Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by
Introduction
Improving performance,
reducing risk
What we do
Introduce you to Annex SL, the new high level structure (HLS) of all
ISO Standards.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Disclaimer
Whilst every care has been taken to ensure that the
dates indicated in this presentation are correct,
timescales - that are out of our control - can change.
Improving performance,
reducing risk
June
2012
December
2012
April
2013
May
2014
March
2015
September
2015
Draft design
spec. and
WDO
Approved
design spec
and WD1
CD for
comment
and ballot
ISO/DIS
9001:2014
published
for
comment
(3 months)
Proposed
FDIS
publication
Proposed
ISO
9001:2015
publication
Proposed
Transition
Period
3 years from
standard
publication
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Implications for
your
organisation
Dependent on
your
organisations
circumstances
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
ISO/DIS 9001:2014
Key areas of change to documented requirements
Clause No: Title
Item
Change
1: Scope
Scope
2: Normative References
Normative References
4: Context of the
organization
Context of the
organization
New requirements
5: Leadership
Leadership
6: Planning
Risks/Opportunities
Planning of changes
New requirement
Greater area of focus
7: Support
Knowledge
Documented
Information
New requirement
New requirement
8: Operation
Outsourcing
Design & Development
Post Delivery Activities
New requirement
Requirements made clearer
Greater area of focus
9: Performance Evaluation
Performance indicators
Management Review
10: Improvement
Continual Improvement
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Annex SL - Implications
Annex SL is the structure for all new and revised ISO Standards.
Annex SL (previously ISO Guide 83) defines the framework for a generic
management system.
All new ISO management systems standards (MSS) will adhere to this
framework and all current MSS will migrate at their next revision.
Improving performance,
reducing risk
1. MARKET RELEVANCE
Have the needs of all users been considered?
2. COMPATIBILITY
Is it compatible with other standards and there is no overlap or conflict?
3. TOPIC COVERAGE
Is it sector specific, could a generic standard be used?
4. FLEXIBILITY
Will it allow an organisation to add to/ innovate for competitive advantage?
5. FREE TRADE
Could it form a technical barrier to global trade?
6. APPLICABILITY
How would an organisation prove conformity?
7. EXCLUSIONS
Is the purpose deliberately to exclude competitors?
8. EASE OF USE
Could the user of the standard easily implement the requirements?
Improving performance,
reducing risk
ISO 9001:2008
0. Introduction
0. Introduction
1. Scope
1. Scope
2. Normative Reference
2. Normative Reference
5. Management Responsibility
6. Resource Management
7. Support
7. Product Realisation
8. Operation
9. Performance Evaluation
10.Improvement
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Management of Risk,
Opportunity and Change
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Neighbour
Customer
Regulator
Town
Council
Government
Sustainable
Happiness
Employer
Supplier
Community at
large
Family
members
Sustainable
Business
Competitor
Interest Group
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Risk
Inconsiderate Neighbour
Town Council
Opportunities
Move house (rent out/
buy new)
Soft talk
Engage town council /
police
Sustainable
Happiness
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Risk
Increase in price
materials by supplier
of
raw
Customer
Opportunities
Use alternative materials
Obtain from alternative sources
Bulk purchase
Revise the design to eliminate
material needs
Terminate product
Sustainable
Business
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Whats new?
The requirements of each clause
Improving performance,
reducing risk
ISO/DIS 9001:2014
Key areas of change to documented requirements
Clause No: Title
Item
Change
1: Scope
Scope
2: Normative References
Normative References
4: Context of the
organization
Context of the
organization
New requirements
5: Leadership
Leadership
6: Planning
Risks/Opportunities
Planning of changes
New requirement
Greater area of focus
7: Support
Knowledge
Documented
Information
New requirement
New requirement
8: Operation
Outsourcing
Design & Development
Post Delivery Activities
New requirement
Requirements made clearer
Greater area of focus
9: Performance Evaluation
Performance indicators
Management Review
10: Improvement
Continual Improvement
Clause 1: Scope
No substantive change
Improving performance,
reducing risk
DO
CHECK
ACT
9.
PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION
10.
IMPROVEMENT
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
CONTEXT OF
THE
ORGANIZATION
LEADERSHIP
PLANNING
SUPPORT
OPERATION
Improving performance,
reducing risk
5.
