies that compared the individual departments of individual companies, there
really had never been any verified studies that focused on the continuous engagement of
Bangladeshi employees over an extended period of time. That is the point that many
companies need to realize, as mentioned earlier. The complete engagement of employees
is not something that can happen once or at specific times during the year. A company can
only reap the true benefits of complete engagement if it is continuous throughout the year.
The current study of a companys engagement levels is truly important and plays a
significant role in a companys development, because they have to take the necessary
actions to address the problems and issues discovered through the results of those
confirmed studies. Are the investments that a company makes throughout the year to
improve the morale and enhance the satisfaction of their staff truly worth it? Has there
been any real growth because of those changes? Are the employees now more or less
engaged to the company because of the changes that have been made?
A recent study was conducted between a couple of facilities that specialize in manufacturing
in Bangladesh as well as a centre of administration. Established in the late 1990s, this
company is heavily involved in activities that are related to the distribution of food and
beverages. This company is also infamously known for bragging about their great things
come in small packages workforce, consisting of not more than a thousand employees. In
the year of 2010, the decision was made by the executives of this company to take the
journey of assessing the overall engagement levels of their employees over the course of
the following two years.
Definitions
The primary factors that characterize most people revolve around the concept of building
and retaining the solid foundation of the commitment to doing a great job. Built upon that
foundation are other significant elements, such as an employees desire to do a great job as
well as their abundance of energy when it comes to doing that job. Millions of employees
around the globe strive to enjoy that amazing feeling that you normally get in the pit of your
stomach on your first day of work but disappear shortly thereafter and are never heard
from again. These steps lead to the main goal of maximizing overall performance on an
individual basis as well as the organisation in general.
Business owners, managers and other executives need to realize that their employees play
the most significant role in the achievement of success in their industry. Therefore, they are
able to capitalize on their true potential by ensuring that everything that each of their
employees brings to the table remains at the nucleus of their overall operation. Such things
as capability, commitment, creativity and an overall positive attitude work wonders for the
morale of the entire staff and the productivity of the entire organisation in general. It is
obviously true that a great business strategy and a sufficient amount of capital are also vital
factors to the formula of success. However, the key factor that determines whether a
business will succeed or fail is focused on the behaviour of that companys employees while
they are on the job.
A strategic approach to achieving full engagement of employees on the job allows them to
do their very best while they are on the clock. They are only able to do their very best if
they feel appreciated and respected, as well as they are fully aware of how important their
involvement is to the success of the entire company. An associate of the company that
specializes in home insulation, KHI, once stated that the engagement of a companys
employees occurs the moment of equally shared value the employee is valued by the
business and the business is valued by the employee [Insert-11].
Employees that are fully involved and engaged have been able to inadvertently create a
deeply personal connection with their jobs and the companies that have hired them to do
those jobs. They strive to do their very best and to have successful careers within their
respective companies, which directly results in long-term monetary benefits for both the
company and its staff.
When it comes to results, behaviour and attitude within the rules of engagement, there are
several key differences. An employees attitude gives them the ability to feel pride and
overall loyalty to their company and to their job. They play essential roles within their
departments and are key team players. Their behaviour allows them to go above and
beyond in everything they do, ensuring that they reach their full potential within their
working with the company and how they feel they are being treated. Therefore, emotions
are key elements that play an important role when it comes to the bottom-line victories
won within a company. No matter what the Human Resources or management
departments may do to increase employee satisfaction, there is always going to be the
group of people that never give their best. There is no way around that, regardless of the
company or the industry. However, most employees have the strong desire to commit
themselves to organisations in order to satisfy the empowering yet basic need to be an
important part of something that is important.
points from the studies on engagement as well as those that studied predictive elements for
engagement as well as frustration overall.
It has been proven that employees will start off at a new job fully energized, excited and
engaged as they are fully prepared to embark on this new adventure of employment,
according to a study conducted by Coffman and Gonzalez-Molina (2002). Sadly, though,
that number drops on average during the first half of their first year with the company to
38% and, after a decade, is less than 20%. Since the quality and effectiveness of its staff are
two of the most important elements of an agency that specializes in human services, these
saddening statistics are even more alarming (Ewalt, 1991).
