Obama Imported 300,000 Muslims Into the US in 2013

by VERONICA COFFIN on JANUARY 10, 2015

By Pamela Geller
The idea that America has better
assimilated its Muslims than the UK
and Europe is ridiculous on its face.
Its a matter of numbers. The only
difference between the US and
France, the UK and the rest of that
doomed continent is that they began importing Muslims decades
earlier than the US.
We are on the same path. The number of immigrants in the United
States jumped 3 percent in three years to a record 41.3 million in
2013 and that the nearly 300,000 who came from Muslim
countries pose a major national security threat.
During the Bush years, I reported regularly on the immigration
numbers from Muslim countries. I reported those figures in my
book, Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the

Resistance . Under Obama, those numbers were no longer accessible.

But the little we do know is stunning.
Refugee resettlement, religious visas, diversity visas the Obama
administration uses various devices to get around any limitations or
stop gaps against dangerous immigration.
The concept of immigration jihad goes all the way back to Muhammad.
Al-Hijrah (immigration) as a means of supplanting the native
population and reaching the position of power is a tenet of Islamic
imperialism.
The concept of Muslim immigration began with Islams prophet. Soon
after Muhammad arrived to Yathrib (Medina) together with his close
friend and father of his wife Aisha, Abu Bakr, they were joined by a ring
of other friends and followers, known in Islamic history as

Companions. They formed in Medina the first body of Muslim

immigrants in history and very soon changed the face of Medina,
making it the city of the victorious Islam. Immigration transformed
Muslims from weak and scattered groups of individuals loyal to their
religious leader, into a consolidated army, then a united community
and finally, into a socio-religious political state. If Muhammad and his
group had never immigrated to Yathrib in 622 AD, there would never
have been any Islamic social, economic and political expansion.
(continue reading...)
Peter Hammond wrote in his book:
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies
agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the
other components tend to creep in as well. Heres how it works. As
long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given
country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving
minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States Muslim 0.6%
Australia Muslim 1.5%
Canada Muslim 1.9%
China Muslim 1.8%
Italy Muslim 1.5%
Norway Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and
disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and
among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark Muslim 2%
Germany Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom Muslim 2.7%
Spain Muslim 4%
Thailand Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to
their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the

introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby

securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase
pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves
along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France Muslim 8%
Philippines Muslim 5%
Sweden Muslim 5%
Switzerland Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them
to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law.
The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire
world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase
lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris ,
we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends
Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam ,
with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such
tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana Muslim 10%
India Muslim 13.4%
Israel Muslim 16%
Kenya Muslim 10%
Russia Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad
militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian
churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror

attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia Muslim 40%
Chad Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers
of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic
ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and
Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania Muslim 70%
Malaysia Muslim 60.4%
Qatar Muslim 77.5%
Sudan Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run
ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out
the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been
experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh Muslim 83%
Egypt Muslim 90%
Gaza Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia Muslim 86.1%
Iran Muslim 98%
Iraq Muslim 97%
Jordan Muslim 92%
Morocco Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan Muslim 97%
Palestine Muslim 99%
Syria Muslim 90%
Tajikistan Muslim 90%
Turkey Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of Dar-es-Salaam the Islamic House of

Peace. Here theres supposed to be peace, because everybody is a
Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only
word, such as in:
Afghanistan Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia Muslim 100%
Somalia Muslim 100%
Yemen Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the
most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their
blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was
me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my
family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the
tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. Leon Uris,
The Haj
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under
100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim
populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and
within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even
enter these ghettos. There are no national courts nor schools nor nonMuslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate
into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They
learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime
punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations,
Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national
average would indicate.
Look at this study released back in September:

Study: Mideast Immigrants to US Pose Huge Security Threat,

September 25, 2014
A new study shows that the number of immigrants in the United States
jumped 3 percent in three years to a record 41.3 million in 2013
and that the nearly 300,000 who came from Muslim countries pose a
major national security threat, the reports co-author told Newsmax on
Thursday.
All of that does raise national security concerns, and I dont think
there has been any consideration of that, said Steven Camarota,
research director for theCenter for Immigration Studies.
The Washington-based nonprofit organization released the study on
Thursday. It is based on an analysis of Census data from 2010 to last
year. Camarota conducted the study and co-authored it with CIS
demographer Karen Zeigler.
The primary threat from a group like ISIS to the homeland is through
our immigration system, Camarota said, referring to the Islamic State
terrorist group that has beheaded three Westerners in recent weeks.
No ones suggesting that theyre going to launch a missile and hit
New York, but rather theyre going to board an airliner and blow it up,
he added. Theyre going to park a car in a public place, theyre going
to go on a shooting spree, or any one of those things.

