Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steven R. Thompson
U. S. Air Force Research Laboratory
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate
Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
Presentation Outline
Acknowledgements
MIL-HDBK-5 Historical Milestones and Background
Transition from MIL-HDBK-5 to MMPDS
Design Allowables Terminology
Current MMPDS Design Allowable Applications and Issues
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
Acknowledgements Government
Federal Aviation Administration
Dr. John Bakuckas, FAA Technical Center, AAR-431
Mr. Robert Eastin, FAA, National Resource Specialist
Mr. Jon Hjelm, FAA, Airframe Certification Engineer
Air Force
Mr. Steve Thompson, AFRL/MLSC
Mr. Neal Ontko, AFRL/MLSC
Army
Walter Roy, APG
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
Acknowledgements Industry
MMPDS Industrial Steering Group (ISG)
Mr. Steve Fantle, Boeing (Chair)
Mr. Pete Brouwer, Alcoa (Vice Chair)
The aircraft metallic material suppliers and users that have
- Bell Helicopter
- Corus Aluminum
- McCook
- Textron Aero Fasteners
- Boeing
- Howmet
- Northrop Grumman
- Universal Alloy
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
Handbook 5)
1954 Battelle began coordination of the Handbook under
contract with the Air Force
1956 Converted from ANC-5 to MIL-HDBK-5
1971 Incorporated detailed guidelines for statistical analysis
of data
1985 Incorporated Weibull analysis methods to account for
skewed strength distributions
1988 Completed replacement of all constant-life fatigue
diagrams with statistically based equivalent stress plots
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
1999
2000
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
2003
10/13/2003
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
statistical significance
10/13/2003
500
Skew ness = -1.00
Skew ness = -0.60
Skew ness = -0.20
Normal
Skew ness = 0.20
Skew ness = 0.60
Skew ness = 1.00
450
400
350
300
Mode = 100
Std. Dev. = 5.0
250
200
150
100
50
0
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
Normalized Strength
110
115
120
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
10
10/13/2003
11
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
Sample Size
n = 20
n = 30
n = 50
n = 100
n = 300
n = 1000
0.00%
-2.00%
-4.00%
-6.00%
-1.00 -0.80 -0.60 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.20
True Skewness
0.40 0.60
0.80 1.00
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
12
10/13/2003
13
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
14
10/13/2003
15
10/13/2003
16
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
17
10/13/2003
18
10/13/2003
19
10/13/2003
20
P
D
t
ln
Ai
t
t
= A0 + A1 + A2 ln
D
D
=
=
=
=
=
test load,
fastener diameter
sheet thickness
natural logarithm
regression coefficients
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
21
3.50
Py / D2, x 10-4
3.00
2.50
2.00
Individual Data
1.50
Group Averages
1.00
New Average
Old Average
0.50
0.00
0.00
T90 Allowable
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
t/D
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
22
10/13/2003
23
m 2
da
K
K
K
1
R
log[
/
(
(
)
)
c o
max
1
log
= C1 + C2 tanh
dN
K
K
log(
/
)
o
c
where Ko
Kc
Kmax
R
m
=
=
=
=
=
C1, and C2
lower asymptote,
upper asymptote,
maximum stress intensity,
stress ratio (stress ratios less than zero set to 0),
optimized exponent between 0 and 1 (to account
for stress ratio effects, and
regression coefficients.
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
24
1.0E-04
da/dN, inches/cycle
1.0E-05
1.0E-06
1.0E-07
1.0E-08
1
10
100
1,000
0.50
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
25
10/13/2003
26
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
27
0.100
0.010
0.001
1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08
Estimated Crack Initiation Cycles
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
28
1.E+07
1.E+06
1.E+05
1.E+04
1.E+03
1.E+02
Kt = 1.00
Kt = 1.50
Kt = 2.00
Kt = 4.00
Kt = 5.00
Mean
+/- 3 Sigma
1.E+01
1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08
Actual Total Life
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
29
10/13/2003
30
10/13/2003
31
Questions?
Equipment Development
and Mechanical Systems
aeromat-2001-pmp.ppt
10/13/2003
32