Recently, another issue has arisen that could possibly also be a factor contributing to high
frustration levels. What is that? It is the exponential increase for services that also have a
sufficient decrease in revenues (local and national) that provide programming for those
specific jobs. Therefore, the primary focus and objective of program administrators and
managers has shifted towards effectiveness and efficiency as well as accountability of those
service providers because these factors can drastically increase the presence of stress and
overall dissatisfaction among the employees (Ritchie, Kirche & Rubens, 2006). The
bureaucratic system in which customer service workers operate limits the effectiveness that
an employee can have on their clients life. This system creates an environment that is
more conducive for enhanced control and the organisation of massive numbers of
employees in one specific area. Unfortunately, it also increases the separation of labor
which creates isolation among the employees, fragmentation and the overall
reprogramming of workers (Arches, 1991).
Most of the research conducted on frustration that has been covered already focused on
predecessors and results. It wasnt until recently that researched have begun paying
attention to the other side of the spectrum of frustration the engagement of employees
(Gonzalez-Roma, Schaufeli, Bakker, & Loret, 2004). Current studies are conducted around
the world, searching for comparisons between the positive structure of engagement and the
negativity of frustration overall. It is understood that engagement could create perspectives
on how to eliminate the issue of frustration (Maslach et al., 2001). As long as the issues of
stress and workplace dissatisfaction are addressed, companies will be able to successfully
create an environment for their employees to likely become engaged without many
complications (Freeney & Tiernan, 2006). This process would call for an emphasis on the
prevention of frustration overall as well as the fostering of effectiveness, involvement and
energy enhancements within the workplace (Maslach & Leiter, 1997).
Investigations have been conducted by several researchers to determine whether or not
staff engagement is the absolute opposite factor of frustration (Maslach et al., 2001,
Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004, Gonzalez-Roma, et al. 2004, Freeney & Tiernan, 2006). At this
point in time, their research supports that theory (Freeney & Tiernan, 2006). The core
elements of frustration are such things as cynicism, exhaustion and inefficacy overall, which
are direct opposites of the vigor, absorption and dedication associated with engagement
(Gonzalez-Roma et al. 2006). These polar opposites also have different predictors and
resulting consequences as well (Schaufli & Bakker, 2004).
Frustration was compared with disengagement by Kahn (1990) and the conclusion was
reached that the employees that withdraw from their job mentally, emotionally and
physically are the ones that are disengaged and suffer from frustration (Freeney & Tiernan,
2006). A significant difference between the two conditions is that frustration focuses
particularly on the demands of a job. On the contrary, engagement is displayed through
employment resources as job control, easy accessibility to needed materials, the job
resources such as job control, the attainability of educational opportunities, overall
involvement in the decision-making procedure, positive fortification, and backing from
colleagues (Freeney & Tiernan, 2006).
Frustration profiles were conducted by Maslach and Leiter (1997) with the staff of a couple
of hospital units. Employees from one of the units showed typical profiles, proven by their
unfavorable scores across the board. On the other hand, the other hospital unit scored
favorably in those areas including control, overall value and workload. Towards the top of
the list of the fascinating discovers of those researchers was the fact that the patients of
those units that had engaged staff members were much more satisfied with the level of
overall care that they were receiving in contrast to those treated by the burnt out staff from
the other unit (Maslach & Leiter, 1997).
The unquestionable link, then, between engagement and frustration conditions have been
proven by the results of research conducted recently. An employee that is clearly engaged
will not become frustrated; however, this does not necessarily mean that an employee that
is not frustrated is also engaged (Freeney & Tiernan, 2006). The research that has been
conducted on the comparisons between engagement and frustration have contributed
greatly to this field overall and should not be stopped any time soon. However, the overall
perspective needs to be broadened from just focusing on the human services field and
related occupations.
the manager, can be modified and can also vary extensively from one work environment to
another (Coffman & Gonzalez-Molina, 2002).