LEADERSHIP
6.
PLANNING
7.
SUPPORT
DO
CHECK
ACT
8.
OPERATION
9.
PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION
10.
IMPROVEMENT
Leadership and
commitment
Actions to
address risk
and
opportunities
Needs and
expectations of
interested
parties
Quality policy
Quality
objectives &
planning to
achieve them
Competence
Scope of
management
system
Roles,
responsibilities
and authorities
Planning of
changes
Awareness
Resources
Determination of
requirements for products
and services
Design and development of
products and services
Monitoring,
measurement,
analysis and
evaluation
Nonconformity
and corrective
action
Control of externally
provided products and
services
Internal audit
Production and service
provision
Continual
improvement
General
Communication
Control of nonconforming
process outputs, products and
services
Management
review
Documented
information
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Implications
How will these changes affect my
organisation?
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Annex SL - Implications
Annex SL will drive management systems standards
(MSS) integration, thereby delivering increased benefits
and efficiencies while providing a more complete view
of an organisation often spanning multiple sites,
geographies and suppliers.
As organisations begin to understand and appreciate
the value of different management systems all
speaking a common language, it will be organisations
and - and in turn the consumer - who stand to be the
true beneficiaries.
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Implications: Leadership
There are now more areas where top management need
to demonstrate their involvement and engagement with
the quality management system, such as:
Ensuring integration of QMS requirements into the
organisations processes.
Promoting awareness of the process approach.
Assuring the QMS achieves its intended results.
Supporting other relevant management roles to
demonstrate their leadership.
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Implications: Risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Implications: Change
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Implications: Performance
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Implications: Integration
The introduction of high level common text and
structure for all management systems standards
through the adoption of Annex SL will help
organisations using more than one standard to align
aspects and/or integrate elements or the whole of their
management system.
Improving performance,
reducing risk
2015
2016
2017
2018
September 2015
Published ISO 9001
Standard
Improving performance,
reducing risk
What next?
How significant are the changes for me and
my organisation?
What should my organisation be doing
next?
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Level of
involvement
of top
management
Maturity of
your QMS
Dependent
on your
organisations
circumstances
Implications
for your
organisation
Approach to
risk
management
Use of a
process based
approach
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Questions
What areas represent the
biggest change for your
organisation?
What do you see as the
biggest challenge in your
organisation for transition
to ISO 9001:2015?
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Knowledge
management
process
Top management
engaged and
Involved in the QMS
Risk management
process
Context of
your
organisation
Integrated
management
system
Process-based
approach
Systematic
change
management
Competency
Development
Knowledge
Development
Understanding
ISO/DIS 9001:2014
for Procurement &
Logistics
(2 Days)
ISO 9001:2015
QMS Internal
Auditor
Refresher
Training **
(1 Day)
Understanding
ISO/DIS 9001:2014
for Human
Resource
Management
(2 Days)
ISO 9001:2015
QMS Internal
Auditor
Training **
(2 Days)
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Gap Analysis
Which gap analysis is best for me and my organisation?
Achievements
Final outcomes for your organisation
UNDERSTAND
An in-depth understanding
of what your organisation
needs to address to meet the
new
and
enhanced
requirements
of
ISO
9001:2015.
TRANSITION
ADVANTAGE
Summary
Much of your existing system will, no doubt, meet large parts of the
new standard so you will not be starting from scratch.
You have three years to transition to the new standard from the
publication date.
If you would like additional help such as a Gap Analysis against the
new standard, on site training of your existing auditors, or want us to
deliver a management briefing, LRQA is here to help.
Improving performance,
reducing risk
@LRQA
www.linkedin.com/company/lrqa
www.lrqa.com/isostandardsupdate
enquiries@lrqa.com
Improving performance,
reducing risk
www.iso.org
www.iioc.org
www.irca.org
www.thecqi.org
www.iaf.nu
Improving performance,
reducing risk
www.lrqa.com.sg
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Improving performance,
reducing risk
Lloyds Register and variants of it are trading names of Lloyds Register Group Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Copyright Lloyds Register Quality Assurance Limited 2014. A member of the Lloyds Register group.