Puana Trial Transcript

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
3
4
5
6
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
GERARD K. PUANA,
Defendant.
8
9
10
11
12
LAWRENCE L. TONG
ANDREA HATTAN
Office of the United States Attorney
Prince Kuhio Federal Building
300 Ala Moana Blvd Ste 6100
Honolulu, HI 96850
For the Defendant:
ALEXANDER SILVERT
Office of the Federal Public
Defender
PJKK Federal Building
300 Ala Moana Blvd Rm 7-104
Honolulu, HI 96850
Official Court
Reporter:
Cynthia Ott, RMR, CRR

United States District Court
300 Ala Moana Blvd, Room C-270
Honolulu, Hawaii 96850
18
20
21
Jury Trial - Day One
For the Government:
17
19
Honolulu, Hawaii
December 4, 2014
8:40 A.M.
APPEARANCES:
14
16
CRIMINAL NO. 13-00375 LEK
TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL

BEFORE THE HONORABLE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
X
22
23
24
25
Proceedings recorded by machine shorthand, transcript produced

with computer-aided transcription (CAT).
2
1
I N D E X
2
3
EXAMINATIONS
NIALL SILVA
DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. TONG......................

VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION BY MR. SILVERT................
DIRECT EXAMINATION (Continued) BY MR. TONG..........
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. SILVERT....................
VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION BY MR. TONG...................
CROSS-EXAMINATION (Continued) BY MR. SILVERT........
REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. TONG....................
RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. SILVERT..................
REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. TONG....................
6
7
8
9
PAGE
10
LOUIS KEALOHA
11
DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. TONG......................
20
28
30
37
41
42
61
68
78
80
12
13
E X H I B I T S
14
GOVERNMENT'S:
15
1 and 2 were received in evidence...................

1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 were received in evidence..........
3 was received in evidence..........................
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DEFENDANT'S:
PAGE
32
34
94
PAGE
QQQQ was received in evidence.........................42

AA was received in evidence...........................52
JJJ was received in evidence..........................54
PPPP was received in evidence.........................60
3
1
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2014
(The following proceedings were held in open court in the
presence of the jury:)
THE CLERK:
Criminal 13-00735LEK, United States of
America versus Gerard K. Puana.
a jury trial.
record.
8
9
10
(8:40 A.M.)
This case has been called for
Counsel, please make your appearances for the
Please speak into a microphone.

MR. TONG:
Good morning, Your Honor.
Larry Tong and
Andrea Hattan, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, representing the

United States.
11
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
12
With us at counsel table are Postal Inspector Brian
13
Shaughnessy and Ora Morita, a paralegal specialist of our
14
office.
15
16
THE COURT:
All right.
Good morning to all of you,
and thank you for your presence today.
17
Mr. Silvert.
18
MR. SILVERT:
19
ladies and gentlemen of the jury.
20
of Gerard Puana, and my investigator, Adam Choka.

All right.
Good morning,
Alexander Silvert, on behalf
21
THE COURT:
Good morning to all of you.
22
And good morning, ladies and gentlemen of the jury.
23
Thank you very much for being bright-eyed and enthusiastic.
24
are going to start with opening statements.
25
And I'll turn to Mr. Tong.
Will it be you or
We
4
1
Ms. Hattan who will be giving opening for the government?
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
I will, Your Honor.

All right.
Thank you.
Your Honor, may I have a moment to
introduce myself to the jury because I have not met them
before?
THE COURT:
You may, yes.
MR. TONG:
Ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce myself.
May it please the court.
Counsel.
10
name is Larry Tong.
11
throughout the trial will be Andrea Hattan, another Assistant
12
U.S. Attorney.
13
Osborne, the individual you met two days ago.
14
I'm an Assistant U.S. Attorney.
My
With me
Both of us work in the same office with Les
Unfortunately, Mr. Osborne is not able to continue
15
with this trial, so the two of us will have the privilege of
16
presenting the evidence to you in his absence.
17
So I just wanted to introduce myself, since I don't
18
know any of you and I wasn't privy to the proceedings the other
19
day.
20
I assume that the other day you learned what this case
21
was about.
This case is about the destruction and theft of a
22
mailbox.
23
Gerard Puana, the individual in the aloha shirt in the middle
24
there, physically ripped a mailbox off of its pedestal and took
25
it away.
We will show that on June 21 of 2013 the defendant,
5
1
The mailbox belonged to his niece, Katherine Kealoha.
Katherine Kealoha is a city prosecutor.
to Louis Kealoha, the chief of the Honolulu Police Department.
In 2013, at the time of this incident, the Kealohas lived in
Kahala.
Ms. Kealoha is married
The mailbox that was involved is not a simple plastic
mailbox that says U.S. Mail on it, the type that you see at
City Mill.
ornate.
It was instead a little bit more fancy.
It had a satin-type finish.
It had a locking mechanism.
It was
It had a little roof on
10
it.
And there was a little slot
11
that the mailman could use to slide the mail into the mailbox.
12
And this ornate mailbox sat on top of a pedestal, a
13
little concrete or very hard object that was anchored with a
14
base in the ground and coming up to support the mailbox.
15
The Kealohas last saw the mailbox on the evening of
16
June 21, late in the afternoon.
17
awoke it was missing.
18
there, it was sticking up, and that at the top of the pedestal
19
there was a little bolt up -- sticking up into the air which
20
used to secure the mailbox, but the mailbox itself was gone.
21
The next morning when they
They noticed that the pedestal was still
Katherine Kealoha decided to report the theft of the
22
mailbox to the police.
So Katherine Kealoha called 911, the
23
general number for the police, and reported the theft.
24
patrol officer then responded to the Kealoha residence on
25
June 22nd, the morning after the event, and started an
6
1
investigation.
At that time no one had seen the event, but, as it
turns out and as you will see, it was captured on videotape.
And the reason for that is that the Kealoha house had a
security system.
surveillance cameras pointed at various locations of the house.
The system was maintained by the Honolulu Police Department
because they wanted to protect Chief Kealoha and his wife from
any threats or any incidents.
10
The security system included six different
So after they received the report, the HPD sent out a
11
technical officer, a computer person, to go to the residence
12
and retrieve the video.
13
called the criminal intelligence unit, which is a unit in the
14
HPD that has specialized duties, including protecting the HPD,
15
its officers and, of course, its chief.
16
This officer was part of a group
The officer in question is Niall Silva.
You'll hear
17
from him later this morning.
18
residence and went to the control box where all of the
19
information about the monitors was located.
20
that everything was working, that the cameras were operational,
21
that the images were being recorded on computer, that the date
22
and time stamped on the image matched the date and time of the
23
incident.
24
25
Officer Silva went to the Kealoha
He checked to see
He then reviewed the tape and saw that it had captured

the event at about 11:30 p.m., a little before midnight, the
7
1
night before.
And you will see the tape.
The tape shows -- there is a long street in front of
the Kealoha residence in Kahala, where they lived at the time.
A white car drives up the street, doesn't deviate, comes
straight to the Kealoha residence.
the driveway.
It stops right in front of
There is several moments when you see the tape where
nothing happens.
Then an individual gets out of the driver's
side of the car and walks deliberately to the mailbox.
The
10
individual is wearing a long, light-colored tee shirt and baggy
11
cargo shorts, the type with the big pockets that you can stuff
12
with all sorts of things.
13
not slippers, and there's a ball cap.
14
He's also wearing socks and shoes,
The individual walks up to the mailbox, leans forward,
15
tries to fiddle with it as if he's trying to get to the
16
contents, and then sort of stands up and looks a little like
17
this, puts his arms around it, yanks it off the pedestal.
18
then takes this mailbox, goes to the car, opens the door, puts
19
it in the car, and drives away.
20
You're going to see the images of that particular
21
video.
22
very deliberate.
23
place, knew that place.
24
25
He
It will show that the crime was not rushed.
It was
It was almost as if the individual owned that
Now, I'll be the first to tell you that when you see
the videos, they are not real clear.
This is not like watching
8
1
high-def television, where you can see every pore on the face,
to the chagrin of media people and actors and others.
video is black and white, and it's not the clearest, but it was
clear enough that people could identify the defendant.
The
You'll hear that the HPD detectives took the video and
showed it to Katherine Kealoha.
recognized the person taking the mailbox as her uncle, the
defendant.
Katherine Kealoha immediately
You'll hear that the video was shown to Chief Kealoha.
10
Chief Kealoha has known the defendant for many years.
11
he's known the defendant longer than he's known his wife.
12
used to work out together, they socialized.
13
family came together, and there was a family relation, they
14
would see each other at family gatherings and at the Kealoha
15
house.
16
defendant.
17
He was shown the video.
They
And once the
He says, yes, that's the
A third person, an HPD officer named Bobby Nguyen, was
18
also shown the video.
19
Kealoha's niece, so he too is family.
20
In fact,
Officer Nguyen married Katherine
I see one of you thinking about it.
There is a family
21
relation here, and I'll get into that in a minute.
He is part
22
of the family, and, in fact, Officer Nguyen lived in the back
23
of the Kealoha residence at the time of the incident.
24
seen and known the defendant, Gerard Puana, for a number of
25
years, in fact, called him Uncle Gerry.
He had
9
1
And Officer Nguyen saw the video, and he too
recognized the person taking the mailbox, destroying the
mailbox, as Uncle Gerry, the defendant, Gerard Puana.
You're going to hear that the identifications were
based on various characteristics.
build.
witnesses will tell you that.
One was his stature and his
He was lighter at the time than he is now.
The
Another was the way that he walked.
He has a very
unique walk, where he sort of puts his hip forward and
10
almost -- some witnesses may call it cocky -- swinging his
11
arms.
12
He also has the manner of dress, the tee shirt that's
13
a long sleeve with shorts, with socks and shoes.
14
recognize that.
15
defendant.
16
The witnesses
So you'll hear that they identified the
After that particular identification, HPD took steps
17
to arrest the defendant, Gerard Puana.
18
and said, you're under arrest for theft in the second degree, a
19
felony under Hawaii state law.
20
theft involved were given to him.
21
An officer arrested him
No specifics about what the
Once the arrest was made, he was brought to the
22
station.
The lead detective decided he wanted to question the
23
defendant about the mailbox theft.
24
Postal Inspector Shaughnessy.
25
reasons.
The detective then called
He did that for a couple of
One reason was because, as you probably already heard
10
1
on the day I wasn't here, that there is a -- an offense under
federal law for stealing a mailbox that is used for the
delivery of United States mails.
Another reason is there was some concern on the part
of HPD that there could be a conflict of interest in having the
city prosecutors decide whether to prosecute a case involving
one of their own, Katherine Kealoha.
8
9
10
So HPD called Inspector Shaughnessy.

station.
He went to the
He said, sure, I'll participate in the interview.

You'll hear that once Inspector Shaughnessy was in the
11
room, a Detective Akagi brought the defendant to the room, and
12
Inspector Shaughnessy introduced himself.
13
Shaughnessy, an inspector with the United States Postal
14
Inspection Service.
15
badge, and that was that.
16
that the defendant was there.
17
He said, I'm Brian
He then showed him his credentials, his

He said no more about the reason
You'll hear that after hearing that the postal
18
inspector was there, the defendant spontaneously said, "I'm
19
wrongly accused, I had nothing to do with that mailbox," even
20
though no one had mentioned that he was under investigation for
21
the mailbox.
22
So, ladies and gentlemen, in a nutshell, that's what
23
you're going to hear in this case.
You're going to
24
hear -- you'll see the video, you'll hear the eyewitnesses who
25
will identify the defendant based on their familial and
11
1
long-standing relationship.
involvement in a mailbox event, even though he hadn't been told
that's what he was there for.
You'll hear his statement denying
Now I want to address the family angle.
I saw a
couple of you trying to keep straight who's related to whom and
how.
Kealoha is related to the defendant.
through marriage to Katherine Kealoha and the defendant.
Many of the witnesses here are related.
Katherine
Bobby Nguyen is related
You will hear that the Puana family is a fairly large
10
family, and, like many large families, there are good times,
11
and there are bad times.
12
times when the defendant was frequently at the Kealoha house.
13
The good times, you'll hear, included
Back in 2007, 2009 -- please don't hold me to the
14
dates, I'm not completely sure -- the Kealohas were renovating
15
their residence.
16
renovations.
17
They were doing pretty significant
Katherine Kealoha asked her dad to help renovate the
18
residence.
19
in the area.
20
his brother, to assist with some of the carpentry and the
21
painting work.
22
defendant was at the Kealoha residence quite frequently.
23
were the good times.
24
25
Her dad is a master shipbuilder and has expertise

The dad then hired the defendant, Gerard Puana,
And for a period of a couple of years, the

Those
And by the way, I should tell you, the surveillance

cameras that were used to capture the crime later were not
12
1
present at the front of the house when the defendant used to go
over there.
There were bad times in the family too.
As a matter
of fact, you will inevitably hear, for sure, that there is a
civil lawsuit where people in the Puana family are arguing over
money.
transaction where the defendant's mom took out a mortgage on
her property to get money for various reasons.
Kealoha helped with that transaction to buy the defendant a
10
The basic claim grows out of a complicated real estate
Katherine
condo.
11
You'll hear that now in the civil lawsuit there are
12
claims where the defendant and his mother are suing Katherine
13
Kealoha claiming that she stole money, claiming that she took
14
money and used it for purposes that were not proper.
15
Kealoha denies that.
16
money she took was returning money she put in.
17
Katherine
She will tell you very generally that any
Fortunately for you, you're not going to have to hear
18
all the evidence about what is a complicated, messy financial
19
dispute colored by family emotions.
20
another case by another jury across Punchbowl Street on another
21
day.
22
whether to believe certain witnesses or whether the dispute
23
created strong emotions that could explain why the defendant
24
would blatantly rip a mailbox off of its pedestal belonging to
25
his niece.
That will be heard in
But you will hear about the dispute only as it relates to
13
1
Ladies and gentlemen, the case should not take too
long.
We're all sharing that hope.
sure you will conclude that a mailbox was destroyed, that the
event was captured on tape, and the only issue for you to
decide really is going to be did the defendant do it.
At the conclusion, I'm
We ask you to listen to the evidence, to use your
independent judgment, to look at the videos, to look at the
witnesses and decide whether they are credible, and use your
common sense and reason in evaluating all of this.
10
11
You will hear people say it is him and it is not him,

and, fortunately, all that matters is what you conclude.
12
We submit to you that when we finish this case, you
13
will consider the evidence and find the defendant, Gerard
14
Puana, guilty of destroying and tearing down the mailbox.
15
Thank you for your attention.
16
THE COURT:
17
Mr. Silvert, will you be giving the
opening?
18
MR. SILVERT:
19
THE COURT:
20
MR. SILVERT:
21
22
Thank you, Your Honor.
the jury.
Good morning.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen of
Good morning, Counsel.