Through his research, Kahn wanted to find a way to identify the conditions that a person
must go through psychologically in order to explain momentary experiences of personal
engagement (or even disengagement) depending on various situations that may arise at
work (Kahn, 1990). Using observational methods and effective interviewing techniques, he
conducted a study on personal engagement among 16 members of a firm and 16 camp
counselors. From his findings, he concluded that people have a choice to make in their
respective lines of work. They can draw from within to different degrees at work while
committing themselves in all possible ways to the various roles that they have to perform
throughout the day. Or, they can withdraw and completely disconnect themselves from
their roles and assigned tasks. The results of his study prove that the meaningfulness,
availability and safety are key psychological conditions that will determine how an individual
will perform his or her role within the workplace. The identification of these conditions
provides a solid foundation and structure for the studies being conducted on employee
engagement.
The state of overall meaningfulness has been described by Kahn (1990) as a condition that
allows an employee to feel truly valuable and useful, knowing that what they are doing
every day on the job is makes a difference and is appreciated by upper management. In
this context, the attribute of safety can be defined as conditions within an environment that
allow people to act normally without the fear of negative results or detrimental
consequences. It is discovered in scenarios within the workplace that workers believe they
will not suffer by being engaged to their work. Kahn (1990) once defined the attribute of
availability as possessing the means necessary to be engaged with your job at any given
moment. Kahns model does recognize the fact that life outside of the workplace as well as
internal coping mechanisms can have a significant impact on an employments engagement
(or lack thereof) to their job. His work (1990) also determined that employees have
proportions of themselves that are personally preferred and expressed within their
performance on the job. If a match could be made between those preferable actions and
the mental conditions present within the workplace, they will be able to successfully engage
themselves with the job (Kahn, 1990).
A field study was conducted several years ago on an insurance agency in the Midwest. May,
Gibson and Harter (2004) used a format for their survey that thoroughly examined the
reasons behind some employees becoming engaged while others became alienated or
disconnected all together. Their results proved that simple job satisfaction is definitely not
the same as true employee engagement. Actual engagement requires active emotions and
cognitive behaviours. Their studies actually supported Kahns earlier findings that value and
safety were direct links to how much an employee chose to personally invest into their roles
in the workplace. A positive relationship was also found between meaningfulness and job
enrichment with a perfect role fit. The support provided by a great supervisor or manager
and positive relationships with co-workers are also related directly to the psychological
safety that is experienced in the workplace.
An analysis of past studies focused on the engagement of employees was conducted several
years ago by the Gallup Organisation, according to Harter, Schmidt, and Hayes (2002). The
relationship between the satisfaction and engagement of employees was thoroughly
examined along with the professional results of customer service and satisfaction, profit,
turnover, accidents and productivity overall. It was also noted by Harter et al. (2002) that
the active quality of those measured elements provides definition for the engagement of
employees in general. Therefore, complete engagement is directly related to valued results
and many of the primary concerns of engagement. Top scoring businesses when it came to
engagement also provided proof of decreased turnover rates in their respective companies
(Harter et al., 2002).
Over 14,000 employees from multiple occupations were interviewed in a cross study
conducted all around the authors country by Schaufeli, Bakker, and Salanova (2006). They
used a systematic questionnaire that provided an accurate measurement of engagement
levels within the workplace. Their research proved that engagement was directly connected
to such qualities as vigor and dedication, as mentioned earlier. The only similarity that was
determined between frustration and engagement is the fact that it is a stable condition that
slightly increases over time (Schaufeli et al., 2006).
Over 100 employees from different industries were surveyed by Saks (2006) in a study that
was structured around a model that tested the precursors and consequences of
engagement both on a job level as well as on an organisational level. Saks (2006) concluded
that, on an organisational level, the engagement consisted of a persons attachment and
attitude towards their respective company. On the other hand, employee engagement
focused more on how much (or less) the employee was actually absorbed within their own
job role. The study also determined that resources on the job are the top predictor of all of
the different dimensions of engagement that have been studied and are specifically
important to workers involved in working conditions that are extremely stressful (Bakker et
al., 2007).
Recently, a similar study was conducted by Sprang, Clark & Whitt-Woosley (2007) when they
tried to examine the relationship between frustration and the location of the practice. Their
studies provide that suburban areas do produce a higher number of frustrated employees
than urban areas. It proposed that these increases could be due to the various elements
associated with suburban practices that do not affect urban ones such as the shortages of
available health professionals, the limited availability of resources, demanding workloads
and their overall geographical isolation. Their studies clearly showed that isolation could be
a serious issue for social workers assigned to suburban areas.
