CIS REPORT CARD (November 2014)

Name: Amy

Class: SSAT 1

Grade Chart:

Teachers Comments:
For the past 2 months, the SSAT 1 class has worked on the
project, McDonalds VS. Lotteria. We decided to debate on this
topic, because eating instant foods has been a great problem in
todays society, so we wanted to research the two major franchises
to learn about what we are eating and what we can do to eat
healthier. Weve researched about the marketing, advertisement,
compared menus, calories, ingredients, and how those two
companies differ in different countries. Throughout the research,
each student had his or her theme and had to research and write a
speech about it. Our final speech is now ready, so they each have
to memorize and fully prepare for the project.
Amy didnt complete most of her homework for the past quarter.
Her performance would have been much better if she tried harder
to do her work. Otherwise, her behavior is great, and I hope she
tries harder for the best result for this project.

A+ = 97-100 %
A = 93 96 %
A - = 90 92 %
B+ = 87-89%
B = 83-86%
B - = 80-82 %
C+ = 77-79%
C = 73-75%
C- = 70-72%
D = 60 69%
F = Below 60%

Criteria

Weak

Time: T,Th 6:30-7:30

Fair

Average

Some effort shown

followed by rough,
choppy elaboration
Clear in some parts
but not overall

Average impact of
facts and position
followed by
smooth elaboration
Most clear and
orderly in all parts

Teacher: Noelle

Above Average
Strong statements of your position
followed by smooth elaboration

20/20

Viewpoints and responses are

outlined both clearly and orderly in
presentation

18/20

Content

Weak or missing
facts or weak
elaboration

Organization
& Clarity

Unclear in most
parts

Use of
Argumentation

Few or no
relevant
supporting
facts/examples

Some relevant
examples/facts
given

Many
examples/facts
given: most
relevant

Clear reasoning and evidence is

shown using examples, quotes,
statistics, or other types of
elaboration

Your arguments
and knowledge
about the topic is
not clear to the
audience

Only prepped on
role, not able to
elaborate,
challenge or
answer opponent
because of lack of
background
knowledge
No counterarguments made
orally on your part,
but you are able to
help your team
with rebuttal

Able to answer
some of
opponents/
audiences
questions or
arguments clearly,
with facts/
examples

You are able to argue against your

opponent with insightful, factbased support. You are able to
answer any questions the opponent
or audience has clearly, and you
seem very knowledgeable about
the topic and your support

Some effective
counter-arguments
made

Many effective counter-arguments

made that challenge the opponent
and your audience

Average
appropriate
behavior shown

Maintained focus and stayed on

task

Preparedness
&
Background
Knowledge

Showed
Energy &
Enthusiasm in
Voice
Behavior

Total:

No effective
counter
arguments made

Showed a lack of
respect while
speaking, and /
or while others
were speaking

Attempted to stay
on task

89/100

Score:

Final Grade

18/20
15/20
8/10
10/10

B+

CIS REPORT CARD (November 2014)

Name: Anthony Class: SSAT 1

Time: T,Th 6:30-7:30

Teacher: Noelle

Grade Chart:

Teachers Comments:

A+ = 97-100 %
A = 93 96 %
A - = 90 92 %
B+ = 87-89%
B = 83-86%
B - = 80-82 %
C+ = 77-79%
C = 73-75%
C- = 70-72%
D = 60 69%
F = Below 60%

For the past 2 months, the SSAT 1 class has worked on the
project, McDonalds VS. Lotteria. We decided to debate on this
topic, because eating instant foods has been a great problem in
todays society, so we wanted to research the two major
franchises to learn about what we are eating and what we can do
to eat healthier. Weve researched about the marketing,
advertisement, compared menus, calories, ingredients, and how
those two companies differ in different countries. Throughout the
research, each student had his or her theme and had to research
and write a speech about it. Our final speech is now ready, so they
each have to memorize and fully prepare for the project.
Although Anthony is new to this class, hes doing really great.
His research and speech are great, so he now needs to work hard
to memorize the contents. However, he needs to focus more
during class. Otherwise, hes a great student.

