Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page
Atypical Presentations
3
4
3. Management .. 6
3.1 Management of a Child with Suspected Dengue Infection
10
10
11
4. Laboratory Diagnosis 11
5. Advice for Parents on Source Reduction in the Home and Vicinity 12
6. References ..13
7. Members of Committee 15
1. DEFINITION
Dengue virus infections cause a spectrum of illness ranging from asymptomatic, mild
undifferentiated fever to classical dengue fever (DF), and dengue fever with
haemorrhagic manifestations, or dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and the dengue shock
syndrome (DSS). The classification of severe dengue has been complicated by the
variation in clinical picture, for which the underlying pathophysiology may be different.
1.1 Scope of the problem
There are four strains of the dengue virus. The virulence pattern is different in different
regions and spontaneous mutation in the viral strain can cause variation in the virulence
pattern. The presence of all 4 viral strains in Malaysia in the recent years has made the
infection endemic and a threat to the population. All age groups are being affected. As
there is no specific treatment available it is imperative to assist all clinicians to recognize
the varied clinical spectrum seen and start symptomatic treatment early. Many clinicians
are unaware of the unusual modes of presentation and multisystem involvement being
seen now.
1.2 Morbidity Issue
Some facts about the dengue situation in the country:
1. Prevailing virus strains are predominantly DEN 1 followed by DEN 2 in 1996 and
1997.
2. Case fatality rate (CFR) for DHF is higher in Malaysia than the neighbouring
countries. The Ministry of Health Vector Borne Disease Control Section (Cawangan
Penyakit Bawaan Vektor) recorded a total number of dengue fever cases in 1998 as
26,240 with 5 deaths. There were 53 deaths out of a total of 1,133 cases of dengue
haemorrhagic fever in the same year. Taking the latter numbers, the CFR is 4.67%.
Cambodia has the highest CFR of about 10%. The CFR in Thailand and Indonesia
are only 0.3% and 0.5% respectively. Intensive public health education, education of
frontline practitioners, and early recognition of the disease pattern in patients have
resulted in reduction of severe cases of DSS (Grade IV).
3. Unfamiliarity with the WHO Classification of dengue infection could result in cases
of DHF being reported as DF, and hence the relatively small number of notified cases
of DHF, resulting in the high CFR.
DF and DHF is a notifiable disease in this country since 1974. It is compulsory for all Medical
Officers to notify the disease under the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act, 1988.
All cases diagnosed clinically are to be notified by the attending Physicians / Medical Officers to
the nearest district health office within 24 hours. One should not wait for laboratory confirmation
of the case before notification. Early notification is very essential for control measures to be
instituted immediately. Delay in notification will lead to delay in control measures taken by
health personnel, which will further lead to occurrence of outbreaks. Confirmation of a case by
laboratory diagnosis depends very much on the time the specimen is taken and the type of test
used. Also normally two specimens are required for confirmation in most cases.
Asymptomatic
Undifferentiated
Fever
Without
Haemorrhage
Symptomatic
Dengue Fever
Syndrome
Unusual
Haemorrhage
No Shock
Dengue Shock
Syndrome
The clinical course of classic dengue fever has been well described in adults by Siler
(1926)2 and Sabin (1959)3
2.1 Pointers to Clinical Diagnosis of Dengue Infection
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Atypical presentations
Acute abdominal pains, diarrhoea, severe gastrointestinal haemorrhage 5,6
Severe headache, convulsions, altered sensorium 7
Respiratory distress 8
Range (%)
42 66
31 41
33 42
34 40
Mean (%)
50
36
37
38
42 52
37 47
47
42
If the baseline haematocrit is not available, the average haematocrit appropriate for age
can be used. An initial haematocrit of > 40% warrants close monitoring.
Initial IV fluid
5% D/NS (5%D/0.45%saline in younger children)
@ 6 ml/kg/hr
Follow up haematocrit at least 6 hourly / hourly vital signs / urine output
IMPROVEMENT
NO IMPROVEMENT
Hct.
