9/4/2014

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

Today
News
Reference
Education
Log In
Register

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

Author: J Bayne Selby Jr, MD; Chief Editor: Eugene C Lin, MD more...
Updated: May 16, 2013

Overview
Since pathologists and anatomists first began examining the heart, they realized that a connection existed
between deposits of calcium and disease. When x-rays were discovered, calcium was again recognized as a
disease marker. In fact, for most of the 20th century, calcium, because of its density, was the only feature that
stood out on radiographs of the heart. In the 1950s, heart disease became more recognized as a significant cause
of mortality in the United States. Along with this recognition came numerous publications about the ability to
detect calcifications in the coronary arteries with radiography. In some ways, this period can be thought of as the
first age of importance for calcium detection in the heart.
This period came to an end with the widespread acceptance of coronary angiography and other less invasive tests,
such as stress thallium testing. If an actual stenosis or area of ischemia could be detected, attempts to
qualitatively detect calcium with radiography or fluoroscopy seemed primitive. The advent of angioplasty and stent
placement in the treatment of arterial stenoses seemed to herald the end of calcium detection.
Why, then, should this or any other article present information about detecting calcification in the coronary
arteries? The answer is threefold.
First and foremost, calcium is a marker for a diseased artery.
The second is related to the recent revolution in CT scanning. Electron-beam CT (EBCT) was the first technique to
provide a real breakthrough in the quantitation of calcium in the coronary arteries. Although this examination is
valuable, the cost of the machines limited its use, and, by association, its impact. Some time afterward came
helical, or spiral, CT. This technique was further improved with the addition of twin- and even quad-detector arrays.
These machines allowed truly fast, completely noninvasive examination of the average person. During this period
the scanners were still not quite sophisticated enough to allow direct visualization of the coronary arteries while
filled with contrast material. This continued to focus attention on the capabilities and significance of calcium
scoring.
Advances in CT technology have continued with the development of 16- and 64-slice scanners. With these
scanners, more attention was directed to coronary artery CT angiography, but the use of calcium scoring in
preventive cardiology had solidified. The latest scanners are volume-type 320-detector machines that can scan in a
heartbeat two. The questions involving these procedures now have changed from "Can we do this?" to "When
should we do this?"
See the CT scan images of coronary artery calcification below.

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/352189-overview#showall

1/7

9/4/2014

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

Coronary artery calcification - CT. Cross-sectional image obtained through the heart at the level of the left anterior descending (LAD)
artery. The protocol on the CT machine colors all structures w ith an attenuation of greater than 130 HU pink. No calcium (pink) is present
in the LAD or diagonal branch.

Coronary artery calcification - CT. Image obtained in a patient w ith a large amount of calcium in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery.
Note that other hyperattenuating structures (eg, bone, calcified lymph nodes) are pink. During the scoring process, the radiologist must
circle only those areas that correspond to one of the coronary arteries.

Coronary artery calcification - CT. Image obtained w ithout the threshold set to color the calcium pink. Note the large amount of calcium in
the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex arteries.

Coronary artery calcification - CT. Section caudal to that in the previous image show s calcium in the left anterior descending (LAD)
artery as it courses dow n the front of the heart. The vessel is now depicted in cross section.

Third, according to the American Heart Association, coronary artery disease caused 20% of all deaths in the
United States in 2004, with mortality being 451,326. It is estimated that in 2008, 770,000 people in the United
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/352189-overview#showall

2/7

9/4/2014

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

States will experience a first heart attack and 430,000 will experience a recurrent attack. In 2004, cardiovascular
disease mortality in women was about 460,000, more than the combined deaths from lower respiratory disease,
Alzheimers disease, accidents, and diabetes mellitus combined.[1]

