Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYSIS
OF
"T" FORMATION
WITH MAN-in-MOTION
Preliminary Formations
Triple Flanker and Flankers
-*-
& J .
ALSO
Iv
-
SUGGESTED DEFENSES
-Pt
- .vy^-T
JOHN "OX" DaGROSA
LIBRARY
CQI-IKiiE
EU<iA.W>N
BlLLi^'aAM' Wi^IflJ^GJOl* ^
Wth
Dedicated to
AMOS ALONZO STAGG, YALE 1888
Sportsman and Coach
Uf
Member,
rootboll
Rules CommiHee
f*hilai<MphlA> P*e
FOREWORD
Lt.i-irr:..
-and
oo
1"^'^
^
o
.ggd, fd and
the honker formotton
S=
--'tf hr^c
cooches that
Shaughnessy,
, '/"rabrrl"!
m
r
p
'
i
l
l
i
r
l
'
h thl-T" ond man.in.motion, wo. on aid to Stogg
tor many years. Shoughnessy, with the spring practice aid of Bernie Mastersan of the Chicago Bears, established the "T" with man-in-motion in
the space of one season and proved that the attack could be mastered by
a college team.
The impact of the "T" formation with man-in-motion and its system of
counter attack has not yet been fully felt. 1940 provided a preview in
the success which attended the operations of Stanford University and th6
Chicago Bears of the National Professional League, both of which teams
employed the attack.
The Chicago Bears have used the "T" and a man-in-motion for a good
many years, but it was 1940 that saw George Halas and Ralph Jones of
Lake Forest College streamline the attack and realize on its full possibilities
by introducing the counter attack and the many variations of the "T" and
man-in-motion. They embellished the attack with the all-important variations
in formation structure. Halas developed the counter attack and the many
refinements in the individual assignments of the players which added to the
deceptive features of the attack. Most of the analysis which follows is based
tipon a study of Bears' streamlined version of the "T" formation with the
all-important man-in-motion.
The defense is on the run. Now coaches will be burning the midnight
oil in efforts to fashion and construct defenses which con cope with this
newest of weapons in our annual autumn warfare.
That's been the story from football's earliest daysfirst the offense and
then the defense is in ascendency.
The following analysis is an effort to present the problems occasioned
by the developments of 1940 and to provide some insight on the mysteries
of football's newest offensive weapons and suggest some possible defensive
measures wit-h which to meet these new weapons.
We have only scratched the surface, but the American Football Coaches
are a resourceful lot and the scales will undoubtedly soon be again tipped
in favor of the defense.
INTRODUCTION
During the seasons of 1937, 1938 and 1939, American Football made
far-reaching advances with respect to the defensive phases of the game.
The defense was organized to "ploy the percentage," or in other words,
to take full advantage of each chapge in the tactical situation (the down,
yards to go, location of the teams on the field,-score, time left to play, and
other conditions) by constantly shifting and changing. Not only did the
five-man line defense (5-3-2-1) take its place with the other major defenses
(6-2-2-1), (7-1-2-1) and the minor defenses (6-3-2), (7-2-2), (8-2-1),
but additional defensive techniques were developed such as the defensive
huddle; sliding and looping lines; fade-outs, overshifts and undershifts,
subterfuging and varied defensive alignments, such as five-man line distribu
tion against weakness and six-man line distribution against strength. All of
these techniques ore based upon a cooperative organization of defensive
ploy. The result was a multiplicity of new problems facing the offense. The
offensive players were constantly looking for "the defensive man who wasn't
there," and blocking assignments were deranged. The coaching profession
is fully aware of the burden which was shifted over on the offense by these
defensive innovations.
The season of 1940, however, sow several major offensive weapons
employed which weighed the balance of the gome back in favor of the
attack. The more important features of the new offensive weapons may be
summarized as follows: Location of the offensive holes for attack through
the offensive line, and not through the defensive line; use of preliminary
formations with subsequent shifts, mon-in-motion; flankers or distractors;
double line splits; high offensive line; charging from unset line stance when
in preliminary formation; semi-spreads; more effective releasing of linemen
into the secondary. Speed and deception with split second timing were the
chief characteristics of the attacks which employed some or all of the
devices mentioned above.