Our immigration system is a vital part of national security. Everybody

doesnt seem to recognize that, Camarota said. The question is,
what are the implications of our rapidly growing Middle Eastern
population? The numbers certainly raise it.
The CIS report shows that the United States was home to a record
41.3 million legal and illegal immigrants last year. That was up nearly
1.4 million from the 39.9 million in 2010, while the number was 31.1
million in 2000.
By comparison, the U.S. immigrant population stood at 9.6 million in
1970.
About 16 percent of the U.S. population last year was foreign-born,
whether in the country legally or illegally, according to the data. Thats
about one in eight residents, or one of every six adults.
Those numbers reflect two basic facts: an extremely high level of
legal immigration, a very permissive legal immigration system and
they also reflect a failure to control illegal immigration, Camarota
said.
Somewhere between a fourth and a third of those immigrants are
here illegally.
The largest number of immigrants in the United States are Mexicans,
with more than 11.5 million living here illegally and legally last year.
The number of Mexican immigrants fell by 126,126 or 1 percent
over the period because of some dying and others leaving the country,
Camarota said.
According to the study, the Middle Eastern population grew by 207,758
in the period, or 13 percent, to more than 1.8 million last year. That
compared with 1.6 million in 2010 and 1.1 million in 2000.

Leading the growth from that region was Saudi Arabia, with 43,878
immigrants nearly double the number who were in the U.S. in 2010.
The analysis shows that 88,894 Saudis lived in this country last year.
Iraq was next, with about 41,094 immigrants, for a 26 percent increase
to a total of 200, 894.
But the total number of immigrants from predominantly Muslim
countries totaled 295,743 in the period, according to the CIS study.
That was up by 13.5 percent.
The total number of immigrants from primarily Muslim countries in the
U.S. was more than 2.4 million last year, compared with 2.1 million in
2010 and 1.5 million in 2000.
Camarota attributed the rise in Mideast immigration to myriad U.S.
policies, whether they granted asylum or refugee status to people from
the region or involved the nations defense forces.
Once there is a presence, the possibility of going to the United States
becomes a much more realistic possibility, he said. The presence of
the United States in a country in a big way, whether its Afghanistan or
Iraq, tends to spur immigration.
Overall, however, the Middle East is only fourth among regions of the
world from where people emigrate to the U.S.
The leader is south Asia, which was up 372,546, or 16 percent, to 2.7
million; east Asia, up 364,909, or 5 percent, to 7.8 million; and the
Caribbean, up 223,011, or 6 percent, to more than 3.9 million
immigrants.
China is No. 1 in east Asia, with 217,305 people coming from that
country in the period, or 10 percent, for a total of 2.3 million last year.

India is the leader in south Asia, with 254,355, or 14 percent, to more

than 2 million.
More people came to the U.S. from the Dominican Republic than any
other Caribbean country, with 111,859, or 13 percent, to a total of
991,046 last year.
From Central America the nexus of the border crisis that has led to
hundreds of thousands of illegals, especially minors traveling alone,
crossing the Rio Grande into south Texas in recent months the
number of immigrants jumped by 113,744, or 3.7 percent, over the
three years.
The number of immigrants from the region in the U.S. surpassed 3.1
million last year.
The biggest number, 71,469, came from Guatemala. That marked an
8.6 percent surge, for a total of 902,293. Next was El Salvador, up 3.1
percent, or 38,018; and then Honduras, up 2.1 percent, or 11,017, to a
total of 533,598.
It just reminds us of how enormous the immigrant population is and
what a large share of the population it is, Camarota told Newsmax.
The data added yet another dimension to the immigration debate as
President Barack Obama considers what executive actions he will
announce after the November congressional elections.
After a high-profile Rose Garden ceremony in May in which he vowed
to act unilaterally on immigration because of the continued stalemate
in Congress, Obama did an about-face earlier this month and said he
would postpone any action until after the elections out of fears that
his moves could cause Democrats to lose the Senate.

What he is still considering after the election is not just the

legalization of illegal immigrants on his own, but substantial increases
in legal immigration on his own, Camarota said.
Hes going to reinterpret the law that, for the last 20 years, everyone
has thought imposed some caps on green cards and other measures.
Hes going to say those caps dont exist, which would make those
numbers higher.
To accelerate these numbers even further, thats something there
should be a long national debate about, Camarota continued. Its
something thats very hard to argue that the president should just be
able to do on his own.
A senior Republican aide also highlighted the national security
concerns posed by the CIS study.
This report confronts Congress with important national security and
community safety questions, the aide told Newsmax.
We cant let our immigration system, like that of the U.K.s, be used
as a vehicle for jihadism and growing pockets of radicalism spreading
in our own towns.