Pathophysiology of Calcium in the Coronary Arteries

In an early study of autopsy findings in 2,500 patients, calcium in the coronary arteries and the total plaque burden
were shown to be correlated. Patients who died of coronary artery disease were found to have 2-5 times as much
calcium as those who died of other causes.
In June 2000, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) Consensus Panel
wrote the following in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology: "Coronary calcium is part of the
development of atherosclerosis; it occurs exclusively in atherosclerotic arteries and is absent in the normal
vessel wall." Simply put, the presence of calcification in the epicardial coronary arteries indicates that the patient
has coronary atherosclerosis.[2]
This observation is of great significance, because atherosclerotic coronary artery disease is the number 1 cause of
death in the Western world. Our ability to screen for coronary artery disease and, hopefully, prevent the sequelae
of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death has traditionally depended on the assessment of atherosclerotic
risk factors and on tests of coronary flow reserve.
Atherosclerotic risk factors have been evaluated in multiple longitudinal epidemiologic studies, such as the
Framingham Heart Study. These studies have defined advancing age, male sex (or better stated, the absence of
protective female hormones), hypertension, dyslipidemias, diabetes, cigarette smoking, and family history as
predictors of subsequent cardiac events and angiographically demonstrated coronary artery disease.
Tremendous overlap exists, and sensitivities and specificities vary, even when multiple risk factors are applied.
Novel risk factors have been proposed in an effort to enhance disease detection, particularly in asymptomatic
patients. As a result, clinicians now may measure levels of homocysteine, fibrinogen, lipoprotein subunits (eg,
lipoprotein A), C-reactive protein, and other biochemical markers of coronary atherosclerosis and subsequent
cardiovascular events.
The stress test has been used for many years to noninvasively identify coronary artery disease and to screen
patients who are at risk for subsequent cardiac events. Although it is valuable in populations in whom
atherosclerotic risk factors may produce obstructive coronary lesions, stress testseven those performed with
associated nuclear and echocardiographic imaging techniquesfrequently fail in the identification of patients who
are at risk for subsequent cardiac events.
Why does this testing sometimes fail? First, Bayesian analysis reveals that the usefulness of any test depends on
the pretest likelihood of the presence of disease. Therefore, if stress testing is used in a population of
asymptomatic individuals, it lacks both sensitivity and specificity, because the prevalence of obstructive coronary
artery disease is low in this group. More important, the mechanism of cardiac events (ie, myocardial infarction,
sudden cardiac death) is not detectible with the stress test or any measure of coronary flow reserve. Multiple
angiographic and epidemiologic studies have shown that the mechanism of myocardial infarction and/or sudden
cardiac death in asymptomatic patients is plaque rupture with superimposed thrombosis. In most cases, the
plaque burden is not flow limiting; therefore, the patient does not have a positive stress-test result or even a
significantly abnormal coronary angiogram.
These facts have renewed our interest in imaging techniques that can be used to detect a coronary atherosclerotic
plaque at a point in its natural history when flow-limiting obstructive disease does not exist. Coronary calcification
can begin in patients as young as 10-20 years. The calcification itself is calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite),
which is similar to that in bone. Such calcium deposition was believed to be the result of a degenerative process,
but evidence now suggests an active process, perhaps a response to injury, that is regulated in the fashion similar
to bone mineralization. At this point, the mechanism of calcium deposition in areas of atherosclerotic plaque is not
completely understood.

Types of CT Scanners
The initial investigation of coronary artery calcification with CT was made possible with the development of the
electron-beam CT (EBCT) scanner in the late 1980s. The speed of this machine was vastly superior to that of
existing CT scanners. With this speed, it had the ability to "stop" heart motion enough to allow measurement of
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/352189-overview#showall

3/7

9/4/2014

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

the amount of calcium in a coronary artery. Another revolution in CT has was the development of ultrafast spiral
CT.[3, 4]

Principles of EBCT
One of the factors that limit the speed of a conventional CT scanner is necessary rotation of the tube around the
patient. EBCT completely avoids this problem because the machine does not have any moving parts. A beam of
electrons is generated and then focused with a series of electromagnets. The beam is directed onto 1 of 4
tungsten targets under the patient. The resultant fan-shaped X-ray beam passes through the patient and is
collected by a 210 arc of detectors above the patient. More than 3,000 detectors are used in this process.
EBCT allows the acquisition of 1.5- to 3-mm sections, with an exposure time of 100 milliseconds. The images are
gated to the end of diastole, and the entire examination is performed during 1 breath hold by the patient. Usually,
40-60 sections are obtained with this method.

Principles of multisection helical CT

Helical, or spiral, CT has renewed interest in many applications for CT. The major advantage to this technique is
that it is faster than conventional CT. In addition, CT manufacturers have been able to put as many as 320 sets of
detectors into the conventional donut configuration.
During a single-section spiral CT examination, the patient moves at a rate of about 5 mm/s while the tube rotates
at a rate of up to 3 revolutions per second. Typically, a scanning length of 8-11 cm is used. Most existing spiral
scanners are capable of a sub 100-ms acquisition time. Although this still hasn't equaled the original temporal
resolution of EBCT, the other aspects of the multislice scanners make them overwhelmingly better. All major CT
manufacturers now have 128-slice or greater machines available, with the latest being 320-slice.