The Model "T" formation with mon-in-motion, as used by the Chicago
Bears of the Notional Professional League and by Stanford University
(illustrated and diagrammed at P. 13, et seq.), offers an attack which taxes
the defense to such an extent that the balance of power is recaptured by
the offense. There is a continuing threat of a ploy into the line, while the.
mon-in-motion is a potential wingback or flanker. The attack is constantly
moving or flowing from one formation to another without the one second
s t o p t h a t i s n e c e s s a r y i n s h i f t i n g . M o s t i m p o r t a n t o f a l l , it p r o v i d e s t h e
offense with an effective counter attack (away from the man-in-motion).
Boston College used a preliminary "T" formation with the Quarterback
or Inside Blocking Back off-set from the center, either to the right or left.
Several successful plays were run from this preliminary formation with the
l i n e c h a r g i n g f r o m a n u n s e t s t a n c e ( s e e i l l u s t r a t i o n s I b e l o w a n d XXXI,
page 3 0 ) ; from the preliminary formation with the Q.B. in motion, the line
r e m a i n i n g i n i t s u n s e t p o s i t i o n . ( S e e I l l u s t r a t i o n II.)
'
Boston College also employed a triple flanker formation which was very
e f f e c t i v e ( s e e I l l u s t r a t i o n s XXXII a n d XXXIII, p a g e 3 2 ) .
Illustration I
I l l u s t r a t i o n II
Bail went to O'Rourk, the Left Halfback. Manin-motion turned down the field for pass. Fullback
fakes getting ball. Ends cross, Left Halfback passes
to Right End.
Illustration
I l l u s t r a t i o n IV
Note spacing of offensive (QIants) linemen.Note backfleld alignment Is heavy to the short side
of the line.
MAN-ln-MOTiON
The "T" formation with man-inmotlon is not a complicated attack.
It is recognized that some coaches
hold contrary views on this subject
but the authors have made a pains
taking analysis of the attack in
question and believe that their con
clusions are based upon sound rea
soning. The formation does not
require superior material to make it
effective.
It is recognized that one specialist
is required but it is believed that a
normal squad will produce one or
more players who can meet the
qualifications for the all-important
position of Quarterback. This player
must be able to pass and he must be
a nifty ball handler, but he does not
have to be a blocker. The footwork
required of the Q.B. is not difficult;
in fact, ordinary spinner plays from
single and double wing bock forma
tions place a greater premium on
footwork than does the "T." The
Q.B. handles the ball on all plays
and makes a shallow delivery to the
other bocks.
The ball handling between the
Center and Q.B. has been aptly de
scribed as "an automatic and blind
exchange," and the Center is there
by relieved of the customary worry
about his passes. The Center can
keep his head up arid be used as
an effective blocker. The blocking
assignments of the linemen for the
most part call for face or brush
blocks (individual assignments)
The ANALYSIS of
V,
,0.00800,0
I ; jMi! f
0
Note: Holes are numbered through
the offensive line from 1 to 10.
Backs are numbered from 1 to 4.
R.H.B. through the 8 hole would
be 48. The first digit designates the
back (4) and the second digit the
hole (8).
L.H.B. off tackle to the right would
be play No. 29, meaning No. 2 back
through No. 9 hole. Thus the play
The ANALYSIS of
The ANALYSIS of
THE SNAP
Note:
The snap number is based on the
c o u n t s y s t e m . If Q . B . d e s i g n a t e s t h e
5th number, then the ball is snapped
on the 5th count, thus: 1-2-3-4-5.
The Q.B. will always start with one
and count up to the snap number.
If n u m b e r i s 9 , h e w o u l d c o u n t
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9.
Method of anticipating snap is
e m p l o y e d . If t h e n u m b e r i s 5 , t h e
ball is snapped by the center antici
pating the 5th number, thus: 1-2-3-4
pass 5. (Note: When the Q.Bryrants
the ball he can relieve the center
BALL
The ANALYSIS of
10
syos.