According to their findings, problems that arise in urban areas are usually noticeable by the
public and other professionals within the industry. However, problems within the suburban
community mostly fly under the radar until a natural disaster or public crisis that draws a lot
of media exposure occurs. This overall neglect can cause social workers in suburban areas
feeling isolated and less important than their colleagues I urban areas. The findings from
this research also noted key problems, including professional isolation (Waltman, 1990;
Watt & Kelly, 1996), decreased accessibility to formalized resources (Davenport &
Davenport, 1982), privacy and nondisclosure issues as well as complications dealing with
transportation (Ginsberg, 1998) have also been recorded.
The results of the frustration studies previously conduct might have some differences. A
large amount agrees there are negative key components in suburban agencies practice
settings that have possible effects on the levels of frustration. Moving forward form this
hypothesis the suburban workers might become less involved in the work they have to do.
The site that was used to test the study was in an area of the mid-western part of the state
that had the same population as the study that was already being conducted. The areas
included in the areas tested were highly urban, office locations in regards to how involved
the population included areas in the South Asian region ranging from very suburban to
highly urban areas including business locations that will examine how involved this
particular key component is to for this population.
Additional factors of include how much work experience an individual has and how it relates
to frustration. These factors were also examined. Even though some studies show that
frustration happens when people are new to job, other studies show no connection at all.
Studies conducted play a very important role in learning about frustration. Some studies on
frustration agree that individuals with less years of service are likely to report higher levels
of frustration; the opposite is thought to be true of engagement. While some studies on
frustration agree that individuals with less years of service are likely to report higher levels
of frustration, the opposite is thought to be true of engagement. Coffman and GonzalezMolina (2002) In a different study, Schwartz, Tiamiyu and Dwyer (2007) sampled 1,200
social workers to find out if social work clinicians decline in hope or exhibit increased
frustration over the course of their careers. Research shows a lower frustration rate in
recent years in private practices. Public practices however do not have the same results.
There has been no foreseeable evidence change in public settings. Some factors were not
fully looked into, such as employees with multiple years of service that have scores that do
not get better but gradually get worse. Also employees have the tendency to drop off in six
months or less or the drop off that happens within ten years of employment
Additional examination of the data gathered shows that gender also might play a part in the
frustration of human service workers .In a study Turkish study of school counselors
conducted by Yildirim (2008) results showed that levels of frustration did not differ
significantly between males and females. There is a difference in the actual data in some of
the research gathered in several of the studies however the research offers that females are
more vulnerable to stress and, therefore, tend to report higher levels of frustration than do
their male counterparts. (Sprang, Clark, & Whitt-Woosley, 2007). Despite this research
other studies showed that there might possibly be a higher frustration rate among male
employees. Yet another source, the Schaufeli, Bakker, and Salanova study (2006), showed
that the Belgian, German, Finnish, and Norwegian men scored slightly higher on the three
engagement dimensions than did women in the study. The verdict is still out because the
research supports both sides. The tools that were used in the study will be compared on
how involved each gender is engaged. The agency staff is the source of influence to how
much their employees are involved. A good team reflects good leadership. Employees tend
to reflect or imitate the characteristics of their leaders; it may be difficult for them to
engage if the leaders of the organisation do not demonstrate positive behaviours associated
with engagement (Kerfoot, 2008). The discoveries found in this study will seek to help the
agencies understand their supporting staff and the leaders and managers they employee.
Taking note of all the information given it is important to weigh the benefits and drawbacks
of this kind of Internet based study by survey accordingly. Is using the Internet to examine
empirical research enough? Is there enough information to properly conduct a controlled
study? These questions are important to review.
An Internet-based study entitled Employee Engagement Survey was pioneered and
created, for a number of employees with similar characteristics. This Employment
Engagement Survey was originally designed for the inclusion of employees who were
already working with the company. Items were first gathered by reviewing the Gallup
Organisations 12-question instrument designed to measure employee engagement
(Thackray, 2001). Gallup conducted numerous focus groups and completed thousands of
interviews with workers in order to identify the key areas that measure engagement. Having
been used with approximately 1.5 million employees, Gallups tool makes an ideal
instrument from which to model the survey questions for this study (Thackray, 2001).