Technique
Although each manufacturer has different protocols, the basic techniques are similar. No patient preparation is
required. Blood samples do not have to be obtained, and no contrast material is used. Some manufacturers
recommend the removal of any metal object that may be near the chest region. Examples include metal buttons,
bras with underwires, and necklaces. Metal objects are removed because they cause non-linear x-ray scatter that
can produce artifacts in the images.
Asking patients to practice holding their breath may be helpful, not because a long breath hold is needed (usual
duration, 15-30 s), but because reproducibility of their breath-holding is enhanced. Many centers ask the patient to
complete a risk-assessment questionnaire to aid in the overall interpretation of the study. The patient lies supine
on the scanner gantry with the arms over the head. If the patient cannot raise the arms, an acceptable scan can
be obtained with the patient's arms at his or her sides.
Settings for the scanner depend on the manufacturer's recommendations. A typical protocol for a quad-slice
multidetector CT would be 165 ma, 120 kVp, 0.5 pitch, and quad X 2.5 mm.
The use of cardiac gating is an area of current disagreement. Some manufacturers do not use it at all, while others
disagree about whether it should be used prospectively or retrospectively. Although the addition of gating is not
difficult, it requires more patient preparation than that of the simple CT scanning. Leads must be placed on the
patient's chest; at some centers, the patient may need to wear a hospital gown.

Results
Coronary segments with a luminal obstruction of greater than 50% are likely to have some calcification that is
detectable with electron-beam CT (EBCT). In one trial, a 0 calcium score had a 100% predictive value in the
exclusion of angiographic evidence of obstructive epicardial coronary lesions. The higher the calcium score, the
more likely the presence of angiographic obstructive disease. In another study,[5] a calcium score greater than 371
had a 90% specificity in the detection of a luminal obstruction of greater than 70%. Specificity tends to decrease
with advanced patient age, but it increases with the number of calcified vessels as well as the total calcium score.
[6]

In a study in which calcium scores and thallium stress test results were compared, almost one half of the patients
with scores greater than 400 had a normal thallium stress result.[7] Such testing may not be contradictory in terms
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/352189-overview#showall

4/7

9/4/2014

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

of the pathophysiology; thallium detects inducible ischemia, not plaque burden.

Coronary calcification is strongly associated with the prognosis. Indeed, the extent of coronary atherosclerosis
(total calcium score) is the most powerful predictor of subsequent or recurrent cardiac events. This was true in the
early days when calcium was detected with fluoroscopy and conventional CT.
When EBCT calcium scores became available, the prognostic value of coronary calcification was again affirmed.
The higher the calcium score, the worse the prognosis.[8, 9, 10] The degree of coronary calcium was a good
predictor of the development of symptomatic cardiovascular disease. In a study by Agatston et al, the mean
calcium score for patients with a cardiovascular event was 399, compared with a mean score of 76 in those
without such an event. One study suggested that the detection of coronary calcification at EBCT was a better
predictor of subsequent events than many traditional risk factors, including those evaluated in the Framingham
database.[11]
Cardiac events do occur in patients with low calcium scores, but the incidence is low. Intravascular
ultrasonographic studies show that as many 30% of coronary plaques are devoid of calcium. In an autopsy study,
[12] the benefit of combined assessment of coronary artery calcification and risk factors (Framingham Risk Index)
in predicting sudden cardiac death was apparent. In the study, 79 consecutive adults with sudden cardiac death
were evaluated by using a Framingham Risk Index and histologic findings of coronary calcification. The risk
classifications with the 2 techniques agreed in a majority of the patients. Patients with plaque erosion (as opposed
to plaque rupture) who were dying of sudden cardiac death had significantly less coronary calcification and lower
Framingham Risk Indexes.
Clearly, in establishing the cardiac risk, traditional coronary artery disease risk factors and coronary calcification
may be most useful when used in combination. Whether risk stratification is further enhanced with the use of novel
risk factors is yet to be determined.[8, 13, 14]

The Future
Calcium scoring can be accomplished without cardiac gating, but most of the current work is devoted to either
prospective or retrospective gating. At this time, every major manufacturer has or is working on both of these
methods. Retrospective gating may be proven to be the most accurate technique, because it allows the operator
to choose the optimum time during diastole for image selection.[15, 16, 17]
In terms of nontechnical aspects, the most important work being performed now is the formation of large
databases. Only long-term analysis of this data will reveal the ultimate value and role for this procedure.
The most exciting possibility with calcium scoring may be CT angiography in the coronary arteries. As the
scanners become faster and as the 3-dimensional computer postprocessing workstations become more powerful,
this examination may become a reality. Already, preliminary studies are being performed in Europe to evaluate the
feasibility of CT angiography of the coronary arteries.

