Professional Documents
Culture Documents
W O R D S
Background: Young breast cancer survivors have specific needs related to age.
Breast cancer
Clarifying the relationships between unmet information needs and quality of life (QOL)
Quality of life
enhance QOL in patients. Objective: This study aimed to identify the unmet information
Young survivors
needs and examine the relationships between unmet information needs and QOL in
young breast cancer survivors in Japan. Methods: Participants completed an
information needs questionnaire containing 26 items, the World Health
Organization Quality of Life InstrumentYShort Form (WHOQOL-BREF), and a
demographic and medical information questionnaire. Results: Fifty participants
(30.7%) were unsatisfied with overall communication with medical professionals.
The mean scores on all subscales of the WHOQOL-BREF of the participants who were
satisfied with overall communication with medical professionals were significantly
higher than those of the unsatisfied group. follow-up tests, treatment for recurrence
of breast cancer, strategies about communication with medical staff, and nutrition
were significantly related with all subscales in the WHOQOL-BREF. Secondary
menopause caused by hormonal therapy was significantly related with physical and
psychological health. Conclusions: Japanese young breast cancer survivors have
unmet information needs, including age-specific issues. These unmet information
needs are related to QOL. In particular, overall communication with medical
professionals, which is the most unmet information need, is related to QOL.
Author Affiliations: Division of Nursing Science, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University (Dr Miyashita); Clinical Cancer
Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka (Dr
Ohno); Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Toho University Omori
Medical Center, Tokyo (Dr Kataoka); Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate
School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka (Dr Tokunaga); Department of Surgery, Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital (Dr Masuda); Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery,
Okayama University Hospital (Dr Shien); Department of Nursing School of Health
and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya (Dr Kawabata);
and Cancer Survivorship Research Division, Center for Cancer Control and
Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo (Dr Takahashi), Japan.
This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant number 20592540 and
by research fund from the Japanese Breast Cancer Society.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Correspondence: Mika Miyashita, PhD, RN, Division of Nursing Science,
Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3,
Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan 734-8553 (mika-tky@umin.ac.jp).
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is
permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The
work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
Accepted for publication July 23, 2014.
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000201
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Conceptual Framework
Miyashita et al
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Methods
Design
A cross-sectional descriptive research design was used to survey
unmet information needs and QOL.
Measures
QUALITY OF LIFE
Unmet information needs were assessed by a questionnaire constructed of 26 questions on a 4-point Likert-scale that asked about
satisfaction with information received from medical professionals.
The questionnaire also included 1 question that asked about satisfaction with overall communication with medical professionals.
The questions were created on the basis of results of a focus group
discussion aimed at identifying what difficulties young breast
cancer survivors had and what information they expected to receive.
Each question could be answered by selecting very satisfied,
moderately satisfied, little unsatisfied, or unsatisfied. If
study participants did not receive the information, they could
answer not received. The contents of our questionnaire are
consistent with a previous study that developed measurements
of satisfaction with information in breast cancer survivors. Although
the measurements assessed diagnosis and treatment-related issues,
as well as survivorship issues, they did not evaluate specific issues
in young breast cancer survivors.38 In this study, the questions
included specific issues pertinent to young breast cancer survivors, such as secondary menopause caused by chemotherapy or
hormonal therapy and fertility after the therapies. Because this
survey focused on necessary or desirable information, the term
medical professionals included physician, nurse, and other medical staff.
DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL VARIABLES
We asked participants about cancer stage, months since diagnosis, type of surgery, adjuvant therapy, symptoms, education,
and satisfaction with their income. Age, marital status, number
of children, employment status, and menopausal status at diagnosis (ie, when they were diagnosed with breast cancer) and at
the time of the survey (ie, when they responded to this survey)
were obtained.
Cancer NursingTM, Vol. 00, No. 0, 2014
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Participants were classified in a satisfied group (ie, very satisfied or moderately satisfied)
or an unsatisfied group (little unsatisfied or unsatisfied) based on
their answers for the unmet needs questionnaire. Normality was
tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for scores on the WHOQOLBREF. Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine whether
there were differences in mean scores on the WHOQOL-BREF
between participants who were satisfied with the information and
those who were unsatisfied.