Criteria

Weak

Fair

Average

Some effort shown

followed by rough,
choppy elaboration
Clear in some parts
but not overall

Average impact of
facts and position
followed by
smooth elaboration
Most clear and
orderly in all parts

Above Average
Strong statements of your position
followed by smooth elaboration

18/20

Viewpoints and responses are

outlined both clearly and orderly in
presentation

20/20

Content

Weak or missing
facts or weak
elaboration

Organization
& Clarity

Unclear in most
parts

Use of
Argumentation

Few or no
relevant
supporting
facts/examples

Some relevant
examples/facts
given

Many
examples/facts
given: most
relevant

Clear reasoning and evidence is

shown using examples, quotes,
statistics, or other types of
elaboration

Your arguments
and knowledge
about the topic is
not clear to the
audience

Only prepped on
role, not able to
elaborate,
challenge or
answer opponent
because of lack of
background
knowledge
No counterarguments made
orally on your part,
but you are able to
help your team
with rebuttal

Able to answer
some of
opponents/
audiences
questions or
arguments clearly,
with facts/
examples

You are able to argue against your

opponent with insightful, factbased support. You are able to
answer any questions the opponent
or audience has clearly, and you
seem very knowledgeable about
the topic and your support

Some effective
counter-arguments
made

Many effective counter-arguments

made that challenge the opponent
and your audience

Average
appropriate
behavior shown

Maintained focus and stayed on

task

Preparedness
&
Background
Knowledge

Showed
Energy &
Enthusiasm in
Voice
Behavior

Total:

No effective
counter
arguments made

Showed a lack of
respect while
speaking, and /
or while others
were speaking

Attempted to stay
on task

93/100

Score:

Final Grade

20/20
18/20
10/10
7/10

CIS REPORT CARD (November 2014)

Name: Annie

Class: SSAT 1

Grade Chart:

Teachers Comments:
For the past 2 months, the SSAT 1 class has worked on the
project, McDonalds VS. Lotteria. We decided to debate on this
topic, because eating instant foods has been a great problem in
todays society, so we wanted to research the two major franchises
to learn about what we are eating and what we can do to eat
healthier. Weve researched about the marketing, advertisement,
compared menus, calories, ingredients, and how those two
companies differ in different countries. Throughout the research,
each student had his or her theme and had to research and write a
speech about it. Our final speech is now ready, so they each have
to memorize and fully prepare for the project.
Annie worked really hard this quarter. I would like to appreciate
her hard work, and I hope she continues to work hard throughout
the project. Good job, Annie!

A+ = 97-100 %
A = 93 96 %
A - = 90 92 %
B+ = 87-89%
B = 83-86%
B - = 80-82 %
C+ = 77-79%
C = 73-75%
C- = 70-72%
D = 60 69%
F = Below 60%

Criteria

Weak

Time: T,Th 6:30-7:30

Fair

Average

Some effort shown

followed by rough,
choppy elaboration
Clear in some parts
but not overall

Average impact of
facts and position
followed by
smooth elaboration
Most clear and
orderly in all parts

Teacher: Noelle

Above Average
Strong statements of your position
followed by smooth elaboration

18/20

Viewpoints and responses are

outlined both clearly and orderly in
presentation

18/20

Content

Weak or missing
facts or weak
elaboration

Organization
& Clarity

Unclear in most
parts

Use of
Argumentation

Few or no
relevant
supporting
facts/examples

Some relevant
examples/facts
given

Many
examples/facts
given: most
relevant

Clear reasoning and evidence is

shown using examples, quotes,
statistics, or other types of
elaboration

Your arguments
and knowledge
about the topic is
not clear to the
audience

Only prepped on
role, not able to
elaborate,
challenge or
answer opponent
because of lack of
background
knowledge
No counterarguments made
orally on your part,
but you are able to
help your team
with rebuttal

Able to answer
some of
opponents/
audiences
questions or
arguments clearly,
with facts/
examples

You are able to argue against your

opponent with insightful, factbased support. You are able to
answer any questions the opponent
or audience has clearly, and you
seem very knowledgeable about
the topic and your support