Another tool that can be useful research is found at http://www.decwise.com/employeesurveys.html. This site is imperative because it reviews and compares the actions and
performance of employees and can help management teams to form a model for what they
want for future employee relations. Another source that is a wealth of information is the
Decisionwise Employee Engagement Survey. By reviewing the, Are We Making Progress
questionnaire professional agencies can take the experience studies already given to help
them in developing their own model for the survey they want to offer.
(http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/Progress.pdf).
The major factor in making a blueprint for the original survey was to consider what
questions would really grab the attention of the employee. This model proposes that in
order for individuals to fully engage with their jobs, the three psychological conditions of
meaningfulness, safety, and availability must be met in the work environment (Kahn, 1990).
The questions are asked in a very strategic way. Each of grouped questions has a specific
meaning, initially, the organisations leadership and planning, then, the organisations
corporate culture and communications. About the employees, their role at this organisation,
their work environment, relationship with your immediate supervisor and friends, rewired
training and development, satisfaction factors, career forecasting.
The next major factor involved in the development of the original survey was to create some
questions focused on the psychological aspect. Another major proposition of the
engagement model is that the three key psychological conditions are to some degree within
the control of the management of a given agency (Coffman & Gonzalez-Molina, 2002).
These types of questions engage the employee to see how they would handle themselves in
situations that are controlled by management. It allows one to see how a person would use
their mind to properly think their way through situations where they might be agitated by
management or by fellow employees. Employees were asked several questions including
the targeted nine questions hidden in the questionnaire without directly asking them
specifically.
After a surface blueprint was completed the survey was tested on several professionals in
the field customer service teams or units. The selection of these individuals was not at
random. They were carefully selected based on their experience in their given fields of
customer services. These professionals included several key members of the customer
service team such as the Manager, a number of existing workers, and Specialists. Having
information from these valued individuals solidified that the information chosen was
correct. The validity of the research was again tested with a pilot study in July 2012. The
seven question study was done to form the blueprint for this survey created a study that
could utilized for an official format and was used as a tool for some 306 customer service
staff members. These questions tested to discover what the satisfaction level and
engagement of the staffs. Cronbachs Alpha is used to determine if all the items within the
instrument measure the same thing. The closer the alpha is to 1.00, the greater the internal
consistency of the items being measured (George & Mallery, 2006). The marker of an
acceptable reliability coefficient is generally 0.7. However, even lower thresholds are
sometimes reported in the literature (Nunnaly, 1978). The given evidence shows that the
Cronbachs score of .773 is solid proof that the study works. The only question that added
any weight to the results was the question regarding having friends and work. Even
removing that specific question still met the requirements to be suitable in the study.
Table 1
Reliability Measure of Pilot Study Data
Recognition of Job
Concerned Supervisor
Mission of Org
Work Friends
Employee Inputs
Training and Equipment
Coworker Cooperation
Cronbachs
Alpha
.773
If Removed,
Scale Mean
N of Items
7
If Removed,
Scale Variance
27.81
27.21
27.19
26.72
27.59
27.29
27.11
16.539
17.126
19.266
22.365
15.812
18.219
21.855
Correlation
Correlated
Items
.675
.658
.531
.216
.575
.372
.386
If Removed,
Cronbachs
Alpha
.712
.712
.729
.789
.719
.777
.774
The Process
The Customer Service of Grameenphone received an email that was sent to each of the
individuals that worked for the division. Each person who worked for the company gave
their informed permission that the information be used for the company. Once the
employees clicked on the link they would be able to take the survey on a secure site. They
would have ten days in order to answer all the questions. The findings of each survey were
sent to be studied using Google Docs Form to make each survey nameless. The forms after
made anonymous were downloaded into the SPSS program for analysis as mentioned above
the host website was http://www.docs.google.com.
Outcomes
The purpose of the survey instrument being designed was to measure the levels of engagement of
the participants to their jobs. Once all of the responses had been collected, Chronbachs Alpha was
then conduct to test the instruments reliability overall. The final score from that test of .773 was
similar to the result from the pilot study and is considered as being acceptable when it comes to
reliability (Nunnaly, 1978).
As mentioned within the Appendix, the participants were given five items to choose from when they
were answering each question strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree and then strongly disagree.