Results
Participants
Quality of Life
Miyashita et al
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
At Diagnosis
Characteristic
Mean (SD)
Range
Mean (SD)
Range
Age, y
Months since diagnosis
44.8 (6.6)
61.3 (60.5)
21Y64
1Y330
39.9 (4.5)
Y
18Y45
At Diagnosis
111
23
17
11
1
68.1
14.1
10.4
6.7
0.6
111
23
18
8
3
68.1
14.1
11.1
4.9
1.8
60
25
53
25
0
36.8
15.3
32.5
15.3
0.0
62
21
54
25
1
38.0
12.9
33.1
15.3
0.6
59
33
63
8
36.2
20.2
38.7
4.9
79
36
40
8
48.5
22.1
24.5
4.9
11
77
47
24
4
6.7
47.2
28.8
14.7
2.5
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
48
76
31
5
3
29.4
46.6
19.0
3.1
1.8
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
11
44
55
14
5
34
6.7
27.0
33.7
8.6
3.1
20.9
Y
Y
Y
Y
83
69
1
10
50.9
42.3
0.6
6.1
109
108
141
19
54.2
53.7
70.1
9.5
Y
Y
Y
Y
106
22
35
65.0
13.5
21.5
6
10
145
3.7
6.1
89.0
(continues)
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
At Diagnosis
Characteristic
Mean (SD)
Range
Mean (SD)
Range
Pregnant
Unknown
0
Y
0.0
1
1
0.6
0.6
Discussion
Table 2 & Number and Percentage of Participants Who Were Satisfied or Unsatisfied With the Information
Received From Medical Professionals (N = 163)
Received Information
163
163
160
158
155
150
148
142
135
131
129
128
121
119
118
116
113
110
100
93
90
80
80
72
68
41
(100)
(100)
(98.2)
(96.9)
(95.1)
(92.0)
(90.8)
(87.1)
(82.8)
(80.4)
(79.1)
(78.5)
(74.2)
(73.0)
(72.4)
(71.2)
(69.3)
(67.5)
(61.3)
(57.1)
(55.2)
(49.1)
(49.1)
(44.2)
(41.7)
(25.2)
Satisfied
113
127
126
125
116
116
124
101
102
105
92
97
99
97
80
79
73
83
89
61
57
44
60
58
58
18
(69.3)
(77.9)
(78.8)
(79.1)
(74.8)
(77.3)
(83.8)
(71.1)
(75.6)
(80.2)
(71.3)
(75.8)
(81.8)
(81.5)
(67.8)
(68.1)
(64.6)
(75.5)
(89.0)
(65.6)
(63.3)
(55.0)
(75.0)
(80.6)
(85.3)
(43.9)
Unsatisfied
50
36
34
33
39
34
24
41
33
26
37
31
22
22
38
37
40
27
11
32
33
36
20
14
11
23
(30.7)
(22.1)
(21.3)
(20.9)
(25.2)
(22.7)
(16.2)
(28.9)
(24.4)
(19.8)
(28.7)
(24.2)
(18.2)
(18.5)
(32.2)
(31.9)
(35.4)
(24.5)
(11.0)
(34.4)
(36.7)
(45.0)
(25.0)
(19.4)
(16.2)
(56.1)
Because of rounding, percentages may not total 100. Data are presented as n (%).
Miyashita et al
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Satisfied
Group
P
71.3 (13.4)
113
71.2 (13.5)
116
69.8 (14.9)
101
70.6 (13.6)
92
71.1 (15.1)
80
73.0 (13.2)
79
72.7 (12.9)
73
71.3 (13.9)
61
72.1 (12.7)
57
71.6 (71.6)
44
70.4 (12.2)
60
72.7 (18.5)
18
n
64.1
50
62.6
39
66.3
41
64.2
37
64.7
38
64.0
37
66.2
40
64.0
32
64.8
33
66.9
36
64.8
20
61.0
23
(12.1)
(13.3)
(66.9)
(14.7)
(12.3)
(14.9)
(13.6)
(12.9)
(12.7)
(12.3)
(13.6)
(14.0)
Mean (SD)
Unsatisfied
Group
1980
.002
1456
.001
1704
.098
1236
.015
1053
.007
927
.001
1064
.017
661
.011
672
.024
649
.164
452
.097
107
.008
P
71.1
113
70.9
116
69.3
101
70.3
92
72.0
80
72.3
79
74.3
73
72.6
61
73.5
57
72.6
44
70.0
60
72.0
18
(13.0)
(12.4)
(72.6)
(10.1)
(12.5)
(11.9)
(12.5)
(12.8)
(13.3)
(13.1)
(12.9)
(12.5)
Satisfied
Group
66.5
50
65.3
39
69.3
41
67.4
37
66.1
38
66.8
37
68.0
40
65.4
32
67.9
33
67.7
36
70.7
20
65.5
23
(12.2)
(13.0)
(67.7)
(15.4)
(13.4)
(12.6)
(13.3)
(13.2)
(13.1)
(13.6)
(12.3)
(13.4)
Mean (SD)
Unsatisfied
Group
Satisfied
Group
2254
.037
1615
.007
2004
.761
1479
.238
1061
.007
1121
.040
1068
.017
689
.018
768
.142
631
.114
599
.991
144
.094
P
69.7
113
69.0
116
68.5
101
68.6
92
70.4
80
70.7
79
71.1
73
70.3
61
70.4
57
69.6
44
66.9
60
72.9
18
(13.9)
(12.2)
(69.6)
(11.7)
(12.0)
(12.4)
(12.7)
(11.8)
(12.0)
(68.5)
(11.8)
(12.1)
Social Relationships
WHOQOL-BREF
Psychological Health
(14.8) 2246
.037
(13.9) 1526
.002
(13.7) 1756
.156
(13.6) 1445
.180
(14.1) 1148
.032
(13.0) 827
G.001
(14.2) 1115
.038
(14.6) 634
.006
(14.6) 649
.014
(69.1) 685
.300
(11.3) 436
.068
(14.2) 139
.073
n
67.8
50
65.8