Some effective
counter-arguments
made

Many effective counter-arguments

made that challenge the opponent
and your audience

Average
appropriate
behavior shown

Maintained focus and stayed on

task

Preparedness
&
Background
Knowledge

Showed
Energy &
Enthusiasm in
Voice
Behavior

Total:

No effective
counter
arguments made

Showed a lack of
respect while
speaking, and /
or while others
were speaking

Attempted to stay
on task

94/100

Score:

Final Grade

20/20
20/20
8/10
10/10

CIS REPORT CARD (November 2014)

Name: Ted

Class: SSAT 1

Grade Chart:

Teachers Comments:
For the past 2 months, the SSAT 1 class has worked on the
project, McDonalds VS. Lotteria. We decided to debate on this
topic, because eating instant foods has been a great problem in
todays society, so we wanted to research the two major franchises
to learn about what we are eating and what we can do to eat
healthier. Weve researched about the marketing, advertisement,
compared menus, calories, ingredients, and how those two
companies differ in different countries. Throughout the research,
each student had his or her theme and had to research and write a
speech about it. Our final speech is now ready, so they each have
to memorize and fully prepare for the project.
Ted worked really hard this quarter, and I would like to appreciate
his hard work. He now needs to concentrate on memorizing and
familiarizing himself with the scripts. Good job, Ted!

A+ = 97-100 %
A = 93 96 %
A - = 90 92 %
B+ = 87-89%
B = 83-86%
B - = 80-82 %
C+ = 77-79%
C = 73-75%
C- = 70-72%
D = 60 69%
F = Below 60%

Criteria

Weak

Time: T,Th 6:30-7:30

Fair

Average

Some effort shown

followed by rough,
choppy elaboration
Clear in some parts
but not overall

Average impact of
facts and position
followed by
smooth elaboration
Most clear and
orderly in all parts

Teacher: Noelle

Above Average
Strong statements of your position
followed by smooth elaboration

20/20

Viewpoints and responses are

outlined both clearly and orderly in
presentation

18/20

Content

Weak or missing
facts or weak
elaboration

Organization
& Clarity

Unclear in most
parts

Use of
Argumentation

Few or no
relevant
supporting
facts/examples

Some relevant
examples/facts
given

Many
examples/facts
given: most
relevant

Clear reasoning and evidence is

shown using examples, quotes,
statistics, or other types of
elaboration

Your arguments
and knowledge
about the topic is
not clear to the
audience

Only prepped on
role, not able to
elaborate,
challenge or
answer opponent
because of lack of
background
knowledge
No counterarguments made
orally on your part,
but you are able to
help your team
with rebuttal

Able to answer
some of
opponents/
audiences
questions or
arguments clearly,
with facts/
examples

You are able to argue against your

opponent with insightful, factbased support. You are able to
answer any questions the opponent
or audience has clearly, and you
seem very knowledgeable about
the topic and your support

Some effective
counter-arguments
made

Many effective counter-arguments

made that challenge the opponent
and your audience

Average
appropriate
behavior shown

Maintained focus and stayed on

task

Preparedness
&
Background
Knowledge

Showed
Energy &
Enthusiasm in
Voice
Behavior

Total:

No effective
counter
arguments made

Showed a lack of
respect while
speaking, and /
or while others
were speaking

Attempted to stay
on task

94/100

Score:

Final Grade

20/20
18/20
10/10
8/10

CIS REPORT CARD (November 2014)

Name: Candy Class: SSAT 1
Grade Chart:
A+ = 97-100 %
A = 93 96 %
A - = 90 92 %
B+ = 87-89%
B = 83-86%
B - = 80-82 %
C+ = 77-79%
C = 73-75%
C- = 70-72%
D = 60 69%
F = Below 60%

Criteria

Time: T,Th 6:30-7:30

Teacher: Noelle

Teachers Comments:
For the past 2 months, the SSAT 1 class has worked on the
project, McDonalds VS. Lotteria. We decided to debate on this
topic, because eating instant foods has been a great problem in
todays society, so we wanted to research the two major franchises
to learn about what we are eating and what we can do to eat
healthier. Weve researched about the marketing, advertisement,
compared menus, calories, ingredients, and how those two
companies differ in different countries. Throughout the research,
each student had his or her theme and had to research and write a
speech about it. Our final speech is now ready, so they each have
to memorize and fully prepare for the project.
Candy did great this quarter! Although she sometimes forgot to email me her scripts, she finally pulled through and turned in her
assignments on time. Now, she just needs to memorize her scripts
and give her best. Good job, Candy!