R.H.B.
F.B;
L.H.B.
I
Q'B. . !
-'iOCXXOOi -v -c-o
R.H.B. 4 to 4'/2 yards, F.B. 41/2 to 5 yards,
L.H.B. 4 to 4 Vz yards.
The ANALYSIS of
11
o oobo O
Note: All the holes which can be
hit from the original "T" are still
threatened and can be hit by the
fullback and remaining halfback.
The defense must shift to meet the
man-in-motion; the end, the backerup or the halfback must cover and
take someone out of the set defense.
2. Two Men-in-Motion.
^ tn Motion
In fWo'Jfla
o ccSoo o
The ANALYSIS of
12
O-
ccSco
O*"
o ccScc c----
O CC&O O
Ooooo o
The ANALYSIS of
47 on 3 count.
Note: Q.B. gets ball from center
and makes a half turn to the left
pivoting on the right foot (back to
line of scrimmage), and gives the
ball to R.H.B. with his left hand (can
use both), then continues to drift
back to complete the fake.
The R.H.B. on the snap of the ball
takes a short step back with twist of
body and then drives for No. 8 hole.
The F.B. and L.H.B. both turn their
bodies to the right with left arm
over, dropping their left shoulder as
if in possession of the ball.
The line has individual blocking
assignment according to defensive
setupwith such method of block
ing you will get releasing of linemen
in secondary.
The objective of this play is speed
and deception based upon quick'
opening in the line.
See Illustrations V, VI, VII and
VIII.
Stanford scoring its first touch
down against Nebraska in the Rose
Bowl (1?41), Gallerneau, the right
Illustration V
13
The ANALYSIS of
14
A
A
i
2. Split Buck Inside Tackle with
Man in Motion (Goes to Right and
Left).
The ANALYSIS of
P l a y S i g n a l . Formation "T"
L.H.B. in motionPloy 20 on 4 or
5 count.
15
P l a y S i g n a l . Formation "T"
R.H.B. in motionCounter play 20
on 5.
P l a y S i g n a l . Formation "T"
L.H.B. in motionPlay 30 on 4 or
5 count.
Note: The Q.B. can give the F.B.
the ball with both hands (under
hand pass). Man-in-motion (L.H.B.)
will try to be closer to line of scrim
mage than before so he con better
execute a reverse block on the de
fensive end.
P l a y S i g n a l . Formation "T"
L.H.B. in motionPloy 10 on 5.
Note: No complicated assign
ments.
Note: The basic plays can be
called from various changes in for
mation structure. You will note later
herein a variety of featured changes
in this system all of which ore sim
ple and place little additional bur
den on the offense.
1
16
The ANALYSIS of
IX. FORWARD PASSES
l::
- "
In
The ANALYSIS of
Illustration XI
17
5. Passes by halfbacks.
AEnd around direct pass. Play
No.Pass 80.
Note: Pass can be also thrown to
Right End.
The ANALYSIS of
18
lUlM
^ >
\
G
^
p /
E 1T\
hoc!'-.
T/E-
The ANALYSIS of
19
"in
Illustration XII
Illustration XIII
The ANALYSIS of
J. End Run by Q.B. Man-in-Motion.
KBears Flat
Men-in-Motion.
Pass from
Two
Stanford vs. U.C.L.A.
Illustration XVI
The ANALYSIS of
Illustration XVII
21
(NOTE
1. Buck Pass.
The ANALYSIS of
22
Illustration XXI
N>
1
III
Illustration XIX
Note
The ANALYSIS of
23
I l l u s t r a t i o n XXIII
1. Thrown to Man-in-Motion
Faking Counter from Man-in-Motion.
2. Inside Tackle
p^Man-in-Motion.
Counter
f -- -
{ifitiyos
I l l u s t r a t i o n XXH
From
Q.B. handing ball away with left
hand and keeping his back to the
defense (he could keep the ball and
trail to outside or drop back to pass
t o e n d s o r m a n - i n - m o t i o n ) . F.B. i s
leading R.H.B., who has ball. Of
fensive right tackle has engaged
the defensive end, need only put on
a brush or face block.