You're going to see me frequently take my glasses off.
23
I can see you with my glasses, I can't read my papers.
24
see it all through the trial.
25
This case is about the taking of a mailbox.
You'll
You're
14
1
going to hear evidence from a -- about a surveillance video.
And Mr. Tong said that it's grainy, it's hard to see, and it's
not like TV.
have to be, at the end of this case, the judge and jury of
whether Mr. Puana is the individual that's in that video.
Well, that's an understatement.
You're going to
You're going to have an opportunity throughout this
trial and when you deliberate to watch that video.
government has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that that is
him.
10
And the
The reason the government is calling Katherine
11
Kealoha, Chief Louis Kealoha, and Bobby Nguyen, all very close
12
to each other, family members, is because you can't tell who's
13
on that video.
14
If you could tell who was on that video, you'll look
15
at him, you'll look at the video, and it's over.
16
calling them because you cannot.
17
Now, you took an oath as a jury.
They're
And I want to thank
18
you for being on this jury because it is a privilege.
19
the utmost highest of constitutional duties to be a juror and
20
to have a jury trial.
21
Not many countries have jury trials, so you have a special
22
privilege and honor to sit on this jury.
23
It is
This is what our country is all about.
And I'm sure at the end of this case you will
24
deliberate with fairness and equality and impartiality, and
25
look at that video, and look at the evidence, and look at the
15
1
2
lack of evidence, and return a verdict of not guilty.

What Mr. Tong said in his opening is correct, but he
left out a couple things.
receive any evidence from the government that the police
recovered a mailbox, nothing.
evidence from the government that the mail in the mailbox was
recovered or found, either on Mr. Puana or anywhere.
8
9
Where is the mailbox?
You will not
You will not receive any
The government will not even show you the mailbox.

They're going to show you the pedestal.
10
show you the mailbox.
11
trial as part of this evidence, why is it that the government
12
didn't show you the mailbox, and I am.
13
14
MR. TONG:
I will.
They will not even
I want you to think during this
Your Honor, I don't like to object, but
this is really closing argument.
15
THE COURT:
I agree.
16
Go ahead, Mr. Silvert.
17
MR. SILVERT:
All right.
Sustained.
There's an old saying that things aren't
18
as they appear to be, that saying in this case goes in spades.
19
You will hear from the first witness through the end that
20
things are not the way they appear to be.
21
During cross-examination, I will bring that out, and
22
so I ask you to pay close attention during this trial to the
23
evidence that's brought out, both through the direct and
24
through my cross.
25
Now, the government is going to present those three
16
1
witnesses to say that they looked at the video, and it's
Mr. Puana in the video.
to say that they looked at the video, and it's not him, and why
they believe it's not him.
conflicting testimony over what's depicted in that video.
In our case, I will present witnesses
So you're going to have very
But as Mr. Tong kind of alluded, this case doesn't
start with the theft of a mailbox, it started back in September
of 2012.
family was getting along pretty well.
And you will hear that prior to September 2012, the

In fact, Katherine
10
Kealoha used to refer to my client as her favorite Uncle
11
Gerster, but there was this complicated reverse mortgage that
12
they undertook, where my client's 93-year-old mother, who owns
13
a home, agreed to do a reverse mortgage that Katherine Kealoha
14
organized and functioned and ran in order to get money to buy
15
my client a house.
16
And after the money was spent to purchase his condo,
17
there was $150,000 left over.
18
of it.
19
that money for her own purposes.
20
The money is gone, every penny
The civil lawsuit alleges that Katherine Kealoha took
Now, again, that civil lawsuit will be decided soon.
21
It's pending.
And Mr. Tong talked about that, that that
22
lawsuit is pending, and that is a critical piece of evidence
23
you're going to hear about because what happens here will have
24
an impact on what happens there.
25
that Katherine Kealoha and Chief Kealoha are saying it's my
And it's the defense position
17
1
client for the reason to help them discredit him here today so
they can use that in the civil trial to their advantage.
Back in September of 2012, Florence Puana wrote a
letter to Katherine Puana -- Katherine Kealoha asking, what are
you doing, what happened to the money?
a letter back, and you're going to hear about that letter.
that's before this lawsuit was filed.
back to that in a moment.
Katherine Kealoha wrote

And
And I'm going to get
When the lawsuit was filed in March of 2013, in June,
10
on June 19th, 2013, Katherine Kealoha went to a deposition, her
11
deposition in that case.
12
had to continue it to another day because it hadn't finished.
13
That's June 19th.
14
June 29th, my client is arrested.
15
They only finished half of it.
June 21st, the mailbox gets stolen.
They
On
Now, you will hear evidence that HPD -- many divisions
16
of HPD conducted an investigation into this case prior to my
17
client's arrest on June 29th.
18
was on June -- well, they didn't say a date because that's
19
important too, but at some point after my client's arrest, HPD
20
decided that there might be a conflict in asking the state
21
prosecutor's office to prosecute this case because Katherine
22
Kealoha was involved, so they referred the case to the United
23
States Postal Service.
24
25
The government has said that it
There was no difference, the evidence will show, in

their knowledge of who was involved in this case, Katherine
18
1
Kealoha, from June 22nd, yet they investigated this case
through the arrest and never stepped back and said, you know
what, we have a conflict, let the federal government deal with
it.
And the evidence that we will bring out on cross will
show you why they did that, why they wanted to control the
investigation on behalf of Chief Kealoha and not the federal
government.
You're going to hear evidence of reports that are
10
falsified, reports that have been altered, surveillance that
11
hasn't been recorded, all before my client was ever identified
12
as the perpetrator.
13
You're going to hear that the HPD from day one did not
14
investigate a single other person for this offense other than
15
Mr. Puana, before he was ever identified by Katherine Kealoha.
16
How is that?
17
You're going to hear evidence that Chief Kealoha and
18
Katherine Kealoha lived in a residence that was being
19
vandalized repeatedly.
20
were fired at their house.
21
during this time period who are doing things at their house,
22
breaking into the garage, vandalizing their car.
23
investigation of who those people were, none.
24
25
People were yelling obscenities.
Shots
So there are a bunch of people
No
From day one, the evidence will show the only person
they went after was Mr. Puana.
The only person they went after
19
1
was the person who had the audacity to file a civil lawsuit
against Katherine Kealoha.
It's about Katherine Kealoha, it's about her reputation, it's
about her job, it's about her license to practice law, that's
what this case is about.
That's what this case is about.
So I leave you with these words from Katherine
Kealoha, words that you're going to hear from her own mouth,
"How dare anyone make such malicious and false statements
against me?
I will prove that this is a horrible lie.
Any
10
person who repeats this lie should be damned ashamed of
11
themselves for stating such crap.
12
decided to state these twisted lies."
13
the words that she used in writing a letter to her 93-year-old
14
grandmother.
They will rue the day they

Those are only some of
15
At the end of this case, I ask you to consider all the
16
evidence, and particularly, don't rely on me, don't rely on the
17
government, look at that videotape.
18
end of this case, you will find my client not guilty.
19
And I submit to you at the
The government must prove that he's guilty beyond a
20
reasonable doubt, that is the burden, and I'm going to hold you
21
to your oath at the end of this case and ask you to return a
22
verdict of not guilty.
23
THE COURT:
All right.
The parties have concluded
24
their opening statements.
I am now going to invoke the witness
25
exclusionary rule, so, counsel, if you have any witnesses, they
20
1
should remain outside of the courtroom unless and until they
testify in court and complete their testimony.
3
4
MR. TONG:
Silva.
5
6
Your Honor, United States calls Niall
THE COURT:
You may.
Do you need assistance from
Mr. Nakamura or Mr. Myer?
Mr. Myer, could you assist Mr. Tong.
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
10
They're much bigger and stronger, so maybe.

Good morning, sir.
to the witness stand.
Thank you.
11
(Witness sworn.)
12
THE CLERK:
13
You can come right up
Please state your first name and your last
name, and spell your first and last name.
14
THE WITNESS:
15
alpha, Lima, Lima.
16
alpha.
17
It's Niall Silva.
November, India,
Last name S -- Sara, India, Lima, victory,
DIRECT EXAMINATION
18
BY MR. TONG:
19
Good morning, sir.
20
Good morning.
21
Would you please tell us your present occupation.
22
I'm presently retired.
23
Okay.
24
I was a police officer with the Honolulu Police
25
Department.
And what did you do before retirement?
21
1
When were you a HPD officer?
From 1988 to December of 2013.
So you've been retired a little less than a year?
Yes.
And can you tell the jury what your formal education
consists of?
degree.
All from here in Oahu?
10
Yes.
11
And during your time at HPD, what kind of assignments did
12
you have?
13
14
warrant section, the firearms section, training division, solo
15
motorcycles, and my last assignment was with the criminal
16
intelligence unit.
17
18
the HPD?
19
Yes.
20
And what kind of work did you do in that capacity?
21
Video editing, production, all the things you need to do
22
to -- we use to document departmental events.
23
24
the criminal intelligence unit; is that correct?
25
High school graduate with a bunch of college but no
Ranged from patrol, where everybody has to go, to the
And did you spend any time working in the video unit for
I spent about eight years working in the video unit.
Now, you said that your last assignment at HPD was with
Yes.
22
1
What was your position within the CIU?
I was a tech.
And what does that mean?
I deal with surveillance, cameras, installation,
monitoring, recovering footage, maintenance, and also computer
things.
This was for the criminal intelligence unit, correct?
Yes.
Tell us what that unit does.
10
The criminal intelligence unit is a unit directly under
11
the chief's office that is vested with receiving, gathering,
12
and sharing information with other branches of law enforcement
13
for the bigger picture.
14
protection of the department.
15
16
would that include its various officers and employees?
17
18
doing something wrong, we would also have to do surveillance
19
and gather information in those cases also.
20
21
you have that date in your mind?
22
Yes, sir.
23
And did you receive an assignment on that morning?
24
Yes, sir.
25
What was your assignment?
Okay.
Yes.
And we're also vested with the
And when you say protection of the department,
On occasion, if there's an officer suspected of
Now let me direct your attention to June 22 of 2013.
Do
23
1
To go to 1018 Kealaolu and recover a hard drive from a
security system.
And what part of town is that address located in?
In the Kahala area, near the golf course.
And do you know who lived there at the time?
The chief of police.
Okay.
Yes.
About what time did you arrive?
10
Just around 9:00 a.m.
11
And I believe you just said your assignment was to recover
12
some surveillance equipment or video?
13
Footage, yeah, that's right.
14
Footage?
15
The hard -- actually recovered the hard drive that is part
16
of a recording unit of the surveillance equipment.
17
18
existed at that residence?
19
Yes.
20
Can you describe for the jury generally what it consisted
21
of?
22
23
device.
24
And who maintained that system?
25
Who maintained it?
And did you go to that location?
Were you familiar with the surveillance equipment that
It consisted of four cameras, a monitor and a recording
24
1
Yes.
I'm not sure who maintained it consistently, but I was
sent there to recover the footage from it.
But would it fall within the responsibility of the HPD?
It could.
You're not sure?
Yeah.
All right.
residence?
And what did you do upon arriving at the
10
When I arrived at the residence I met with Officer Nguyen,
11
and I went to where the location of the device was, made sure
12
it was operating correctly, checked the date and time, and then
13
reviewed the footage.
14
then I removed the hard drive, and I put in a blank one.
15
16
checking to see that the system is working?
17
18
monitor.
19
operating program for that surveillance equipment, and then you
20
can play back the footage.
21
time, and so you can play it back and review it.
And then once I reviewed the footage,
And just to elaborate a little bit, what's involved in
You've got to -- there's a little mouse, and you have a
22
And you've got to use the mouse to go get into an
And it has time stamp what date and
And after I did all of that, I removed the hard drive.
23
So you have to, like, close down the system for a moment, take
24
the hard drive out and put another one, and then restart the
25
system.
25
1
But when you stop the system, it's just the recording
part.
It still has the same date and time running
continuously.
was operational?
correct.
had a date and time stamped on it, and it corresponded to the
What were the results of your review of whether the system
Oh, the system was operational, and the date and time was
Okay.
And so we're clear on that, you mean that the video
10
time that you saw?
11
Yes.
12
Okay.
13
Yes.
14
What did you do with the hard drive?
15
Took it back to my office where I have a computer that has
16
a special program in there that's able to view security camera
17
footage.
18
clip and some still shots, and I put that on to what we
19
consider a master disk, and I made a copy.
20
into a secured -- I have a file cabinet that only I can access,
21
and I kept it in there.
22
23
that correct?
24
Yes.
25
And did you see footage of an event involving a mailbox?
And you recovered the hard drive?
And I replayed that video.
Okay.
And then I took the video
And then I put it
And I assume you reviewed all of the footage; is
26
1
Oh, yes.
Do you recall the approximate time of that incident
according to the cameras?
the evening time, about 2330 hours, around there, which is
11:30 p.m.
into evidence?
I believe it was the day before I went there, the 21st, in
And after you saw that footage, what exactly did you put
I put in -- the evidence, I took a video clip of before
10
the event and after the event and then a bunch of stills of the
11
event, and I submitted that into evidence.
12
13
the format?
14
A DVD and CDs.
15
And did the images or moving pictures on those items
16
fairly and accurately depict what was on the hard drive?
17
And the items that you submitted into evidence, what was
Yes.
18
MR. TONG:
19
THE COURT:
20
You may.
Or you could use the digital
overhead, if you want.
21
22
And if I may approach, Your Honor?
MR. TONG:
I think I need to identify it first, if I
may.
23
THE COURT:
24
Mr. Silvert, are you stipulating?
25
dispute over this --
All right.
Thank you.
Is there any
27
1
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, could I do a quick voir
dire, because there's new information I was unavailable -- I
was untold of.
THE COURT:
Okay.
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
Just a quick voir dire.
All right.
approach, set your foundation.
dire.
BY MR. TONG:
So, Mr. Tong, you can