Weak

Fair

Average

Some effort shown

followed by rough,
choppy elaboration
Clear in some parts
but not overall

Average impact of
facts and position
followed by
smooth elaboration
Most clear and
orderly in all parts

Above Average
Strong statements of your position
followed by smooth elaboration

18/20

Viewpoints and responses are

outlined both clearly and orderly in
presentation

18/20

Content

Weak or missing
facts or weak
elaboration

Organization
& Clarity

Unclear in most
parts

Use of
Argumentation

Few or no
relevant
supporting
facts/examples

Some relevant
examples/facts
given

Many
examples/facts
given: most
relevant

Clear reasoning and evidence is

shown using examples, quotes,
statistics, or other types of
elaboration

Your arguments
and knowledge
about the topic is
not clear to the
audience

Only prepped on
role, not able to
elaborate,
challenge or
answer opponent
because of lack of
background
knowledge
No counterarguments made
orally on your part,
but you are able to
help your team
with rebuttal

Able to answer
some of
opponents/
audiences
questions or
arguments clearly,
with facts/
examples

You are able to argue against your

opponent with insightful, factbased support. You are able to
answer any questions the opponent
or audience has clearly, and you
seem very knowledgeable about
the topic and your support

Some effective
counter-arguments
made

Many effective counter-arguments

made that challenge the opponent
and your audience

Average
appropriate
behavior shown

Maintained focus and stayed on

task

Preparedness
&
Background
Knowledge

Showed
Energy &
Enthusiasm in
Voice
Behavior

Total:

No effective
counter
arguments made

Showed a lack of
respect while
speaking, and /
or while others
were speaking

Attempted to stay
on task

92/100

Score:

Final Grade

18/20
18/20
10/10
10/10

A-

CIS REPORT CARD (November 2014)

Name: Christy

Class: SSAT 1

Grade Chart:

Teachers Comments:
For the past 2 months, the SSAT 1 class has worked on the
project, McDonalds VS. Lotteria. We decided to debate on this
topic, because eating instant foods has been a great problem in
todays society, so we wanted to research the two major franchises
to learn about what we are eating and what we can do to eat
healthier. Weve researched about the marketing, advertisement,
compared menus, calories, ingredients, and how those two
companies differ in different countries. Throughout the research,
each student had his or her theme and had to research and write a
speech about it. Our final speech is now ready, so they each have
to memorize and fully prepare for the project.
Christy worked hard this quarter. Her speech and research have
been great. I want to appreciate her hard work throughout this
quarter. Now, she just needs to give her best for this project. Great
job, Christy!

A+ = 97-100 %
A = 93 96 %
A - = 90 92 %
B+ = 87-89%
B = 83-86%
B - = 80-82 %
C+ = 77-79%
C = 73-75%
C- = 70-72%
D = 60 69%
F = Below 60%

Criteria

Weak

Time: T,Th 6:30-7:30

Fair

Average

Some effort shown

followed by rough,
choppy elaboration
Clear in some parts
but not overall

Average impact of
facts and position
followed by
smooth elaboration
Most clear and
orderly in all parts

