Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capurso*
1. Introduction.
The limit analysis of rigid-plastic continua with associated flow rules is based on the two known theorems of
structure plastic collapse [1], [2]. However, the systematic
application of such theorems to real structural problems
is generally quite complicated and cannot be generalized
to determine unitary procedures for numerical calculation.
On this subject, many important old and recent studies
[3 through 11 ] refer such problems to the known principles
of linear programming, by connecting the appropriate
linearization of the yield surface with the discretization
of the continuum, thereby offering a systematic procedure
for the numerical solution of such problems. However,
in our opinion, the simultaneous application of both
discretization procedures prevents a full evaluation of
such procedures for the general formulation of the problem.
Continuum discretization - - which can be achieved by
several m~_thods (finite differences, finite elements, series
expansions etc.) - - only represents a mean of numerical
calculation to solve an actual structural problem, while
the linearization of the yield surface implies the possibility
of introducing, in autonomous form, theoretical basic
(a = 1..... m)
(2.1)
( a = l ..... m)
(2.2)
no<-[n<<<t
Fig. 1.
53
for which we use the common notation of tensorial summation also for index a. However, since the two conditions:
(2.3)
mean that:
n,~2~ = i~j
(7,~ >t 0 ,
(7~ >t 0 .
"
__
>1 0
(7~1
(77s
at
if
)~ > 0.
~,j = a,~2~'
(2.11)
where:
~<
(2.12)
~
. a
ct
n U
--
n U
>1
'~*J
--
&t
0 = ( 7 =
(2.6)
(2.5)
et
(2.10)
0
non o = (7=
if
(2.4)
(2.9)
(2.8)
),~ -----0
(2.7)
(2.13)
MECCANICA
n71;t~ = } , j ,
2 = >/ 0
(3.6)
(2.14)
(2.15)
(3.7)
n , ] ( f f - - 2,,) = 0
(2.16)
and, correspondingly:
0
0 .
z~
a~n~(2 - - 20) = O.
(2.17)
if,,
VI
"
(2.18)
3.
(i = 1, 2, 3)
(3.1)
1 (o;,,
['u = ~
\ c-~xj
a x , / = c9";0~
(3.2)
P(it,) = f v D('e's)dV"
a,i = a i j ( x l ,
(3.4)
Vn.
(3.9)
.j'" = f ,;,
v,,
d.}/j)dV
(3.10)
:c~
(3.11)
where we adopt the common notation of tensorial summation with regard to index h.
B,, dualizing the program (3.11), which is a typical
linear program, we obtain the dual principle:
P,, = min al,#n n~lt~, = ei) ,
x 2 , xa),
in
#h >1 0 .
(3.12)
f a ,F u d V
V
MARCH 1971
a:'2~dV.
V
(3.5)
-f
a=dV
(3.13)
Vh
keeping in mind that Eq. (3.12) can be considered equivalent to second Eq. (3.8) if and only if:
P,('u,) = P(u,)
(3.14)
55
.h
etj
(i,j = 1, 2, 3; h = l ..... M)
(3.15)
ot
(a=l
I~1~>~ 0
..... m; b = l
~r,,,e.,/dV O)
(4.6)
subject to constraints:
a
i 0 -= cgta'O~, m/m1
~< 0~ in
ut=O
S,
..... A)
,1f V
in
(4.7)
Xt;MV + f 8 T Tt}~dS = 1
(3.16)
6 = min (t}0 rain (2=)
which will be used for the approximate numerical calculation of the continua static collapse load.
4.
(4.1)
fv D(elj)dV
k --
(4.2)
f ,, X,i,,dV + f sp T,i,,dS
is called kinema/ica//y admissible if k,~ represent the strain
rates associated with the displacement rate (4.1) and these
latter comply with the external compatibility conditions:
ul=0
in
S,,.
(4.3)
Assuming:
f ,. A'~i,,dV + f s r T/mdS = l
(4.4)
f v a=2=dV
(4.8)
subject to constraints:
n,~2==cg.;t/),
2 ~>/ 0
ue = 0
in
in
Su
(4.9)
f v A~it,dV + f s T T,i,idS = 1 .
Eqs. (2.4) and (4.8) are both analytical formulations of
the kinematical theorem. It is easy to demonstrate that
they also include, as particular aspect, the static theorem.
In fact, if we denote by s a generical multiplier of external
loads and restrict the class of stresses a~j appearing in
Eq. (4.6) to the class which satisfies the equilibrium conditions:
c)f~ri/+ sA'j = 0
in
~rqni = sT/
in
Sr
(2)
(4.10)
where nl (i = 1, 2, 3) are the direction cosines of the normal to the external surface in ST, we obviously have:
cyO~ijdV
fv
(4.11)
in
V,
ut = 0
in
S,
(4.12)
f ,, X[u,dV + f %, T[mdS = 1 .
k = f D('e,/)dV.
(4.5)
The kinematically admissible multiplier therefore coincides with the total power of dissipation P (see (3.3)),
associated with strain rates (4.1). The kinem,tic theorem
of limit analysis states however that the collapse multiplier 6 is the minimum kinematically admissible coefficient.
Taking into consideration the equivalence between the
kinematically admissible coefficient and the total power
of dissipation, from Eq. (3.8) we deduce that the collapse
.56
mix (~ro) s
(4.13)
subject to constraints:
O,a~ + sA'~ = O,
m~atj <~ a =
in
atjnt = s T j
in
S~
(4.14)
(5.8)
since:
(5.9)
g = ,}t(.~,, .,:o_, m)
( i , j = 1, 2, 3)
(sA)
l/i
.k k
~q
lit
u; = 0
in
S,,
(i=1,2,3,
k=l
( i , j = 1, 2, 3; k = 1..... N )
e u = O,lO~
(5.4)
(5.2)
( X I ~ X 2 , X3)
in
Vt,
.l~ h k
f o,,,';,,v
Vh
(5.6)
f
MARCH 1971
fit
h .k hk
j~MV = a~q
eu.
(5.10)
~t
~*
.k hk
ok.I,"
(5.11)
atjeo = ~
(5.12)
afjq ets = ~
t-~k'h"
q = s
(5.13)
(5.5)
0}.
h hk
"~
,ut,/>
6, = max {s aoeb = ~
#U
q eli,
(5.7)
o~
(5.14)
6.
Conclusions.
and of the principles concerning the static collapse multiplier of the continua, on which is based the proposal of a
numerical approach for a strictly general calculation. The
application of this procedure to actual cases of technical
interest will be the subiect of other studies to be published
in the near future.
Received 15 June 1970.
REFERENCES
[1 ]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
58
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]