Professional Documents
Culture Documents
____________________________
No.__________________
Monica Hoeft
v.
Michael J. Astrue
______________________________
______________________________
Pursuant to Rules 13.5 and 30.2 of this Court, Petitioner Monica Hoeft, In Pro
Se, in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, hereby respectfully requests to the
Honorable Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, that the time to file a
petition for a writ of certiorari in this matter be extended for 60 days up and
including May 17th, 2010, 60 days from the 90 day due date of March 18th,
2010, from the denial of the en banc petition attached hereto as Appendix 3
Hoeft’s Appeal perfected on July 7, 2009 and mandate was entered On July
hearing and an extension of time due to illness and it was granted for
Page 1 of 5
October 5th, 2009 attached hereto as Appendix 2. Hoeft Moved for Counsel
on October 4th, 2009 and it was denied. And mandated was entered
mentally ill and not on any medications and not being seen by any doctors
until January 21st, 2010 see Appendix 5. She does not know if the
medications she will get will render her capable of maintaining such an
important suit as the one before her now. Unless she knows her medical
disorders. She spent almost three years in bed before she was
rather than the whole and rejecting the medical evidence of the
treating physician and that of the Social Security Physician Dr. Rogina
Page 2 of 5
disability, without giving a reason as to why he rejected the testimony
(2) Petitioner fired her attorney for malfeasance after she found out that
(3) Petitioner moved the Federal District Court in Reno, NV to remand the
ALJ’s decision, but the Magistrate upheld the decision. Hoeft asked
(4) After Various motions to extend time on both sides, and motions for
counsel on Hoeft’s side, the appeal was perfected and the appeal was
heard. Hoeft’s request for disability was denied on July 7, 2009. Hoeft
court.
Now Hoeft asks that this honorable Court entertains a Writ of Certiorari.
But Petitioner cannot comply within the specified time unless she is
her in forma pauperis status is granted and also needs an excess of time
with the Rules of this Court but one that also conveys the message that
this Court needs to hear. Petitioner is of the informed belief that this is a
Page 3 of 5
most important case for the High Court to hear in that the administrative
Law Judge to the Ninth Circuit has trampled recklessly on the rights of a
that is required by law as set forth by this court under the case of Heckler
v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458, 103 S.Ct. 1952, 76 L.Ed.2d 66 (1983) and that
DATED:
Respectfully Submitted,
______________________
Monica Hoeft
Page 4 of 5
0CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
DATED:
____________________
Monica Hoeft
In Pro Se
Page 5 of 5