Strong agree was systematically coded as five points while strongly disagree was coded simply as
one point. With that point system, the lowest possible score was 8 while the highest possible score
was 40. The final scores that fill between 32 and 40 indicated that the employees were engaged
more fully than those that scored below 32. Results showed that the vast majority of those that
responded with engaged to their jobs (M = 29.30, SD = 3.95).
The sample responses are described in Table II to each of the items listed on the measurement scale
of engagement. Table III focuses on the overall score of engagement for the sample.
Table 2
Engagement Scale: Descriptive Statistics
Recognition of Job
Concerned Supervisor
Mission of Org
Work Friends
Employee Inputs
Training and Equipment
Coworker Cooperation
Longer Stay
Valid N
Max
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Mean
3.5518
4.1297
4.1010
4.4192
3.8213
3.7448
4.1797
3.6801
Mean
29.2952
SD
3.9521
Table 3
Valid N
The results of the Levenes test proved that equal variances would be assumed and that an alpha
level would be set to .05 to limit a Type I error or accepting the null falsely. Within this specific
sample, the mean score of the participants from the suburban settings was 28.9871 (SD = 3.80), n =
138. On the other hand, the mean score for the participants from the urban settings was 28.8791
(SD = 4.10), N = 61. Therefore, this showed that the respondents from the suburban settings
reported higher engagement levels than those working in urban settings. Nonetheless, there was no
real significance of the statistics between the urban and suburban employees in regards to their
engagement scores. Thus, there was no support for the hypothesis (p = .330, 197 df, t -.977).
Years Served
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Total Score
.084
.119
199
Even though the males scored higher on the instrument, the difference between the two groups was
not really significant in reference to statistics so the hypothesis was not sufficiently supported by the
test (p = .064, 197 df, t 1.800).
Nevertheless, the conclusion further supports the theory that engagement has no direct connections
with work-related issues, such as income or seniority. On the other hand, it is a construct solely
related to the employees control of their own fate at work along with their sense of true
empowerment (Buhler, 2006).
In addition, conclusions from that study are similar to Yildirims frustration analysis from 2008. It
found no real connection between years of service and employee frustration. One of the
explanations behind the findings is simply that the agency provided the environment that was
necessary for the staff to become engaged, regardless of other work-related issues such as seniority,
tenure or pay. One of the implications from the results of the study enforced policies that encourage
overall engagement of employees regardless of their length of service.
Instrument
The researcher was the person that created the instrument used in this study (see Appendix). It was
created to fulfill the purpose of measuring employee engagement within the field of customer
services. The duration of the survey was conducive to quick and simplistic completion, encouraging a
higher participation rate. Designed to measure the important concepts of employee engagement,
this allowed the research to further study demographic factors and variables of work-life against the
studied levels of employee engagement. After being pilot tested, it was concluded that the
instrument was reliable with a Cronbachs Alpha score of .773. After one question was added in, the
score increased to .798 which also demonstrated acceptable reliability.
A major conclusion of this study was the proven reliability and effectiveness of the instrument when
it comes to measuring the levels of employee engagement, which is great news for researchers that
want to study these levels within agencies that specialize in human services.
The Employee Engagement Survey would not be used within many more studies that deal with
employees in the field of human services in order to continue developing their effectiveness and
being able to determine which demographic factor(s) were the mostly connected with high levels of
engagement. One of the explanations for the high level of engagement overall was that the agency
provided three important psychological conditions of promoting engagement: availability,
meaningfulness and safety for their employees (Kahn, 1990).
Within the survey, three questions addressed the mental condition of meaningfulness. According to
Kahns research (1990), this condition is described as a feeling that is received as a return on a
persons investment of themselves into their work. Employees experience this condition when they
feel valuable, worthwhile and useful to their company (Kahn, 1990). The first survey question asked
participants if they had every received a degree of recognition for good performances on the job.
184 of the respondents (87%) answered within agree to strongly agree, showing that the staff of the
agency agreed that they received a return on the investment of themselves within their jobs.
The third question asked respondents if the agencys target object made them understand how
much their work really mattered. 199 of the respondents (96%) astoundingly gave a positive
response to that question between slightly agree to strongly agree. This result shows that the target
objective and mission of the company was clearly understood by the staff and they felt positive
about the work that they were doing. The fifth question asked them if they felt as if their opinions
and thoughts were taken seriously on their job. By agreeing to the question, the results would
indicate that they felt that they were making valuable contributions to the agency. This was proven
by the resulting fact that 195 of the respondents (95%) agreed with the statement.