And then you can ask to voir
10
Mr. Silva, I believe you have been handed one DVD and one
11
CD that have been marked as Exhibits 1 and 2 for
12
identification.
13
Yes, sir.
14
And let's take them one at a time.
15
Do you have those items in front of you?
Turning to Exhibit 1, do you recognize that particular
16
item?
17
Yes.
18
And what is it?
19
It is a CD that I submitted.
20
How do you recognize it as such?
21
It has my ugly handwriting on it, and it has the case
22
number and date and time that I recovered the evidence.
23
24
the hard drive that you recovered from the Kealoha residence on
25
June 24, 2014?
So was that a fair and accurate recording of a portion of
28
1
Yes.
2
3
MR. TONG:
We would ask that -- well, let me do
Exhibit 2 first, and then I'll move them both in for voir dire.
THE COURT:
All right.
BY MR. TONG:
Could you tell us what that is?
and it also is for the same case.
Now if I may, Mr. Silva, let's take a look at Exhibit 2.
This is also a CD.
And it's the second disk that I made,
10
And how do you recognize as it being one that you made in
11
connection with this particular case?
12
It also has my handwriting on it.
13
Okay.
14
include the video that you referenced in your testimony as well
15
as the still photographs?
16
Yes.
17
18
MR. TONG:
We would ask that Exhibits 1 and 2 be
received.
19
20
And am I correct that those are the CDs that
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, may I have a quick voir
dire?
21
THE COURT:
22
You may.
VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
23
BY MR. SILVERT:
24
25
entire hard drive --
Mr. Silva, you testified that you actually seized an
29
1
Yes.
-- is that correct?
correct?
have, it has capabilities to take snapshots of the still -- of
the video.
of a certain portion of the video, which gives you a photo.
How many hours of video are on the hard drive?
I don't know.
10
But you testified you saw it all?
11
Yeah.
12
Could it have days?
13
Oh, yeah.
14
look through that.
15
16
the chain of custody been preserved?
17
I don't believe so.
18
So what we have here are just snippets of the hard drive,
19
and the hard drive itself has been destroyed?
20
I'm not sure.
21
But you're not here today to introduce the hard drive as
22
evidence?
23
No.
24
Just a piece of it?
25
Just a copy of what was on the hard drive.
The hard drive only has video on it,
Yeah, it has video on it, but with the software that I
So you run the video, and you can take a snapshot
Many hours.
Yeah, you've got to sit there for hours and
Is the hard drive in evidence -- has the hard drive, has
I no longer work there.
30
1
MR. SILVERT:
Thank you.
Your Honor, may we have sidebar?
THE COURT:
So what I'll do is we'll take it up during
the break with regard to this.
evidence at this time.
Do you have an area that you can go around, or we have
to resolve it now?
sidebar.
9
10
I won't receive it into
MR. TONG:
Or you need it to -- okay, let's take a
Maybe it would help if I could ask a couple
of questions.
11
THE COURT:
12
Yes, you may.
DIRECT EXAMINATION (Continued)
13
BY MR. TONG:
14
So you reviewed the entire hard drive, correct?
15
Yes, sir.
16
And am I correct that the hard drive showed images of the
17
front of the residence, correct?
18
Yes, sir.
19
And part of the screens showed a mailbox, correct?
20
Yes, sir.
21
A mailbox sitting on top of a pedestal, correct?
22
Yes.
23
In your review of the entire hard drive, did you see any
24
images showing anyone taking the mailbox from that pedestal?
25
Yes.
31
1
And is it those images that were recorded on Exhibits 1
and 2?
Yes.
On the portion of the hard drive that was not recorded on
Exhibits 1 and 2, did any of those show any other individual
coming up to the mailbox and yanking it off the pedestal?
No.
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:

So you're asking that it be received?
10
MR. TONG:
11
THE COURT:
12
MR. SILVERT:
13
All right.
Your Honor, I have a significant
objection, if I could make it at sidebar.
14
THE COURT:
15
(Sidebar.)
16
THE COURT:
17
I renew my offer, yes.
All right.
So you can.
Let the record reflect the presence of
Mr. Silvert, Ms. Hattan, and Mr. Tong.
18
MR. TONG:
19
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, the actual evidence is the
20
hard drive.
He simply took surveillance -- some portion of the
21
hard drive.
The reason this is so -- it's the hard drive
22
that's the evidence, not what he took from it, and they're not
23
offering that.
24
25
More importantly, in discovery and subpoenas, I

specifically asked both the government and HPD for copies of
32
1
any of the video from a two-day period of time, and I can show
you the documentation and affidavit stating there is no such
evidence.
They don't have any evidence.

So that either indicates -- because he just said that
they have it for days -- that either they've destroyed the
piece of evidence, the actual piece of evidence, or they lied
in their response.
8
9
I have not seen the hard drive.

there was a hard drive.
And that's the evidence.
10
that any of it be introduced.
11
THE COURT:
12
All right.
MR. TONG:
14
(End of sidebar.)
15
THE COURT:
Over your objection, it's
So the court is receiving into evidence
Exhibits 1 and 2.
17
18
So I object
received.
13
16
I was never told
(Government Exhibit Numbers 1 and 2 were received in

evidence.)
19
THE COURT:
20
MR. TONG:
Mr. Tong, your witness.

Your Honor, I apologize, having just come
21
into the case, I'm not sure where the original court exhibits
22
are.
23
the pictures?
Have they been provided to Mr. Nakamura, the binder of
24
THE COURT:
25
MR. TONG:
I'm not sure.
Mr. Nakamura?
If he has them, if they may please be shown
33
1
to Mr. Silva.
THE CLERK:
MR. TONG:
THE CLERK:
Mr. Tong, are you referring to 1. -Yes, exactly.
Thank you, sir.
Your Honor, Exhibits 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 are
with the witness.
THE COURT:
All right.
Your witness, Mr. Tong.
BY MR. TONG:
the exhibits Mr. Nakamura just referenced.
All right, Mr. Silva, I want to direct your attention to

Turning first
10
to -- well, let's do them all three at a time.
Would you
11
please examine Exhibits 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3.
12
Okay.
13
Do you recognize those three photographs?
14
Yes.
15
And what are they?
16
They're stills that I captured from that hard drive.
17
it's representing that -- that event that was at the front of
18
the chief's house.
19
pointing multi direction.
20
21
depict the images that were on the hard drive that you
22
recovered?
23
24
those photographs.
25
MR. TONG:
And
This camera is on the street's edge
And do Exhibits 1.1, .2, and .3 fairly and accurately
Yes, sir.
And you will see the date and time stamps on
We would ask that Exhibits 1.1, 1.2, and
34
1
1.3 be received in evidence.
THE COURT:
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
and is overruled.
6
7
Any objection?
Over my objection I made before.
All right.
Your objection is incorporated
It's received.
(Government Exhibit Numbers 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 were

received in evidence.)
MR. TONG:
May we ask Mr. Nakamura to display Exhibit 1.1,
10
please.
11
BY MR. TONG:
12
Officer Silva --
13
THE CLERK:
Your Honor?
14
THE COURT:
Yes, please publish.
15
THE CLERK:
It's published to the jury.
16
MR. TONG:
Okay.
Okay.
Ladies and gentlemen, are all your
17
screens working?
I see nods.
18
BY MR. TONG:
19
20
correct?
21
Yes.
22
And where would that appear in this particular picture?
23
It's in the upper left-hand corner.
24
Would that be the area that I'm sort of making a purple
25
arrow and circle in?
Officer Silva, you referenced a date and time stamp,
35
1
Yes.
And can you decipher how to read that?
It's the year, the month, and the day.
And then there appears to be, after 6-21, a reference
to -- whoops, not there.
The next -- over, yeah.
MR. TONG:
Just tap something?
THE CLERK:
Mr. Nakamura, how do I erase this again?
In the corner.
10
MR. TONG:
Left or right?
11
Thank you, sir.
Clear, got it.
12
BY MR. TONG:
13
There is a reference here to --
14
Yeah, that would be hours, minutes, and seconds.
15
Okay.
16
those of us civilians?
17
Basically 20 -- 2331 hours.
18
So that is right before midnight?
19
Yes.
20
All right.
21
I'm goofing up here --
22
Yes.
23
Okay.
24
No artwork, sir.
25
that was.
And in military time, how does that translate for
It would be 11:31 p.m.

And in the right, there is a channel -- which
But that CH1 would designate what camera
36
1
And where in this particular photograph does it show a
mailbox?
In the lower left-hand corner --
I'm going to try --
-- at the cursor.
All right.
was on the hard drive that you recovered, correct?
Yes.
And what use, if any, did you make of this particular
And you said this was used by -- I mean, this
10
photograph?
11
Excuse me?
12
What did you use this photograph for?
13
purpose?
14
15
you review the video on the software you're able to see the
16
date and time stamp on the video, but when you download it to a
17
disk, you lose the date and time on the video, but when you
18
take still shots, the still shots retain the date and time.
I mean, there was a
Oh, yeah, the video that I recorded on the disk -- when
19
So I use it to give you an accurate representation of
20
date and time according to where the photos are taken in the
21
video.
22
23
basically to recover the evidence --
24
Yes.
25
-- and put it in evidence?
Okay.
And am I correct your assignment that day was
37
1
Yes.
MR. TONG:
May I have one moment, Your Honor?
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
Mr. Silvert, your witness.
MR. SILVERT:
Thank you.
You may.
I have nothing further.
Thank you.
Thank you.

CROSS-EXAMINATION
10
BY MR. SILVERT:
11
12
date that you have.
13
when you watch it, does it have a time date on it?
14
Yes, sir.
15
But when you download it, it does not?
16
Yeah, when you download it as a video, it doesn't show it
17
on top of the video when you play it.
18
19
that you recorded -- that you downloaded?
20
Yes.
21
So these government's exhibits, the two exhibits that you
22
downloaded that day, did you put the time stamp on them?
23
Excuse me, what do you mean?
24
The videos -- not the still photos, but the videos, the
25
clips?
I just want to understand something about the time and
Right.
The video itself that's on the hard drive,
So there's no time stamp, no date on the video
38
1
No, I have the video.
The still photos are there to
reference the video, so you know what the time is on the video.
time, date or stamp on it?
Correct, sir.
And the hard drive itself, you don't know where that is?
No, sir.
And these are -- did someone direct you what to download
and what not to download?
So the video itself that -- during mixing doesn't have a
10
Well, my directions were to review it and record whatever
11
was needed.
12
And you made that decision of what was needed?
13
Yes, sir.
14
No one else?
15
No one else.
16
Now, you said there were four cameras, correct?
17
Yes.
18
Well, that's not true.
19
It's over a year ago, sir, and I'm retired.
20
Well, I understand that, but you were very positive.
21
were asked a question by the government, and you gave an
22
answer, right?
23
Yes, sir.
24
If you weren't sure, you're an officer, you've testified
25
many times, you know how to say, I'm not sure, correct?
There are six, right?
You
Is that correct?
39
1
Well, that was my recollection, sir.
So your recollection is four video cameras?
Yes.
Would your recollection be refreshed if I showed you six
videos?
It depends.
7
8
MR. SILVERT:
triple Q -- quadruple Q?
THE COURT:
10
11
Your Honor, may the witness be shown
If you have it, you can put it on the --
MR. SILVERT:
I have it on -- but just for the
witness.
12
THE COURT:
All right.
13
THE CLERK:
Sorry, Your Honor, the jury is muted.
14
THE COURT:
Yes.
Yes.
So the jury --
So you can direct him to look
15
at his screen.
16
BY MR. SILVERT:
17
18
from the hard drive?
19
Yes, sir.
20
So there are six videos?
21
Yes.
22
Six cameras?
23
Yes.
24
You chose to download only two, correct?
25
Yes.
Is this a reflection of what you -- of what you received
You're correct.
Six cameras.
40
1
And you chose to download only for a specific period of
time, right?
Right, the time that covered the event.
Right.
before, correct?
No.
Or the day before that, correct?
No.
But you could have?
10
Yes, I could have.
11
You could have downloaded other sections, other videos,
12
other than the two cameras that you decided to download,
13
correct?
14
Yes.
15
The purpose of downloading this was to preserve it so that
16
it could be used to try to determine who stole the mailbox,
17
right?
18
Correct.
19
The vehicle that's in the -- these clips, that would
20
really help determine who stole the video, correct?
21
Yes, sir.
22
If you could get a license plate, correct?
23
Yes.
24
If you could get a good shot of the car, correct?
25
Yes.
You didn't download or save what happened the day
Is that right?
41
1
So you want the best, clearest shot you could get because
then you find out who's driving the vehicle, right?
In a perfect world.
4
5
MR. SILVERT:
moment, Your Honor.
6
7
Before I leave this, Your Honor, I would ask that this

still shot be published to the jury.
THE COURT:
MR. SILVERT:
10
Could the witness be shown -- well, one
Do you want to receive it in evidence?

Yes.
Your Honor, could this be
published to the jury?
11
MR. TONG:
12
MR. SILVERT:
13
MR. TONG:
14
THE COURT:
15
Is he offering the exhibit?

I'm offering this still shot --
May I voir dire?

You may.
VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
16
BY MR. TONG:
17
18
And that appears to consist of six different still shots; is
19
that correct?
20
Yes.
21
And do you recognize those shots?
22
Yes.
23
And were they of the different locations in the Puana
24
residence?
25
Mr. Silva, you have in front of you, I guess Exhibit QQQQ.
Yes.
42
1
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
THE CLERK:
All right.
All right.
We have no objection.
Received.
I'm sorry, the Kealoha residence.

I'm sorry, counsel, I do not have QQQQ on
the list.
MR. TONG:
And we don't have the exhibit either, to
the best of my knowledge, so.
THE CLERK:
There's no updated exhibit list.
THE COURT:
All right.
So you'll get that to us, but
10
there's no objection by the government, so it is received.
11
We'll indicate it.
12
for the record.
And Mr. Silvert is to get us the hard copy
13
THE CLERK:
Your Honor, may I publish?
14
THE COURT:
Yes, publish, please.
15
(Defendant Exhibit Number QQQQ was received in
16
evidence.)
17
CROSS-EXAMINATION (Continued)
18
BY MR. SILVERT:
19
20
particular time that you would have seen from the six cameras,
21
correct?
22
Yes, sir.
23
Now, you watched each and every one of these cameras,
24
correct?
25
So, again, this is a still shot of the view at one
Yes, I watched it like that initially.
43
1
2
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, could the witness be shown
PPPP?
THE COURT:
He may.
THE CLERK:
The jury is muted.
BY MR. SILVERT:
Do you recognize that shot?
It's not up yet, sir.
THE CLERK:
MR. SILVERT:
10
THE COURT:
I'm sorry.
Counsel, is it double P?
It's quadruple P.
All right.
So your question.
11
BY MR. SILVERT:
12
Do you recognize that shot?
13
Yes.
14
Isn't that from one of the cameras?
15
Yes.
16
It's from one of the cameras you didn't download, correct?
17
Yes.
18
Isn't that a nice shot of the car?
19
It's all right.
20
If you took a still shot, you might be able to even see
21
the license plate, right?
22
No.
23
You don't think so?
24
I tried using whatever capabilities of this program to get
25
a clearer shot, but that's it.
Did you try?
44
1
Isn't that the best shot of the back of the car that you
ever saw --
I'm not sure.
-- of all the video clips that you watched?
sure?
No.
But today, if I asked you -- or asked HPD to make a better
shot of this, we couldn't because there's no hard drive left,
correct?
You're not
10
I'm not sure.
11
You said you went to the residence -- you went to the
12
residence at 9:00?
13
Excuse me -- yeah, at around 9 a.m., yeah.
14
Who directed you to go to the residence?
15
My lieutenant called me and sent me down there.
16
Who's your lieutenant?
17
Lieutenant Derek Hahn.
18
Lieutenant Hahn is the acting captain of CID?
19
At this time, I believe.
20
So he gave you orders to go to the house, correct?
21
Yes, sir.
22
And this was at 9:00 in the morning?
23
Yes, sir.
24
When you went to the house, who was there?
25
Officer Nguyen was there.
45
1
Officer Nguyen?
Yes.
And who's he from, what division?
He also works in the CIU.
And Ms. Kealoha was there?
I didn't talk to anybody except for Officer Nguyen.
Do you know if she was there?
I don't know.
Who gave you access to the house?
10
Officer Nguyen was there prior to me.
11
So he got there first?
12
Yes.
13
Even before 9:00?
14
Before I arrived, yes.
15
And this is HPD equipment?
16
about that.
17
18
it.
19
You testified on direct it was HPD equipment?
20
I didn't say it was HPD equipment.
21
So you don't know whose equipment it is?
22
It could be his private equipment.
23
So you don't know?
24
I'm not sure because I didn't install it, sir.
25
Are you aware that the report, the first report of this
I want to be perfectly clear
This is HPD equipment?
I believe so, sir.
I'm not sure because I didn't install
46
1
crime, according to the police reports, is at 1:30 in the
afternoon?
MR. TONG:
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, I have him on my witness
list.
THE COURT:
witness, you would?
8
9
Objection, Your Honor, beyond the scope.
So if you had recalled him as your

All right, I'll permit you to --
MR. SILVERT:
BY MR. SILVERT:
10
11
for the first time at 1:30 in the afternoon?
12
No, I wasn't aware of that, sir.
13
How is it that you got to the house at 9:00 in the
14
morning?
15
16
Are you aware that Katherine Kealoha reported this crime
What were you told about what you were investigating?