39
68.6
41
68.2
37
67.6
38
65.0
37
68.4
40
65.1
32
66.1
33
69.1
36
65.8
20
66.0
23
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
73.3 (12.8)
113
73.7 (13.0)
116
Possible symptoms after hospital
72.0 (13.5)
discharge
101
Lymphedema
71.8 (13.1)
92
Treatment for recurrence of breast
72.9 (13.7)
cancer
80
Strategies about communication
75.5 (12.6)
with medical staff
79
Consulting service that can be used 74.5 (12.1)
by patients at their ease
73
Nutrition
74.0 (12.5)
61
Exercise
73.6 (12.8)
57
Genetics
72.7 (72.7)
44
Breast reconstruction
71.8 (12.8)
60
Complementary and alternative
74.0 (16.2)
therapy
18
Unsatisfied
Group
Satisfied
Group
Physical Health
65.2
50
64.4
39
65.5
41
64.1
37
62.1
38
65.1
37
66.8
40
62.8
32
64.0
33
64.7
36
64.6
20
61.2
23
(10.4)
(9.7)
(64.7)
(11.3)
(11.3)
(11.2)
(10.6)
(11.7)
(11.4)
(65.5)
(11.3)
(10.8)
Mean (SD)
Unsatisfied
Group
Environment
2257
.040
1712
.023
1699
.093
1323
.047
903
G.001
1054
.015
1141
.054
639
.006
641
.012
623
.100
549
.570
99
.004
U Score
Table 3 & Mean Scores on the World Health Organization Quality of Life InstrumentYShort Form (WHOQOL-BREF) Subscales of the Satisfied Group and
(13.4)
(11.7)
(10.1)
815
.084
853
.062
387
.781
276
.474
(11.4)
(13.8)
(13.4)
(17.9)
(15.7)
(12.1)
(13.6)
(13.7)
(13.3)
(14.7)
(15.5)
(12.1)
(13.8)
(13.5)
(14.2)
(15.5)
(14.1)
(12.2)
(13.5)
(14.4)
(14.8)
(12.9)
74.3
97
71.9
83
70.8
57
72.2
58
Secondary menopause caused by
hormonal therapy
Secondary menopause caused by
chemotherapy
Fertility after chemotherapy
64.3
22
67.5
27
68.3
14
66.8
11
(14.6)
699
.012
916
.155
366
.568
248
.240
71.1
97
70.1
83
69.2
57
69.9
58
(13.6)
61.4
22
64.4
27
66.0
14
61.8
11
(13.4)
624
.002
866
.076
369
.593
211
.074
70.5
97
70.7
83
70.0
57
69.5
58
(12.6)
64.7
22
67.7
27
67.6
14
67.0
11
(15.2)
853
.137
985
.338
405
.989
311
.888
68.8
97
68.8
83
67.3
57
67.2
58
(11.2)
63.9
22
63.1
27
65.0
14
63.4
11
(10.8)
P
n
n
P
n
n
P
n
n
n
n
U Score
Mean (SD)
U Score Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
U Score Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Unsatisfied
Group
Unsatisfied
Group
Satisfied
Group
Satisfied
Group
Unsatisfied
Group
Satisfied
Group
Unsatisfied
Group
Satisfied
Group
Environment
Social Relationships
Psychological Health
Physical Health
WHOQOL-BREF
Unsatisfied Group Among Patients Who Received Information on Specific Issues Pertinent to Young Breast Cancer Survivors
Table 4 & Mean Scores on the World Health Organization Quality of Life InstrumentShort Form (WHOQOL-BREF) Subscales of the Satisfied Group and
Miyashita et al
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Limitations
Conclusions
This study identified the unmet information needs that are related to QOL in young breast cancer survivors in Japan. Satisfaction with overall communication with medical professionals,
which is related to QOL, is the most unmet need. Information
on secondary menopause, which is an age-specific issue, is not
being met, and that may impact QOL in young breast cancer
survivors. Future research assessing patient perception of the need
of information should provide more detailed knowledge about
unmet information needs. In addition, a nationwide survey on
younger breast cancer survivors is necessary to correctly identify
Cancer NursingTM, Vol. 00, No. 0, 2014
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
specific unmet information needs. This study suggests that oncology nurses should teach patients communication skills and provide adequate information with consideration of age to meet the
unmet information needs. It is necessary to develop a brief assessment tool to detect the needs of younger breast cancer survivors.