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author
J Bayne Selby Jr, MD Professor of Radiology, Co-Director, Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of
Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina
J Bayne Selby Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
and South Carolina Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Coauthor(s)
Pamela Bowe Morris, MD, FACC, FACP, FACPM Assistant Professor of Medicine, Consulting Staff, Director
of Preventive Cardiology, Co-Director of Women's Heart Care, Medical University of South Carolina; Consulting
Staff, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Roper Hospital; Medical Director, FitHeart Cardiovascular
Disease Prevention Program
Pamela Bowe Morris, MD, FACC, FACP, FACPM is a member of the following medical societies: American
College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American
College of Preventive Medicine, American Heart Association, National Lipid Association, and Phi Beta Kappa
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/352189-overview#showall

5/7

9/4/2014

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board
Justin D Pearlman, MD, ME, PhD, FACC, MA Chief, Division of Cardiology, Director of Cardiology
Consultative Service, Director of Cardiology Clinic Service, Director of Cardiology Non-Invasive Laboratory,
Director of Cardiology Quality Program KMC, Vice Chair of Medicine, UCLA
Justin D Pearlman, MD, ME, PhD, FACC, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American
College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research,
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt
Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Robert M Krasny, MD Resolution Imaging Medical Corporation
Robert M Krasny, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society and
Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Chief Editor
Eugene C Lin, MD Attending Radiologist, Teaching Coordinator for Cardiac Imaging, Radiology Residency
Program, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington
School of Medicine
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine,
American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Additional Contributors
The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Michael Assey, MD, to the
development and writing of this article.

References
1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the
American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. Jan
29 2008;117(4):e25-146. [Medline].
2. O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
Expert Consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of
coronary artery disease. Circulation. Jul 4 2000;102(1):126-40. [Medline].
3. Joshi PH, Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, Blankstein R, Nasir K. What is the role of calcium scoring in the
age of coronary computed tomographic angiography?. J Nucl Cardiol. Dec 2012;19(6):1226-35. [Medline].
4. Marwan M, Mettin C, Pflederer T, Seltmann M, Schuhbck A, Muschiol G, et al. Very low-dose coronary
artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV
tube voltage protocols. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. Jan-Feb 2013;7(1):32-8. [Medline].
5. Rumberger JA, Brundage BH, Rader DJ. Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium
scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc. Mar 1999;74(3):24352. [Medline].
6. Rumberger JA. Coronary artery calcification: "...empty your cup.". Am Heart J. May 1999;137(5):774-6.
[Medline].
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/352189-overview#showall

6/7

9/4/2014

Coronary Artery Calcification on CT Scanning

7. Nishida C, Okajima K, Kudo T, Yamamoto T, Hattori R, Nishimura Y. The relationship between coronary
artery calcification detected by non-gated multi-detector CT in patients with suspected ischemic heart
disease and myocardial ischemia detected by thallium exercise stress testing. Ann Nucl Med. Dec
2005;19(8):647-53. [Medline].
8. Raggi P, Khan A, Arepali C, Stillman AE. Coronary artery calcium scoring in the age of CT angiography:
what is its role?. Curr Atheroscler Rep. Oct 2008;10(5):438-43. [Medline].
9. Ho JS, Fitzgerald SJ, Stolfus LL, Wade WA, Reinhardt DB, Barlow CE, et al. Relation of a coronary
artery calcium score higher than 400 to coronary stenoses detected using multidetector computed
tomography and to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Cardiol. May 15 2008;101(10):1444-7.
[Medline].
10. Prabhakar M, Ko DT. Can coronary calcification measured by CT predict future coronary events?. CMAJ.
Oct 25 2005;173(9):1034. [Medline].
11. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary
artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 15 1990;15(4):827-32.
[Medline].
12. Taylor AJ, O'Malley PG. Self-referral of patients for electron-beam computed tomography to screen for
coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. Dec 31 1998;339(27):2018-20. [Medline].
13. Budoff MJ, Gul KM. Expert review on coronary calcium. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(2):315-24.
[Medline].
14. Ratti C, Chiurlia E, Grimaldi T, Malagoli A, Ligabue G, Modena MG. Coronary calcification in
cardiovascular risk stratification. Minerva Cardioangiol. Oct 2006;54(5):591-601. [Medline].
15. Ozturk E, Kantarci M, Durur-Subasi I, Bayraktutan U, Karaman A, Bayram E, et al. How image quality
can be improved: our experience with multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography. Clin
Imaging. Jan-Feb 2007;31(1):11-7. [Medline].
16. de Roos A, Kroft LJ, Bax JJ, Geleijns J. Applications of multislice computed tomography in coronary
artery disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. Jul 2007;26(1):14-22. [Medline].
17. Dehmeshki J, Ye X, Wang F, Yu Lin X, Abaei M, Siddique MM, et al. An accurate and reproducible
scheme for quantification of coronary artery calcification in CT scans. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc.
2004;3:1918-21. [Medline].
Medscape Reference 2011 WebMD, LLC

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/352189-overview#showall

7/7