MR. TONG:
Well, object to the first part as
argumentative, Your Honor.
17
THE COURT:
You need a microphone closer.
18
MR. TONG:
19
Object to the first part as argumentative.
20
THE COURT:
Sure.
All right.
Overruled, it's
21
cross-examination.
22
BY MR. SILVERT:
23
You can answer the question.
24
Excuse me, can you ask that again?
25
Yeah.
How is it that you arrived at the house at 9:00 in
47
1
the morning?
What were you told?
I was told to go down there and recover the hard drive.
Did anyone tell you why?
Not initially.
When were you told?
I'm not sure, but it's after I got back to the station.
Before you looked at the video?
No, I looked at the video at the house.
How did you know what you were looking for?
You were just
10
checking that it was working?
11
Yes.
12
So you weren't looking for anything when you looked at the
13
video at the house, you were just making sure it worked?
14
Yes.
15
Then back at the police station, you were told what?
16
That a crime had occurred, and that I should look for the
17
footage.
18
What time were you told that?
19
I'm not sure, sir.
20
You know how to write police reports, correct?
21
Yes, sir.
22
You write police reports all the time, correct?
23
Yes.
24
It's your duty to do that, right?
25
Yes.
48
1
Did you write a police report detailing what you were told
to do when you arrived at the house, when you were told what
the crime was, and when you made the video?
No.
No report at all?
No.
Isn't it a disciplinary action for failing to file a
police report?
Only if I was required to.
10
And you were not required to put down any of this
11
information in a police report?
12
Not in my capacity as a tech.
13
But in your capacity as a tech, you arrive at a certain
14
time, correct?
15
Yes.
16
You're told certain things, right?
17
at a certain time, correct?
18
Yes.
19
None of that is recorded?
20
I think it's recorded on that follow-up page that I
21
submitted with the evidence.
22
23
took the video, correct?
24
Yeah.
25
And that would be at 2331, correct?
Right.
You download the video
The only thing that's recorded is the time you
49
1
No, that's the time of the occurrence of the crime.
Okay.
recovered the footage was at 8:59 in the morning, correct?
Correct, sir.
Okay.
And the time that you were assigned and that you
I'd like to show you --
MR. SILVERT:
BY MR. SILVERT:
Can it be published to the witness.
-- Exhibit -- Exhibit AA.
THE CLERK:
The jury is muted, Your Honor.
10
THE COURT:
Thank you.
11
BY MR. SILVERT:
12
Do you recognize this document?
13
Yes, sir.
14
Is this the document you prepared regarding what time you
15
were assigned and what time you recovered the videotape?
16
Yes.
17
And you recognize that you created it?
18
Yes.
19
MR. SILVERT:
One moment, Your Honor.
20
BY MR. SILVERT:
21
22
you recovered the footage, correct?
23
Yes.
24
That document doesn't state where you recovered the
25
footage?
And in that document, it states that on June 22nd at 8:59,
50
1
Well, the footage was over there at 1018 Kealaolu.
Say that again.
The hard drive was located at 1018 Kealaolu, on the top of
the page.
That says where it comes from, correct?
Yes.
So it wasn't recovered from HPD, it was recovered from the
residence?
10
11
Yeah.
The hard drive was, yeah.
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, I'm going to move this --
I'd ask that this be moved into evidence.
12
THE COURT:
13
Any objection, Mr. Tong?
14
MR. TONG:
15
MR. SILVERT:
16
THE COURT:
17
All right.
This being Exhibit AA?
Yes.
It's been identified as the
follow-up report.
18
MR. TONG:
19
MR. SILVERT:
20
That's correct.
Is it three pages?
Your Honor, it's three pages.
I'll move
the other two pages.
21
THE COURT:
22
MR. SILVERT:
23
page?
24
BY MR. SILVERT:
25
All right.
Could the witness be shown the next
This is also a document you prepared, correct?
51
1
Yes, that's the evidence sheet.
Right.
Yes.
It confirms that at 8:59 in the morning, you recovered the
evidence?
up on top -- on my tagging, where it says hallmarked --
Yes.
-- yeah.
10
You're doing this because you want to create a chain of
11
custody for the videotape, correct?
12
Yes.
13
So it's very important that this information is correct
14
because -- so no one can challenge how you got the video and
15
where it went, correct?
16
Yeah.
17
If you could turn to the next page.
18
of your report, correct?
19
Yes.
20
Same thing, it confirms 8:59 in the morning, correct?
21
Yes.
22
23
So the evidence sheet you created, correct?
No, that's -- the evidence sheet only -- oh, yeah -- well,
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, I move that AA be admitted
into evidence.
24
THE COURT:
25
MR. TONG:
This is another page
Any objection?
No objection.
52
1
THE COURT:
MR. SILVERT:
Received.
Could the first page be published to the
jury?
THE COURT:
(Defendant Exhibit Number AA was received in
evidence.)
BY MR. SILVERT:
about --
So this is the page we talked about before talking
10
11
It may.
THE CLERK:
Your Honor, sorry, the document is
published.
12
THE COURT:
The record will reflect the document is
13
published.
Your question.
14
BY MR. SILVERT:
15
16
it says you recovered the videotape at the house on a certain
17
time, correct?
18
Yes, sir.
19
And you recovered one original and one copy, correct?
20
No, that's what I submitted.
21
That's what you submitted?
22
I released the one original and copy of the surveillance
23
footage to evidence and one to the detective.
24
That's correct.
25
Yes.
This is the page we were just talking about before, where
So that's correct, right?
53
1
Okay.
If you were to change the report somehow, you would
have to do a follow-up report?
Yes, I'd have to write a follow-up.
You wouldn't use the same piece of paper and write over
it?
No, it would be a different type of follow-up form.
Right.
change a report or add something, you're going to file a
different piece of paper, correct?
Because this is the piece of paper.
10
Yes, sir.
11
Not use the exact same one?
12
Right.
13
In fact, it would be improper?
14
Yeah.
15
MR. SILVERT:
16
published to the jury anymore.
17
THE COURT:
18
MR. SILVERT:
19
THE COURT:
20
MR. SILVERT:
21
THE CLERK:
Any time you
Your Honor, if we could not have this
All right.
I'm moving on.
Let it be muted.
Could the witness be shown JJJ?
Your Honor, the jury is muted.
22
BY MR. SILVERT:
23
Do you see this form?
24
Yep.
25
Same form as the other -- as AA that we just talked about,
54
1
correct?
Right.
But there's a difference?
Well, it's a different form physically.
That's correct.
release --
7
8
THE COURT:
Well, before you have him testify about
it, would you move it into evidence?
9
10
So in the box where it says, I
MR. SILVERT:
Yes.
Your Honor, may I move it into
evidence?
11
THE COURT:
12
MR. TONG:
13
THE COURT:
14
(Defendant Exhibit Number JJJ was received in
15
No, Your Honor.

Received.
evidence.)
16
17
Any objections?
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, may it be published to the
jury?
18
THE COURT:
It may be published to the jury.
19
THE CLERK:
I'm sorry, Your Honor, the exhibit has
20
been published.
21
THE COURT:
Thank you.
22
BY MR. SILVERT:
23
This is the exact same form as we just saw, AA, correct?
24
Yeah, it's the same format.
25
But this one is different in that where it says, I release
55
1
blank originals and/or blank copies of surveillance, instead of
the typed number one, there's handwritten number four, correct?
Yes.
In fact, it looks like it's actually not even a typed
number four, it's handwritten, correct?
I'd have to see the original to be sure.
Well, did you do that?
I might have.
copies -- I did submit four disks, yeah.
Did you make that change?
That's correct.
I don't know.
You know, in the other two
10
But the government asked you -- well, I
11
asked you about Exhibit AA, and you said that was accurate, and
12
that was what you filled out, correct?
13
Yes.
14
But you altered it to be 4, 4, correct?
15
Yes.
16
You didn't use a different form as you said you would have
17
to do if you were going to change a document, correct?
18
Yes.
19
You just altered it, correct?
20
(No audible response.)
21
So departmental rules, standards of conduct in reporting
22
requires you to prepare a different report, correct?
23
24
sir.
25
I'm not sure exactly what the administrative rules say,
How long were you a police officer?
56
1
A little over 25 years.
And there's policy statements issued to police officers on
how to do -- how to behave, how to conduct, and how to file
reports, correct?
Yes, sir.
And you must have been familiar with those rules, correct?
You have to be, you're required to be, aren't you?
Yes.
You know, according to those rules, as you testified
All the time.
10
before, you can't alter a document that's already been
11
prepared, you have to prepare a new one and change it, correct?
12
13
same.
14
15
document, correct?
16
It's not the same as the other document, correct.
17
And, in fact, all the typing on it is the same except for
18
those numbers, correct?
19
Yes.
20
Even the signature at the bottom, which is yours, correct?
21
Yes.
22
Even the date, the ID number, correct?
23
Yes.
24
Even the date and time submitted, correct?
25
Yes.
All that information other than that number is all the
I understand that.
But it's not the same as the original
57
1
So you used the same form and altered it, correct?
Yes, sir.
And that's improper?
Excuse me?
That's improper.
What is your point?
It's not a point.
What's done is done, sir.
Right.
Is it proper or improper to do that?
What's done is done, so, so be it, correct?
10
Correct?
11
Correct to what?
12
So be it.
13
violated the policies of HPD, we don't care?
14
15
Doesn't matter you altered the form, you
MR. TONG:
Your Honor, this is argumentative, even if
it's cross.
16
THE COURT:
All right.
17
MR. SILVERT:
18
THE COURT:
I'll rephrase it.
Okay, thank you.
19
BY MR. SILVERT:
20
21
lot to you, right?
22
It does.
23
Do you think it's significant that the wrong document
24
might be given to the prosecution or to any prosecutor rather
25
than the correct document?
So, to you, if you alter a document doesn't really mean a
58
1
Yes, sir.
So -- okay.
you made?
They went over to the command, to the lieutenant.
So there's a property -- there's a sheet that recounts --
if you look at --
7
8
MR. SILVERT:
If we go back to AA again.
Then can we
go to the second section.
9
10
What happened to the other three copies that
This has been introduced into evidence, Your Honor.

May I have it published to the jury?
11
THE COURT:
It may be published.
12
BY MR. SILVERT:
13
14
right?
15
Yes, for the originals.
16
Right.
17
Yes, sir.
18
So if you download and you make one copy, and then you
19
make three more, this only has to be with the one copy?
20
Yes, that's just with the originals that go into evidence.
21
So the other three copies, we have no idea where they
22
went?
23
No, sir.
24
Just the one?
25
Yes.
This page, at the bottom, it says, chain of custody,
For the original, not the extra copies?
59
1
And you have no report of what happened to those other
three documents?
No, sir.
I'd ask you to look at Government Exhibit 7.
THE CLERK:
Your Honor, the jury has been muted.
THE COURT:
Thank you.
BY MR. SILVERT:
Do you recognize that document?
Yes.
10
That's the document from AA, it's the first page that only
11
has the one video, correct?
12
Right.
13
So that document ended up in the hands of the government,
14
correct?
15
If you say so.
16
Well, it's their exhibit, Government Exhibit 7.
17
MR. TONG:
18
THE COURT:
Your Honor, there's no foundation.

It calls him to speculate, so sustained.
19
Ask another question.
20
BY MR. SILVERT:
21
This isn't the altered document, correct?
22
No.
23
This isn't the one that's correct, that actually shows you
24
made four copies, correct?
25
Yes.
60
1
It's the one that shows you only made one?
Yes.
Did Katherine Kealoha see this -- see the video in your
presence?
No, not in my presence.
You had no conversation with her?
No.
MR. SILVERT:
Oh, one moment, Your Honor.
10
11
photo, but I would move to admit it.

THE COURT:
That's the vehicle.
Has it been received?
I believe we
published it, so I think it is received.
14
15
My better half.
Your Honor, I don't know if I admitted PPPP, the still
12
13
Nothing further.
MR. TONG:
No, it was not offered, and we have no
objection.
16
THE COURT:
17
MR. SILVERT:
18
THE COURT:
There's no objection.
20
THE CLERK:
Quadruple P.
21
THE COURT:
Quadruple P is received in evidence.
22
(Defendant Exhibit Number PPPP was received in
19
23
Yes.
So is that double
P?
evidence.)
24
25
Do you want to --
MR. SILVERT:
jury?
Your Honor, may we publish it to the
61
1
THE COURT:
You may.
THE CLERK:
Your Honor, quadruple P is published.
THE COURT:
Thank you.
BY MR. SILVERT:
the car, that has not been downloaded, correct?
So this is the still photo we were talking about, about
Yes.
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
10
MR. TONG:
11
Thank you.
Nothing further.
Redirect, Mr. Tong?

Yes, thank you, Your Honor.
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
12
BY MR. TONG:
13
14
a picture of a white car, correct?
15
Yes.
16
And is it true that the portions of the video that you
17
preserved in evidence also showed a white car?
18
Yes.
19
And it shows the white car driving down the street and
20
stopping, correct?
21
Yes.
22
Now, you were shown a still image showing six different
23
cameras at the residence; is that correct?
24
25
Mr. Silva, a few follow-up questions.
You were just shown
Yes.
MR. TONG:
May I see that image, please?
62
1
2
I have no objection if it's published, Your Honor,

it's in evidence.
May I ask that it be shown to the jury?
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
tell us.
It shall.
I don't know the exhibit number, he has to
QQQQ.
Does the jury have that?
THE CLERK:
BY MR. TONG:
Your Honor, the QQQQ has been published.
And Officer Silva, there appears to be a black car in at
10
least two of those images; is that correct?
11
Yes.
12
And did you know whose car that was?
13
It's the chief's car.
14
All right.
15
as a technician saving the images, correct?
16
Yes.
17
All right.
18
your memory as to how many surveillance cameras there were at
19
the house?
20
Yes.
21
And how many were present?
22
Six.
23
Now, you were asked a number of questions about these two
24
reports.
25
So that was not of particular concern to you
Having reviewed Exhibit QQQQ, did that refresh
MR. TONG:
We can remove that, if you would, please.
63
1
BY MR. TONG:
"altered" -- let's take a look at Exhibit AAA, please.
The two reports -- and I'll use Mr. Silvert's word
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
MR. SILVERT:
MR. TONG:
THE CLERK:
MR. TONG:
10
THE CLERK:
If we may have that published, Your Honor?