Furthermore, it is important that oncology nurses provide education and emotional support to medical professionals to enhance
communication between cancer patients and medical professionals.
A survivorship care plan focusing on age-specific issues may be able
to enhance QOL in young breast cancer survivors.
21.
22.
23.
24.
References
1. Siege R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin.
2014;64(1):9Y29.
2. Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo KI, Katanoda K, Ajiki W, Sobue T; The
Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group. Cancer incidence and incidence
rates in Japan in 2005: based on data from 12 population-based Cancer
registries in the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41:139Y147.
3. Center for Cancer Control and Information Services. http://ganjoho.jp/
public/statistics/pub/statistics01.html. Accessed May 24, 2014.
4. Freedman RA, Partridge AH. Adjuvant therapies for very young women
with early stage breast cancer. The Breast. 2011;20(Suppl 3):S146YS149.
5. Kataoka A, Tokunaga E, Masuda N, Shien T, Kawabata K, Miyashita M.
Clinicopathological features of young patients (G35 years of age) with breast
cancer in a Japanese Breast Cancer Society supported study [published online
ahead of print]. Breast Cancer. 2013. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%
2Fs12282-013-0466-2/fulltext.html. Accessed June 1, 2014.
6. Wenzel LB, Fairclough DL, Brady MJ, et al. Age-related differences in the
quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment. Cancer. 1999;
86(9):1768Y1774.
7. Kroenke CH, Rosner B, Chen WY, Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Holmes MD.
Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;
22(10):1849Y1856.
8. Rosen A, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Rosenzweig L. Psychosocial distress in
young cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2009;25(4):268Y277.
9. Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Quality of life among younger women
with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3322Y3330.
10. Camp-Sorrell D. Cancer and its treatment effect on young breast cancer
survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2009;25(4):251Y258.
11. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau M, Hood N. Risk of menopause during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;
8(17):2365Y2370.
12. Roche N. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer in young women.
The Breast. 2006;15(52):571Y575.
13. Dunn J, Steginga SK. Young womens experience of breast cancer: defining
young and identifying concerns. Psychooncology. 2000;9(2):137Y146.
14. Zebrack B. Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors.
Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(4):349Y357.
15. Wang X, Cosby LG, Harris MG, Liu T. Major concerns and needs of
breast cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 1999;22(2):157Y163.
16. Gould J, Grassau P, Manthorne J, Gray RE, Fitch MI. Nothing fit me:
nationwide consultations with young women with breast cancer. Health
Expect. 2006;9(2):158Y173.
17. Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs
and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of
research (1980-2003). Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):250Y261.
18. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P. The
unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer. 2000;88(1):
226Y237.
19. Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Burton L, Cook P, Boyes A. Supportive
Care Review Group. Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of
patients with cancer. Cancer. 2000;88(1):217Y225.
20. Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hunt GE, et al. The development and evaluation
of a measure to assess cancer survivors unmet supportive care needs: the
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Miyashita et al
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
cancer patients: a national survey for breast care specialists. Breast Cancer.
2013;20(3):230Y240.
Yoshida S, Otani H, Hirai K, et al. A qualitative study of decision-making
by breast cancer patients about telling their children about their illness. Support
Care Cancer. 2010;18(4):439Y447.
Tautz E, Momm F, Hasenburg A, Guethlin C. Use of complementary
and alternative medicine in breast cancer patients and their experiences: a
cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:3133Y3139.
Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hobbs KM, Wain G. After cancer: the unmet supportive
care needs of survivors and their partners. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2007;25(4):89Y104.
Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues
in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4174Y4183.
Thewes B, Meiser B, Taylor A, et al. Fertility- and menopause-related
information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(22):5155Y5164.
Karaoz B, Aksu H, Ku0uk M. A qualitative study of the information needs of
premenopausal women with breast cancer in terms of contraception, sexuality,
early menopause, and fertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(2):118Y120.
Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
11