Kahn (1990) described the condition of safety in his report as a significant factor and important
psychological condition when it came to employee engagement. His research further showed that
employees feel safe in an environment that is both open and supportive.
Safety occurs when individuals feel liberated and able to express themselves without negative
consequences, confident in the fact that their environment is clear of boundaries and the
organisational norms are clearly understood (Kahn, 1990). The question on the scale of employee
engagement asked participants if they were concerned about their own welfare. 197 (94%) agreed
with that statement which showed that they felt as if they were supported by their management
team, feeling connected to their superiors.
Another question focuses on the issue of having friends on the job. Participants agreed with that
statement since 202 (97.5%) selected a response between slightly agree and strongly agree, showing
that employees felt connected with their co-workers and freely expressed themselves. The seventh
question asked participants if they felt their co-workers did a good job, in which 199 employees
agreed, proving that they work toward a common goal with their co-workers within the agency. The
final psychological factor of the structure of engagement overall is availability. Kahn (1990)
described this factor as being the sense of possessing the psychological, physical and even emotional
resources required in order to invest oneself into the role that they play at work.
A question on the survey asked participants if the organisation that they worked for provided the
equipment that they needed to successfully complete their jobs. The overall positive response
showed that 189 (90%) of the employees at least agreed with the statement, proving that the
agency regularly supplied exactly what the employees needed in their assigned roles within the
agency. The eighth question asked the participants if they would still be working for the same agency
two years later. 180 (72%) agreed with that statement.
Kahns (1990) studied model of employee engagement proved that those psychological conditions
were related to engagement as well as management control within the agency. The aforementioned
scores from the finalized study showed that the management team of the studied agency made a
positive contribution to the overall engagement of their employees. It was recorded that the agency
being studied successfully implemented a plan for leadership development one month prior to the
conduction of the actual survey. The focus of the plan was empowering supervisors and training the
members of management on effectively leading their teams.
The program put a variety of different strategies into practice that require attendance for leadership
training courses, assigned readings and the overall development of an official leadership plan for
each and every supervisor or manager. One can reasonably assume that the plan may have
positively impacted the final scores of the survey. A significant implication from these results is that
the agency should consider continuing investments into the leadership plan and any other related
programs to maintain high levels of employee engagement. Directing resources towards the
companys target objective is proven, then, to be an effective and worthy investment for the agency
to consider.
Conclusion
The results of this confirmed study greatly contributed to the limited research available on the topic
of engagement for employees. It contributed specifically to the beginning statistical information
gathered about employee engagement among the staff of a customer services department.
Employee engagement is widely understood as being an imperative part of the outcomes of
successful organisational structures and should be closely analysed within the field of social work.
Funding for their organisation is often connected directly to success rates of that organisation. A
staff that is fully engaged can significantly contribute to achieving positive outcomes, proving that
the concept of full engagement should be a top priority of social work research and the
implementation of innovated policies.
VII. Bibliography
Arches, J. (1991). Social burnout structure, and job satisfaction. Social Work, 36(3), 202-06.
Ayers, K.E. (2006). Engagement is not enough. Integro Leadership Institute LLC.
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work
engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology,
99(2), 274-284.
Baldrige National Quality Program Are We Making Progress Survey. Retrieved March 11, 2007 from
http://www.baldrige.nist.gov/PDF_files/Progress.pdf
Baldwin, H. (2005). [Interview with Lynn Franco]. Why is job satisfaction falling? Optimize, 42.
Retrieved March 6, 2007 from www.optimizemag.com.
Buhler, P. (2006). Engaging the workforce: a critical initiative for all organizations. SuperVision, 67(9),
18-20.
Chan, T. (2004). Preliminary findings of RSA national study rehabilitation counseling. Presented at
2004 National Conference of NCRE/RSA/CSAVR, Washington, DC.
Coffman, C., & Gonzalez-Molina, G. (2002). Follow this path. How the worlds greatest organizations
drive growth by unleashing human potential. Warner Books.
Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64,
464-494.