You may.
It's double A.
Double A.
I'm sorry, that's triple -Double A, Defense Exhibit double A, please.
Your Honor, the exhibit has been
11
published.
12
BY MR. TONG:
13
14
seizing the evidence from the Kealoha residence; is that
15
correct?
16
Yes.
17
And I believe the part that Mr. Silvert was focused on,
18
first off, it did document the location of the seizure; is that
19
correct?
20
Yes.
21
1018 Kealaolu Avenue, correct?
22
Yes.
23
As well as the time of the events, June 21, '13, at
24
11:31 p.m., correct?
25
Okay.
Yes.
And this is the document that you prepared after
64
1
And these items, the equipment checklist represent the
items that you testified to earlier that you did to assure that
the system was working; is that correct?
Yes.
And everything that was working, you initialled NS; is
that correct?
Yes.
All right.
this portion, where you said you released one original and one
And it seems that you were questioned about
10
copy, correct?
11
Yes.
12
And right below that, there's the section that says the
13
original went into evidence and the copy went to the detective;
14
is that correct?
15
Yes.
16
Now, what's the purpose of documenting that the original
17
went into HPD evidence?
18
19
you want it to be true and accurate and not have anybody
20
blaming later.
21
22
evidence room; is that correct?
23
Correct.
24
And that's why when you saw the exhibit, it reflected
25
everybody that had touched the evidence after it was put into
The original is the one that's the most important because
And once it gets into evidence, it's maintained by the
65
1
the evidence room, correct?
it shows the chain of custody, yeah.
could?
into evidence, and who accepted it into evidence.
I don't think -- oh, yeah, from me to whoever it went to,
And chain of custody means what, to the jury, if you
Just making sure that, from my hands, that original went
And if it's been removed from evidence for any reason,
it'll document who it went from in evidence and who it went to,
10
so that we know that there was no time, you know -- or there's
11
continuity that nothing had been tampered with, yeah.
12
13
MR. TONG:
And if we may please see -- have published
page two of Exhibit AA, please.
14
THE COURT:
May we, Your Honor?
You may.
15
BY MR. TONG:
16
Do you have that in front of you, Mr. Silva?
17
Yes.
18
MR. TONG:
And do the jurors have that in front of
19
you?
Okay.
20
BY MR. TONG:
21
22
page two of Exhibit AA.
23
That's the evidence sheet.
24
Okay.
25
Yes.
And, Mr. Silva, could you explain what this document is,
And did you prepare that document?
66
1
And that basically shows when you placed evidence into the
evidence --
Room, yes.
-- custodian's care, correct?
Yes.
And there's a section in the middle that I'm trying to
circle called chain of custody, correct?
Yes.
And what does that represent?
10
That represents that I put two items into evidence, and
11
the receiver was Johnette Moses from the evidence room.
12
Now the other document that you were shown, Exhibit JJJ --
13
MR. TONG:
May we publish that, Your Honor?
14
THE COURT:
You may.
15
THE CLERK:
Your Honor, JJJ, previously admitted, is
16
published.
17
BY MR. TONG:
18
19
copies to evidence and copy to the detective, correct?
20
Yes.
21
Was there any difference in the evidence that you released
22
to the detective, the extra three copies, between the copies
23
and the original placed in evidence?
24
No.
25
You just -- what did you do to create those copies?
It says you put four copies -- four original and/or four
67
1
I made them -- when I'm making them, I actually make them
in the same sequence, so the exact same copy is made.
reflects -- the original one reflects that four items were put
in evidence; is that correct?
Yes.
The CDs and the various stills, correct?
Yes.
Okay.
Okay.
And your evidence custodian report actually
Is it unusual to give extra copies of digital
10
evidence to officers working on an investigation?
11
No.
12
Why not?
13
Because they need to review things and just part of doing
14
an investigation.
15
16
the one original?
17
Well, because you don't want to take it out unnecessarily.
18
And apart from reflecting that three extra copies were
19
made, are there changes in the substance of your follow-up
20
report, which is Exhibit JJJ, from the original one, which is
21
Exhibit AA?
22
Why can't they just go into the evidence room and look at
No.
23
MR. TONG:
24
THE COURT:
25
MR. TONG:
May I have one moment, Your Honor?

You may.
68
1
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
THE CLERK:
Your Honor, we can leave this up.
Fine.
Give Mr. Tong a few seconds.
Yes, please.
I'm sorry, Counsel.
The jury is muted
currently.
THE COURT:
No, I think he wants it up for this --
THE CLERK:
Put it back up.
THE COURT:
Display it, please, for the jury.
It's now displayed.
10
RECROSS-EXAMINATION
11
BY MR. SILVERT:
12
13
the videotape?
14
The four disks, yeah, they were submitted.
15
There were four disks submitted?
16
Yes.
17
So this is now one original of each disk?
18
Yes.
19
You were only asked to introduce two disks?
20
Yes.
21
When you said in this form, 4 originals, 4 originals of
THE COURT:
What's your question?
22
BY MR. SILVERT:
23
Are there four disks or two disks of -- that you made?
24
There are four in evidence.
25
There are four disks in evidence?
69
1
Yes.
MR. SILVERT:
Okay.
And if we can go to the second
page of AA.
BY MR. SILVERT:
custody.
Yes.
When did you make the copies?
I made the copies at a later time.
10
When?
11
Before I submitted it.
12
So you didn't submit any evidence for chain of custody
13
until July 1st --
14
Correct.
15
-- correct?
Mr. Tong was asking you questions about the chain of
16
So you recovered the tapes on June 22nd, correct?
Mr. Puana was arrested on June 29th, correct?
THE COURT:
Are you asking him when Mr. Puana was
17
arrested?
Do you know?
18
BY MR. SILVERT:
19
Do you know if Mr. Puana was arrested June 29th?
20
I'm not aware of his arrest.
21
So you kept the disk in your personal pockets or hands or
22
desk until --
23
In a locked file cabinet --
24
In a locked file cabinet?
25
-- that I only have access to.
70
1
A chain of custody is supposed to prevent any questioning
about the validity of a document, correct?
Yes, sir.
Wouldn't the chain of custody start with you, once you
seized it?
It did.
Okay.
submit it until July 1st, correct?
Yes, sir.
10
Go back to first page.
11
release any of the videos to Detective Akagi until July 1st,
12
correct?
13
Of the copies I released to him, yeah.
14
Where does it say that?
15
It doesn't say that.
16
So go back to JJJ.
17
4 copies, right?
18
Yes, sir.
19
That one also says you didn't release anything to
20
Detective Akagi until July 1st?
21
Yes.
22
So when you got the video with all the copies, however
23
many you made, no one but yourself had that until July 1st,
24
2013?
25
And then you didn't put it into -- you didn't
This form says that you did not
JJJ is the form where you said you had
Well, I had possession of it, and other officers did
71
1
review the tape.
Wouldn't you keep a record of other people reviewing it?
No.
Isn't that part of the chain of custody?
No.
So anybody can come and review the videos, copies,
whatever, and you don't keep a record?
No, because I'm present.
Do you have a memory of that happening?
10
Of?
11
Of anyone coming and looking at the video?
12
I believe some of our officers that were involved in the
13
investigation did come to my office and reviewed it.
14
Who?
15
Officer Nguyen.
16
From CIU?
17
Yes.
18
been or officers from that unit.
19
20
have just come and taken a look, correct?
21
Yes, sir.
22
So it couldn't be possible that a video was shown to
23
someone else that you wouldn't know about?
24
25
original.
It never left my control.
And I'm not sure who the other detectives might have
But they wouldn't have removed it from you, they would
It could be possible they had a copy, but not the
72
1
But you didn't let any copies go, correct?
Not until July
1st, correct?
detective, yeah.
didn't let any of the copies out of your possession before July
1st, correct?
No, I said I didn't let any of the originals out.
You said a moment ago that people would come and look at
Those are just the ones that I have that I gave to the
I understand that, but you testified just a minute ago you
10
the videotape at your office, correct?
11
Yes.
12
If they have copies, they don't have to go to your office
13
and look at anything, do they?
14
15
Could I clarify, Your Honor?

THE COURT:
Yes, you can.
But you have to wait till
16
he finishes his question, and you have to wait until he
17
finishes his answer.
18
What is your answer, sir?
19
THE WITNESS:
Well, you got to realize that I
20
recovered a hard drive that he can play back and forth over and
21
over again, and that's for whoever came to see it.
22
But I made copies to give to the guys that have to go
23
out on the road.
24
went after that.
25
BY MR. SILVERT:
And so I don't know who saw it or where it
73
1
So let's just get this clear, you made extra copies,
correct?
Yes.
Which you didn't report in your original form, correct?
Yes.
And at some point, you made some extra copies, correct?
Yes.
And you let them out, anybody could have them, correct?
No, not anybody, just whoever was involved in the case.
10
But you didn't write a report keeping track of anybody who
11
looked at those videos or took it out, right?
12
Correct.
13
So you don't know who took it out, correct?
14
That's what I'm telling you, sir.
15
So it could have been someone not involved in the case,
16
correct?
17
Not -- after it leaves my hands, I don't know.
18
Right.
19
right?
20
Yes.
21
Did Detective Akagi -- is the first time he got his hands
22
on a copy of the report July 1st, 2013?
23
I'm not sure.
24
Do you have any memory of him coming in earlier?
25
He was -- I don't even know when he was assigned to the
You don't even write down who you give it to,
74
1
case.
video?
No.
Did Louis Kealoha come into your room and look at the
video?
No.
Did Bobby Nguyen come into your room and look at the
video?
Did Katherine Kealoha come into your room and look at the
10
Yes.
11
When?
12
The morning that we got it.
13
So the very day you got it, Bobby Nguyen came into your
14
office and saw it, and you remember that?
15
16
yeah.
17
But you're sure of that?
18
I can't tell you the time, but I am pretty sure he saw the
19
video that day.
20
Did you make a report of that?
21
No.
22
So it's just your memory today that that happened?
23
Yes.
24
Do you know his significance to this case?
25
No.
I'm not sure of when because I was reviewing the footage,
75
1
2
MR. TONG:
that.
3
4
Your Honor, I object to the relevance of
MR. SILVERT:
There's no report whatsoever that Bobby
Nguyen saw --
THE COURT:
Overruled.
BY MR. SILVERT:
the video the day you got it?
Do you know the significance of Bobby Nguyen looking at
Can you rephrase the question, sir?
10
11
Ask the next question.
THE COURT:
Does he know why, the reason for it, is
that what you're asking?
12
MR. SILVERT:
13
THE COURT:
I'll ask that.
Okay.
14
BY MR. SILVERT:
15
16
the day you got it?
17
Because he was part of the investigation.
18
He was part of the investigation into the theft of one of
19
his closest relative's mailbox?
20
I don't understand what you're saying.
21
Sure.
22
conduct that you have to abide by as a police officer, correct?
23
Yes.
24
One of those standards of conduct is that you may not
25
participate in an investigation if it's -- if it's of yourself
Do you know why Bobby Nguyen was able to look at the video
I'll put it another way.
There are standards of
76
1
or a family member, correct?
MR. TONG:
Your Honor, I object to this line of
questioning unless there's a foundation that he had some role
in assigning people or doing the investigation itself.
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
I'm just asking --
Wait.
Stop.
officer.
officer, not as a supervisor.
Overruled.
He's a police
He's asking for his general knowledge as a police
Do you understand the question?
10
THE WITNESS:
11
THE COURT:
12
THE WITNESS:
13
THE COURT:
Yes.
Do you have an answer?

Yes.
Okay.
Please.
14
BY MR. SILVERT:
15
And what's the answer?
16
It depends on the circumstance.
17
All right.
18
circumstance, correct?
19
20
a case that you're not involved, but if you're directly a part
21
of it then you've got to do your job.
22
23
conflict of interest, you're supposed to tell your superior,
24
correct?
25
No.
So the rule can be iffy depending upon the
I mean, you wouldn't want to just involve yourself in
But if you're directly a part of it and you have a
I believe so.
77
1
And then the superior officer would decide whether you
should continue in the investigation or not, correct?
Yes.
Did he -- did Bobby Nguyen come into the room with anybody
else?
Excuse me?
Did he come into the room to watch the video with anyone
else?
No.
10
He was by himself?
11
Yes.
12
Did he tell you who gave him the authority to come in?
13
He works in my office.
14
So anyone who works in your office can come and look at
15
the video, and you don't ask why?
16
He was there when I recovered it.
17
He was at the house when you recovered it?
18
Yes.
19
Bobby Nguyen?
20
THE COURT:
Yes, that's his testimony.
Ask the next
21
question.
22
BY MR. SILVERT:
23
Did he watch the video at the house with you?
24
He did review it shortly while I was doing the tasks and
25
checking to make sure that everything was correct.
78
1
At the house?
At the house.
And then subsequently, he comes to the HPD and watches it
again?
Yes.
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
8
9
Thank you.
No further questions.
Any other questions, Mr. Tong?

REDIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. TONG:
10
Just to clarify, once you seized the hard drive, you put
11
it in your office, correct?
12
Yes.
13
And where did you keep it?
14
I kept it in a locked filing drawer that I only have
15
access to.
16
17
mean other people in the unit could get into the locked drawer
18
without your consent?
19
20
knew the combination to.
21
22
evidence room, correct?
23
Yes.
24
But the copies that you made were viewable by others --
25
Yes.
And when you say only you had access, I mean, does that
No, because it had a combination lock on it that I only

It was my personal lock.
So they could only see the original through you or the
79
1
-- is that correct?
Okay.
And you mentioned that Officer Nguyen was at
the house when you recovered the CDs -- or the video; is that
correct?
Yeah.
Did you know where he lived at the time?
No.
The hard drive, yeah.
MR. TONG:
MR. SILVERT:
10
11
Okay.
THE COURT:
Thank you.
Nothing further.
All right.
And that's both on your direct
that you would have called him as a witness?
12
MR. SILVERT:
13
THE COURT:
That's correct.
All right.
Thank you, sir.
14
excused as a witness.
15
anyone until the conclusion of the trial.
16
sir.
17
You're
Please don't discuss your testimony with

Good day to you,
So, ladies and gentlemen, I think this would be a good
18
time for our recess.
And is 20 minutes, is that sufficient?
19
All right, so a 20-minute recess.
20
notebooks on your chairs, and don't discuss the case or allow
21
anyone to discuss it with you.
And please leave your
22
Please rise for the jury.
23
(At 10:18 a.m., the jury was excused, and the
24
25
following proceedings were held:)

THE COURT:
And we're in recess for 20 minutes.
80
1
2
Mr. Tong, if you could have your next witness, right

before the recess, take the stand.
(Whereupon, a short recess was taken.)
(The following proceedings were held in open court in
the presence of the jury:)
6
7
THE COURT:
The record will reflect the presence of
the ladies and gentlemen of the jury, counsel, and Mr. Puana.
Mr. Tong, your next witness.
MR. TONG:
10
Honor.
11
12
The United States calls Louis Kealoha, Your
THE COURT:
Good morning, sir.
oath.
13
(Witness sworn.)
14
THE CLERK:
15
If you would take the
Please state your first name and your last
name, and spell your first and last name.
16
THE WITNESS:
17
Louis Kealoha, L-O-U-I-S.