3. Indirect Buck with Fake Coun
ter from Man-in-Motion.
n Rk.lO'.b.T
Stanford vs. Nebraska
Rose Bowl, 1941
The ANALYSIS of
24
la SlolloA
^ " In
The ANALYSIS of
/?
25
oJV-- - -o
Illustration XXV
V
4. End Flank Out with Two Menin-Motion to Create a Spread.
Note: BucksPassesRuns are
possible.
O- .'"-'"i'l'*. --0
<r"
n Motion
""
Illustration XXVI
26
The ANALYSIS of
Illustration XXVII
Illustration XXVIII
The ANALYSIS of
27
q
^
^ In Mo'.lon
d^CXiOO
28
The ANALYSIS of
"T" FORMATION
with MAN-in-MOTION
The ANALYSIS of
SYSTEM
EMPLOYED
29
BY
BOSTON
COLLEGE
I. FORMATIONS.
I l l u s t r a t i o n XXIX
lo#i
~ ^
o oooo o
o o
Illustration XXX
o
CTriple Flanker Formation.
OOO^OOO
IS To
^#51
/s-roxoxffs,
ooo
The ANALYSIS of
30
"T" FORMATION
BFast Pass.
Note: Take off from the Wedge'
Center Buck.
Note:
Line would come up to the line
of scrimmage and assume a high
stance and never get set. They
would often never get up to the line
of scrimmage. They caught oppo
nents flat-footed many times.
This wedge play scored in the
Sugar Bowl; also against George
town, Temple and many others.
They seem to get a jump on the
boll, and opponents seemed to be
surprised.
Illustration XXXI
All
31
32
The ANALYSIS of
illustration XXXII
TRIPLE).
ALateral Forward
Single Flanker.
Pass
from
The tall back has thrown the ball out to the out
side flanker
who appears at the right edge of the
illustration.
Illustration XXXIll
The ANALYSIS of
SYSTEM
EMPLOYED
33
DSemi-Spread
Motion.
O
BY
with
Man-in:
O O SCO O O
I l l u s t r a t i o n XXXIV
I. FORMATIONS..
ASingle Wing Back.
O oooo o
o
o
o
I l l u s t r a t i o n XXXV
CX3S
O
O
I l l u s t r a t i o n XXXVI
CFlanker.
O OXOCX3 O
O
34
The ANALYSIS of
Illustration XXXVIll
The ANALYSIS of
I l l u s t r a t i o n XL
i l l u s t r a t i o n XL!
I l l u s t r a t i o n XLII!
I l l u s t r a t i o n XLIV
I l l u s t r a t i o n XLII
35
36
The ANALYSIS of
illustration XLV
Illustration XLVI
2. Straight Delayed Buck.
Note: Play strikes up the center.
BMan-in-motion
Back.
Around
Tail
3. Off Tackle to Short Side.
Illustration XLVII
The ANALYSIS of
Illustration XLVIil
This
2. Straight Buck.
oo
37
38
The ANALYSIS of
SYSTEM
EMPLOYED
BY
GEORGETOWN
UNIVERSITY
I. FORMATIONS.
(Right
O CDCSOOOO
O o
o
BShort Punt.
BSweep to the left.
O
OOfSOO
o
o
o
CSpread Formation.
o
9.
o/""
9,
s-ir
Note: Plays from this formation
are:
1. Bucks by F.B.
2. End runs to right and left.
3. Reverse play to right and left.
4. Passes.
5. Reverse passes.
CBuck Play.
O-t.
The ANALYSIS of
DSingle Reverse.
39
EDouble Reverse.
FRunning Pass.
The ANALYSIS of
40
TRIPLE WINGBACK
FORMATION
EMPLOYED
Illustration XLIX
BY
BROWN UNIVERSITY
Brown vs. Yale
right or left.
Note: The shift is fast.
The ANALYSIS of
(Long
41
>
*"
42
The ANALYSIS of
FEATURED PLAYS
OF
1940 SEASON
ACornell Reverse.
BNotre Dame
Pass from Flanker.
Fake
Reverse
ETennessee Off Tackle Drive.