Davenport, J.A., & Davenport J. (1982). Utilizing the social network in rural communities. Social
Casework, 63(2), 106-113.
Decisionwise Leadership Intelligence, Employee Surveys. Retrieved, March 13, 2007 from
http://www.decwise.com/employee-surveys.html
Ewalt, P. L. (1991). Trends affecting recruitment and retention of social work staff in human services
agencies. Social Work, 36(22), 214-217.
Frauenheim, E. (2006). Study: Workers are disengaged but staying put. Workforce Management,
85(22).
Freeney, Y. & Tiernan, J. (2006). Employee engagement: An overview of the literature on the
proposed antithesis to burnout. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 27(3-4), 130-141.
Garner, B. R., Knight, K., & Simpson, D. D. (2007). Burnout among corrections based drug treatment
staff. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(5), 510522.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2006). SPSS for windows step by step, a simple guide and reference (6th
ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. Ginsberg, L. (Ed.). (1998). Social work in rural communities (3rd
ed.). Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
Gonzalez-Roma, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Lloret, S. (2004). Burnout and work
engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68,
165-174.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee
satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
Hobel, J. (2006). Loyal staff worth the effort. Canadian HR Reporter, 19(19), 26-26.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work.
The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Kelly, M. & Lauderdale, M. (1996). The internet: Opportunities for rural outreach and resource
development. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 19(4), 4-9.
Kerfoot, K. (2008). Staff engagement: It starts with the leader. MEDSURG Nursing, 17(1) 64-65.
Loehr, J., & Schwartz, T. (2003). The power of full engagement. The Free Press.
Maslach, C. (2003). Job burnout: New directions in research and intervention. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 12, 189-192.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout. San Francisco: Jossey/Bass.
Maslach, C., Schaufelli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52,
397-422.
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness,
safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
NASW Code of Ethics. Retrieved February 10, 2008 from
http://www.naswdc.org/pubs/code/code.asp
Norusis, M. J. (2006). SPSS 14.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc.
Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rampersad, H. (2006). Self-examination as the road to sustaining employee engagement and
personal happiness. Performance Improvement, 45(8), 18-25.
Ritchie, W. J., Kirche, E., & Rubens, A. J. (2006). A process for development and validation of a
customized scale to assess work environment in government organizations. Review of Public
Personnel Administration, 26(4), 382-389.
Rohland, B. M. (2000). A survey of burnout among mental health center directors in a rural state.
Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 27, 221-237.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial
Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with
burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293315.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a
short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
66(4), 701-716.
Schwartz, R.H., Tiamiyu, M. F., & Dwyer, D.J. (2007). Social worker hope and perceived burnout: The
effects of age, years in practice, and setting. Administration in Social Work, 31(4), 103-119.
Seligman, M. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American
Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
Soderfeldt, M., Soderfeldt, B., & Warg L.E.. (1995). Burnout in Social Work. Social Work, 40(5), 638646.
Sprang, G., Clark, J. J., & Whitt-Woosley, A. (2007). Compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and
burnout: factors impacting a professionals quality of life. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 12,
259-280.
Thackray, J. (2001). Feedback for real. Gallup Management Journal. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from
http://gmj.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=811
Townsend, P. L., & Gebhardt, J. E. (2007). The executive guide to understanding and implementing
employee engagement programs. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
Waltman, G.H. (1990). New options in continuing education: Professional development for rural
social workers. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 13(3), 16-20.
Watt, J.W., & Kelly, M.J. (1996). Addressing practitioners isolation through new technologies:
Creating an electronic journal for students, practitioners, and educators via the internet.
Human Services in the rural Environment, 19(4) 10-15.
Wienbach, R.W., & Grinnell, R. M., Jr. (2007). Statistics for social workers (7th ed.). Pearson
Education. Inc.
Witt, K. J., (1998). Best practices in interviewing via the internet. Proceedings of Sawtooth Software
Conference, Sawtooth Software, Inc., Sequim, Washington, 15-37.
Yildirim, I. (2008). Relationships between burnout, sources of social support and sociodemographic
variables. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(5) 603-616.
Yoon, D. & Kelly, M. (2008). Organizational excellence and employee retention in social work.
Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education,
11(3) 30-35
VIII. Appendix