DIRECT EXAMINATION
18
BY MR. TONG:
19
Good morning, sir.
20
Good morning.
21
What is your occupation?
22
I'm a police officer with the Honolulu Police Department.
23
And what is your position within the Honolulu Police
24
Department?
25
I'm the chief of police.
81
1
What are your duties as the chief of police?
I run one of the largest police departments in the nation.
That has to do with managing the budget, keeping our citizens
safe through public safety, and networking and partnering with
the community.
And how long have you been chief of the HPD?
Five years.
How long was your appointment initially?
Five years.
10
And what is the status of your present employment?
11
I was just appointed to a second five-year term.
12
Okay.
13
Department?
14
I'm going on 32 years.
15
What types of positions have you held before becoming
16
chief?
17
18
worked in the narcotics vice division, the criminal
19
investigation division, juvenile services division, and the
20
training division, and also the -- we had an accreditation
21
office.
22
23
consists of, starting with high school?
24
25
have a two-year associate's degree from the Leeward Community
And how long have you been with the Honolulu Police
I've worked in the patrol division for about 12 years.
Could you tell the jury what your formal education
I'm a 1978 graduate of Damien Memorial High School.
82
1
College, University of Hawaii.
I have a four-year degree in
criminal justice and business administration from Wayland
Baptist University.
University in criminal justice.
education from the University of Southern California.
Are you married?
Yes, I am.
What is your spouse's name?
Katherine Kealoha.
10
And how long have the two of you been married?
11
18 years.
12
What is her occupation?
13
She is a prosecutor with the city prosecutor's office.
14
And I assume, over the last 18 years, you have met some of
15
her family members?
16
Yes, I have.
17
Do you know someone named Gerard Puana?
18
Yes, I do.
19
And what is the relationship between Katherine Kealoha and
20
Gerard Puana?
21
Gerard is Katherine's uncle.
22
And if you were to see Mr. Puana, would you recognize him?
23
Yes, I would.
24
Do you see him in court today?
25
Yes.
I have a graduate degree from Chaminade

And I have a doctorate of
83
1
Could you identify him by pointing him out and indicating
an article of his clothing?
glasses.
He is seated to my left in the aloha shirt and wearing
5
6
MR. TONG:
May the record reflect the identification
of the defendant, Gerard Puana?
THE COURT:
It shall.
BY MR. TONG:
How did you meet the defendant?
10
I've known the defendant for over 30 years, even before I
11
came into the police department.
12
30-plus years ago.
13
14
your interaction with the defendant in the 30 years you've
15
known him?
16
17
cordial.
18
and bye, talk to him in passing.
19
We used to go to the same gym
And can you describe generally for the jury the nature of
Basically, from when we were at the gym, we were just

I never worked out with him.
I used to tell him hi
But after that, I saw him, like around in the '90s, he
20
was working as a security officer at the Aiea Shopping Center,
21
and my mom had a restaurant there, and I saw him there.
22
And then later on when I started going out with
23
Katherine, it wasn't until we were married that I saw him
24
again, and he came to our wedding.
25
And after that, I saw him sporadically, but the most
84
1
that I've seen him in recent history was when he was helping us
to remodel our home.
your home.
I was living in Kahala.
And can you give us the approximate timeframe when you
were doing this remodelling?
It was basically between 2006 and 2008.
And what kind of work were you doing?
10
We were remodelling the inside and outside of the house,
11
and that involved plumbing, electrical, and laying down new
12
tile floors, and also doing a roof.
13
14
the repairs?
15
16
plumber, is the one that helped us with the remodelling.
17
18
remodelling?
19
20
some contact with Gerard, and then Gerard started to come to
21
our house.
22
23
remodeled, how often would the defendant come to your
24
residence?
25
Okay.
Let's talk a little bit about the remodelling of

Where were you living at the time?
Was there a contractor or some responsible person handling
My father-in-law, who's a retired contractor and a master
And how is it that the defendant was involved in the
That is my father-in-law's brother, and so I guess he had
Okay.
And during the time that your house was being
Maybe five days a week.
And, you know, at least a year, I
85
1
would say.
Had he been inside the house?
He's been inside the house.
Outside the house?
Outside.
And what were the circumstances under which you would see
him at your house?
the back, and he would be working on that cottage.
10
He knows every inch of that house.
He would -- he would be -- we have this small cottage in

You know,
he would be working inside of the house.
11
I would see him when I came home after work.
12
never came home early, like in the mornings, but I used to see
13
him when I came home after work.
14
15
unexpectedly?
16
Absolutely.
17
Can you give us a few examples?
18
Well, one time -- I think it was -- well, what happened is
19
myself and my daughter, we were swimming in the pool.
20
we're just enjoying ourselves and playing around.
21
of a sudden, Gerard suddenly appears.
22
while we were in the pool.
23
daughter is startled, because the front gate -- we have two
24
front gates, one is a metal front gate and one is a --
25
And I
Were there times when he would come to your house
MR. SILVERT:
And
And then all
He walks towards us
And he's startled, I'm startled, my
Objection, Your Honor, sidebar.
404(b).
86
1
THE COURT:
(Sidebar.)
THE COURT:
Okay.
All right.
The record will reflect the
presence of Mr. Silvert, Mr. Tong, and Ms. Hattan.
Mr. Silvert.
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, it appears the government is
attempting to introduce evidence of a prior bad act, possibly a
trespass or burglary.
MR. TONG:
No 404(b) notice was given of this.
It's not a bad act.
It's designed to show
10
his knowledge and familiarity with the premises, which I think
11
goes to bias and motive, and whether he would be the person
12
shown on the video, whether he would have the familiarity with
13
the place to the degree that he would commit that act.
14
THE COURT:
Is there going to be any testimony
15
elicited about any -- either a report to the police or any
16
accusations?
17
MR. TONG:
18
accusations.
19
event.
20
No.
There were no criminal charges, no
He's never suggested that it was a criminal
MR. SILVERT:
Right.
But the problem is that the
21
crime occurred in the front of the house.
He's -- the way he's
22
just testified, he was startled, like, you know, he wasn't
23
expected to be there, how could he get in.
24
to solicit testimony about the gate being closed and locked or
25
whatever.
He was just about
This is a prior bad act, and I would move to -- that
87
1
it not be allowed in.
THE COURT:
It's not a prior bad act.
It's a prior
showing that he is comfortable opening their gate and walking
into the back of their house.
5
6
MR. TONG:
but --
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
9
10
Actually, I think he did jump the gate,
said, I agree.
Yeah.
-- with the exception of what you just
And it's to show familiarity.
There's going to
be no suggestion that there was a criminal charge or an act.
11
MR. SILVERT:
But if there's any testimony that the
12
gate was locked or anything is the inference that he somehow
13
jumped it or did something, that's the bad act.
14
trespass.
15
MR. TONG:
That's the
If the court is inclined to view it as a
16
404(b) rule of inclusion, you can give a cautionary
17
instruction.
18
We have no objection to that.
THE COURT:
No -- okay.
But -- okay, I'm going to
19
overrule the objection.
20
you're not to go into anything that -- you know, because he is
21
a police officer, he can assess whether or not --
22
MR. TONG:
23
THE COURT:
24
MR. TONG:
25
gets.
I'll permit the questioning.
But
I'm not going to ask him that.

That's what I'm saying.
If Mr. Silvert does, he may get what he
88
1
2
THE COURT:
Right.
But I'm not going to permit any
questioning down that line.
MR. SILVERT:
And that includes whether the gate was
locked or unlocked, because if he says it's locked, then the
clear inference is that he impermissibly entered the property.
So they can't go to whether the gate was locked or closed or
anything.
8
9
10
THE COURT:
Well, it's completely relevant to his
knowledge and comfort level in terms of walking around the

house, whether he thinks people are there or not.
11
MR. SILVERT:
But they can get that in, which they've
12
already done, but if they try to go down the road that the gate
13
was locked or somehow closed, and that he, therefore,
14
improperly entered the property, that's 404(b).
15
their evidence in without doing that.
16
17
THE COURT:
They can get
It's not that he improperly entered the
property.
18
MR. SILVERT:
It is if the gate -- if the gate is
19
closed or locked, it means he improperly came.
20
they didn't invite him, which is what they've already testified
21
to.
22
locked or closed, that's the criminal conduct.
23
act.
24
25
He wasn't --
And he -- if they introduce evidence that the gate was
THE COURT:
I disagree with you.
That's the bad
I think the
testimony is clear they invited him on the property.
They knew
89
1
that --
2
3
MR. TONG:
was not expecting him, and he was startled.
MR. SILVERT:
startled.
he's comfortable --
THE COURT:
They invited him generally, but that day he
And that he was startled, they were
They've got that in that he knows how to get in,
Anyway, I've ruled.
It's overruled.
You
can keep questioning him.
(End of sidebar.)
10
THE COURT:
11
BY MR. TONG:
12
Your next question.
I apologize, Chief, I don't recall exactly where we were.
13
You were discussing an incident where you and your
14
daughter were in the pool in the back of your house, and the
15
defendant appeared unexpectedly, correct?
16
Yes.
17
Can you describe what happened?
18
Well, we were shocked because the front gate and the side
19
gates were both locked.
20
MR. SILVERT:
21
THE COURT:
22
THE WITNESS:
Your Honor, objection.
Overruled.
Both were locked.
He suddenly appears,
23
he looks startled, we looked startled.
And then he says that
24
he's there to pick up his toolbox, which was on the side of the
25
house.
90
1
With that, I went into the house, called Katherine,
told her, your uncle is here, and, you know, maybe he wants to
talk to you.
He said something that sticks out in my mind --
THE COURT:
Okay, wait, now this is a narrative.
Do
you want to ask a question?
BY MR. TONG:
What did he say?
He said he was there for his toolbox.
10
Okay.
11
And just to go into his -- he was dishevelled, he didn't
12
have a shirt on, he was profusely sweating.
13
remember he had this cigarette in his mouth that wasn't lit,
14
and it was bent up, like he ran into a wall or something.
15
And then Katherine spoke to him.
And I always
I took my daughter
16
into the house.
17
driveway, but he didn't take it with him at that time.
18
then he left.
19
Okay.
20
There's a second time after that, that he came to our
21
house uninvited.
22
23
24
25
And he took his toolbox and put it in the

And
Could you describe the circumstances of the second time.

MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, I'm going to make my same
objection.
THE COURT:
Overruled.
It's speculative at this
91
1
point.
THE WITNESS:
Basically, my friend and I were sitting
in the garage.
the driveway, and he asks to speak to Katherine.
5
6
Gerard pulls up in a classic car, parks it in
I go into the house.
Katherine, your uncle is here,
he wants to talk to you.
And I remember them standing in front of the driveway
next to the street talking for about an hour.
BY MR. TONG:
10
11
Okay.
Now --
THE COURT:
Do we have a time for this?
12
BY MR. TONG:
13
Can you give us the approximate time when that occurred?
14
It was maybe about 9:00 in the evening.
15
THE COURT:
What year?
16
BY MR. TONG:
17
What about year?
18
The first time, the one where he came to our house
19
uninvited when we were swimming in the pool, was about 2011.
20
The second time was 2012.
21
Okay.
22
Okay.
23
-- to June the 22nd of 2013.
24
Okay.
25
Do you remember an incident that you noticed on that
Now, I'm going to move you forward one year --
92
1
particular day?
Yes.
What did you see?
I woke up early in the morning.
usually go out surfing.
6:00.
out, and I noticed our mailbox isn't there.
10
I proceeded to drive
And I was so frustrated because of all the other

incidents that was occurring at my house that I decided to wait
and report it and let my wife know when I came home.
11
I came home about maybe 9:30 that morning, and I told
12
my wife what had happened.
13
14
talk first about the mailbox.
15
mailbox was?
16
17
street on the Koko Head side of the property.
18
It's in front of the house?
19
Yes.
20
What did you and your wife use the mailbox for?
21
We used that to collect mail.
22
Okay.
23
No, I know what you're saying.
24
-- I need to know.
25
It was about maybe between 5:30 and
I loaded up my board on the car.
8
9
It was a weekend.
Okay.
Let's break that down into smaller segments.
Let's
Can you describe where the
The mailbox was located on a grass median close to the
Sounds like a stupid question, but --
So the post office would come and put your mail in
93
1
that particular box; is that correct?
Yes.
And can you describe the type of box that it was?
Gee, the dimensions was maybe --
Well, how about just generally, without being overly
specific.
It was a metal box.
Okay.
And it was on a metal stand.
10
Okay.
11
And the mailbox was attached to the metal stand.
12
had -- it was locked, and they had slits in there so that you
13
could insert your mail.
14
15
that day you noticed that the box was missing?
16
Yes.
17
What was there?
18
Just the post.
19
All right.
20
21
I mean, is it plastic, metal?
All right.
And they
And you say that as you left your property
MR. TONG:
And may Chief Kealoha please be shown
Exhibit 3.
22
THE COURT:
He may.
23
If you would look at the screen.
24
THE WITNESS:
25
THE CLERK:
Okay.
Do you want the original?
94
1
MR. TONG:
Yes, please.
Oh, no, the screen is fine.
THE CLERK:
Your Honor, the jury is muted.
THE COURT:
Thank you.
BY MR. TONG:
Chief, do you have Exhibit 3 on your screen to your right?
Yes, sir.
And do you recognize that picture?
Yes.
What does it show?
10
That's the mailbox post without the mailbox.
11
And does that fairly and accurately depict the appearance
12
of that pedestal on the date in question, June the 22nd of
13
2013?
14
Yes, it does.
15
MR. TONG:
16
MR. SILVERT:
17
THE COURT:
18
MR. TONG:
19
THE COURT:
It may be published.
20
MR. TONG:
21
(Government Exhibit Number 3 was received in
22
23
We would ask that Exhibit 3 be received.