Teacher: Noelle

Above Average
Strong statements of your position
followed by smooth elaboration

20/20

Viewpoints and responses are

outlined both clearly and orderly in
presentation

18/20

Content

Weak or missing
facts or weak
elaboration

Organization
& Clarity

Unclear in most
parts

Use of
Argumentation

Few or no
relevant
supporting
facts/examples

Some relevant
examples/facts
given

Many
examples/facts
given: most
relevant

Clear reasoning and evidence is

shown using examples, quotes,
statistics, or other types of
elaboration

Your arguments
and knowledge
about the topic is
not clear to the
audience

Only prepped on
role, not able to
elaborate,
challenge or
answer opponent
because of lack of
background
knowledge
No counterarguments made
orally on your part,
but you are able to
help your team
with rebuttal

Able to answer
some of
opponents/
audiences
questions or
arguments clearly,
with facts/
examples

You are able to argue against your

opponent with insightful, factbased support. You are able to
answer any questions the opponent
or audience has clearly, and you
seem very knowledgeable about
the topic and your support

Some effective
counter-arguments
made

Many effective counter-arguments

made that challenge the opponent
and your audience

Average
appropriate
behavior shown

Maintained focus and stayed on

task

Preparedness
&
Background
Knowledge

Showed
Energy &
Enthusiasm in
Voice
Behavior

Total:

No effective
counter
arguments made

Showed a lack of
respect while
speaking, and /
or while others
were speaking

Attempted to stay
on task

98/100

Score:

Final Grade

20/20
20/20
10/10
10/10

A+

CIS REPORT CARD (November 2014)

Name: Max

Class: SSAT 1

Grade Chart:

Teachers Comments:
For the past 2 months, the SSAT 1 class has worked on the
project, McDonalds VS. Lotteria. We decided to debate on this
topic, because eating instant foods has been a great problem in
todays society, so we wanted to research the two major franchises
to learn about what we are eating and what we can do to eat
healthier. Weve researched about the marketing, advertisement,
compared menus, calories, ingredients, and how those two
companies differ in different countries. Throughout the research,
each student had his or her theme and had to research and write a
speech about it. Our final speech is now ready, so they each have
to memorize and fully prepare for the project.
Max did really great this quarter. He was able to come up with his
final speech on time, and his contents were also very informative
and well-organized. I hope he continues to work hard like this.
Good job, Max!

A+ = 97-100 %
A = 93 96 %
A - = 90 92 %
B+ = 87-89%
B = 83-86%
B - = 80-82 %
C+ = 77-79%
C = 73-75%
C- = 70-72%
D = 60 69%
F = Below 60%

Criteria

Weak

Time: T,Th 6:30-7:30

Fair

Average

Some effort shown

followed by rough,
choppy elaboration
Clear in some parts
but not overall

Average impact of
facts and position
followed by
smooth elaboration
Most clear and
orderly in all parts

Teacher: Noelle

Above Average
Strong statements of your position
followed by smooth elaboration

20/20

Viewpoints and responses are

outlined both clearly and orderly in
presentation

18/20

Content

Weak or missing
facts or weak
elaboration

Organization
& Clarity

Unclear in most
parts

Use of
Argumentation

Few or no
relevant
supporting
facts/examples

Some relevant
examples/facts
given

Many
examples/facts
given: most
relevant

Clear reasoning and evidence is

shown using examples, quotes,
statistics, or other types of
elaboration

Your arguments
and knowledge
about the topic is
not clear to the
audience

Only prepped on
role, not able to
elaborate,
challenge or
answer opponent
because of lack of
background
knowledge
No counterarguments made
orally on your part,
but you are able to
help your team
with rebuttal

Able to answer
some of
opponents/
audiences
questions or
arguments clearly,
with facts/
examples

You are able to argue against your

opponent with insightful, factbased support. You are able to
answer any questions the opponent
or audience has clearly, and you
seem very knowledgeable about
the topic and your support

Preparedness
&
Background
Knowledge

Showed
Energy &
Enthusiasm in
Voice
Behavior

Total:

No effective
counter
arguments made

Showed a lack of
respect while
speaking, and /
or while others
were speaking

Attempted to stay
on task

Some effective
counter-arguments
made

Average
appropriate
behavior shown

94/100

Score:

Many effective counter-arguments

made that challenge the opponent
and your audience

Maintained focus and stayed on

task

Final Grade

18/20
18/20
10/10
10/10