Professional Documents
Culture Documents
photovoltaic systems
C. Rodriguez, Student Member, IEEE, G. A. J. Amaratunga, Member, IEEE
I. INTRODUCTION
di pv
dt
I L i pv ( v pv + Rs i pv ) / Rsh
1
ln
+ 1
L pv
Is
1
( v pv + Rs ipv )
Lpv
(2)
1
i pv Nidc
C pv
(3)
dt
Ldc
dvdc
1
=
idc Kiout cos ( t + )
dt
Cdc
Finally, KVL at the output of the inverter yields,
diout Kvdc cos ( t + ) Rout iout vg
=
dt
Lout
(4)
(5)
(6)
di pv
I L I s exp v pv + Rs i pv + L pv
1
dt
v pv + Rs i pv + L pv di pv / dt
i pv = 0
Rsh
(1)
Equations (2)-(6) constitute a system of nonlinear, timevarying differential equations defining the dynamics of grid
connected photovoltaic modules, and has the form,
x& = f ( x,t )
(7)
f ( x, t ) = 0
(8)
di
I L I s exp v + L 1 i = 0
dt
dv p
=0
dt v
Therefore the dynamics of the system are given by,
i C
di 1 1 I L i
= ln
+ 1 v
dt L I s
dv 1 p
=
i
dt C v
(9)
The fixed points of the system are found by solving the
system of coupled nonlinear equations,
(10)
1 I i
0 = ln L
+ 1 v
Is
(12)
p
0=i
v
This requires a numerical solution, for example, through
Newton-Raphson.
(11)
J=
1
( IL i ) + Is
(13)
p
Cv 2
1
C
(14)
1,2 =
( J11 + J 22 ) ( J11 J 22 )
2
+ 4 J12 J 21
(15)
Let us assume that the radical is positive. Then the system will
be stable if,
( J11 + J 22 ) + ( J11 J 22 )
+ 4 J12 J 21 < 0
( J11 + J 22 )
( J11 J 22 )
>
+ 4 J12 J 21
(17)
(18)
( J11 + J 22 )
(19)
(20)
[ IL i + Is ]
i < IL + Is
1
L C p
2
C L v2
1
L C p
2
C L v2
if
v2 >
p L
2 C
(21)
Fig. 6. Phase portrait of photovoltaic array solutions.
if
v2 <
p L
2 C
B ( x ) = x R 2 lim x ( t ) x*stable = 0
t
(23)
where x
(24)
f 2
1 f 2
N
=
=
;
x1 C pv x3
C pv
(29)
R
f3
f
N f3
1
;
=
= dc ; 3 =
Ldc x4
Ldc
x2 Ldc x3
(30)
K cos ( t + )
f 4
1 f 4
=
=
;
x3 Cdc x5
Cdc
(31)
f 5 K cos ( t + ) f5
R
=
= out
;
(32)
x4
x5
Lout
Lout
Notice that the states directly affecting the Jacobian matrix
are only the PV array voltage and current.
The system parameters are the following: Rs = 0.0819 ,
Rsh = 72k, Lpv = 1H, Cpv = 10mH, Rdc=0.1, Ldc=1mH,
Cdc=400F, Rout=0.1, Lout=10mH, transformer ratio N = 15.
The systems fixed points (state 5 is actually a periodic
solution) and control parameters in steady state are listed in
TABLE I.
TABLE I.
FIXED POINTS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC CONVERTER
J=
f
=
x
f1
x
1
f n
x
1
f1
xn
f n
xn
V. SIMULATION EXAMPLES
df1
Rs
1
1
=
1 +
dx1
L pv I L + I s (1 + Rs / Rsh ) i pv v pv / Rsh Rsh
Rs
L pv
df1
1
1
=
dx2
L pv Rsh I L + I s (1 + Rs / Rsh ) i pv v pv / Rsh
Lpv
(28)
Fig. 11. PV array voltage and current for power p =150W and a fault duration of
60 ms.
VIII. BIOGRAPHIES
VI. CONCLUSIONS
We have presented a mathematical model suitable for
stability analysis that includes the nonlinear behaviour of gridconnected photovoltaic modules. Utilizing the model we have
shown there exist two solutions for a specific power injection
into the grid mains, one of which is a saddle node and
therefore unstable in practical terms. Moreover, eigenvalue
analysis was introduced to define regions of attraction that
determine the dynamics of the converter states.
Simulations including the entire power converter were done
to support the mathematical analysis. Results showed that the
system is more susceptible to instability under high loading
levels, i.e. when operating close to its maximum power point.
This is mainly due to the small margin available in order to
withstand any disturbance.
Further research focuses on the determination of stability
margins and operating limits, as well as the development of
better control strategies to cope swiftly with disturbances in
the grid.
VII. REFERENCES
[1] S.W.H. de Haan, H. Oldenkamp, E.J. Wildenbeest, Test results of a 130
W AC module; a modular solar AC power station, IEEE Fist World
Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Vol. 1, pp. 925-928, 1994.
[2] R.H. Wills, F.E. Hall, S.J. Strong, J.H. Wohlgemuth, The AC photovoltaic
module, Twenty Fifth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, pp. 12311234, 1996.
[3] B. Kroposki, R. DeBlasio, Technologies for the new millennium:
photovoltaics as a distributed resource, IEEE Power Engineering Society
Summer Meeting, Vol. 3, pp. 1798-1801, 2000.
[4] Li Wang, Ying-Hao Lin. Random fluctuations on dynamic stability of a
grid-connected photovoltaic array, IEEE Power Engineering Society
Winter Meeting. Vol.3, pp.985-989, 2001.
[5] A. Woyte, R. Belmans, J. Nijs, Testing the islanding protection function of
photovoltaic inverters, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 18,
No. 1, pp. 157 162, 2003.
Gehan Amaratunga (M 90) . obtained his B.Sc from Cardiff University and
PhD from Cambridge, both in EE. He has held the
1966 Professorship in Engineering at the University
of Cambridge since 1998. He currently heads the
Electronics, Power and Energy Conversion Group,
one of four major research groups within the
Electrical Engineering Division of the Cambridge
Engineering Faculty. He has worked for 20 years on
integrated and discrete electronic devices for power
conversion; and on the science and technology of
carbon based electronics for 15 years. His group was amongst the first to
demonstrate integration of logic level electronics for signal processing and high
voltage power transistors in a single IC ( chip). His current research on
integrated power conversion circuits for connecting solar modules directly to the
AC grid draws directly on his research in power ICs . This work on novel solar
inverter technology is currently being commercialised through a start up
company, Enecsys Ltd. He also leads an active research effort in novel solar cell
technologies. His group has developed a new approach to enhancing the
performance of low cost polymer solar cells by combining semiconducting
polymers with carbon nanotubes.
He has previously held faculty positions at the Universities of Liverpool (Chair
in Electrical Engineering), Cambridge, and Southampton. He also held the UK
Royal Academy of Engineering Overseas Research Award at Stanford
University. He has published over 300 journal and conference papers.