Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DATE 4/15/08
AGENDA ITEM 4G
STAFF CONTACT: Rich Hoey, P.E., Director of Water Resources, (360) 753-8495,
rhoey@ci.olympia.wa.us
PRESENTERS AND
OTHERS NOTIFIED: Jacob and Wendy Schoepfer
BUDGET IMPACT/
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Greater of $3,000 per acre-foot or $80,000. The source of funds is the
Drinking Water Utility. Staff proposes to use funding allocated for
water rights acquisition in the Drinking Water Capital Fund 461, Source
of Supply Program #9700. Adequate funding exists in the program for
this acquisition.
PRIOR COUNCIL/
COMMITTEE REVIEW: None.
Since the mid 1990s, the City of Olympia has pursued the development
of an alternate water source that is more protected from potential
water quality problems. The City determined that the best solution
was to move the water production site from McAllister Springs to
groundwater wells at an upgradient location, known as the McAllister
Wellfield.
Over the past seven years, the City has spent considerable time and
money to develop a sophisticated groundwater model to better
understand the effects of pumping at the McAllister Wellfield. The
model is a powerful tool to use in assessing potential impacts of
pumping on groundwater levels and on nearby lakes, streams and
rivers.
The most recent model results predict that moving the water source
from McAllister Springs to the McAllister Wellfield will result in
significantly higher flows in McAllister Creek. At the same time,
pumping at the wellfield may cause relatively small depletions of flow
in other surface water bodies in the Nisqually and Deschutes
Watersheds.
One of these surface water bodies is Lake St. Clair, approximately one
mile south of the McAllister Wellfield. In order to offset any potential
impact to Lake St. Clair and other water bodies, the City has been
developing a mitigation plan as part of its water right application for
the McAllister Wellfield.
ANALYSIS AND OPTIONS: In developing the mitigation plan for the McAllister Wellfield, City staff
evaluated several potential alternatives for mitigating impacts of
pumping on Lake St. Clair. These included pumping groundwater and
putting it back in the lake, recharging the lake with reclaimed water,
purchasing and retiring water rights and habitat improvements. Staff
determined that purchasing and retiring water rights was the most
effective and least costly option for mitigation.
Page 2 of 3
• A non-refundable “Transfer Application Payment” of $7000 due
at end of the due diligence period (unless the agreement is
terminated), which amount will be credited against the
purchase price at closing.
• From the end of the due diligence period, the City has 90 days
to obtain water right transfer approval by Department of
Ecology. If there is a delay in the transfer process, the City
and seller may negotiate a longer transfer period.
• The agreement outlines the various conditions for closing.
Option 1: Authorize City Manager to sign purchase and sale agreement for
purchase of a surface water right from Jacob and Wendy Schoepfer.
Implications
1. The City will be able to address its McAllister Wellfield mitigation
requirements in the Lake St. Clair area, provided that the
Department of Ecology approves the water rights transfer as
expected.
2. The Drinking Water Utility will expend capital funding totaling
approximately $81,000 plus legal and other costs associated with
the water rights transfer.
Option 2: Do not authorize City Manager to sign purchase and sale agreement
for purchase of a surface water right from Jacob and Wendy
Schoepfer.
Implications:
1. The City will be challenged to address its McAllister Wellfield
mitigation requirements in the Lake St. Clair area due to limited
water right availability and high cost of other mitigation
alternatives.
Page 3 of 3