Stable pulse & BP
Urine output
Hct. Pulse
Pulse pressure < 20 mmHg
Urine output
IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVEMENT
NO IMPROVEMENT
*Increase iv rate to 15 ml/kg/hr
FURTHER
IMPROVEMENT
UNSTABLE VITAL
SIGNS
Urine output
Signs of shock
(see Figure 3)
HAEMATOCRIT
(or distress)
HAEMATOCRIT
IV colloid infusion
Blood transfusion
IMPROVEMENT
Figure 2 : Volume replacement flow-chart in DHF with >20% increase in haematocrit 17
(Hct = Haematocrit, D/NS = Dextrose-saline solution)
* Exercise caution when administering iv fluids to children weighing > 30 kg
Adapted from Ref 12 : Nimmanitya S, 1997 & WHO95632
NO IMPROVEMENT
Adjust iv therapy
Oxygen
Correct acidosis
Haematocrit
Blood transfusion
10 ml/kg
Haematocrit
Colloid infusion
10-20 ml/kg iv
Plasma / Haemaccel / 5% albumin / Dextran
40
4. Insertion of central venous line carries the risk of haemorrhage. The intraosseous
route is acceptable in the child with profound shock.
5. The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of shock has failed to show any benefits
13,14
6. The efficacy of heparin in DIC and the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in dengue
shock syndrome have not yet been documented.
3.7 Criteria for discharging patients hospitalised with dengue/DHF 15
All of the following six criteria must be met before a patient is discharged :
.
Absence of fever for 24 hours without the use of antipyretics, and a return of appetite
Visible improvement in clinical picture
Stable haematocrit
Three days after recovery from shock
3
Platelet count greater than 50,000/mm and rising
No respiratory distress
4. LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS 16
There are three approaches in the laboratory diagnosis of dengue infection. These are:
1) Serology
2) Virus isolation
3) Detection of dengue ribonucleic acid
4.1 Serology
This is by far the most practical method for the laboratory diagnosis of dengue infection.
Although the haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test has been traditionally employed, it is
labour-intensive, requires 3 days to perform and is only available in 3 centres; the
Institute for Medical Research, University of Malaya and University Malaysia Sarawak
The serological test of choice is the detection of dengue IgM by enzyme immunoassay.
This test, which takes only a few hours, is available in the same 3 centres mentioned.
The following commercial tests are available for the detection of dengue IgM:
a) Dengue IgM Dot Enzyme Immunoassay (Venture Technologies, Malaysia)
b) Pan Bio Dengue IgM ELISA
c) Pan Bio Dengue Rapid (5 min) Immunochromatographic Test
All these commercial tests have been evaluated by the WHO Collaborating Cenre for
DF/DHF and found to have high sensitivity and specificity
11
The Ministry of Health has made available the dengue IgM Dot Enzyme Immunoassay in
all central laboratories in each state
The interpretation of serological results must be carefully considered against clinical
suspicion and not taken in isolation.
Serological results may be negative in early acute blood specimen and a second
specimen should be tested to confirm or exclude dengue infection.
4.2 Virus isolation:
Although this is the most definitive method for the diagnosis of dengue infection, it is
only performed in very few research laboratories. Its usefulness is in virus surveillance
and the prediction of outbreak severity
4.3 Detection of dengue ribonucleic acid
The use of polymerase chain reaction to detect dengue RNA is not a routine procedure
and should be considered more of a research tool. It is indicated when there is a
diagnostic problem.