No objection.
Received.
May it be --
evidence.)
THE CLERK:
24
to the jury.
25
BY MR. TONG:
Your Honor, the exhibit has been published
95
1
All right.
THE COURT:
Thank you.
BY MR. TONG:
of this.
describing?
Yes.
And what is this little piece that appears to be sticking
out on top?
And, Chief Kealoha, I'm going to just highlight the middle

Am I correct that's the post that you were
10
That's the piece that connected the mailbox to the post.
11
All right.
12
appearance that you saw?
13
Yes, sir.
14
And you testified that you then went out and went surfing?
15
Yes.
16
And Katherine reported it?
17
Yes.
18
Now at the time of this event, June of 2013, what, if any,
19
security system did you have at your house?
20
21
the back.
22
And who did those cameras and system belong to?
23
The Honolulu Police Department.
24
Why did the Honolulu Police Department install those
25
cameras, if you know?
And when you went out that day, this is the
We had several cameras on the front of the house and in
96
1
That was based on their advice.
Okay.
It was basically to provide security not just for myself,
but also because of my family and -- yeah.
expressed a sense of frustration when you saw this mailbox had
been ripped off the post --
Yes.
-- correct?
Okay.
And it was to provide security for you?
Now, earlier, in describing the events, you
And you started to go into events, and I
10
stopped you, do you remember that?
11
Yes.
12
Can you describe generally the types of events that you
13
had encountered or experienced that led to this frustration?
14
15
doors were French doors, they were double-paned.
16
it was just before I became appointed, somebody had shot out
17
the glass pane.
18
In early 2009, before I was the police chief, our front

And in 2008,
And I made a police report.
After I became the chief of police, somebody shot out
19
the other side.
20
criminal intelligence unit.
21
would be in front of my house yelling profanities, like F you,
22
don't touch me, and you can't arrest me.
23
And at that time I had reported it to the

But these -- other times, somebody
There were also times where -- and I cannot speak for
24
my wife, so you have to ask her that -- but the second set,
25
when we put up the second set of doors in 2012, somebody came
97
1
in again and -- gone onto the property.
kicked the pane in again.
It looks like they
But going back, the reason why I had put up -- had the
advice to put up a security system occurred after Gerard came
to our house when we were in the pool the second time because I
was afraid for the safety of my family.
described, the defendant was never charged with anything in
connection with those incidents, correct?
Okay.
And just to be fair, these incidents that you've
10
No.
11
And when you say somebody shot out your door, what kind of
12
weapon are we talking about?
13
14
vividly remember -- I don't have the date, but I remember
15
coming home one day after a business trip, and the right side
16
of the door was shattered on the first set of doors.
It looks like it was a pellet gun that was used.
17
I just
And I walked into the house and said, what happened,
18
and my daughter said, I don't know.
19
I heard a loud bang.
20
That's why I'm out here.
And, you know, all of those incidents really made me
21
fearful for the safety of my family.
22
23
your testimony that you have a daughter who was living with you
24
at all these relevant times?
25
Okay.
Yes.
And without giving a specific age, I gather from
98
1
Okay.
Now, let's talk a little bit about the surveillance
system.
recommendation, correct?
Yes.
And how many cameras were there, do you know?
You know, we started out with two at the garage, on both
sides, and then one looking at the front gate.
three that I recall.
Okay.
10
But they had installed more because after the second set
11
of new doors that we had put in, when the window was shattered,
12
it looked like they came over the back wall because when the
13
officers came to check the video -- the VCR or the CD player,
14
and they checked it, which was located in the garage, somebody
15
had disconnected it.
16
the back.
You testified that it was installed by HPD at their
17
Those are the
So it looks like the person came in from
So after that happened, they had put a couple cameras
18
in the back of the house and then one on a pole just outside of
19
my house.
20
21
of the incident where your mailbox was destroyed?
22
Yes.
23
And that was taken from a couple of cameras in front of
24
the house; is that correct?
25
Okay.
Yes.
And am I correct that you have actually seen video
99
1
Were those cameras in place at the house at the time when
the defendant was working, doing the construction work at your
residence?
No.
They came later?
They came about 2011.
it for me, again, was the safety of my family.
that.
Okay.
10
And what happened, what triggered
Now, I'm going to actually -- well, let me withdraw
There came a time when you learned that the actual
11
incident had been recorded on video; is that correct?
12
Yes.
13
And have you reviewed the video recordings?
14
I have.
15
All right.
16
going to ask the court for permission to play government's
17
Exhibit 1, which is a CD, and have you look at it.
18
19
So what I would like to do, Chief, is I'm
MR. TONG:
And if we may, Your Honor, may we publish
it also to the jury?
20
THE COURT:
21
MR. TONG:
22
Does Mr. Nakamura have the video?
23
THE CLERK:
24
MR. TONG:
25
BY MR. TONG:
Yes.
Thank you.
Oh, you need the original?

Yes.
100
1
show where your mailbox is located?
Yes.
And could you tell us where it is?
On the bottom left.
Would it be the area that I'm circling here?
Yes.
8
9
I have a quick question before we go on.
MR. TONG:
All right.
Ms. Morita, if you could please
continue the video.
10
(Exhibit 1 video played.)
11
MR. SILVERT:
12
Does this video
Your Honor, can we stop it right here,
and can I make a brief objection?
13
THE COURT:
It's already received in evidence.
14
MR. SILVERT:
I understand that, but the video seems
15
to be hiccuping, it's going very slow.
16
Could I ask them to restart it, so it goes in realtime.
17
18
MR. TONG:
Wait.
It's not in realtime.
I object to his statement.
I don't
agree with it.
19
THE COURT:
20
MR. TONG:
You can have an opportunity -Time out, time out.
I'm sorry, Your Honor,
21
we actually talked over where the offender appeared.
22
back it up, so we can --
23
THE COURT:
May we
Well, so for completeness, why don't you
24
just start it from the beginning, so it's not highlighted,
25
yeah.
101
1
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
I mean, it's a video.
MR. TONG:
Did the court want to take up the objection
first?
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
MR. SILVERT:
10
All right.
THE COURT:
Very good.
Your Honor, we have it.
All right.
MR. SILVERT:
14
THE COURT:
Thank you.
If you would,
jury.
It's the exact same copy.
All right.
It may be published to the
It's received.
16
MR. SILVERT:
17
beginning or whatever you want?
Do you want to replay it from the
18
MR. TONG:
19
MR. SILVERT:
20
MR. TONG:
21
run from there, that's fine.
Just from about the one minute mark.

You tell us where you want it.
Right there is good.
MR. SILVERT:
23
THE COURT:
24

BY MR. TONG:
Just if you'll let it
Thank you.
22
25
We're happy to
please.
13
15
I think that will solve the problem.
let the government play it.
11
12
We should be able
to do that.
4
5
Okay.
Is it published to the jury?
Yes, publish it to the jury.
102
1
Okay.
Chief, before I ask you questions about that video,
you saw it, right?
Yes.
All right.
ago, correct?
Yes.
Was there another video?
That looks like a different angle.
Okay.
And that's one of the videos you saw some time
And you mentioned earlier this one looks like it
10
was sort of from up above, correct?
11
Yes.
12
And was there a camera high somewhere?
13
There was a camera on a -- it was like a telephone pole.
14
Okay.
15
and ask you to look at that, and then I'll ask you about the
16
contents.
Now, what I'd like to do is show you another video
17
MR. TONG:
May we play Exhibit 2, Your Honor?
18
THE COURT:
You may.
19
MR. TONG:
Thank you.
20
21
BY MR. TONG:
22
Okay.
23
Yes.
24
And first off, there was a black car or SUV in the
25
foreground?
Chief, did you see that video as well?
103
1
Yes.
Whose car was that?
That was my car.
And with regard to the incident involving the mailbox, do
you recognize the person that appeared in those videos?
Yes, I do.
And who was it?
Gerard Puana.
And is that the defendant in this case?
10
Yes, it is.
11
And how do you recognize from those videos the individual
12
as being the defendant?
13
14
walks.
15
the -- our home, that's the kind of clothes that he wore,
16
long-sleeved tee shirt, the cargo pants, and the cap.
17
18
walk allows you to identify him from those videos?
19
20
strutting, you know.
21
that walk many times.
22
23
particular video.
24
the defendant wear cargo shorts before?
25
I've known Gerard for over 30 years.
And I know how he
Our brief -- in that time where he was remodelling
And when you say you know how he walks, what about his
It's like a weightlifter's walk, where he's kind of
Okay.
And so I recognize that walk.
I've seen
You've mentioned the style of his dress in that
Absolutely.
You talked about cargo shorts.
Had you seen
That was like his -- his style of clothes
104
1
that he used to wear all the time.
Was there anything distinctive about them?
Just that they had, like, pockets on the side.
think he used to put a lot of things in there, that's why.
that be part of your ability to recognize him?
and he used to wear long-sleeved shirts.
And I think you just mentioned shoes and socks.
Not so much shoes and socks.
Okay.
All right.
And I
Why would
It was the cap that he wore,
And you had seen him dressed in that
10
fashion on other occasions; is that correct?
11
Many times.
12
All right.
13
defendant appeared back at the time of the incident, June of
14
2013, to the present?
15
16
I -- how he looks in this video is how he looked when he was
17
charged and convicted for breaking into his neighbor's house.
And are you able to compare the way the
Well, he's picked up a lot of weight since that time.
18
MR. SILVERT:
19
THE COURT:
20
21
this time.
And
Your Honor --
All right.
We need to take a recess at
All right.
Actually, before we take the recess and take up any
22
matters, I'm going to specifically instruct the jury that they
23
need to disregard that last piece of testimony.
24
And I'm going to specifically instruct this witness,
25
you are not to testify about that unless you are specifically
105
1
asked by the prosecutor.
THE WITNESS:
I'm sorry, Your Honor.
THE COURT:
THE WITNESS:
THE COURT:
So, ladies and gentlemen, we need to take up some
All right.
I apologize.
I know.
matters outside your presence.
I'm going to have you take a
recess at this point, and we will see you shortly.
exactly sure how long this will take.
I'm not
Thank you very much.
10
11
(At 11:28 a.m., the jury was excused, and the
12
13
14
We're in recess.
THE COURT:
Let the record reflect the presence of
counsel and Mr. Puana, and that the jury is not present.
15
At this time, I'll let the witness step down, and
16
we're going to take up some matters, sir, so if you could wait
17
outside.
Thank you.
18
MR. SILVERT:
19
speak to anyone else?
20
21
And I am going to ask the court to let me voir dire

the witness on this issue as I make my argument.
22
THE COURT:
23
MR. SILVERT:
24
25
Could Your Honor instruct him not to
As you make your argument?

Well, after I make my argument, I'm
going to ask the court to allow me to voir dire this witness.

THE COURT:
Well, let's take one thing at a time.
106
1
All right.
So, sir, Chief Kealoha, if you could
refrain from talking to anyone, of course, about your testimony
until you complete your testimony.
THE WITNESS:
THE COURT:
The record will reflect that the witness is no longer
Absolutely.
Thank you, sir.
in the courtroom.
Mr. Silvert.
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, I'm moving for a mistrial.
10
This is clearly 404(b) evidence.
11
continued the trial.
12
surprise from anybody.
13
We've had our motions.
Now this comes out.
We've
This is not a
We -- you know, there's been allegations, and we knew
14
that he had this arrest record.
The government knows they have
15
this arrest record.
16
32 years, I'm sure he's testified thousands of times, comes out
17
and is asked a specific question which elicited a specific
18
response, how did you know, well, I knew because, and then he
19
blurts out about the -- a burglary, his conviction, his
20
incarceration.
This witness, who is the chief of police
21
THE COURT:
He didn't talk about incarceration.
22
MR. SILVERT:
23
And, you know, completely destroying my client's
I'm sorry, Your Honor.
24
credibility in front of the jury with evidence that should not
25
have been permitted.
It cannot be undone, Your Honor, that
107
1
kind of conviction, a burglary.
Your Honor, I'm asking that the case be -- there be a mistrial
declared.
This is what he said.
So,
I don't believe a simple instruction to the jury in
this kind of case, with issues of credibility, that involves a
burglary-type offense, can be undone from this witness.
don't believe it was unintentional.
8
9
10
11
And I
It may -- if the government wants to say that they

didn't know he was going to say it, that's one thing, but not
this witness.
THE COURT:
Well, I'm just looking at the question
12
that was asked, but my recollection is that Mr. Tong didn't
13
elicit this.
14
and he did testify about his clothing as well as his walk.
15
16
17
18
He was asking how he was able to recognize him,
MR. TONG:
Your Honor, the question came after the
portion Your Honor is referencing.

THE REPORTER:
I have it, Your Honor.
Would you like
me to read it?
19
THE COURT:
Yes, thank you.
20
THE REPORTER:
"And are you able to compare the way
21
the defendant appeared back at the time of the incident, June
22
of 2013, to the present?"
23
MR. TONG:
That is the question, Your Honor.
It asked
24
nothing about his background or his record.
It was not
25
designed to elicit that, nor did I expect that response.
108
1
MR. SILVERT:
But the other problem is it's not even a
conviction, Your Honor, it was a DAG.
problem.
So now we have a 404(b)
THE COURT:
Mr. Tong, do you wish to address his motion for a
No, I understand what your objection is.
mistrial?
MR. TONG:
I think the court can cure it by giving the
jury a cautionary instruction, number one, striking that
portion of his response, and saying they should not consider
10
that testimony in arriving at a verdict ultimately, and
11
whatever else the court wants to put in.
12
All I can say is I was asking him to compare his
13
appearance simply to elicit the difference in his weight.
14
I think --
15
16
17
18
And
THE COURT:
Which he started off talking about his
MR. TONG:
You can see the question clearly was not
weight.
designed to do that.
19
THE COURT:
20
MR. TONG:
Yes.
And, again, Your Honor, if there was some
21
miscommunication, I stepped into this case at about 4 p.m.
22
yesterday.
23
THE COURT:
24
MR. TONG:
25
THE COURT:
I looked at your question.

Yeah.
Your question didn't elicit that.
109
1
And he talked about -- he started off with his answer
talking about the weight difference, and then spoke about this
other matter.
4
5
So we're going to take a recess.
And then when we
reconvene I'll rule on your motion, Mr. Silvert.
All right.
Thank you.
MR. SILVERT:
I would just note, Your Honor, we're
only on the second witness.
trial.
10
THE COURT:
11
MR. TONG:
It's not like we're deep into the
Understood.
We're --
One -- I never talk to witnesses while
12
they're on the stand, but I'd like the court's permission to at
13
least advise Chief Kealoha that certain areas are off ground
14
when he's on the stand, and not go into anything more than
15
that.
16
May I?
THE COURT:
Mr. Silvert -- I think he does need to be
17
instructed, but I would just say wait until after this recess,
18
and I'll give you some time to do that.
All right.
19
So we'll be in recess for 15 minutes.
20
21
THE COURT:
22
23
Thank you.
counsel and Mr. Puana, and that the jury is not present.
So, counsel, before the recess, Mr. Silvert made a
24
motion for a mistrial based on the testimony given by
25
Chief Kealoha regarding Mr. Puana's arrest and conviction for
110
1
2
burglary.
Mr. Tong has argued that the curative instruction that
the judge -- that the court gave prior to recess was
sufficient, or, if necessary, an additional cautionary
instruction can be given to cure the prejudice.
In doing a quick review, the court concludes that I
have no choice but to grant the defendant's request for a
mistrial, instead of instructing the jury to disregard
Chief Kealoha's testimony and giving a strong curative
10
11
instruction.
Declaring a mistrial is appropriate only where a
12
cautionary instruction is unlikely to cure the prejudicial
13
effect of an error.
14
Circuit and other circuits, in particular Toolate versus Borg,
15
828 F.2d 571, which is a 1987 Ninth Circuit case.
16
This has been recognized by the Ninth
In contemplation of the parties' positions, given
17
first the testimony with regard to a reference to Mr. Puana
18
being arrested and convicted on a burglary charge, I find that
19
the prejudice is too great to be overcome by a curative
20
instruction because, one, it refers to a similar offense that's
21
involved in this particular case.
22
I also find specifically too that it was not elicited
23
at all by Mr. Tong's questioning, that Mr. Tong's question, as
24
we reviewed on the record prior to the recess, clearly related
25
to Mr. Puana's physical appearance in the video and the basis
111
1
for the witness' recognition of the person depicted in the
video as being Mr. Puana.
testimony about an arrest and conviction.
Wholly unsolicited, the witness gave
In determining whether or not there was -- or there is
a curative instruction to overcome the prejudice, the court
considered various information that could be used for a
curative instruction, but because of the nature of the charges
in this case and the testimony given with regard to this prior
arrest and conviction, coupled with the fact that the court
10
ruled on this issue in a motion in limine, particularly relying
11
on the fact that no 404(b) notice was given with regard to the
12
conviction, and noting that it's early in the case, and
13
Mr. Silvert did not mention in his opening statement any
14
reference to whether or not Mr. Puana would be testifying.
15
Clearly, if this type of evidence was inevitable to be
16
entered into evidence, such as would be the case, arguably, if
17
Mr. Silvert had represented to the jury that Mr. Puana would,
18
indeed, be testifying, and he could be confronted by the
19
government on cross-examination, but as this is only the second
20
witness in the government's case, clearly at this point
21
Mr. Silvert and his client have not and could not be required
22
to have a discussion at this point whether or not Mr. Puana's
23
going to take the stand.
24
25
Therefore, the court concludes that there is no