CTennessee Reverse.
The ANALYSIS of
43
DEFENSE
AGAINST THE "T" FORMATION
WITH MAN-in-MOTION
HOW DEFENSE HAS BEEN
DETERMINED
After a complete study of the "T"
formation with man-in-motion, "we
have come to the following conclu
sions:
1. Speed and deception, with
men-in-motion, individual line block
ing and releasing of linemen in the
secondary for quick opening plays,
are the basic characteristics of the
attack.
2. You will note much strategy in
the offensive maneuvers such as:
(a) Shifting from a preliminary
formation into a model "T" forma
tion with a possibility of change in
formation structure such as: split
ends, double split between tackle
and end, balanced or unbalanced
line, etc. This may cause defensive
line and backers-up to over and
under shift.
(b) Indirect feeding of the ball
by Q.B. to give backs quick starts
into the line through a simple count
system for the snap of the ball. The
Q.B. always screens the play and
defense cannot follow the ball.
(c) Faking and twisting of the
backs on the snap of the ball has a
tendency to distract or draw the de
fensive linemen and backers-up out
of position.
(d) Man-in-motiqoends flank
ing out two men-in-motion at
different, times, etc., all maneuvers
that will cause the defense to shift
or slide out of position.
The ANALYSIS of
44
The ANALYSIS of
45
<2>
C?
<2?
<D<S>
T
C
//
Note: Ball cannot be passed until
the offense shifts (seven men must
be on line of scrimmage), therefore
the defense should hold their posi-
46
The ANALYSIS of
Single Wing
Unbalanced Line
o \
f
Note: Chicago Bears have tried
these variations as a surprise ele
ment in the past. The arrows show
the directions the backers-up step on
the start of each play if no one goes
in motion.
3. HOW TO LINE UP TO MEET
THE "T" FORMATION AND THE AS
SIGNMENTS OF THE DEFENSE.
o o o
<5^
o\
c-^
J
single Wing
Balanced Line
oo
//
y0^60^0^ c5\
C-*
"T"
Balanced Line
~F
4'
H
^ ire
The ANALYSIS of
47
The ANALYSIS of
48
H-'
The ANALYSIS of
"
a o
f ! C- O
/
49
//
. ri
The ANALYSIS of
50
0
/
/
B
o o o
O
Q
f
OtXCO
Q
F
Note: If second man in motion,
the outside bocker-up still covers
and the center guard should shift
fast.
B. Sliding (Right or Left).
Note: If the offense presents a
double split linethen the defensive
tackle should slide in front of the
offensive tackle and play him with a
straight forearm shiver charge and
cover his territory; also keep blocker
away from his body and try not to
go into bockfield. If offensive end
splits only a yard or two, then the
defensive end ploys to the offensive
end's outside and then drives across
as usual. If the offensive end goes
out further than two yards, then de
fensive end should ploy off the end's
inside shoulder and drive into the
bockfield. If the end moves far out
as a flanker with tackle splitthen
the defensive end comes back in and
plays the regular defensive end.
The ANALYSIS of
51
o o
.<1
b
f-/*yit.
\yOS.
*-s
Slide Rule 1The first man-inmotion is covered by the outside
bocker-up and the other backers-up
slide to reenforce the line.
Slide Rule 2If the offensive ends
move out as flankers, they are cov
ered by the defensive halfbacks.
Forward passes should be covered
by playing a zone defense.
The ANALYSIS of
52
o
S T
//
OCECXD
f.
r E
T I
-/
F
.-'I
c /. f
-
jr
The ANALYSIS of
53
54
The ANALYSIS of
:z o /it
J
The ANALYSIS of
55
*N
I ? V
ff
, ^OyvS
!
\ ' s
'
56
The ANALYSIS of
P
o*
After S h i r t
(5-3-2-1)
O
o
cooxcoo
Note: They will shift to right and
left formation.
q
H
(6-2-2-1)
c-^
/f
Note: The left defensive end plays
his position according to the dis
tance the triple wing is split out. If
THE AUTHORS
BOB
HALL,
Ph.B., LLB.