5. ADVICE FOR PARENTS ON SOURCE REDUCTION IN THE HOME AND
VICINITY
Instructions as recommended by Health Division, Ministry of Health, Malaysia
1. Cover all water containers such as pails, urns or drums tightly or add larvicide (eg. 1
tablespoon (10gm) of ABATE 1% SG to 20 gallons of water) every 3 months
2. Add 2 teaspoons of salt to each ant trap to prevent mosquitoes from breeding
3. Change the water in flower vases every week
4. Remove the water and clean the flower pot trays weekly
5. Check roof gutters weekly and clear leaves or other debris that block the water flow
6. Clean the surrounding area of your house. Throw all containers which can collect
water such as empty cans and bottles into plastic bags and place them into the
appropriate bins
7. Use an insecticide spray (aerosol) in the house to kill adult mosquitoes
8. Allow the authorities to fog the interior of the house
9. Use mosquito repellants and/or mosquito nets to avoid mosquitoes from biting
12
References
1. WHO (1986) Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever: Diagnosis, Treatment, Control. World
Health Organisation.Geneva
2. Siler JF (1926) Dengue: Its history, epidemiology, mechanism of transmission,
etiology, clinical manifestations, immunity and prevention. Philippine Journal of
Science 29 : 170-210
3. Sabin AB (1959)Dengue: In Rivers TM and Horsfall FL (eds) Viral and Rickettsial
Infections of Man. Lipincott. Philadelphia pp556-568
4. WHO (1975) Technical Guides for Diagnosis, Treatment,Surveillance, Prevention and
Control of dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. World Health Organisation. Geneva
5. Sumarmo, Wulur H. Jahja E, Gubler DJ Sutomenggolo TS,Saroso JS (1983) Clinical
observations on virologically confirmed fatal dengue infections in Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 61: 693-701
6. George R, Liam CK, Chua CT, Lam SK, Pang T, Geethan R, Foo LS (1988): Unusual
clinical manifestations of dengue virus infection. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical
Medicine and Public Health. 19: 585-590
7. Lum LCS, Lam SK,Choy YS, George R, Harun F (1996). Dengue Encephalitis: a true
entity? American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 54: 256-259
8. Lum LCS, Thong MK, Cheah YK and Lam SK (1995) Dengue- associated adult
respiratory distress syndrome. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics 15 : 335-339
9. Lum LCS, Lam SK, George R and Devi S (1993). Fulminant hepatitis in dengue
infection . Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 24: 467471
10. Chye JK, Lim CT, Ng KB, Lim JMH, George R, Lam SK (1997). Vertical
transmission of Dengue Clinical Infectious Diseases 25: 1374-1377
11. Teeratkul A, Limpakarnjanarat K, Nisalak A, Nimmanitya S (1990). Predictive value
of clinical and laboratory findings for early diagnosis of dengue and dengue
haemorrhagic fever (Abstract). Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and
Public Health. 21: 696-697
12. Nimmanitya S (1997) Dengue haemorrhagic fever diagnosis and management
Chapter 7. Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic fever. LAB International. Editors DJ
Gubler and G Kuno
13. Sumarmo, Talogo W, Asrin A, IsnahandojoB and Sabudi A (1982). Failure of
hydrocortisone to affect outcome in dengue shock syndrome. Paediatrics 69: 45-49
13
14
15
Appendix # 1
Yes
Admit to Hospital
(see Appendix # 2)
No
High Haematocrit
Platelets < 100,000 / mm3
Yes
No
Give Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS)
and Paracetamol.
Monitor haematocrit, tourniquet test and
platelet count daily
Rising haematocrit
Platelets < 100,000 / mm3
Yes
No
Continue to monitor
-Clinical condition
-Platelet count
-Haematocrit
DETERIORATION
(unstable vital signs,
shock, rising haematocrit)
Yes
No
Discharge
Collect convalescent serum
2 weeks later
Adapted from WHO95634
16
Appendix # 2
Yes
No
IV fluid bolus
(Figure 3)
Monitor :
- electrolytes
- blood gases
IMPROVEMENT
(pulse pressure > 20mmHg,
haematocrit normal)
Yes
No
Continue iv therapy
(follow Figure 2)
Administer iv colloid
therapy
(follow Figure 3)
Yes
DETERIORATION
RISING
HAEMATOCRIT
Yes
No
No
Stop iv therapy
Discharge when indicated
Collect convalescent serum
Stop iv drip
Discharge when indicated
Collect convalescent serum
Yes
IMPROVEMENT
No
? FLUID OVERLOAD ?
(Pulmonary oedema, raised JVP,
crepitations, rapidly enlarging liver,
heart rate > 120 / min)
Yes
Consider frusemide
17