curative instruction that the court can give to overcome the
112
1
prejudice of the testimony, and on these bases grants
Mr. Silvert's motion for mistrial.
All right.
So, counsel, you can make your record.
And then what I propose to do is have the jury brought in,
inform them that we all give them -- extend our thanks to them
for their service, but that the court has declared a mistrial,
and another jury will be selected to determine this case at a
later date.
I intend to bring them back to chambers to answer
10
questions because it's been kind of an unusual case.
11
have trial yesterday and so forth.
12
about, of course, anything about the case itself, and just
13
thank and excuse them at that time.
14
15
All right.
I'm not going to talk
Mr. Tong, is there anything that you'd
like to place on the record before we bring the jury back?
16
MR. TONG:
17
THE COURT:
18
MR. SILVERT:
19
We didn't
No, Your Honor.
Thank you.
Mr. Silvert?
No, Your Honor.
I assume we can talk
about subpoenas and a new trial date next, after --
20
THE COURT:
Yes.
21
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, what I am concerned about,
22
one thing, we've got members of the press here.
He was never
23
convicted, and I don't think it's fair that that testimony be
24
put out over the airwaves.
25
think what should be said is he was not convicted, there was a
I know we can't stop them, but I
113
1
DAG, and it was expunged.
2
3
4
THE COURT:
All right.
I'll allow you to make your
record.
So what I would ask you to do, counsel, is after I
excuse the jury and bring them back into chambers to thank
them, and then I'll probably meet with them for five minutes,
if you could remain in the courtroom, and then we'll go back on
the record and talk about rescheduling.
But while we're in the recess, if you wouldn't mind
10
meeting and conferring among yourselves about potential new
11
trial dates and the subpoenas and so forth.
12
Now, I know, Mr. Tong and Ms. Hattan, this places you
13
in a delicate position because I don't know if the rule is
14
going to be who touched the case last has it next or what have
15
you, if you're able to schedule it based on your trial
16
calendars.
17
meet and confer with Mr. Silvert, and we'll take up the matter
18
on the record when I return with the jury.
But if you could either inquire of your office or
19
MR. TONG:
20
THE COURT:
21
22
23

All right.
So we're in recess.
Mr. Nakamura is going to get the jury.

THE CLERK:
I'll get the jury, and I'll come get you,
Your Honor.
24
THE COURT:
Thank you very much.
25
114
1
2
(The following proceedings were held in open court in

the presence of the jury:)
3
4
THE COURT:
counsel, Mr. Puana, and the ladies and gentlemen of the jury.
So, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, on behalf of the
parties, the attorneys, and, of course, myself, I thank you for
your service, as short as it was.
jury.
reschedule the case for trial; but, unfortunately, another jury
10
I'm going to excuse you as a
I've declared a mistrial in this case, and we will
will make the decision in this case.
11
So, with the great thanks on behalf of everyone here,
12
I do excuse you as jurors, and ask that you follow Mr. Myer, my
13
law clerk, to my chambers.
14
any questions about the mechanics of the jury trial, not the
15
specifics of the case, but any questions you might have about
16
the mechanics of the jury trial, and then I'll discharge you to
17
jury pool for your documentation or whatever paperwork they
18
give you.
19
20
I'll speak to you briefly, answer
So thank you very much.

They're excused.
And we're in recess.
21
22
(At 12:08 p.m., the jury was excused, and the
23
24
25

THE COURT:
counsel and Mr. Puana.
115
1
2
So may I first inquire of the status of whether or

not, Mr. Tong, you'll be trying the retrial?
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
I don't know, Your Honor.

Okay.
Mr. Osborne is still incapacitated, and
he's nowhere where I could confer with him.
is I've checked -- or Ms. Hattan actually has checked with
Mr. Osborne's calendar, and we've come up with the first
available date that he could be available with Mr. Silvert, and
10
we won't postpone it.
11
trial.
If he's not available, I'll do the
But that date actually is the end of April.
12
THE COURT:
13
MR. TONG:
14
So what I've done
Okay.
And I think we're in agreement on that.
And we'll -- if that's acceptable to the court --
15
THE COURT:
So -- I'm sorry, so you're looking at
16
starting trial the 28th.
17
anticipating we're still looking at five trial days, three for
18
the government, two for the defense.
19
20
MR. SILVERT:
Okay, so April 28th.
And I'm
Your Honor, given the way it went, I'm a
little worried about that.
21
THE COURT:
Well, you know what, I may just give you
22
guys time limits or something because there's so much fodder
23
that we could kind of go astray.
24
for that, three days for the government, two days for the
25
defense.
So I'm going to put you down
116
1
And I just need to let you know that I've already
confirmed sitting with the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco --
what are the days, Warren? --
case.
5
6
MR. SILVERT:
so we've got to be done with the
Is there any way we could get the week
before April 28th?
THE COURT:
I think I'm out of district that week.
THE CLERK:
He's talking about early April.
THE COURT:
No, he's talking about the week of the
11
THE CLERK:
No.
12
THE COURT:
Right.
13
So I'm sitting with the Ninth Circuit the 11th, so I
10
21st.
I'm away.
14
have to leave that weekend.
15
if we start the 28th, that should give you more than enough --
16
28th, 29th, 30th, and 1st, and then the 5th through 6th for the
17
defense case, and then the deliberating.
18
19
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
21
MR. SILVERT:
25
I guess May 27th.
May 27th.
Your Honor, I'd rather have leeway,
given this case, than be squeezed into five days.
23
24
Is there any other day in May, just so
we have a little leeway?
20
22
So we need to finish -- well, but
THE COURT:
days.
Well, I'm going to squeeze you into five
I'm not going to let you guys go on and on.

MR. TONG:
It's kind of hard to squeeze him.
117
1
MR. SILVERT:
I'm not Charmin.
THE COURT:
We can do it -- I'll leave it up to you folks which --
No comment.
but I'm going to give you three days for the government, two
days for the defense.
this nature.
That's more than enough for a charge of
MR. SILVERT:
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
May, Your Honor.
Okay.
May 27th.
May 27th?
That's fine, provided we exclude
10
time on grounds of continuity of counsel, that being the first
11
available date.
12
MR. SILVERT:
13
THE COURT:
14
dates then for that.
15
done.
16
THE CLERK:
Absolutely.
All right.
Very good.
Just the trial dates, everything else is
Trial date May 27th, that's a Wednesday,
17
because Memorial Day is the 25th.
18
Judge Kobayashi will be set at a later time.
19
MR. SILVERT:
20
THE CLERK:
21
We'll give you the
A final pretrial before
Okay.
Like before, to check in with the parties,
Your Honor.
22
THE COURT:
Yes.
23
THE CLERK:
We can set one later.
24
THE COURT:
Yes, once we find out who's going to be
25
counsel in the case.
I think it makes sense to do it then.
118
1
2
THE CLERK:
The exclusion of time, Your Honor, is the
government going to prepare an order from today?
THE COURT:
MR. TONG:
THE COURT:
I think so, right?

I believe so, Your Honor.
It would have to be from today.
So the
court makes the specific findings that the ends of justice
outweigh the individual defendant's and the general public's
right to a speedy trial, and, therefore, it excludes time from
today, December 4, 2014, up through and including May 27, 2015,
10
on the basis that a new trial has been required, and the first
11
available date so that continuity of counsel is May 27th, 2015.
12
13
If you would prepare the order, Ms. Hattan and

Mr. Tong.
14
MR. TONG:
We will, Your Honor.
15
MR. SILVERT:
Your Honor, one last matter.
I would
16
ask the court permission to call Chief Kealoha to the witness
17
stand now to be questioned about whether he intentionally made
18
the statement.
19
I think it may have ramifications not only for the
20
next trial, but also for possible appeal of whether he intended
21
to delay this trial and cause a mistrial.
22
He's a police officer of 32 years.
He knows
23
Rule 404(b), which applies in the state as well.
24
not supposed to talk about these things.
25
professionalism and his years of service.
He knows he's
He talked about his
119
1
It wasn't responsive to the question.
He went out of
his way to say it.
verdict would have had an impact on that civil case.
honestly, I believe he did it intentionally, and I think if he
did, we need to know, and it may have a legal consequence for
this case in the future as well as on appeal.
There's a civil case pending where this

So, quite
I don't doubt that Mr. Tong didn't solicit it, but I
think if this witness intentionally did it, I think that's
important to know.
10
THE COURT:
So what you're saying is you want me to
11
have him take the stand, and you're going to ask, did you
12
intentionally ask that question -- or answer the question.
13
14
MR. SILVERT:
404(b), his knowledge of --
15
16
I'm going to ask his knowledge of
THE COURT:
that.
No, I'm not going to let you ask him about
You can ask him if he intentionally said that.
17
MR. SILVERT:
18
THE COURT:
At least let me ask that question.
But he intentionally said it in a sense
19
that it came out of his mouth.
20
MR. SILVERT:
No.
But my question is did he
21
intentionally say it knowing that it was improper and knowing
22
it could cause a mistrial.
23
24
25
MR. TONG:
Your Honor, the inquiry is whether I did it
on purpose.
THE COURT:
Right.
120
1
MR. TONG:
You've already found I didn't.
Mr. Silvert
now admits that I didn't, although he earlier implied that I
planned this with Chief Kealoha.
The inquiry is whether the government induced a
mistrial, not whether a witness spontaneously volunteered
information that was improper.
humiliation.
to it.
He's doing it just for public
It has no legal consequence, and I would object
THE COURT:
And I would agree with Mr. Tong in his
10
statement is that clearly there's case law that supports where
11
the government intentionally or recklessly creates a situation
12
where a mistrial will have to be declared.
13
But in reviewing the transcript, one, the question
14
itself didn't call for that response; two, I think it's clear
15
on the record, you know, Mr. Tong got this case yesterday
16
afternoon in terms of trying it.
17
forward with -- being as well prepared as you are, given the
18
late notice of getting this case.
19
And I thank you for coming
So there's no sort of indication that he's been
20
working with this witness or somehow there's some sort of
21
government involvement.
22
case law to show me, where a witness goes, for lack of a better
23
word, rogue and blurts out something, that unless there's some
24
sort of indication that the court specifically directed counsel
25
to advise their clients not to testify about certain areas, I
I'm unaware of, and if you have any
121
1
don't think that then there's anything to trigger the
government's culpability for this.
That's a long way of saying I deny your request.
So I deny your request.

All right.
So anything else that we need to address?
MR. SILVERT:
As to subpoenas, Your Honor, can the
subpoenas we've already issued be considered continuing, so we
don't have to reissue them?
8
9
THE COURT:
Yes, although I would task you and your
office with contacting those subpoenaed and advising them of
10
the new date.
And if there's any indication that they will not
11
be cooperative unless they're served with a new subpoena, I'd
12
leave that up to you to advise me --
13
MR. SILVERT:
14
THE COURT:
15
So, Mr. Puana, of course, your conditions of release
16
-- with regard to the same.
are still in effect.
You understand this?
17
THE DEFENDANT:
18
THE COURT:
19
MR. SILVERT:
20
THE COURT:
21
MR. TONG:
22
THE COURT:
Sure.
Okay.
Anything else, Mr. Silvert?
No, Your Honor.
Mr. Tong, anything else?

No, Your Honor.
Thank you.
Well, thank you very much.
And we have
23
the new trial date, so unless there's anything further, we are
24
in recess.
25
(The proceedings concluded at 12:42 p.m., December 4, 2014.)
Good day to everyone.
122
1
COURT REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE
2
3
I, CYNTHIA R. OTT, Official Court Reporter, United
States District Court, District of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, do
hereby certify that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 753 the foregoing is
a true, complete and correct transcript of the stenographically
reported proceedings had in connection with the above-entitled
matter and that the transcript page format is in conformance
with the regulations of the Judicial Conference of the United
10
11
12
States.
DATED at Honolulu, Hawaii, December 29, 2014.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
_/s/ CYNTHIA R. OTT

CYNTHIA R. OTT, RMR, CRR

Puana Trial Transcript

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Puana Trial Transcript

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

For the Defendant:

Cynthia Ott, RMR, CRR

Jury Trial - Day One

For the Government:

CRIMINAL NO. 13-00375 LEK

TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL

Proceedings recorded by machine shorthand, transcript produced

DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. TONG......................

DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. TONG......................

1 and 2 were received in evidence...................

QQQQ was received in evidence.........................42

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2014

(The following proceedings were held in open court in the

presence of the jury:)

Criminal 13-00735LEK, United States of

America versus Gerard K. Puana.

This case has been called for

Counsel, please make your appearances for the

Please speak into a microphone.

Good morning, Your Honor.

Larry Tong and

Andrea Hattan, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, representing the

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.

With us at counsel table are Postal Inspector Brian

Shaughnessy and Ora Morita, a paralegal specialist of our

Good morning to all of you,

and thank you for your presence today.

Good morning, Your Honor.

ladies and gentlemen of the jury.

of Gerard Puana, and my investigator, Adam Choka.

Alexander Silvert, on behalf

Good morning to all of you.

And good morning, ladies and gentlemen of the jury.

Thank you very much for being bright-eyed and enthusiastic.

are going to start with opening statements.

And I'll turn to Mr. Tong.

Ms. Hattan who will be giving opening for the government?

I will, Your Honor.

Your Honor, may I have a moment to

introduce myself to the jury because I have not met them

You may, yes.

Ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce myself.

May it please the court.

name is Larry Tong.

throughout the trial will be Andrea Hattan, another Assistant

Osborne, the individual you met two days ago.

I'm an Assistant U.S. Attorney.

Both of us work in the same office with Les

Unfortunately, Mr. Osborne is not able to continue

with this trial, so the two of us will have the privilege of

presenting the evidence to you in his absence.

So I just wanted to introduce myself, since I don't

This case is about the destruction and theft of a

Gerard Puana, the individual in the aloha shirt in the middle

there, physically ripped a mailbox off of its pedestal and took

We will show that on June 21 of 2013 the defendant,

The mailbox belonged to his niece, Katherine Kealoha.

Katherine Kealoha is a city prosecutor.

to Louis Kealoha, the chief of the Honolulu Police Department.

In 2013, at the time of this incident, the Kealohas lived in

Ms. Kealoha is married